Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:25:28.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of lysophospholipids in diets differing in fat contents on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, milk composition and litter performance of lactating sows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 November 2016

P. Y. Zhao ,
Z. F. Zhang ,
R. X. Lan ,
W. C. Liu  and
I. H. Kim
P. Y. Zhao
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Resource & Science, Dankook University, Cheonan, Chungnam 31116, South Korea The New Hope Liuhe Co. Ltd, Chengdu 610063, China
Z. F. Zhang
Affiliation:
College of Life Science and Technology, Southwest University for Nationalities, Chengdu 610041, China
R. X. Lan
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Resource & Science, Dankook University, Cheonan, Chungnam 31116, South Korea
W. C. Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Resource & Science, Dankook University, Cheonan, Chungnam 31116, South Korea
I. H. Kim*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Resource & Science, Dankook University, Cheonan, Chungnam 31116, South Korea
*
†E-mail: inhokim@dankook.ac.kr
Get access

Abstract

It is well known that energy plays an important role in sow growth and development. Increasing the utilization of lipids will be beneficial to sows. Emulsifiers are substances which stabilize mixtures and prevent oil and water from separating, thereby enhancing the digestion of lipids. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of dietary emulsifier (lysophospholipids (LPL)) supplementation in diets differing in fat contents on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and milk composition in lactating sows, as well as performance and fecal score in piglets. A total of 32 multiparous sows (Landrace×Yorkshire) were used in a 21-day experiment. On day 110 of gestation, sows were weighed and moved into the farrowing facility, randomly assigned in a 2×2 factorial arrangement according to their BW with two levels of LPL (0 and 30 mg/kg) and two levels of fat (4.75% and 2.38% fat; 13.66 and 13.24 MJ/kg). BW loss and backfat thickness loss were decreased (P<0.05) by LPL supplementation. Backfat thickness at weaning was higher (P<0.05) in sows fed LPL supplementation diets. The apparent total tract digestibility of dry matter, nitrogen, gross energy and crude fat in sows fed LPL diets was increased (P<0.05) compared with those fed non-LPL diets. Sows fed the high-fat diets had higher (P<0.05) milk fat on day 10 and milk lactose on day 20 than those fed the low-fat diets. Milk fat and lactose concentrations in LPL supplementation treatments was increased (P<0.05) compared with non-LPL treatments on day 10 and day 20, respectively. Positive interaction effects (P<0.05) between fat and LPL were observed for milk fat concentration on day 10. In conclusion, LPL addition decreased BW loss and backfat thickness loss, improved nutrient digestibility and milk fat as well as milk lactose concentrations. In addition, there was a complementary positive effect of dietary fat and LPL supplementation on milk fat concentration in lactating sows.

Keywords

growth performancelysophospholipidsmilk compositionnutrient digestibilitysow
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 11 , Issue 6 , June 2017 , pp. 984 - 990
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aherne, F 2010. Feeding the lactating sow. Retrieved on 20 June 2016 from http://articles.extension.org/pages/27437/feeding-the-lactating-sow#top.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC), 2007. Official methods of analysis of the association of official analytical chemists international, 18th edition. AOAC, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.Google Scholar
Averette, LA, Odle, J, Monaco, MH and Donovan, SM 1999. Dietary fat during pregnancy and lactation increases milk fat and insulin-like growth factor I concentrations and improves neonatal growth rates in swine. The Journal of Nutrition 129, 2123–2129.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Babinszky, L, Verstegen, MWA and Den Hartog, LA 1993. Der Einfluss von Fett auf Verdauung und Energiestoffwechsel von laktierenden Sauen. Fat Science Technology 95, 529–533.Google Scholar
Beyer, M, Jentsch, W, Kuhla, S, Wittenburg, H, Kreienbring, F, Scholze, H, Rudolph, PE and Metges, CC 2007. Effects of dietary energy intake during gestation and lactation on milk yield and composition of first, second and fourth parity sows. Archives of Animal Nutrition 61, 452–468.Google Scholar
Borgstrom, B 1974. Fat digestion and absorption. In Biomembranes, vol. 4B (ed. DH Smyth), pp. 555–620. Plenum Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Boyd, RD, Moser, BD, Peo, ER, Lewis, AJ and Johnson, RK 1982. Effect of tallow and choline chloride addition to the diet of sows on milk composition, milk yield and preweaning pig performance. Journal of Animal Science 54, 1–7.Google Scholar
Cox, NM, Britt, JH, Armstrong, WD and Alhusen, HD 1983. Effects of feeding fat and altering weaning schedule on rebreeding in primiparous sows. Journal of Animal Science 56, 21–29.Google Scholar
Daněk, P, Paseka, A, Smola, J, Ondráček, J, Bečková, R and Rozkot, M 2005. Influence of lecithin emulsifier on the utilization of nutrients and growth of piglets after weaning. Czech Journal of Animal Science 50, 459–465.Google Scholar
Dierick, NA and Decuypere, JA 2004. Influence of lipase and/or emulsifier addition on the ileal and faecal nutrient digestibility in growing pigs fed diets containing 4% animal fat. Journal of the Science and Food Agriculture 84, 1443–1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dourmad, JY, Etienne, M, Prunier, A and Noblet, J 1994. The effect of energy and protein intake of sows on their longevity – a review. Livestock Production Science 40, 87–97.Google Scholar
Drochner, W 1989. Influence of fat supplement on breeding performance and fertility of sows. Uebersichten zur Tierernährung 17, 99.Google Scholar
Du, W, Li, YJ, Zhao, GY, Yin, YL and Kong, XF 2009. Effect of dietary energy level on nutrient utilization, insulin-like growth factor-I and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 in plasma, liver and longissimus dorsi muscle in growing-finishing pigs using soybean oil as an energy source. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 22, 1180–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenton, TW and Fenton, M 1979. An improved procedure for the determination of chromic oxide in feed and feces. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 59, 631–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, CP 1969. Properties of fatty acids in dispersions of emulsified lipid and bile salt and the significance of these properties in fat absorption in the pig and the sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 23, 249–263.Google Scholar
Herr, CT, Kendall, DC, Bowers, KA and Richert, BT 2000. Evaluating variable feed energy levels for grow-finish pigs. Proceeding of Purdue Swine Day, 31 August 2000, West Lafayette, IN, USA, pp. 35–38.Google Scholar
Jackson, JR, Hurley, WL, Easter, RA, Jensen, AH and Odle, J 1995. Effects of induced or delayed parturition and supplemental dietary fat on colostrum and milk composition in sows. Journal of Animal Science 73, 1906–1913.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, H, Gabert, VM, Hedemann, MS and Jensen, SK 2000. Digestion of fat does not differ in growing pigs fed diets containing fish oil, rapeseed oil or coconut oil. Journal of Nutrition 130, 852–857.Google Scholar
Lauridsen, C and Danielsen, V 2004. Lactational dietary fat levels and sources influence milk composition and performance of sows and their progeny. Livestock Production Science 91, 95–105.Google Scholar
Laws, J, Amusquivar, E, Laws, A, Herrera, E, Lean, IJ, Dodds, PF and Clarke, L 2009. Supplementation of sow diets with oil during gestation: sow body condition, milk yield and milk composition. Livestock Science 123, 88–96.Google Scholar
Le Dividich, J, Rooke, JA and Herpin, P 2005. Nutritional and immunological importance of colostrum for the new-born pig. The Journal of Agricultural Science 143, 469–485.Google Scholar
Lepage, G and Roy, C 1986. Direct transesterification of all classes of lipids in a one-step reaction. Journal of Lipid Research 27, 114–120.Google Scholar
Lu, P, Li, DF, Yin, JD, Zhang, LY and Wang, ZY 2008. Flavor differences of cooked longissimus muscle from Chinese indigenous pig breeds and hybrid pig breed (Duroc×Landrace×Large White). Food Chemistry 107, 1529–1537.Google Scholar
Meng, QW, Yan, L, Ao, X, Zhou, TX, Wang, JP, Lee, JH and Kim, IH 2010. Influence of probiotics in different energy and nutrient density diets on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, meat quality, and blood characteristics in growing-finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 83, 3320–3326.Google Scholar
Nelssen, JL, Lewis, AJ, Peo, ER Jr and Crenshaw, JD 1985. Effect of dietary energy intake during lactation on performance of primiparous sows and their litters. Journal of Animal Science 61, 1164–1171.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC) 2012. Nutrient requirements of swine, 11th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Park, MS, Yang, YX, Choi, JY, Yoon, SY, Ahn, SS, Lee, SH, Yang, BK, Lee, JK and Chae, BJ 2008. Effects of dietary fat inclusion at two energy levels on reproductive performance, milk compositions and blood profiles in lactating sows. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A – Animal Science 58, 121–128.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, JE 1981. Supplemental dietary fat for peripartal sows: a review. Journal of Animal Science 53, 107–117.Google Scholar
Reynier, MO, Lafont, H, Crotte, C, Sauve, P and Gerolami, A 1985. Intestinal cholesterol uptake: comparison between mixed micelles containing lecithin or lysolecithin. Lipids 20, 145–150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosero, DS, Odle, J, Mendoza, SM, Boyd, RD, Fellner, V and Van Heugten, E 2015. Impact of dietary lipids on sow milk composition and balance of essential fatty acids during lactation in prolific sows. Journal of Animal Science 93, 2935–2947.Google Scholar
Rosero, DS, Van Heugten, E, Odle, J, Cabrera, R, Arellano, C and Boyd, RD 2012. Sow and litter response to supplemental dietary fat in lactation diets during high ambient temperatures. Journal of Animal Science 90, 550–559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seerley, RW, Griffin, FM and McCampbell, HC 1978a. Effect of sow’s dietary energy source on sow’s milk and piglet carcass composition. Journal of Animal Science 46, 1009–1017.Google Scholar
Seerley, RW, Maxwell, JS and McCampbell, HC 1978b. A comparison of energy sources for sows and subsequent effect on piglets. Journal of Animal Science 47, 1114–1120.Google Scholar
Seerley, RW, Snyder, RA and McCampbell, HC 1981. The influence of sow dietary lipids and choline on piglet survival, milk and carcass composition. Journal of Animal Science 52, 542–550.Google Scholar
Shurson, GC, Hogberg, MG, DeFever, N, Radecki, SV and Miller, ER 1986. Effects of adding fat to the sow lactation diet on lactation and rebreeding performance. Journal of Animal Science 62, 672–680.Google Scholar
Shurson, GC and Irvin, KM 1992. Effects of genetic line and supplemental dietary fat on lactation performance of Duroc and Landrace sows. Journal of Animal Science 70, 2942–2949.Google Scholar
Thaler, B and Holden, P 2010. By-product feed ingredients for use in swine diets. Retrieved on 20 June 2016 from http://porkgateway.org/resource/by-product-feed-ingredients-for-use-in-swine-diets/ Google Scholar
Tummaruk, P, Sumransap, P and Jiebna, N 2014. Fat and whey supplementation influence milk composition, backfat loss, and reproductive performance in lactating sows. Tropical Animal Health and Production 46, 753–758.Google Scholar
Van Heugten, E and Odle, J 2000. Evaluation of lysolecithin as an emulsifier for weanling piglets. ANS Report No. 248, Department Report, Department of Animal Science, North Carolina University, Raleigh, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Yan, L and Kim, IH 2013. Effect of probiotics supplementation in diets with different nutrient densities on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood characteristics, faecal microbial population and faecal noxious gas content in growing pigs. Journal of Applied Animal Research 41, 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, PY, Li, HL, Hossain, MM and Kim, IH 2015. Effect of emulsifier (lysophospholipids) on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and blood profile in weanling pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 207, 190–195.Google Scholar