Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:26:44.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of pre-grazing herbage mass on dairy cow performance, grass dry matter production and output from perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) pastures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2013

C. M. Wims ,
L. Delaby ,
T. M. Boland  and
M. O’Donovan
C. M. Wims
Affiliation:
Grassland Science Research Department, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
L. Delaby
Affiliation:
INRA, AgroCampus Ouest, UMR 1348, Physiologie, Environnement et Génétique pour l'Animal et les Systèmes d'Elevage, F-35590 Saint-Gilles, France
T. M. Boland
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Food Science and Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
M. O’Donovan*
Affiliation:
Grassland Science Research Department, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
*
† E-mail: michael.odonovan@teagasc.ie
Get access

Abstract

A grazing study was undertaken to examine the effect of maintaining three levels of pre-grazing herbage mass (HM) on dairy cow performance, grass dry matter (DM) production and output from perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) pastures. Cows were randomly assigned to one of three pre-grazing HM treatments: 1150 – Low HM (L), 1400 – Medium HM (M) or 2000 kg DM/ha – High HM (H). Herbage accumulation under grazing was lowest (P<0.01) on the L treatment and cows grazing the L pastures required more grass silage supplementation during the grazing season (+73 kg DM/cow) to overcome pasture deficits due to lower pasture growth rates (P<0.05). Treatment did not affect daily milk production or pasture intake, although cows grazing the L pastures had to graze a greater daily area (P<0.01) and increase grazing time (P<0.05) to compensate for a lower pre-grazing HM (P<0.01). The results indicate that, while pre-grazing HM did not influence daily milk yield per cow, adapting the practise of grazing low HM (1150 kg DM/ha) pasture reduces pasture DM production and at a system level may increase the requirement for imported feed.

Keywords

grazing managementdairy cowpasture intakemilk yieldperennial ryegrass
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , January 2014 , pp. 141 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AOAC 1995. Official methods of analysis, vol. I, 16th edition. AOAC International, Arlington, VA.Google Scholar
Combellas, J and Hodgson, J 1979. Herbage intake and milk production by grazing dairy cows. 1. The effects of variation in herbage mass and daily herbage allowance in a short-term trial. Grass and Forage Science 34, 209–214.Google Scholar
Curran, J, Delaby, L, Kennedy, E, Murphy, JP, Boland, TM and O’Donovan, M 2010. Sward characteristics, grass dry matter intake and milk production performance are affected by pre-grazing herbage mass and pasture allowance. Livestock Science 127, 144–154.Google Scholar
Dillon, P 1993. The use of n-alkanes as markers to determine intake, botanical composition of available or consumed herbage in studies of digesta kinetics with dairy cows. PhD thesis. National University of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
Dillon, P and Stakelum, G 1989. Herbage and dosed alkanes as a grass management technique for dairy cows. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 8, 104. (abstract).Google Scholar
Fariña, S, Garcia, S, Fulkerson, W and Barchia, I 2011. Pasture-based dairy farm systems increasing milk production through stocking rate or milk yield per cow: pasture and animal responses. Grass and Forage Science 66, 316–332.Google Scholar
Fulkerson, WJ and Slack, K 1995. Leaf number as a criterion for determining defoliation time for lolium perenne: 2. Effect of defoliation frequency and height. Grass and Forage Science 50, 16–20.Google Scholar
Fulkerson, WJ and Donaghy, DJ 2001. Plant-soluble carbohydrate reserves and senescence-key criteria for developing an effective grazing management system for ryegrass-based pastures: a review. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 41, 261–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibb, MJ, Huckle, CA, Nuthall, R and Rook, AJ 1997. Effect of sward surface height on intake and grazing behaviour by lactating Holstein Friesian cows. Grass and Forage Science 52, 309–321.Google Scholar
Hoden, A, Micol, D, Liénard, G, Muller, A and Peyraud, JL 1986. Interpretation des essais de pâturage avec des bovins: terminologie, modes de calcul, bilans annuels. Bulletin Technique Centre de Recherches Zootechniques et Veterinaires de Theix 63, 31–42.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J 1985. The control of herbage intake in the grazing ruminant. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 44, 339–346.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J and Wilkinson, JM 1968. The influence of the quantity of herbage offered and its digestibility on the amount eaten by grazing cattle. Journal of the British Grassland Society 23, 75–80.Google Scholar
Holmes, CW, Hoogendoorn, CJ, Ryan, MP and Chu, ACP 1992. Some effects of herbage composition, as influenced by previous grazing management, on milk production by cows grazing on ryegrass/white clover pastures. 1. Milk production in early spring: effects of different regrowth intervals during the preceding winter period. Grass and Forage Science 47, 309–315.Google Scholar
Hoogendoorn, CJ, Holmes, CW and Chu, ACP 1992. Some effects of herbage composition, as influenced by previous grazing management, on milk production by cows grazing on ryegrass/white clover pastures. 2. Milk production in late spring/summer: effects of grazing intensity during the preceding spring period. Grass and Forage Science 47, 316–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, E, Hennessy, D and O'Donovan, M 2007. Achieving a 300-day grazing season. In Moorepark 07: Irish dairying – winning on a world stage (ed. F Buckley), pp. 24–28. Teagasc. Moorepark Dairy Production Research Centre, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.Google Scholar
Lowman, BG, Scott, NA and Somerville, SH 1976. Condition scoring of cattle. Bulletin 6. East of Scotland College, Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
MacDonald, K, Penno, J, Lancaster, J and Roche, J 2008. Effect of stocking rate on pasture production, milk production, and reproduction of dairy cows in pasture-based systems. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 2151–2163.Google Scholar
Mayes, RW, Lamb, CS and Colgrove, PA 1986. The use of dosed herbage n-alkanes as markers for the determination of herbage intake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 161–170.Google Scholar
Mayne, CS, Newberry, RD, Woodcock, SCF and Wilkins, RJ 1987. Effect of grazing severity on grass utilization and milk production of rotationally grazed dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 42, 59–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, B, Pierce, KM, Delaby, L, Brennan, A, Fleming, C and Horan, B 2013. The effect of stocking rate and calving date on grass production, utilization and nutritive value of the sward during the grazing season. Grass & Forage Science 68, 364–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEvoy, M, O’Donovan, M, Kennedy, E, Murphy, JP, Delaby, L and Boland, TM 2009. Effect of pre-grazing herbage mass and pasture allowance on the lactation performance of Holstein–Friesian dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 414–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, FR 1996. The influence of grazing frequency and intensity on the vigour of lolium perenne l. Under subtropical conditions. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47, 975–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, DJ, Stakelum, G and Dwyer, J 1989. Modified neutral detergent cellulase digestibility procedure for use with the 'Fibertec' system. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 28, 91–92.Google Scholar
O’Donovan, M 2000. The relationship between the performance of dairy cows and grassland management practice on intensive dairy farms in Ireland. PhD thesis, National University of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
O'Donovan, M and Dillon, P 1999. Measurement of grassland practice on commerical dairy farms. Final Report Project Number 4351. Teagasc, Dublin Ireland.Google Scholar
O’Donovan, M and Delaby, L 2008. Sward characteristics, grass dry matter intake and milk production performance is affected by timing of spring grazing and subsequent stocking rate. Livestock Science 115, 158–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donovan, M, Delaby, L and Peyraud, JL 2004. Effect of time of initial grazing date and subsequent stocking rate on pasture production and dairy cow performance. Animal Research 53, 489–502.Google Scholar
O’Donovan, M, Kennedy, E and Hennessy, D 2011. Turning grass into money. In Moorepark 11: Irish dairying – planning for 2015 (ed. S Butler), pp. 22–25. Teagasc. Moorepark Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland.Google Scholar
O’Donovan, M, Dillon, P, Rath, M and Stakelum, G 2002. A comparison of four methods of herbage mass estimation. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 41, 17–27.Google Scholar
Parga, J, Peyraud, JL and Delagarde, R 2000. Effect of sward structure and herbage allownace on herbage intake and digestion by strip-grazing dairy cows. In Grazing management (ed. AJ Rook and PD Penning), pp. 61–66. British Grassland Society, BBSRC Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
Parsons, AJ and Penning, PD 1988. The effect of the duration of regrowth on photosynthesis, leaf death and the average rate of growth in a rotationally grazed sward. Grass and Forage Science 43, 15–27.Google Scholar
Parsons, AJ and Chapman, DF 2000. The principles of pasture growth and utilization. In Grass: its production and utilization (ed. A Hopkins), pp. 31–89. Blackwell Science, London.Google Scholar
Pérez-Prieto, L and Delagarde, R 2012. Meta-analysis of the effect of pregrazing pasture mass on pasture intake, milk production, and grazing behavior of dairy cows strip-grazing temperate grasslands. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 5317–5330.Google Scholar
Pérez-Prieto, LA, Peyraud, JL and Delagarde, R 2013. Does pre-grazing herbage mass really affect herbage intake and milk production of strip-grazing dairy cows? Grass and Forage Science 68, 93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rutter, SM 2000. 'Graze': a program to analyse recordings of jaw movements of ruminants. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 32, 86–92.Google Scholar
Rutter, SM, Champion, RA and Penning, PD 1997. An automatic system to record foraging behaviour in free-ranging ruminants. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 54, 185–195.Google Scholar
SAS 2005. SAS user’s guide: statistics. SAS Institute Incorporation, Cary, NC.Google Scholar
Shalloo, L 2009. Pushing the barriers on milk production costs/outputs. In Proceedings of the National Dairy Conference 2009, pp. 19–38. 17–18 November, Mullingar and Killarney, Ireland.Google Scholar
Stakelum, G and Dillon, P 2007. The effect of grazing pressure on rotationally grazed pastures in spring/early summer on subsequent sward characteristics. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 46, 15–28.Google Scholar
Tuñon, GE 2013. Improving the use of perennial ryegrass swards for darying in Ireland. PhD thesis. Massey University, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fibre, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.Google Scholar
Wade, MH 1991. Factors affecting the availability of vegetative lolium perenne to grazing dairy cows with special reference to sward characteristics, stocking rate and grazing method. PhD thesis. University of Rennes, France.Google Scholar
Wales, WJ, Doyle, PT, Stockdale, CR and Dellow, DW 1999. Effects of variations in herbage mass, allowance, and level of supplement on nutrient intake and milk production of dairy cows in spring and summer. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 39, 119–130.Google Scholar
Wims, CM, Deighton, MH, Lewis, E, O'Loughlin, B, Delaby, L, Boland, TM and O'Donovan, M 2010. Effect of pregrazing herbage mass on methane production, dry matter intake, and milk production of grazing dairy cows during the mid-season period. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 4976–4985.Google Scholar