Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:22:13.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of supplementation on the performance of grazing Belgian Blue double-muscled heifers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2013

L. O. Fiems ,
J. L. De Boever  and
J. M. Vanacker
L. O. Fiems*
Affiliation:
ILVO – Animal Sciences Unit, Scheldeweg 68, B-9090 Melle, Belgium
J. L. De Boever
Affiliation:
ILVO – Animal Sciences Unit, Scheldeweg 68, B-9090 Melle, Belgium
J. M. Vanacker
Affiliation:
ILVO – Animal Sciences Unit, Scheldeweg 68, B-9090 Melle, Belgium
*
†E-mail: leo.fiems@ilvo.vlaanderen.be
Get access

Abstract

Six experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of a feed supplement on the performance of grazing Belgian Blue double-muscled (BBDM) heifers with an initial weight and age of 195 ± 43 kg and 190 ± 52 days. Treatments included were: Exp. 1: supplementation with beet pulp (BP): 2 kg/day per head v.ad libitum intake; Exp. 2: supplementation ad libitum with BP v. a mixture of BP and soybean meal (SBM; BP/SBM ratio of 80/20; FW (fresh weight) basis); Exp. 3: supplementation with 4 kg/day per head of a mixture of BP/SBM (80/20; FW basis) v. BP/formaldehyde-treated SBM (BP/FSBM); Exp. 4: supplementation with 4 kg/day per head of a mixture with a similar protein content (125 g DVE per kg dry matter (DM)), consisting of 80/20 BP/SBM v. 92/8 BP/FSBM; Exp. 5: supplementation with 3 kg/day per head of a mixture of BP/SBM (80/20; FW basis) v. BP/DDGS (dried distillers grains and solubles; 70/30, FW basis); and Exp. 6: supplementation with 3 kg/day per head of 80/20 BP/SBM v. maize silage (MS) and SBM, on the basis of a similar protein concentration in the DM as the 80/20 BP/SBM supplement, and fed at a similar amount of DM as in the BP/SBM group. Supplementing BP ad libitum did not affect daily gain (0.54 v. 0.48 kg) and partial feed conversion (3.62 kg on average) compared with 2 kg/day. Supplying SBM besides BP increased growth rate compared with BP (0.87 v. 0.62 kg/day; P < 0.001), but partial feed conversion was similar. Supplying FSBM did not affect growth rate and partial feed conversion (P > 0.10), but blood urea levels were reduced by FSBM (P < 0.05). DDGS tended to increase growth rate (0.77 v. 0.59 kg/day; P < 0.10) compared with BP/SBM, without effect on partial feed conversion. Replacing BP by MS did not affect daily gain, but partial feed conversion tended to be higher (3.21 v. 3.60 kg/kg body weight (BW) gain; P = 0.062). Increasing the supplement (80/20 BP/SBM) level from 3 to 4 kg daily, corresponding to 1.02% and 1.18% of the mean BW, respectively, resulted in a tendency (P = 0.121) for an increased growth rate. Grazing BBDM heifers of <1 year of age necessitate extra protein besides an energy supplement to improve their performance. DDGS can replace SBM and BP can be replaced by MS.

Keywords

heifersdouble musclingpasturesupplementation
Type
Nutrition
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue 11 , November 2013 , pp. 1806 - 1815
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdelhadi, LO, Santini, FJ, Gagliostro, GA 2005. Corn silage or high moisture corn supplements for beef heifers grazing temperate pastures: effects on performance, ruminal fermentation and in situ pasture digestion. Animal Feed Science and Technology 118, 63–78.Google Scholar
Anonymous 1971a. Directive 71/250 EEC, community methods of analysis for the official control of feedingstuffs. Official Journal of the European Communities L 155, 13–37.Google Scholar
Anonymous 1971b. Directive 71/393 EEC, community methods of analysis for the official control of feedingstuffs. Official Journal of the European Communities L 279, 7–18.Google Scholar
Anonymous 1972. Directive 72/199 EEC, community methods of analysis for the official control of feedingstuffs. Official Journal of the European Communities L 123, 6–34.Google Scholar
Anonymous 1992. Clinical chemistry. Merckotest 3334. Diagnostica Merck, Darmstadt, Germany.Google Scholar
Anonymous 1998. Directive 98/64/EC, community methods of analysis for the determination of amino-acids, crude oils and fats, and olaquindox in feedingstuffs and amending Directive 71/393/EEC. Official Journal of the European Communities L 257, 14–15.Google Scholar
Bargo, F, Muller, LD, Kolver, ES, Delahoy, JE 2003. Production and digestion of supplemented dairy cows on pasture. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohnert, DW, Schauer, CS, DelCurto, T 2001. Beet pulp supplementation of heifers grazing native flood meadow: performance and ruminal fermentation. Proceedings of the Western Section of the American Society of Animal Science 52, 340–343.Google Scholar
Byers, FM, Moxon, AL 1980. Protein and selenium levels for gowing and finishing beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 50, 1136–1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabrera Estrada, JI, Delagarde, R, Faverdin, P, Peyraud, JL 2004. Dry matter intake and eating rate of grass by dairy cows is restricted by internal, but not external water. Animal Feed Science and Technology 114, 59–74.Google Scholar
De Boever, JL, Cottyn, BG, De Brabander, DL, Vanacker, JL, Boucqué, CV 1999. Equations to predict digestibility and energy value of grass silages, maize silages, grass hays, compound feeds and raw materials for cattle. Nutrition Abstract and Reviews 69, 835–850.Google Scholar
De Brabander, DL, Vancker, JM, De Boever, JL, Geerts, NE 2002. Evaluation and effects of physical structure in dairy cattle nutrition. In Proceedings of the XXII World Buiatrics Congress, 18–23 August 2002, Hannover, Germany, pp. 182–197.Google Scholar
De Campeneere, S, Fiems, LO, De Brabander, DL 2004. Determination of a standard for physical structure requirement for Belgian Blue bulls. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 13 (suppl. 1). 623–626.Google Scholar
Dillon, P 2006. Achieving high dry-matter intake from pasture with grazing dairy cows. In Fresh herbage for dairy cattle (ed. A. Elgersma, J. Dijkstra and S. Tamminga), pp. 1–26. Springer, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Ewoldt, JM, Jones, ML, Miesner, MD 2008. Surgery of obstructive urolithiasis in ruminants. Veterinary Clinics of North America – Food Animal Practice 24, 455–465.Google Scholar
Fiems, LO 2012. Double muscling in cattle: genes, husbandry, carcasses and meat. Animals 2, 472–506.Google Scholar
Fiems, LO, De Brabander, DL 2009. Optimum growth rate of Belgian Blue double-muscled replacement heifers. South-African Journal of Animal Science 39 (suppl. 1). 6–10.Google Scholar
Fiems, LO, Boucqué, CV, Buysse, FX 1979. L'effet d'une supplémentation énergétique au cours de la période de pâturage sur les performances de génisses âgées de 5 à 11 mois. Revue de l'Agriculture 32, 1373–1381.Google Scholar
Fiems, LO, Cottyn, BG, De Campeneere, S, Boucqué, CV 1998. Effect of dietary protein level on performances of early-weaned double-muscled calves. Animal Feed Science and Technology 71, 79–87.Google Scholar
Fiems, LO, De Boever, JL, De Campeneere, S, Vanacker, JM 2002a. Feed intake of young double-muscled bulls fed on grass and supplemented with sugar-beet pulp. Archives of Animal Nutrition 56, 351–359.Google ScholarPubMed
Fiems, LO, De Campeneere, S, De Boever, JL, Vanacker, JM 2002b. Performance of double-muscled bulls affected by grazing or restricted indoor feed intake during the growing period followed by finishing up to two different slaughter weights. Livestock Production Science 77, 35–43.Google Scholar
Fiems, LO, De Boever, JL, Vanacker, JM, De Campeneere, S, De Brabander, DL 2012. Spelt as an ingredient in concentrates for rearing calves. Livestock Science 150, 349–356.Google Scholar
Fiems, LO, Cottyn, BG, Boucqué, CV, Bogaerts, DF, Van Eenaeme, C, Vanacker, JM 1997. Effect of beef type, body weight and dietary protein content on voluntary feed intake, digestibility, blood and urine metabolites and nitrogen retention. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 77, 1–9.Google Scholar
Finneran, E, Crosson, P, O'Kiely, P, Shalloo, L, Forristal, D, Wallace, M 2010. Simulation modelling of the cost of producing and utilising feeds for ruminants on Irish farms. Journal of Farm Management 14, 95–116.Google Scholar
Forbes, JM 1987. Voluntary food intake and reproduction. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 46, 193–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forbes, JM 1995. Voluntary food intake and diet selection in farm animals. CAB International, Oxon, UK.Google Scholar
Gadberry, MS, Beck, PA, Gunter, SA 2004. Forage intake and performance by beef heifers grazing cool-season pasture supplemented with de-oiled rice bran or corn. The Professional Animal Scientist 20, 394–400.Google Scholar
Gadberry, MS, Beck, PA, Morgan, M, Hubbell, D, Butterbaugh, J, Rudolph, B 2010. Effect of dried distillers grains supplementation on calves grazing bermudagrass pasture or fed low-quality hay. The Professional Animal Scientist 26, 347–355.Google Scholar
Goetsch, AL, Murphy, GE, Grant, EW, Forster, LA, Galloway, DL, West, CP, Johnson, ZB 1991. Effects of animal and supplement characteristics on average daily gain of grazing beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 69, 433–442.Google Scholar
Greenquist, MA, Klopfenstein, TJ, Schacht, WH, Erickson, GE, Vander Pol, KJ, Luebbe, MK, Brink, KR, Schwarz, AK, Baleseng, LB 2009. Effects of nitrogen fertilization and dried distillers grains supplementation: forage use and performance of yearling steers. Journal of Animal Science 87, 3639–3646.Google Scholar
Hafley, JL, Anderson, BE, Klopfenstein, TJ 1993. Supplementation of growing cattle grazing warm-season grass with proteins of various ruminal degradabilities. Journal of Animal Science 71, 522–529.Google Scholar
Holmes, JHG, Ashmore, CR, Robinson, DW 1973. Effects of stress on cattle with hereditary muscular hypertrophy. Journal of Animal Science 36, 684–694.Google Scholar
Hopkins, A, Murray, PJ, Bowling, PJ, Rook, AJ, Johnson, J 1995. Productivity and nitrogen uptake of ageing and newly sown swards of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) at different sites and with different nitrogen fertilizer treatments. European Journal of Agronomy 4, 65–75.Google Scholar
Hornick, JL, Raskin, P, Clinquart, A, Dufrasne, I, Van Eenaeme, C, Istasse, L 1998. Compensatory growth in Belgian Blue bulls previously grazed at two stocking rates: animal performance and meat characteristics. Animal Science 67, 427–434.Google Scholar
ISO 1985. Animal feeding stuffs – determination of calcium content – Part 1: titrimetric method. ISO standard 6490/1. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
ISO 1998. Animal feeding stuffs – determination of phosphorus content – spectrometric method. ISO standard 6491. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Karges, KK, Klopfenstein, TJ, Wilkerson, VA, Clanton, DC 1992. Effects of ruminally degradable and escape protein supplements on steers grazing summer native range. Journal of Animal Science 70, 1957–1964.Google Scholar
Kenny, DA, Boland, MP, Diskin, MG, Sreenan, JM 2001. Effect of pasture crude protein and fermentable energy supplementation on blood metabolite and progesterone concentrations and on embryo survival in heifers. Animal Science 73, 501–511.Google Scholar
McGee, M 2012. Review of Irish suckler cow types: research perspective. In Setting a new direction for suckler cow breeding (ed. M McGee and N McHugh), pp. 1–19. Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research & Innovation Centre, Dunsany, Ireland.Google Scholar
McMurphy, CP, Sharman, ED, Cox, DA, Payton, ME, Horn, GW, Lalman, DL 2011. Effects of implant type and protein source on growth of steers grazing summer pasture. The Professional Animal Scientist 27, 402–409.Google Scholar
Mould, FL, Ørskov, ER 1984. Manipulation of rumen fluid pH and its influence on cellulolysis in sacco, dry matter degradation and the rumen microflora of sheep offered either hay or concentrate. Animal Feed Science and Technology 10, 1–14.Google Scholar
Núñez-Dominguez, R, Cundiff, LV, Dickerson, GE, Gregory, KE, Koch, RM 1991. Lifetime production of beef heifers calving first at two vs three years of age. Journal of Animal Science 69, 3467–3479.Google Scholar
Patterson, DJ, Perry, RC, Kiracofe, GH, Bellows, RA, Staigmiller, RB, Corah, LR 1992. Management considerations in heifer development and puberty. Journal of Animal Science 70, 4018–4035.Google Scholar
Peyraud, JL, Delaby, L 2001. Ideal concentrate feeds for grazing dairy cows – responses to supplementation in interaction with grazing management and grass quality. In Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition (ed. PC Garnsworthy and J Wiseman), pp. 203–220. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Segers, JR, Stelzleni, AM, Pringle, TD, Froetschel, MA, Ross, CL, Stewart, RL 2013. Use of corn gluten feed and dried distillers grains plus solubles as a replacement for soybean meal and corn for supplementation in a corn silage-based stocker system. Journal of Animal Science 91, 950–956.Google Scholar
StatSoft 2009. STATISTICA Version 9. Tulsa, OK, USA.Google Scholar
Tamminga, S, Van Straalen, WM, Subnel, APJ, Meijer, RGM, Steg, A, Wever, CJG, Blok, MC 1994. The Dutch protein evaluation system: the DVE/OEB-system. Livestock Production Science 40, 139–155.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB, Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.Google Scholar
Van Vuuren, AM, Van Den Pol-Van Dasselaar, A 2006. Grazing systems and feed supplementation. In Fresh herbage for dairy cattle (ed. A Elgersma, J Dijkstra and S Tamminga), pp. 85–101. Springer, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Vendramini, JMB, Arthington, JD, Sollenberger, LE, Saraiva, T 2011. Rumen-undegradable protein supplementation effects on early weaned calves grazing annual ryegrass. Crop Science 51, 381–386.Google Scholar
Vendramini, JMB, Sollenberger, LE, Dubeu, JCB, Interrante, SM, Stewart, RL, Arthington, JD 2006. Concentrate supplementation effects on forage characteristics and performance of early weaned calves grazing rye–ryegrass pastures. Crop Science 46, 1595–1600.Google Scholar