Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:59:59.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of hydrolysable tannin-treated grass silage on milk yield and composition, nitrogen partitioning and nitrogen isotopic discrimination in lactating dairy cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2019

S. Herremans*
Affiliation:
Production and Sectors Department, Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, Rue de Liroux, 8, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
V. Decruyenaere
Affiliation:
Production and Sectors Department, Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, Rue de Liroux, 8, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
G. Cantalapiedra-Hijar
Affiliation:
Université Clermont Auvergne, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, VetAgro Sup,Unité Mixte de Recherche sur les Herbivores, F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
Y. Beckers
Affiliation:
Precision Livestock and Nutrition Department, University of Liège - Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, Passage des Déportés, 2, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
E. Froidmont
Affiliation:
Production and Sectors Department, Walloon Agricultural Research Centre, Rue de Liroux, 8, 5030 Gembloux, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of oak tannin extract (OTE) added in forage before ensiling on dairy cows fed at 92% of their digestible protein requirements. Six multiparous lactating Holstein cows were used in a crossover design (two treatments × two periods). The control treatment (CON) was based on a diet including 50% of grass silage, whereas the experimental treatment (TAN) included grass silage sprayed with OTE (26 g/kg DM) just before baling. Milk yield (on average 24 kg fat protein corrected milk per day) was not affected, but both milk and rumen fatty acids profiles were impacted by OTE. Nitrogen intake (415 g N per cow per day) and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE; 0.25 on average) were not affected, but a shift from urine (−8% of N intake relatively to control, P = 0.06) to faecal N (+5%; P = 0.004) was observed with the TAN diet (P ≤ 0.05). Nitrogen apparent digestibility was thus reduced for TAN (−3%; P ≤ 0.05). The effect of OTE on ruminal and milk FA profiles suggests an impact on rumen microbiota. Nitrogen isotopic discrimination between animal proteins and diet (Δ15N) was evaluated as a proxy for NUE. While no differences in NUE were observed across diets, a lower Δ15N of plasma proteins was found when comparing TAN v. CON diets. This finding supports the concept that Δ15N would mainly sign the N partitioning at the metabolic level rather than the overall NUE, with the latter also being impacted by digestive processes. Our results agree with a N shift from urine to faeces, and this strategy can thus be adopted to decrease the environmental impact of ruminant protein feeding.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aguerre, MJ, Capozzolo, MC, Lencioni, P, Cabral, C and Wattiaux, MA 2016. Effect of quebracho-chestnut tannin extracts at 2 dietary crude protein levels on performance, rumen fermentation, and nitrogen partitioning in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 44764486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amory, AM and Schubert, CL 1987. A method to determine tannin concentration by the measurement and quantification of protein-tannin interactions. Oecologia 73, 420424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broderick, GA, Grabber, JH, Muck, RE and Hymes-Fecht, UC 2017. Replacing alfalfa silage with tannin-containing birdsfoot trefoil silage in total mixed rations for lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 100, 35483562.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buccioni, A, Pauselli, M, Minieri, S, Roscini, V, Mannelli, F, Rapaccini, S, Lupi, P, Conte, G, Serra, A, Cappucci, A, Brufani, L, Ciucci, F and Mele, M 2017. Chestnut or quebracho tannins in the diet of grazing ewes supplemented with soybean oil: effects on animal performances, blood parameters and fatty acid composition of plasma and milk lipids. Small Ruminant Research 153, 2330.10.1016/j.smallrumres.2017.05.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bussink, DW and Oenema, O 1998. Ammonia volatilization from dairy farming systems in temperate areas: a review. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems 51, 1933.10.1023/A:1009747109538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calsamiglia, S, Ferret, A, Reynolds, CK, Kristensen, NB and van Vuuren, AM 2010. Strategies for optimizing nitrogen use by ruminants. Animal 4, 11841196.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cantalapiedra-Hijar, G, Dewhurst, RJ, Cheng, L, Cabrita, ARJ, Fonseca, AJM, Nozière, P, Makowski, D, Fouillet, H and Ortigues-Marty, I 2018. Nitrogen isotopic fractionation as a biomarker for nitrogen use efficiency in ruminants: a meta-analysis. Animal 12, 18271837.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cantalapiedra-Hijar, G, Fouillet, H, Huneau, JF, Fanchone, A, Doreau, M, Nozière, P and Ortigues-Marty, I 2016. Relationship between efficiency of nitrogen utilization and isotopic nitrogen fractionation in dairy cows: contribution of digestion v. metabolism? Animal 10, 221229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castillo, AR, Kebreab, E, Beever, DE and France, J 2000. A review of efficiency of nitrogen utilisation in lactating dairy cows and its relationship with. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 9, 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavallarin, L, Antoniazzi, S, Borreani, G, Tabacco, E and Valente, ME 2002. Effect of chestnut tannin on protein degradation in lucerne silages. In Proceedings of the 19th General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation, p. dec. La Rochelle, France.Google Scholar
Colombini, S, Colombari, G, Crovetto, GM, Galassi, G and Rapetti, L 2009. Tannin treated lucerne silage in dairy cow feeding. Italian Journal of Animal Science 8, 289291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deaville, ER, Givens, DI and Mueller-Harvey, I 2010. Chestnut and mimosa tannin silages: effects in sheep differ for apparent digestibility, nitrogen utilisation and losses. Animal Feed Science and Technology 157, 129138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decruyenaere, V, Remond, D, Zimmer, N, Poncet, C, Jebri, A and Théwis, A 1996. Effect of chesnut tannins on in vivo and in sacco protein digestion in ruminants. In Actes des 3e Journées Rencontres Recherches Ruminants (ed. Institut de l'Élevage), pp. 9396. Institut de l'Élevage, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Eckard, RJ, Grainger, C and de Klein, CAM 2010. Options for the abatement of methane and nitrous oxide from ruminant production: a review. Livestock Science 130, 4756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Focant, M, Froidmont, E, Archambeau, Q, Dang Van, QC and Larondelle, Y 2019. The effect of oak tannin (Quercus robur) and hops (Humulus lupulus) on dietary nitrogen efficiency, methane emission, and milk fatty acid composition of dairy cows fed a low-protein diet including linseed. Journal of Dairy Science 102, 11441159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frutos, P, Hervas, G, Giráldez, FJ and Mantecón, AR 2004. Review. Tannins and ruminant nutrition. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 2, 191202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gannes, LZ, del Rio, CM and Koch, P 1998. Natural abundance variations in stable isotopes and their potential uses in animal physiological ecology. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology 119, 725737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gerlach, K, Pries, M, Tholen, E, Schmithausen, AJ, Büscher, W and Südekum, K-H 2018. Effect of condensed tannins in rations of lactating dairy cows on production variables and nitrogen use efficiency. Animal, 12, 18471855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goering, HK, Gordon, CH, Hemken, RW, Van Soest, PJ and Smith, LW 1970. Analytical measures of heat-damaged forage and nitrogen digestibility. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Dairy Science Association. Gainesville, FL, USA, 28 June–1 July 1970.Google Scholar
Hagerman, AE, Robbins, CT, Weerasuriya, Y, Wilson, TC and McArthur, C 1992. Tannin chemistry in relation to digestion. Journal of Range Management 45, 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henke, A, Dickhoefer, U, Westreicher-Kristen, E, Knappstein, K, Molkentin, J, Hasler, M and Susenbeth, A 2016. Effect of dietary Quebracho tannin extract on feed intake, digestibility, excretion of urinary purine derivatives and milk production in dairy cows. Archives of Animal Nutrition, 71, 3753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herremans, S, Decruyenaere, V, Beckers, Y and Froidmont, E 2018. Silage additives to reduce protein degradation during ensiling and evaluation of in vitro ruminal nitrogen degradability. Grass and Forage Science, 74, 8696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, WT and Mangan, JL 1977. Complexes of the condensed tannins of sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia scop.) with fraction 1 leaf protein and with submaxillary mucoprotein, and their reversal by polyethylene glycol and pH. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 28, 126136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, AJ and St-Pierre, NR 2001. The relationship of milk urea nitrogen to urine nitrogen excretion in Holstein and Jersey cows. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 22842294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohn, RA, Dinneen, MM and Russek-Cohen, E 2005. Using blood urea nitrogen to predict nitrogen excretion and efficiency of nitrogen utilization in cattle, sheep, goats, horses, pigs, and rats. Journal of Animal Science 83, 879889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krueger, WK, Gutierrez-Bañuelos, H, Carstens, GE, Min, BR, Pinchak, WE, Gomez, RR, Anderson, RC, Krueger, NA and Forbes, TDA 2010. Effects of dietary tannin source on performance, feed efficiency, ruminal fermentation, and carcass and non-carcass traits in steers fed a high-grain diet. Animal Feed Science and Technology 159, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leng, RA and Nolan, JV 1984. Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen. Journal of Dairy Science 67, 10721089.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, HW, Zhou, DW and Li, K 2013. Effects of chestnut tannins on performance and antioxidative status of transition dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 59015907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patra, AK and Saxena, J 2011. Exploitation of dietary tannins to improve rumen metabolism and ruminant nutrition. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 91, 2437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Śliwiński, BJ, Soliva, CR, Machmüller, A and Kreuzer, M 2002. Efficacy of plant extracts rich in secondary constituents to modify rumen fermentation. Animal Feed Science and Technology 101, 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, PH, Sweeney, HC, Rooney, JR, King, KW and Moore, WEC 1956. Stratifications and kinetic changes in the ingesta of the bovine rumen. Journal of Dairy Science 39, 598609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soyeurt, H, Dehareng, F, Gengler, N, McParland, S, Wall, E, Berry, DP, Coffey, M and Dardenne, P 2011. Mid-infrared prediction of bovine milk fatty acids across multiple breeds, production systems, and countries. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 16571667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sponheimer, M, Robinson, T, Ayliffe, L, Roeder, B, Hammer, J, Passey, B, West, A, Cerling, T, Dearing, D and Ehleringer, J 2003. Nitrogen isotopes in mammalian herbivores: hair δ15N values from a controlled feeding study. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 13, 8087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabacco, E, Borreani, G, Crovetto, GM, Galassi, G, Colombo, D and Cavallarin, L 2006. Effect of chestnut tannin on fermentation quality, proteolysis, and protein rumen degradability of alfalfa silage. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 47364746.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toral, PG, Monahan, FJ, Hervás, G, Frutos, P and Moloney, AP 2018. Review: modulating ruminal lipid metabolism to improve the fatty acid composition of meat and milk. Challenges and opportunities. Animal, 12, s272s281.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waghorn, G 2008. Beneficial and detrimental effects of dietary condensed tannins for sustainable sheep and goat production—progress and challenges. Animal Feed Science and Technology 147, 116139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wattiaux, MA and Reed, JD 1995. Fractionation of nitrogen isotopes by mixed ruminal bacteria. Journal of Animal Science 73, 257266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed