Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:03:37.811Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of rearing density on growth, size heterogeneity and inter-individual variation of feed intake in monosex male Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus L.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2013

M. S. Azaza ,
A. Assad ,
W. Maghrbi  and
M. El-Cafsi
M. S. Azaza*
Affiliation:
Aquaculture Laboratory, National Institute of Marine Sciences and Technologies; 28, Rue 2 mars 1934 Salammbo 2025, Tunis, Tunisia
A. Assad
Affiliation:
Unité de Physiologie et d’Écophysiologie des Organismes Aquatiques, Département des Sciences Biologiques, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, Campus universitaire, 2092 Tunis, Tunisie
W. Maghrbi
Affiliation:
Aquaculture Laboratory, National Institute of Marine Sciences and Technologies; 28, Rue 2 mars 1934 Salammbo 2025, Tunis, Tunisia
M. El-Cafsi
Affiliation:
Unité de Physiologie et d’Écophysiologie des Organismes Aquatiques, Département des Sciences Biologiques, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, Campus universitaire, 2092 Tunis, Tunisie
*
†E-mail: med.azaza@instm.rnrt.tn
Get access

Abstract

The growth dispersion of farmed fish is a subject of increasing interest and one of the most important factors in stocking density. On a duration of 60 days, the effect of stocking density on the growth, coefficient of variation and inter-individual variation of feed intake (CVFI) of juvenile Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus L. (14.9 ± 1.2 g) were studied in an experimental tank-based flow-through system. Groups of fish were stocked at four stocking densities: 200, 400, 600 and 800 fish/m3, corresponding to a density of ∼3, 6, 9 and 12 kg/m3 and referred to as D1, D2, D3 and D4, respectively. Each treatment was applied to triplicate groups in a completely randomized design. No treatment-related mortality was observed. The fish densities increased throughout the experiment from 3 to 23.5, 6 to 43.6, 9 to 56.6 and 12 to 69 kg/m3. Results show that mass gain and specific growth rate (SGR, %M/day) were negatively correlated with increased stocking density. Groups of the D1 treatment reached a mean final body mass (FBM) of 119.3 g v. 88.9 g for the D4 groups. Feed conversion ratios (FCRs) were 1.38, 1.54, 1.62 and 1.91 at D1, D2, D3 and D4 treatments, respectively. Growth heterogeneity, expressed by the inter-individual variations of fish mass (CVM), was significantly affected by time (P < 0.001), stocking density (P < 0.001) and their interaction (P < 0.05). The difference in CVM was particularly conspicuous towards the end of the experiment and was positively correlated with stocking density. Similarly, radiographic study shows that CVFI was also found to be significantly greater for groups reared at high stocking densities (D3 and D4) than the other treatments (D1 and D2). These differences in both CVM and CVFI related to the stocking density need to be taken into account by husbandry practices to assure the production of more homogeneous fish size. A simple economic analysis indicates a parabolic relationship between profit and density with optimal final density at the peak of the curve. Given reasonable assumptions about production costs, the optimal final density (Dopt) is 73.7 kg/m3. A sensitivity analysis shows that changes in the fixed cost have no effects on the optimal final density. However, small change in variable costs, such as feed and juvenile costs, may have substantial effect on the optimal density.

Keywords

stocking densityOreochromis niloticusgrowth dispersioninter-individual feed intakesocial hierarchy.
Type
Farming systems and environment
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue 11 , November 2013 , pp. 1865 - 1874
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Public Health Association (APHA) 1995. Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water, 19th edition. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Azaza, MS, Mensi, F, Abdelmouleh, A, Kraïem, MM 2005. Elaboration d'aliments secs pour le Tilapia du Nil Oreochromis niloticus L., 1758 en élevage dans les eaux géothermales du sud tunisien. Bulletin de l'Institut National des Sciences et Technologies de la Mer de Salammbô 32, 23–30.Google Scholar
Azaza, MS, Kammoun, W, Abdelmouleh, A, Kraïem, MM 2009c. Growth performance, feed utilization and body composition of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus L. fed with differently heated soybean meal-based diets. Aquaculture International 17, 507–521.Google Scholar
Azaza, MS, Dhraïef, MN, Kraïem, MM, Baras, E 2010a. Influences of food particle size on growth, size heterogeneity, feed efficiency and gastric evacuation of juvenile Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758). Aquaculture 309, 193–202.Google Scholar
Azaza, MS, Legendre, M, Kraïem, MM, Baras, E 2010b. Size-dependent effects of fluctuating thermal regimes on the growth and size heterogeneity of Nile tilapia. Journal of Fish Biology 76, 669–683.Google Scholar
Azaza, MS, Mensi, F, Wassim, K, Abdelmouleh, A, Brini, B, Kraïem, MM 2009a. Nutritional evaluation of waste date fruit as partial substitute for soybean meal in practical diets of juvenile Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus L. Aquaculture Nutrition 15, 262–272.Google Scholar
Azaza, MS, Wassim, K, Mensi, F, Abdelmouleh, A, Brini, B, Kraïem, MM 2009b. Evaluation of faba beans Vicia faba L. (var. minuta) as a replacement for soybean meal in practical diets of juvenile Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus L., 1758. Aquaculture 287, 174–179.Google Scholar
Björnsson, B, Steinarsson, A, Oddgeirsson, M, Ólafsdóttir, SR 2012. Optimal stocking density of juvenile Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) reared in a land-based farm. Aquaculture 357, 342–350.Google Scholar
Campeas, A, Brun-Bellut, J, Baras, E, Kestemont, P, Gardeur, JN 2009. Growth heterogeneity in rearing sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax): test of hypothesis with an iterative energetic model. Animal 3, 1299–1307.Google Scholar
Carter, CG, Houlihan, DF, McCarthy, ID, Brafield, AE 1992. Variation in the food intake of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella Val.), fed singly or in groups. Aquatic Living Resources 5, 225–228.Google Scholar
Costas, B, Aragao, C, Mancera, JM, Dinis, MT, Conceiçao, LEC 2008. High stocking density induces crowding stress and affects amino acid metabolism in Senegalese sole Solea senegalensis (Kaup 1858) juveniles. Aquaculture Research 39, 1–9.Google Scholar
Damsgård, B, Huntingford, F 2012. Fighting and aggression. In Aquaculture and behavior (ed. F Huntingford, M Jobling and S Kadri), pp. 248–285. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex, UK.Google Scholar
Ellis, T, North, B, Scott, AP, Bromage, NR, Porter, M, Gadd, D 2002. The relationships between stocking density and the welfare of farmed rainbow trout. Journal of Fish Biology 61, 493–531.Google Scholar
El-Sayed, AM 2002. Effect of stocking density and feeding levels on growth and feed efficiency of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.) fry. Aquaculture Research 33, 621–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fessehaye, Y, Kabir, A, Bovenhuis, H, Komen, H 2006. Prediction of cannibalism in juvenile Oreochromis niloticus based on predator to prey ratio, and effects of age and stocking density. Aquaculture 255, 314–322.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2012 . FAO's fisheries and aquaculture department. Statistical collections capture production and aquaculture production datasets 1950–2011. Retrieved July 5, 2012, from http://www.fao.org/fishery/topic/16073.Google Scholar
Hosfeld, CD, Hammer, J, Handeland, SO, Fivelstad, S, Stefansson, SO 2009. Effects of fish density on growth and smoltification in intensive production of Atlantic salmon Salmo salar (L.). Aquaculture 294, 236–241.Google Scholar
Jobling, M, Alanärä, A, Noble, C, Sánchez-Vázquez, J, Kadri, S, Huntingford, F 2012. Appetite and feed intake. In Aquaculture and behaviour (ed F Huntingford, M Jobling, S Kadri), pp. 183–219. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex, UK.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, EH, Christiansen, JS, Jobling, M 1993. Effects of stocking density on food intake, growth performance and oxygen consumption in Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus). Aquaculture 110, 191–204.Google Scholar
Karasu Benli, A, Köksal, G, Özkul, A 2008. Sublethal ammonia exposure of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (L.): effects on gill, liver and kidney histology. Chemosphere 72, 1355–1358.Google Scholar
Lupatsch, I, Santos, GA, Schrama, JW, Verreth, JAJ 2010. Effect of stocking density and feeding level on energy expenditure and stress responsiveness in European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax. Aquaculture 298, 245–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martins, CIM, Schrama, JW, Verreth, JAJ 2005. The consistency of individual differences in growth, feed efficiency and feeding behaviour in African catfish, Clarias gariepinus (Burchell 1822) housed individually. Aquaculture Research 36, 1509–1516.Google Scholar
McKenzie, DJ, Höglund, E, Dupont-Prinet, A, Larsen, BK, Skov, PV, Pedersen, PB, Jokumsen, A 2012. Effects of stocking density and sustained aerobic exercise on growth, energetics and welfare of rainbow trout. Aquaculture 341, 216–222.Google Scholar
Merino, GE, Piedrahita, RH, Conklin, DE 2007. The effect of fish stocking density on the growth of California halibut Paralichthys californicus) juveniles. Aquaculture 265, 176–186.Google Scholar
Ott, RL, Longnecker, M 2001. An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis, 5th edition, 1152 pp. Duxbury, Thomson Learning, Pacific Grove, CA, USA.Google Scholar
Qian, X, Cui, Y, Xie, S, Lei, W, Xiong, B, Yang, Y 2002. Individual variations in growth, food intake and activity in juvenile Chinese sturgeon Acipenser sinensis Gray. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 18, 695–698.Google Scholar
Rema, P, Gouveia, A 2005. Growth and survival of goldfish (Carassius auratus) larvae reared at different densities. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 4, 274–275.Google Scholar
Riche, M, Haley, DI, Oetker, M, Garbrecht, S, Garling, DL 2004. Effect of feeding frequency on gastric evacuation and the return of appetite in Tilapia Oreochromis niloticus L. Aquaculture 234, 657–673.Google Scholar
Ross, LG 2000. Environmental physiology and energetics. In Tilapias: biology and exploitation (ed. MCM Beveridge and BJ McAndrew), pp. 89–128. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Slembrouck, J, Baras, E, Subagja, J, Hung, LT, Legendre, M 2009. Survival, growth and food conversion of cultured larvae of Pangasianodon hypophthalmus, depending on feeding level, prey density and fish density. Aquaculture 294, 52–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbot, C, Higgins, PJ 1983. A radiographic method for feeding studies using metallic iron powder as a marker. Journal of Fish Biology 23, 211–220.Google Scholar
Tran-Duy, A, Schrama, JW, Van Dam, AA, Verreth, JAJ 2008. Effects of oxygen concentration and body weight on maximum feed intake, growth and hematological parameters of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Aquaculture 275, 152–162.Google Scholar
Valente, LMP, Saglio, P, Cunha, LM, Fauconneau, B 2001. Feeding behaviour of fast- and slow-growing strains of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum), during first feeding. Aquaculture Research 32, 471–480.Google Scholar
Wocher, H, Harsányi, A, Shwarz, FJ 2011. Husbandry conditions in burbot Lota lota (L.): impact of shelter availability and stocking density on growth and behaviour. Aquaculture 315, 340–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar