Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:05:29.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of sire breed on ewe dystocia, lamb survival and weaned lamb output in hill sheep systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2009

M. H. M. Speijers ,
A. F. Carson ,
L. E. R. Dawson ,
D. Irwin  and
A. W. Gordon
M. H. M. Speijers*
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute (AFBI), Agriculture Branch, Large Park, Hillsborough, Co Down BT26 6DR, Northern Ireland, UK
A. F. Carson
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute (AFBI), Agriculture Branch, Large Park, Hillsborough, Co Down BT26 6DR, Northern Ireland, UK
L. E. R. Dawson
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute (AFBI), Agriculture Branch, Large Park, Hillsborough, Co Down BT26 6DR, Northern Ireland, UK
D. Irwin
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute (AFBI), Agriculture Branch, Large Park, Hillsborough, Co Down BT26 6DR, Northern Ireland, UK
A. W. Gordon
Affiliation:
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Biometrics Department, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, UK
*
†E-mail: Mari.Speijers@afbini.gov.uk
Get access

Abstract

A study was carried out on six hill farms, located in the main hill regions of Northern Ireland, over three breeding seasons to investigate the effect of sire breed on ewe dystocia, lamb survival and weaned lamb output. On each farm, groups of 26 to 40 purebred Scottish Blackface ewes (n = 3174) were crossed with Blackface, Swaledale, North Country Cheviot, Lleyn and Texel sires by natural service (year 1) and artificial insemination (years 2 and 3). Each of the mating groups was initially balanced for ewe age, live weight and condition score, and a total of 15 sires of each breed were used over the 3 years. In total, 2272 ewes were recorded at lambing, producing 3451 lambs, over the 3 years. Sire breed had a significant effect (P < 0.001) on lamb birth weight with Blackface and Swaledale the lowest and Texel the highest. The proportion of ewes with dystocia was higher with Texel sires compared with Lleyn, Swaledale and Blackface sires (P < 0.05). Ewes mated to Cheviot sires had more dystocia than those mated to Blackface and Swaledale sires (P < 0.05), while ewes mated to Lleyn sire breed had more dystocia (P < 0.05) than those mated to Blackface sire breed. Most of the incidence of dystocia was attributable to increased lamb birth weight (P < 0.001), and some to litter size (P < 0.05). Swaledale, Cheviot, Lleyn and Texel sire breeds increased the incidence of malpresentations (P < 0.05). Lamb live weight at weaning was higher with Texel- and Cheviot- and Lleyn-sired lambs compared with Blackface- and Swaledale-sired lambs (P < 0.01). The level of lamb mortality at birth was not affected by sire breed. However, lamb mortality at weaning was lower for Lleyn-sired lambs compared with the other lamb genotypes (P < 0.05). These results indicate that the use of sires from larger breeds, such as Lleyn and Texel, within the Blackface ewe flocks can increase lamb output, with no apparent detrimental effects on lamb mortality or ewe survival, but increased assistance at lambing will be required.

Keywords

hill sheep systems, genotype, dystocia, lamb mortality
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , March 2010 , pp. 486 - 496
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ADAS 2007. The environmental impact of livestock production. In Review of research and literature: A report for Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Food Farming Group (DEFRA FFG) (ed. K Phillips, M Silgram, P Newell-Price, M Werret, G Povey, B Cottrill and J Newton), p. 96. DEFRA Publications, London, UK.Google Scholar
Al-Nakib, FMS, Bateman, N, Findlay, RH, Smtth, C, Thompson, R 1997. Comparative performance of British hill sheep breeds and crosses. Journal of Agricultural Science 128, 199–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bizelis, JA, Charismiadou, MA, Rogdakis, E 2000. Metabolic changes during the perinatal period in dairy sheep in relation to level of nutrition and breed. II. Early lactation. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition-Zeitschrift Fur Tierphysiologie Tierernahrung Und Futtermittelkunde 84, 73–84.Google Scholar
Boujenane, I, Bradford, GE, Famula, TR 1991. Inheritance of litter size and its components in crosses between the D’man and Sardi breeds of sheep. Journal of Animal Science 69, 517–524.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carson, AF, Irwin, D, Kilpatrick, DJ 2001. A comparison of Scottish Blackface and Cheviot ewes and five sire breeds in terms of lamb output at weaning in hill sheep systems. Journal of Agricultural Science 137, 221–233.Google Scholar
Casellas, J, Caja, G, Such, X, Piedrafita, J 2007. Survival analysis from birth to slaughter of Ripollesa lambs under semi-intensive management. Journal of Animal Science 85, 512–517.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conington, J, Bishop, SC, Grundy, B, Waterhouse, A, Simm, G 2001. Multi-trait selection indexes for sustainable UK hill sheep production. Animal Science 73, 413–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conington, J, Bishop, SC, Waterhouse, A, Simm, G 2004. A bioeconomic approach to derive economic values for pasture-based sheep genetic improvement programs. Journal of Animal Science 82, 1290–1304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalton, DC, Knight, TW, Johnson, DL 1980. Lamb survival in sheep breeds on New Zealand hill country. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 23, 167–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, HP, Read, JL, Russell, WS 1963. Heterosis in crossbred hill sheep. Animal Production 5, 289–299.Google Scholar
Dwyer, CM 2003. Behavioural development in the neonatal lamb: effect of maternal and birth-related factors. Theriogenology 59, 1027–1050.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dwyer, CM 2008. Genetic and physiological determinants of maternal behavior and lamb survival: Implications for low-input sheep management. Journal of Animal Science 86, E246–E258.Google Scholar
Dwyer, CM, Lawrence, AB, Brown, HE, Simm, G 1996. Effect of ewe and lamb genotype on gestation length, lambing ease and neonatal behaviour of lambs. Reproduction Fertility and Development 8, 1123–1129.Google Scholar
Everett-Hincks, JM, Dodds, KG 2008. Management of maternal-offspring behavior to improve lamb survival in easy care sheep system. Journal of Animal Science 86, E259–E270.Google Scholar
Gama, LT, Dickerson, GE, Young, LD, Leymaster, KA 1991. Effects of breed, heterosis, age of dam, litter size, and birth weight on lamb mortality. Journal of Animal Science 69, 2727–2743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grommers, FJ, Elving, L, Vaneldik, P 1985. Parturition difficulties in sheep. Animal Reproduction Science 9, 365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunn, RG 1968. A note on difficult birth in Scottish hill flocks. Animal Production 10, 213–215.Google Scholar
Haughey, KG, George, JM, McGuirk, BJ 1985. The repeatability of rearing performance of Merino and Dorset Horn ewes and its relationship with mature pelvic size. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 25, 541–549.Google Scholar
Holst, PJ, Fogarty, NM, Stanley, DF 2002. Birth weights, meningeal lesions, and survival of diverse genotypes of lambs from Merino and crossbred ewes. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 175–181.Google Scholar
McGuirk, BJ, Bourke, ME 1978. Hybrid vigour and lamb production. I. Reproductive performance of the purebred and crossbred matings. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 18, 745–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mellor, DJ, Flint, DJ, Vernon, RG, Forsyth, IA 1987. Relationships between plasma hormone concentrations, udder development and the production of early mammary secretions in twin-bearing ewes on different planes of nutrition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Physiology and Cognate Medical Sciences 72, 345–356.Google Scholar
Morris, CA, Hickey, SM, Clarke, JN 2000. Genetic and environmental factors affecting lamb survival at birth and through to weaning. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 43, 515–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, ML, Hungerford, LL, Nash, TG, Zinn, GM 1996. Risk factors for perinatal and postnatal mortality in lambs. Veterinary Record 139, 64–67.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noakes, DE 2001. Fetal Dystocia: Aetiology and Incidence. In Arthur’s Veterinary Reproduction and Obstetrics (ed. DE Noakes, GH Arthur, TJ Parkinson and GCW England), pp. 245–263. Elsevier Health Sciences, Hatfield, UK.Google Scholar
Nowak, R, Poindron, P 2006. From birth to colostrum: early steps leading to lamb survival. Reproduction Nutrition Development 46, 431–446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollott, GE, Stone, DG 2006. The breeding structure of the British sheep industry 2003. In A report produced from the British Sheep Breed Survey data for the review of the National Scrapie Plan, 2004 (ed. RD Eglin, A Ortiz Pelaez and CJ Cook), p. 46. DEFRA Publications, London, UK.Google Scholar
Pullar, D 2003. Genetic evaluation and selection of purebred sheep in the UK. In Practice 25, 314–325.Google Scholar
Robinson, JJ 2002. Review of nutritional standards for sheep. In Review nutritional standards for livestock: A report for BSAS and DEFRA, p. 16.Google Scholar
Robinson, JJ, Rooke, JA, McEvoy, TG 2002. Nutrition for conception and pregnancy. In Sheep nutrition (ed. M Freer and H Dove), pp. 189–211. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.Google Scholar
Russel, A 1984. Body condition scoring of sheep. In Practice 6, 91–93.Google Scholar
Sawalha, RM, Conington, J, Brotherstone, S, Villanueva, B 2007. Analyses of lamb survival of Scottish Blackface sheep. Animal 1, 151–157.Google Scholar
Sidwell, GM, Everson, DO, Terrill, CE 1962. Fertility, prolificacy and lamb livability of some pure breeds and their crosses. Journal of Animal Science 21, 875–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidwell, GM, Miller, LR 1971. Production in some pure breeds of sheep and their crosses. I. Reproductive efficiency in ewes. Journal of Animal Science 32, 1084–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slee, J, Springbett, A 1986. Early postnatal behaviour in lambs of ten breeds. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 15, 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speijers, MHM, Carson, AF, Dawson, LER, Gordon, AW 2009. Effects of genotype and plane of nutrition on growth and carcass characteristics of lambs from hill sheep systems. Animal 3, 1232–1245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tenhagen, BA, Edinger, D, Heuwieser, W 1999. Impact of dystocia in primiparous cows on lactational performance and survival. Tierarztliche Umschau 54, 617–623.Google Scholar
Wiener, G, Hayter, S 1974. Body size and conformation in sheep from birth to maturity as affected by breed, crossbreeding, maternal and other factors. Animal Production 19, 47–65.Google Scholar
Wolf, BT 1980. Selection for carcass quality. In Sheep Production (ed. W Haresign), pp. 493–514. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
Woolliams, C, Wiener, G, Macleod, NSM 1983. The effects of breed, breeding system and other factors on lamb mortality. 2. Factors influencing the incidence of delayed birth, dystokia, congenital defects and miscellaneous causes of early death. Journal of Agricultural Science 100, 553–561.Google Scholar