Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:00:06.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of tail docking and docking length on neuroanatomical changes in healed tail tips of pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 December 2014

M. S. Herskin ,
K. Thodberg  and
H. E. Jensen
M. S. Herskin*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Au-Foulum, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
K. Thodberg
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Au-Foulum, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
H. E. Jensen
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, Copenhagen University, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
*
†E-mail: MetteS.Herskin@anis.au.dk
Get access

Abstract

In pig production, piglets are tail docked at birth in order to prevent tail biting later in life. In order to examine the effects of tail docking and docking length on the formation of neuromas, we used 65 pigs and the following four treatments: intact tails (n=18); leaving 75% (n=17); leaving 50% (n=19); or leaving 25% (n=11) of the tail length on the pigs. The piglets were docked between day 2 and 4 after birth using a gas-heated apparatus, and were kept under conventional conditions until slaughter at 22 weeks of age, where tails were removed and examined macroscopically and histologically. The tail lengths and diameters differed at slaughter (lengths: 30.6±0.6; 24.9±0.4; 19.8±0.6; 8.7±0.6 cm; P<0.001; tail diameter: 0.5±0.03; 0.8±0.02; 1.0±0.03; 1.4±0.04 cm; P<0.001, respectively). Docking resulted in a higher proportion of tails with neuromas (64 v. 0%; P<0.001), number of neuromas per tail (1.0±0.2 v. 0; P<0.001) and size of neuromas (1023±592 v. 0 μm; P<0.001). The results show that tail docking piglets using hot-iron cautery causes formation of neuromas in the outermost part of the tail tip. The presence of neuromas might lead to altered nociceptive thresholds, which need to be confirmed in future studies.

Keywords

amputationneuromapainpigtail docking
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , April 2015 , pp. 677 - 681
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous 2003. Regulation No 324 on tail docking and castration of animals. Danish Ministry of Food, Agriculture & Fisheries, Copenhagen, 6 May.Google Scholar
Breward, J and Gentle, MJ 1985. Neuroma formation and abnormal afferent nerve discharges after partial beak amputation (beak trimming) in poultry. Experientia 41, 1132–1134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burnett, MG and Zager, EL 2004. Pathophysiology of peripheral nerve injury: a brief review. Neurosurgical Focus 16, E1.Google Scholar
Dahl-Pedersen, K, Bonde, MK, Herskin, MS, Jensen, KH, Kaiser, M and Jensen, HE 2013. Pathogenesis and pathology of shoulder ulcerations in sows with special reference to peripheral nerves and behavioural responses to palpation. The Veterinary Journal 198, 666–671.Google Scholar
Devor, M 2013. Neuropathic pain: pathophysiological response of nerves to injury. In Textbook of pain (ed. SB McMahon et al.), pp. 861–888. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Devor, M and Seltzer, Z 1999. Pathophysiology of damaged nerves in relation to chronic pain. In Textbook of pain (ed. PD Wall and R Melzack), pp. 129–144. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
Devor, M, Wall, PD and Catalan, N 1992. Systemic lidocain silences ectopic neuroma and DRG discharge without blocking nerve conduction. Pain 48, 261–268.Google Scholar
Dorsi, MJ, Chen, L, Murinson, BB, Pogatzki-Zahn, EM, Meyer, RA and Belzberg, AJ 2008. The tibial neuroma transposition (TNT) model of neuroma pain and hyperalgesia. Pain 134, 320–334.Google Scholar
European Food Safety Authority 2007. Scientific report on the risks associated with tail biting in pigs and possible means to reduce the need for tail docking considering the different housing and husbandry systems. Annex to EFSA Journal 611, 1–13.Google Scholar
European Food Safety Authority 2012. Scientific opinion on the use of animal-based measures to assess welfare in pigs. EFSA Journal 10, 2512.Google Scholar
French, NP and Morgan, KL 1992. Neuromata in docked lambs’ tails. Research in Veterinary Science 52, 389–390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, TL and Carr, SH 1990. Amputation neuroma of docked tails in dogs. Veterinary Pathology 27, 61–62.Google Scholar
Harley, S, More, S, Boyle, L, O’Connell, N and Hanlon, A 2012. Good animal welfare makes economic sense: potential of pig abattoir meat inspection as a welfare surveillance tool. Irish Veterinary Journal 65, 11.Google Scholar
Hunter, EJ, Jones, TA, Guise, HJ, Penny, RHC and Hoste, S 2001. The relationship between tail biting in pigs, docking procedure and other management practices. The Veterinary Journal 161, 72–79.Google Scholar
Keeling, LJ, Wallenbeck, A, Larsen, A and Holmgren, N 2012. Scoring tail damage in pigs: an evaluation based on recordings at Swedish slaughterhouses. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 54, 32.Google Scholar
Noonan, GJ, Rand, JS, Priest, J, Ainscow, J and Blackshaw, JK 1994. Behavioural observations of piglets undergoing tail docking, teeth clipping and ear notching. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 39, 203–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prunier, A, Mounier, AM and Hay, M 2005. Effects of castration, tooth resection, or tail docking on plasma metabolites and stress hormones in young pigs. Journal of Animal Science 83, 216–222.Google Scholar
Sandercock, DA, Gibson, IF, Rutherford, KMD, Donald, RD, Lawrence, AB, Brash, HM, Scott, EM and Nolan, AM 2011. The impact of prenatal stress on basal nociception and evoked responses to tail-docking and inflammatory challenge in juvenile pigs. Physiology and Behaviour 104, 728–737.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sehirlioglu, A, Ozturk, C, Yazicioglu, K, Tugcu, I, Yilmaz, B and Goktepe, AS 2009. Painful neuroma requiring surgical excision after lower limb amputation caused by landmine explosions. International Orthopaedics 33, 533–536.Google Scholar
Simonsen, HB, Klinken, L and Bindseil, E 1991. Histopathology of intact and docked pigtails. British Veterinary Journal 147, 407–412.Google Scholar
Sutherland, MA and Tucker, CB 2011. The long and short of it: a review of tail docking in farm animals. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 135, 179–191.Google Scholar
Sutherland, MA, Davis, BL and McGlone, JJ 2011. The effect of local and general anesthesia on the physiology and behavior of tail docked pigs. Animal 5, 1237–1246.Google Scholar
Sutherland, MA, Bryer, PJ, Krebs, N and McGlone, JJ 2008. Tail docking in pigs: acute physiological and behavioural responses. Animal 2, 292–297.Google Scholar
Sutherland, MA, Bryer, PJ, Krebs, N and McGlone, JJ 2009. The effect of method of tail docking on tail-biting behavior and welfare of pigs. Animal Welfare 18, 561–570.Google Scholar
Taylor, NR, Main, DCJ, Mendl, M and Edwards, SA 2010. Tail-biting: a new perspective. The Veterinary Journal 186, 137–147.Google Scholar
Taylor, NR, Parker, RMA, Mendl, M, Edwards, SA and Main, DCJ 2012. Prevalence of risk factors for tail biting on commercial farms and intervention strategies. The Veterinary Journal 194, 77–83.Google Scholar
Thodberg, K, Jensen, KH and Jørgensen, E 2010. The risk of tail-biting in relation to level of tail docking. Abstract presented at the International Congress of the ISAE, 4–7 August, Uppsala, Sweden, 91pp.Google Scholar
Torrey, S, Devillers, N, Lessard, M, Farmer, C and Widowski, T 2009. Effect of age on the behavioral and physiological responses of piglets to tail docking and ear notching. Journal of Animal Science 87, 1778–1786.Google Scholar
Wall, PD and Gutnick, M 1974. Properties of afferent nerve impulses originating from a neuroma. Nature 248, 740–743.Google Scholar
Zhou, B, Yang, XJ, Zhao, RQ, Huang, RH, Wang, YH, Wang, ST, Yin, CP, Shen, Q, Wang, LY and Schinckel, AP 2013. Effects of tail docking and teeth clipping on the physiological responses, wounds, behavior, growth, and backfat depth of pigs. Journal of Animal Science 91, 4908–4916.Google Scholar