Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:19:51.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Energy balance of individual cows can be estimated in real-time on farm using frequent liveweight measures even in the absence of body condition score

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2013

V. M. Thorup ,
S. Højsgaard ,
M. R. Weisbjerg  and
N. C. Friggens
V. M. Thorup*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, AU-Foulum, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
S. Højsgaard
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajersvej 7G, 9220 Aalborg OE, Denmark
M. R. Weisbjerg
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, AU-Foulum, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
N. C. Friggens
Affiliation:
UMR 791 Modélisation Systémique Appliquée aux Ruminants, INRA, 16 rue Claude Bernard, 75231 Paris, cedex 05, France UMR 791 Modélisation Systémique Appliquée aux Ruminants, AgroParisTech, 16 rue Claude Bernard, 75231 Paris, cedex 05, France
*
†E-mail: vivim.thorup@agrsci.dk
Get access

Abstract

Existing methods for estimating individual dairy cow energy balance typically either need information on feed intake, that is, the traditional input–output method, or frequent measurements of BW and body condition score (BCS), that is, the body reserve changes method (EBbody). The EBbody method holds the advantage of not requiring measurements of feed intake, which are difficult to obtain in practice. The present study aimed first to investigate whether the EBbody method can be simplified by basing EBbody on BW measurements alone, that is, removing the need for BCS measurements, and second to adapt the EBbody method for real-time use, thus turning it into a true on-farm tool. Data came from 77 cows (primiparous or multiparous, Danish Holstein, Red or Jersey) that took part in an experiment subjecting them to a planned change in concentrate intake during milking. BW was measured automatically during each milking and real-time smoothed using asymmetric double-exponential weighting and corrected for the weight of milk produced, gutfill and the growing conceptus. BCS assessed visually with 2-week intervals was also smoothed. EBbody was calculated from BW changes only, and in conjunction with BCS changes. A comparison of the increase in empty body weight (EBW) estimated from EBbody with EBW measured over the first 240 days in milk (DIM) for the mature cows showed that EBbody was robust to changes in the BCS coefficients, allowing functions for standard body protein change relative to DIM to be developed for breeds and parities. These standard body protein change functions allow EBbody to be estimated from frequent BW measurements alone, that is, in the absence of BCS measurements. Differences in EBbody levels before and after changes in concentrate intake were calculated to test the real-time functionality of the EBbody method. Results showed that significant EBbody increases could be detected 10 days after a 0.2 kg/day increase in concentrate intake. In conclusion, a real-time method for deriving EBbody from frequent BW measures either alone or in conjunction with BCS measures has been developed. This extends the applicability of the EBbody method, because real-time measures can be used for decision support and early intervention.

Keywords

body reservesenergy balancereal-timesmoothingstandard body protein function
Type
Nutrition
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue 10 , October 2013 , pp. 1631 - 1639
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bossen, D, Weisbjerg, MR, Munksgaard, L, Højsgaard, S 2009. Allocation of feed based on individual dairy cow live weight changes I: feed intake and live weight changes during lactation. Livestock Science 126, 252–272.Google Scholar
Coffey, MP, Emmans, GC, Brotherstone, S 2001. Genetic evaluation of dairy bulls for energy balance traits using random regression. Animal Science 73, 29–40.Google Scholar
Collard, BL, Boettcher, PJ, Dekkers, JCM, Petitclerc, D, Schaeffer, LR 2000. Relationships between energy balance and health traits of dairy cattle in early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 2683–2690.Google Scholar
Cutullic, E, Delaby, L, Gallard, Y, Disenhaus, C 2012. Towards a better understanding of the respective effects of milk yield and body condition dynamics on reproduction in Holstein dairy cows. Animal 6, 476–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Emmans, GC 1994. Effective energy: a concept of energy utilization applied across species. British Journal of Nutrition 71, 801–821.Google Scholar
Ferguson, JD, Galligan, DT, Thomsen, N 1994. Principal descriptors of body condition score in Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 2695–2703.Google Scholar
Friggens, NC, Berg, P, Theilgaard, P, Korsgaard, IR, Ingvartsen, KL, Løvendahl, P, Jensen, J 2007a. Breed and parity effects on energy balance profiles through lactation: evidence of genetically driven body energy change. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 5291–5305.Google Scholar
Friggens, NC, Ridder, C, Løvendahl, P 2007b. On the use of milk composition measures to predict the energy balance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 5453–5467.Google Scholar
Gibb, MJ, Ivings, WE 1993. A note on the estimation of the body-fat, protein and energy content of lactating Holstein-Friesian cows by measurement of condition score and live weight. Animal Production 56, 281–283.Google Scholar
Goff, JP, Horst, RL 1997. Physiological changes at parturition and their relationship to metabolic disorders. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 1260–1268.Google Scholar
Hüttmann, H, Stamer, E, Junge, W, Thaller, G, Kalm, E 2009. Analysis of feed intake and energy balance of high-yielding first lactating Holstein cows with fixed and random regression models. Animal 3, 181–188.Google Scholar
Martin, O, Sauvant, D 2010a. A teleonomic model describing performance (body, milk and intake) during growth and over repeated reproductive cycles throughout the lifespan of dairy cattle. 1. Trajectories of life function priorities and genetic scaling. Animal 4, 2030–2047.Google Scholar
Martin, O, Sauvant, D 2010b. A teleonomic model describing performance (body, milk and intake) during growth and over repeated reproductive cycles throughout the lifespan of dairy cattle. 2. Voluntary intake and energy partitioning. Animal 4, 2048–2056.Google Scholar
Oikonomou, G, Arsenos, G, Valergakis, GE, Tsiaras, A, Zygoyiannis, D, Banos, G 2008. Genetic relationship of body energy and blood metabolites with reproduction in Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 4323–4332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Development Core Team 2011. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Thorup, VM, Edwards, D, Friggens, NC 2012. On-farm estimation of energy balance in dairy cows using only frequent body weight measurements and body condition score. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 1784–1793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weisbjerg, MR, Hvelplund, T 1993. Estimation of net energy content (FU) in feeds for cattle (in Danish). Research Report no. 3, National Institute of Animal Science, Denmark, 3–39 pp.Google Scholar
Weisbjerg, MR, Munksgaard, L 2008. Concentrate feed strategies in an AMS system (in Danish). In Feeding the dairy cow, Internal report no. 8, Aarhus University AU-Foulum, Denmark, 21–30 pp.Google Scholar
Wright, IA, Russel, AJF 1984. Partition of fat, body-composition and body condition score in mature cows. Animal Production 38, 23–32.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Thorup Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Thorup Supplementary Material(File)
File 292.5 KB