Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:11:41.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of the sustainability of contrasted pig farming systems: economy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2014

E. Ilari-Antoine ,
M. Bonneau ,
T. N. Klauke ,
J. Gonzàlez ,
J. Y. Dourmad ,
K. De Greef ,
H. W. J. Houwers ,
E. Fabrega ,
C. Zimmer  and
M. Hviid
...Show all authors
E. Ilari-Antoine*
Affiliation:
The French Pork and Pig Institute (IFIP), Economy Unit, 34 Boulevard de la Gare, F-31500 Toulouse, France
M. Bonneau
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1348 PEGASE, F-35590 Saint Gilles, France Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1348 PEGASE, Laboratoire SPA, 65 rue de Saint Brieuc, CS 84215, F-35042 Rennes Cedex, France
T. N. Klauke
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science (ITW), Universität Bonn, DE-53115 Bonn, Germany
J. Gonzàlez
Affiliation:
IRTA-Monells, Veïnat de Sies, s/n 17121,Monells, Spain
J. Y. Dourmad
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1348 PEGASE, F-35590 Saint Gilles, France Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1348 PEGASE, Laboratoire SPA, 65 rue de Saint Brieuc, CS 84215, F-35042 Rennes Cedex, France
K. De Greef
Affiliation:
Wageningen UR, Livestock Research, NL-8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
H. W. J. Houwers
Affiliation:
Wageningen UR, Livestock Research, NL-8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
E. Fabrega
Affiliation:
IRTA-Monells, Veïnat de Sies, s/n 17121,Monells, Spain
C. Zimmer
Affiliation:
Bäuerliche Erzeugergemeinschaft Schwäbisch Hall, DE-74549 Schwäbisch Hall, Germany
M. Hviid
Affiliation:
Danish Meat Research Institute, Maglegårdsvej 2, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
B. Van der Oever
Affiliation:
Swine Research Centre, Nutreco R&D, NL-3818KC Amersfoort, The Netherlands
S. A. Edwards
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK
*
†E-mail: estelle.antoine@ifip.asso.fr
Get access

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to present an efficient tool for evaluating the economy part of the sustainability of pig farming systems. The selected tool IDEA was tested on a sample of farms from 15 contrasted systems in Europe. A statistical analysis was carried out to check the capacity of the indicators to illustrate the variability of the population and to analyze which of these indicators contributed the most towards it. The scores obtained for the farms were consistent with the reality of pig production; the variable distribution showed an important variability of the sample. The principal component analysis and cluster analysis separated the sample into five subgroups, in which the six main indicators significantly differed, which underlines the robustness of the tool. The IDEA method was proven to be easily comprehensible, requiring few initial variables and with an efficient benchmarking system; all six indicators contributed to fully describe a varied and contrasted population.

Keywords

pigfarming systemsustainabilityevaluationeconomy
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 8 , Issue 12 , December 2014 , pp. 2047 - 2057
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, RD, Hachfeld, GA and Weness, EJ 2003. Preparing to Transfer the farm Business. University of Minnesota Extension Service. Retrieved October 9, 2013 from http://agmarketing.extension.psu.edu/Business/passonfarm/PrepareToTransferFarm.pdf.Google Scholar
Bonneau, M, de Greef, K, Brinkman, D, Cinar, MU, Dourmad, JY, Edge, HL, Fàbrega, E, Gonzàlez, J, Houwers, HWJ, Hviid, M, Ilari-Antoine, E, Klauke, TN, Phatsara, C, Rydhmer, L, van der Oever, B, Zimmer, C and Edwards, SA 2014a. Evaluation of the sustainability of contrasted pig farming system: the procedure, the evaluated systems and the evaluation tools. Animal, doi:10.1017/S1751731114002110.Google Scholar
Bonneau, M, Klauke, TN, Gonzàlez, J, Rydhmer, L, Ilari-Antoine, E, Dourmad, JY, de Greef, K, Houwers, HWJ, Cinar, MU, Fàbrega, E, Zimmer, C, Hviid, M, van der Oever, B and Edwards, SA 2014b. Evaluation of the sustainability of contrasted pig farming systems: integrated evaluation. Animal, doi:10.1017/S1751731114002122.Google Scholar
Boschma, M, Joaris, A and Vidal, C 1999. Concentration of livestock production. Retrieved October 9, 2013 from http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/envir/report/en/live_en/report.htm.Google Scholar
Briquel, V, Vilain, L, Bourdais, JL, Girardin, P, Mouchet, C and Viaux, P 2001. La méthode IDEA (Indicateurs de durabilité des exploitations agricoles): une démarche pédagogique (The IDEA method (indicators for the sustainability of farms): an educational approach). Ingénieries EAT 2 (25), 29–39. Retrieved October 11, 2007 from http://www.set-revue.fr/sites/default/files/archives/2001/GR2001-PUB00008977.pdf.Google Scholar
Doran, GT 1981. There’s a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management’s goals and objectives. Management Review 70, 11 (AMA FORUM), 35–36.Google Scholar
Duncombe-Wall, D, Moran, P, Heysen, C and Kraehenbuehl, D 1999. Agricultural Sustainability Indicators for Regions of South Australia. Primary Industries and Resources South Australia and the National Landcare programme, Australia. Retrieved November 4, 2007 from http://www.pir.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/file/0018/151056/NRMHist_AgSusIndicators.pdf.Google Scholar
Garforth, C and Rehman, T 2005. Review of literature on measuring farmers’ values, goals and objectives. Project report no. 2 in the ‘Research to understand and model the behaviour and motivations of farmers responding to policy changes (England)’. School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, The University of Reading, Reading, UK.Google Scholar
Gibbon, D 1994. Farming systems research/extension: backgrounds, concept, experience and networking. In Rural and farming systems analysis: european perspectives (ed. Dent, JB and Mcgregor MAE), Book I, pp. 3–18. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Gibon, A, Sibbald, AR, Flamant, JC, Lhoste, P, Revilla, R, Rubino, R and Sørensen, JT 1999. Livestock farming system research in Europe and its potential contribution for managing towards sustainability in livestock farming. Livestock Production Science 61, 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girardin, P, Mouchet, C, Schneider, F, Viaux, P and Vilain, L 2004. IDERICA Etude prospective sur la caractérisation et le suivi de la durabilité des exploitations agricoles françaises (Prospective study on the characterization and follow-up of the sustainability of French farms). Rapport d’étude n° 04 FR 02 03 financée par le MAAPAR, France. Retrieved October 11, 2007 from http://www.agriculture.gouv.fr.zopeclasse1.cedre.nexen.net/sections/publications/etudes/iderica-etude-prospective-sur-la-caracterisation-et-le-suivi-de-la-durabilite-des-exploitations-agricoles-francaises/.Google Scholar
Ilari, E, Daridan, D, Desbois, D, Fraysse, J-L and Fraysse, J 2004. Les systèmes de production du porc en France: typologie des exploitations agricoles ayant des porcs (French pig producing systems: a typology of pig owning farms). Journées de la Recherche Porcine 36, 1–8. Retrieved April 18, 2007 from http://www.journees-recherche-porcine.com/texte/2004/04txtPVerte/01pv.pdf.Google Scholar
Landais, E 1998. Agriculture durable: les fondements d’un nouveau contrat social (Sustainable agriculture: basis for a new social agreement), Courrier de l’environnement 33. INRA, France.Google Scholar
Lien, G, Hardaker, JB and Flaten, O 2007. Risk and economic sustainability of crop farming systems. Agricultural Systems 94, 541–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loevinsohn, M, Sumberg, J and Diagne, A 2012. Under what circumstances and conditions does adoption of technology result in increased agricultural productivity? Protocol. EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London, London. Retrieved October 9, 2013 from http://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=8WSxsZcAkaA%3D&tabid=3174.Google Scholar
Pretty, JN 1998. Supportive policies and practice for scaling up sustainable agriculture. In Facilitating sustainable agriculture: participatory learning and adaptative management in times of environmental uncertainty (ed. NJ Roling and MAE Wagemakers), Part I: Introduction, pp. 23–45. Cambridge University Press, UK.Google Scholar
Réseau Agriculture Durable (RAD) collective work 2002. Evaluer la durabilité d’un système de production: approche, méthodes et diagnostics (To assess the sustainability of a production system: approach, methods and diagnosis). Les Cahiers techniques du CEDAPA, France. Retrieved October 15, 2007 from http://www.cedapa.com/cahiers.htm.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN: 3-900051-07-0. Retrieved September 2, 2009 from http://www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
Smith, A 1776. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Book I. Strahan and Caldwell, London.Google Scholar
Spedding, C 1994. Farming systems research/extension in the European contaxt. In Rural and farming systems analysis: European perspectives (ed. Dent JB and McGregor MAE), Book I, pp. 46–52. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Sridhar, U and Mandyam, S 2010. A simulation framework to study policy formulation and evaluation of economic viability and sustainability of small and marginal farmers. Asia-Pacific Development Journal 17 (1), 27–62.Google Scholar
United Nations, European Commission, International Monetary Fund, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, World Bank 2005. Handbook of national accounting: integrated environmental and economic accounting 2003, studies in methods, Series F, No. 61, Rev.1, Glossary. United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
Vilain, L 2003. La méthode IDEA – Guide d’utilisation, deuxième édition enrichie et élargie à l’arboriculture, au maraîchage et à l’horticulture (The IDEA method, user’s guide, second version enriched and extended to arboriculture, market gardening and horticulture). Editions Educagri, Dijon.Google Scholar
Zahm, F, Viaux, P, Vilain, L, Girardin, P and Mouchet, C 2008. Assessing farm sustainability with the IDEA method – from the concept of agriculture sustainability to case studies on farms. Sustainable Development 16, 271–281.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Ilari-Antoine Supplementary Material

Figure S1

Download Ilari-Antoine Supplementary Material(File)
File 68.5 KB