Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:17:20.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evidence of genetic variability for digestive efficiency in the growing pig fed a fibrous diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2013

J. Noblet ,
H. Gilbert ,
Y. Jaguelin-Peyraud  and
T. Lebrun
J. Noblet
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1348 PEGASE, F-35590 Saint-Gilles, France Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1348 PEGASE, F-35000 Rennes, France
H. Gilbert*
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR444 LGC, F-31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France
Y. Jaguelin-Peyraud
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1348 PEGASE, F-35590 Saint-Gilles, France Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1348 PEGASE, F-35000 Rennes, France
T. Lebrun
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR1348 PEGASE, F-35590 Saint-Gilles, France Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1348 PEGASE, F-35000 Rennes, France
*
†E-mail: Helene.Gilbert@toulouse.inra.fr
Get access

Abstract

Energy digestibility in the growing pig increases with BW increase and may differ between breeds of pigs or between lines selected on criteria other than digestion. However, little is known about the variability in energy digestibility within a line or a breed of pigs, especially when fibrous diets are fed. For this purpose, 20 Large White castrated male growing pigs originating from four boars (five per boar), and three to four sows per boar, were fed a high dietary fibre (DF) diet (18% NDF) and measured over 10 consecutive weeks (30 to 95 kg BW range) for their apparent faecal energy, nitrogen and organic matter digestibility. Each week, faeces were totally collected over 5 days and the feed dry matter intake over the same days was recorded. All digestibility coefficients increased regularly (P < 0.001) over the experimental periods or with BW increase (+0.6 point/10 kg BW increase for energy); this rate of increase was not affected by boar origin (no interaction; P > 0.05). The digestibility coefficients were affected by boar origin (P < 0.005 for energy), with about 2 points for energy between the extremes (81.7% v. 79.5%), and there was no marked interaction between boar origin and period. These preliminary results suggest the possibility of selecting growing pigs for an increased digestive efficiency when fed high DF diets.

Keywords

growing pigdigestibilitygenetic variabilityBWdietary fibre
Type
Nutrition
Information
animal , Volume 7 , Issue 8 , August 2013 , pp. 1259 - 1264
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barea, R, Dubois, S, Gilbert, H, Sellier, P, van Milgen, J, Noblet, J 2010. Energy utilization in pigs selected for high and low residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 88, 2062–2072.Google Scholar
Bastianelli, D, Carré, B, Mignon-Grasteau, S, Bonnal, L, Davrieux, F 2007. Direct prediction of energy digestibility from poultry faeces using near infrared spectroscopy. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference Near Infrared Spectroscopy 9–15 April 2005, Auckland, New Zealand (ed. GR Burling-Claridge, SE Holroyd and RMW Sumner), pp. 626–629. NZ NIRS Society Inc., Hamilton, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Bastianelli, D, Bonnal, L, Juin, H, Mignon-Grasteau, S, Davrieux, F, Carré, B 2010. Prediction of the chemical composition of poultry excreta by near infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Near Infrared Spectroscopy 18, 69–77.Google Scholar
de Haer, LCM, De Vries, AG 1993. Effects of genotype and sex on the feed intake pattern of group housed growing pigs. Livestock Production Science 36, 223–232.Google Scholar
Février, C, Bourdon, D, Aumaitre, A 1992. Effects of level of dietary fiber from wheat bran on digestibility of nutrients, digestive enzymes and performance in the European Large White and Chinese Mei Shan pig. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 68, 60–72.Google Scholar
Kemp, B, den Hartog, LA, Klog, JJ, Zandstra, T 1991. The digestibility of nutrients, energy and nitrogen in the Meishan and Dutch landrace pig. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 65, 263–266.Google Scholar
Kyriazakis, I 2011. Opportunities to improve nutrient efficiency in pigs and poultry through breeding. Animal 5, 821–832.Google Scholar
Le Bellego, L, van Milgen, J, Noblet, J 2002. Effect of high temperature and low protein diets on performance of growing-finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 80, 691–701.Google Scholar
Le Gall, M, Warpechowski, M, Jaguelin-Peyraud, Y, Noblet, J 2009. Influence of dietary fibre level and pelleting on digestibility of energy and nutrients in growing pigs and adult sows. Animal 3, 352–359.Google Scholar
Le Goff, G, Noblet, J 2001. Comparative digestibility of dietary energy and nutrients in growing pigs and adult sows. Journal of Animal Science 79, 2418–2427.Google Scholar
Le Goff, G, van Milgen, J, Noblet, J 2002a. Influence of dietary fibre on digestive utilization and rate of passage in growing pigs, finishing pigs, and adult sows. Animal Science 74, 503–515.Google Scholar
Le Goff, G, Dubois, S, van Milgen, J, Noblet, J 2002b. Influence of dietary fibre level on digestive and metabolic utilisation of energy in growing and finishing pigs. Animal Research 51, 245–259.Google Scholar
Len, NT, Hong, TTT, Ogle, B, Lindberg, JE 2009a. Comparison of total tract digestibility, development of visceral organs and digestive tract of Mong Cai and Yorkshire × Landrace piglets fed diets with different fibre sources. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 93, 181–191.Google Scholar
Len, NT, Ngoc, TB, Ogle, B, Lindberg, JE 2009b. Ileal and total tract digestibility in local (Mong Cai) and exotic (Landrace × Yorkshire) piglets fed low and high-fibre diets, with or without enzyme supplementation. Livestock Science 126, 73–79.Google Scholar
Mignon-Grasteau, S, Muley, N, Bastianelli, D, Gomez, J, Sellier, N, Millet, N, Besnard, J, Hallouis, JM, Carré, B 2004. Wheat based regimen digestibility is highly heritable in growing chickens. Poultry Science 83, 860–867.Google Scholar
Morel, PCH, Lee, TS, Moughan, PJ 2006. Effect of feeding level, live weight and genotype on the apparent faecal digestibility of energy and organic matter in the growing pig. Animal Feed Science and Technology 126, 63–74.Google Scholar
Noblet, J 2006. Recent advances in energy evaluation of feeds for pigs. In Recent advances in animal nutrition 2005 (ed. PC Garnsworthy and J Wiseman), pp. 1–26. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Noblet, J, van Milgen, J 2004. Energy value of pig feeds: effect of pig body weight and energy evaluation system. Journal of Animal Science 82E. Suppl. E229–E238.Google Scholar
Noblet, J, Shi, XS, Dubois, S 1994. Effect of body weight on net energy value of feeds for growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 72, 648–657.Google Scholar
Rougière, N, Gomez, J, Mignon-Grasteau, S, Carré, B 2009. Effects of diet particle size on digestive parameters in D+ and D− genetic chicken lines selected for divergent digestion efficiency. Poultry Science 88, 1206–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SAS Institute 2008. Statistical analysis system release 8.01. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Sundstöl, F, Standal, N, Vangen, O 1979. Energy metabolism in lines of pigs selected for thickness of backfat and rate of gain. Acta Agricultura Scandinavica 29, 337–345.Google Scholar
Wenk, C, Morel, P 1985. Genetic variation of the digestibility of energy in growing pigs. In Digestive physiology in the pig. Proceedings of the 3rd International Seminar on Digestive Physiology in the Pig (ed. A Just, H Jorgensen and JA Fernandez), pp. 396–399. National Institute of Animal Science, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Yen, JT, Tess, MW, Pond, WG, Dickerson, GE 1983. Digestibility and metabolism of dietary nitrogen and energy in contemporary, genetically lean and obese pigs as estimated by total faecal collection and acid insoluble ash. Journal of Animal Science 56, 426–430.Google Scholar