Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:36:00.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Farmers’ actions toward sustainability: a typology of dairy farms according to sustainability indicators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

F. I. Bánkuti Open the ORCID record for F. I. Bánkuti [Opens in a new window] ,
R. C. Prizon Open the ORCID record for R. C. Prizon [Opens in a new window] ,
J. C. Damasceno Open the ORCID record for J. C. Damasceno [Opens in a new window] ,
M. M. De Brito Open the ORCID record for M. M. De Brito [Opens in a new window] ,
M. S. S. Pozza  and
P. G. L. Lima Open the ORCID record for P. G. L. Lima [Opens in a new window]
F. I. Bánkuti*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, State University of Maringá, Avenida Colombo, 5790, Maringá, Paraná87020-900, Brazil
R. C. Prizon
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, State University of Maringá, Avenida Colombo, 5790, Maringá, Paraná87020-900, Brazil
J. C. Damasceno
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, State University of Maringá, Avenida Colombo, 5790, Maringá, Paraná87020-900, Brazil
M. M. De Brito
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, State University of Maringá, Avenida Colombo, 5790, Maringá, Paraná87020-900, Brazil
M. S. S. Pozza
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, State University of Maringá, Avenida Colombo, 5790, Maringá, Paraná87020-900, Brazil
P. G. L. Lima
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, State University of Maringá, Avenida Colombo, 5790, Maringá, Paraná87020-900, Brazil
*
†E-mail: fibankuti@uem.br
Get access

Abstract

Milk production is an important economic and social activity in Brazil. Failure to meet institutional and market demands for quality and sustainability has led farmers, particularly small-scale farmers, to leave agriculture. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the sustainability of dairy farms in Paraná, Brazil. A semi-structured questionnaire was administered to 75 dairy farm operators. Sustainability indicators were generated on the basis of economic, environmental and social data using exploratory factor analysis. Factor scores were subjected to hierarchical clustering, which resulted in the formation of three groups of dairy farms. Groups 1, 2 and 3 had high, intermediate and low levels of sustainability, respectively. Group 1 comprised large-scale dairy farms with high productivity. Dairy farms with intermediate sustainability (group 2) had medium production capacity, and farms with low sustainability (group 1) had the smallest production scale and capacity. Large-scale dairy farms have greater economic, environmental and social sustainability and are, therefore, more likely to survive in the medium and long term.

Keywords

dairy productionmilksocial compliancesustainable agribusinesssustainability indicator
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 14 , Issue S2: 9th Workshop on Modelling Nutrient Digestion and Utilization in Farm Animals (MODNUT) , August 2020 , pp. s417 - s423
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bánkuti, FI and Caldas, MM 2018. Geographical milk redistribution in Paraná State, Brazil: consequences of institutional and market changes. Journal of Rural Studies 64, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bánkuti, FI, Damasceno, JC, Schiavi, SM, Kuwaraha, KC and Prizon, RC 2018. Structural features, labor conditions and family succession in dairy production systems in Paraná State, Brazil. Cahiers. Agriculture 27, 1–11.Google Scholar
Barnes, AP and Toma, L 2012. A typology of dairy farmer perceptions towards climate change. Climatic Change 112, 507–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE) 2018. Censo Agropécuário 2017. Retrieved on 30 January 2019, from https://censos.ibge.gov.br/agro/2017Google Scholar
Brito, MM, Bánkuti, FI, Bánkuti, SMS, Santos, GT, Damasceno, JC and Massuda, EM 2015. Horizontal arrangements and competitiveness of small-scale dairy farmers in Paraná, Brazil. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 18, 155–172.Google Scholar
Center for Advanced Studies on Applied Economics 2019. PIB do agronegócio brasileiro. Retrieved on 15 July 2019, from https://www.cepea.esalq.usp.br/br/pib-do-agronegocio-brasileiro.aspxGoogle Scholar
Consolidation of Labor Laws 1943. Law no. 5,452, Brazil. Retrieved on 13 March 2020, from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/del5452.htmGoogle Scholar
Constitutional Provisions for the Agrarian Reform 1993. Law no. 8,629, Brazil. Retrieved on 13 March 2020, from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/decreto-lei/del5452.htmGoogle Scholar
Defante, L, Damasceno, JC, Bánkuti, FI and Oliveira Ramos, CEC 2019. Typology of dairy production systems that meet Brazilian standards for milk quality. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 49, 1–8.Google Scholar
Dervillé, M and Allaire, G 2014. Change of competition regime and regional innovative capacities: evidence from dairy restructuring in France. Food Policy 49, 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolman, MA, Sonneveld, MPW, Mollenhorst, H and de Boer, IJM 2014. Benchmarking the economic, environmental and societal performance of Dutch dairy farms aiming at internal recycling of nutrients. Journal of Cleaner Production 73, 245–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, F, Hennessy, DA and Jensen, HH 2012. Factors determining milk quality and implications for production structure under somatic cell count standard modification. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 6421–6435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Field, A 2009. Descobrindo a estatística usando o SPSS. Artmed, Porto Alegre, Brazil.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) 2018. Livestock primary. Retrieved on 23 March 2018, from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QL/visualizeGoogle Scholar
Hair, JFJ, Black, WC, Babin, BJ and Anderson, RE 2009. Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, Saddle River, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
Hind, T 2010. Overview of the main environmental issues at farm level and the work that has already been done in the guide to good dairy farming practice. Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation 443, 4–12.Google Scholar
Janker, J and Mann, S 2018. Understanding the social dimension of sustainability in agriculture: a critical review of sustainability assessment tools. Environment, Development and Sustainability 22, 1671–1691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Likert, R 1932. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology 22, 1–55.Google Scholar
Madry, W, Mena, Y, Roszkowska-Madra, B, Gozdowski, D, Hryniewski, R and Castel, JM 2013. An overview of farming system typology methodologies and its use in the study of pasture-based farming system: a review. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 11, 316–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock, and Supply (MAPA) 2002. Instrução Normativa 51. Retrieved on 13 March 2020, from https://freitag.com.br/files/uploads/2018/02/portaria_norma_482.pdfGoogle Scholar
MAPA 2011. Instrução Normativa 62. Retrieved on 13 March 2020, from https://www.normasbrasil.com.br/norma/instrucao-normativa-62-2011_78285.htmlGoogle Scholar
Olde, EM, Oudshoorn, FW, Sørensen, CAG, Bokkers, EAM and Boer, IJM 2016. Assessing sustainability at farm-level: lessons learned from a comparison of tools in practice. Ecological Indicators 66, 391–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira, LFT and Silva, SP 2012. Mudanças institucionais e produção familiar na cadeia produtiva do leite no Oeste Catarinense. Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural 50, 705–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paraná Institute of Social and Economic Development (IPARDES) 2008. Caracterização socioeconômica da atividade leiteira no Paraná. IPARDES, Curitiba, Brazil.Google Scholar
van Passel, S, Nevens, F, Mathijs, E and Van Huylenbroeck, G 2007. Measuring farm sustainability and explaining differences in sustainable efficiency. Ecological Economics 62, 149–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Protection of Native Vegetation 2012. Law no. 12,651, Brazil. Retrieved on 13 March 2020, from http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2012/lei/l12651.htmGoogle Scholar
Ross, SA, Topp, CFE, Ennos, RA and Chagunda, MGG 2017. Relative emissions intensity of dairy production systems: employing different functional units in life-cycle assessment. Animal 11, 1381–1388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlecht, S and Achim, S 2012. A latent class cluster analysis of farmers’ attitudes towards contract design in the dairy industry. Agribusiness 28, 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souza, RP and Buainain, AM 2013. A competitividade da produção de leite da agricultura familiar: os limites da exclusão. Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura 21, 308–331.Google Scholar
Suranindyah, Y, Wahyuni, E, Bintara, S and Purbaya, G 2015. The effect of improving sanitation prior to milking on milk quality of dairy cow in farmer group. Procedia Food Science 3, 150–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimpel, R, Bánkuti, FI, Zambom, MA, Kuwahara, KC and Bánkuti, SMS 2017. Characteristics of the dairy farmers who perform financial management in Paraná State, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 46, 421–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar