Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T13:20:51.216Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Foraging opportunity: a crucial criterion for horse welfare?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2009

H. Benhajali ,
M.-A. Richard-Yris ,
M. Ezzaouia ,
F. Charfi  and
M. Hausberger
H. Benhajali
Affiliation:
Université de Rennes I, Ethologie Animale et Humaine, UMR CNRS 6552, Campus de Beaulieu, 263 avenue du Général Leclerc, 35042, Rennes cedex, France Université Tunis-ElManar, Unité de Biologie Animale et de Systématique Evolutive, Campus universitaire, 2060, Tunis, Tunisia
M.-A. Richard-Yris
Affiliation:
Université de Rennes I, Ethologie Animale et Humaine, UMR CNRS 6552, Campus de Beaulieu, 263 avenue du Général Leclerc, 35042, Rennes cedex, France
M. Ezzaouia
Affiliation:
Haras national de Sidi Thabet 2020, Tunisia
F. Charfi
Affiliation:
Université Tunis-ElManar, Unité de Biologie Animale et de Systématique Evolutive, Campus universitaire, 2060, Tunis, Tunisia
M. Hausberger*
Affiliation:
Université de Rennes I, Ethologie Animale et Humaine, UMR CNRS 6552, Campus de Beaulieu, 263 avenue du Général Leclerc, 35042, Rennes cedex, France
*
†E-mail: martine.hausberger@univ-rennes1.fr
Get access

Abstract

This study aimed at determining the effect of the increase of foraging opportunities on the behaviour and welfare of breeding mares housed in individual boxes but allowed outside 6 h a day in a bare paddock. One hundred Arab breeding mares were divided into two groups of 50 according to the treatment and allowed outside in two bare paddocks at the same density (115 mare/ha) where water and shelter were provided. The treatment consisted in providing the opportunity to forage on hay. Twenty-minute animal focal samplings and scan samplings were used to determine the time budget of the mares during the period from 0900 to 1500 h and study their social behaviour. A total of 300 focal sampling (6000 min), 3300 individual scan sampling (6000 min) and 62 group observations (1240 min) corresponding to the 100 mares were recorded. Non-parametric tests were used to analyse data. Results showed that experimental mares spent more time feeding (65.12% ± 2.40% v. 29.75% ± 2.45%, P < 0.01) and less time in locomotion (11.70% ± 1.31% v. 23.56% ± 1.34%, P < 0.01), stand resting (11.76% ± 2.57% v. 27.52% ± 2.62%, P < 0.01) and alert standing (5.23% ± 1.2% v. 14.71% ± 1.23%, P < 0.01). There was more bonding among experimental mares than control ones (26 v. 14, P < 0.05). Experimental mares showed more positive social interactions (P < 0.01) and less aggression (P < 0.01). These results suggest that giving densely housed mares foraging opportunities improves their welfare.

Keywords

welfaretime-budgetmaresocial behaviourforaging opportunities
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 3 , Issue 9 , September 2009 , pp. 1308 - 1312
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altman, J 1974. Observational study of behaviour: sampling methods. Behaviour 49, 227–267.Google Scholar
Appleby, MC, Lawrence, AB 1987. Food restriction as a cause of stereotypic behaviour in tethered gilts. Animal Production 45, 103–110.Google Scholar
Bashaw, MJ, Tarou, LR, Maki, TS, Maple, TL 2001. A survey assessment of variables related to stereotypy in captive giraffe and okapi. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 73, 235–247.Google Scholar
Beattie, VE, O’Connell, NE, Moss, BW 2000. Influence of environmental enrichment on the behaviour, performance and meat quality of domestic pigs. Livestock Production Science 65, 71–79.Google Scholar
Benhajali, H, Richard-Yris, MA, Leroux, M, Ezzaouia, M, Charfi, F, Hausberger, M 2008. A note on the time budget and behavioural repertoire of densely housed horses. A case study in domestic horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 112, 196–200.Google Scholar
Boyd, LE 1988. Time budgets of adult Przewalski horses: effects of sex, reproductive status and enclosure. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 21, 19–39.Google Scholar
Boyd, L, Bandi, N 2002. Reintroduction of takhi, Equus ferus przewalskii, to Hustai National Park, Mongolia: time budget and synchrony of activity pre- and post-release. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 78, 87–102.Google Scholar
Boyd, LE, Carbonaro, DA, Houpt, KA 1988. The 24-hour time budget of Przewalski horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 21, 5–17.Google Scholar
Byrne, GD, Suomi, SJ 1991. Effects of woodchips and buried food on behavior patterns and psychological well-being of captive rhesus monkeys. American Journal of Primatology 23, 141–151.Google Scholar
Carlstead, K, Brown, JL, Strawn, W 1993. Behavioural and physiological correlates of stress in laboratory cats. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 38, 143–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamove, AS, Anderson, JR, Morgan-Jones, SC, Jones, SP 1982. Deep woodchip litter: hygiene, feeding, and behavioural enhancement in eight primate species. International Journal for the Study of Animal Problems 3, 308–318.Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, TH, Greenwood, PJ, Powell, RP 1976. Ranks and relationships in Highland ponies and Highland cows. Zeitschrift fuer Tierpsychologie 41, 202–216.Google Scholar
Cockram, MS, Kent, JE, Goddard, PJ 1996. Effect of space allowance during transport on the behavioural and physiological responses of lambs during and after transport. Animal Science 62, 461–477.Google Scholar
van Dierendonck, MC, Sigurjonsdottir, H, Colenbrander, B, Thorhallsdottir, AG 2004. Differences in social behaviour between late pregnant, post-partum and barren mares in a herd of Icelandic horses. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 89, 283–297.Google Scholar
Duncan, P 1980. Time-budgets of Camargue horses. II. Time-budgets of adult horses and weaned sub-adults. Behaviour 72, 26–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feh, C 2005. Relationships and communication in socially natural horse herds. In The domestic horse, the evolution, development and management of its behaviour (ed. D Mills and S McDonnell), pp. 83–93. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goodwin, D, Davidson, HPB, Harris, P 2002. Foraging enrichment for stabled horses: effects on behaviour and selection. Equine Veterinary Journal 34, 686–691.Google Scholar
Harris, PA 1999. How understanding the digestive process can help minimise digestive disturbances due to diet and feeding practices. In Proceedings BEVA Specialist meeting on Nutrition and Behaviour (ed. PA Harris, G Gomarsall, HPB Davidson and R Green), pp. 45–50. Equine Veterinary Journal, Newmarket, UK.Google Scholar
Harris, PA 2005. Nutrition, behaviour and the role of supplements for calming horses: the veterinarian’s dilemma. Veterinary Journal 170, 10–11.Google Scholar
Herbers, JM 1981. Time resources and laziness in animals. Oecologia 49, 252–262.Google Scholar
Houpt, KA, Houpt, TR 1989. Social and illumination preferences of mares. Journal of Animal Science 66, 2159–2164.Google Scholar
Huber-Eicher, B, Wechsler, B 1998. The effect of quality and availability of foraging materials on feather pecking in laying hen chicks. Animal Behaviour 55, 861–873.Google Scholar
Johnson, SR, Patterson-Kane, EG, Niel, L 2004. Foraging enrichment for laboratory rats. Animal Welfare 13, 305–312.Google Scholar
Ludes, E, Anderson, JR 1996. Comparison of the behaviour of captive white-faced capuchin monkeys (Cebus capucinus) in the presence of four kinds of deep litter. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 49, 293–303.Google Scholar
Marashi, V, Barnekow, A, Ossendorf, E, Sachser, N 2003. Effects of different forms of environmental enrichment on behavioural, endocrinological, and immunological parameters in mice. Hormone and Behavior 43, 281–292.Google Scholar
Marriner, LM, Drickamer, LC 1994. Factors influencing stereotyped behaviour of primates in a zoo. Zoo Biology 13, 267–275.Google Scholar
McDonnell, SM 2003. The equid ethogram. A practical field guide to horse behavior. Eclipse Press, Lexington, Kentucky, USA.Google Scholar
McGreevy, PD, Cripps, PJ, French, NP, Green, LE, Nicol, CJ 1995. Management factors associated with stereotypic and redirected behaviour in the Thoroughbred horse. Equine Veterinary Journal 27, 86–91.Google Scholar
Morgan, KN, Tromborg, CT 2007. Sources of stress in captivity. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 102, 262–302.Google Scholar
Sigurjónsdóttir, H, van Dierendonck, MC, Snorrason, S, Thórhallsdóttir, AG 2003. Social relationships in a group of horses without a mature stallion. Behaviour 140, 783–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, RR, Rohlf, FJ 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edition. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Sweeting, MP, Houpt, KA 1987. Water consumption and time budgets of stabled pony (Equus caballus) geldings. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 17, 1–7.Google Scholar
Waring, GH 2003. Horse behaviour, 2nd edition. Noyes Publications/William Andrew Publishing, Norwich, New York, USA.Google Scholar
Wells, SM, von Goldschmidt-Rotschild, B 1979. Social behaviour and relationships in a herd of Camargue horses. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie 49, 363–380.Google Scholar
Wolff, A, Hausberger, M, Le Scolan, N 1997. Experimental tests to assess emotionality in horses. Behavioural Processes 40, 209–221.Google Scholar
Young, RJ, Carruthers, J, Lawrence, AB 1994. The effect of a foraging device (The ‘Edinburgh Foodball’) on the behaviour of pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 39, 237–247.Google Scholar