Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:52:20.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic analysis of return over feed in Canadian Holsteins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2009

J. Bohmanova ,
F. Miglior ,
J. Jamrozik ,
B. J. Van Doormaal ,
K. J. Hand  and
D. Lazenby
J. Bohmanova*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Poultry Science, Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
F. Miglior
Affiliation:
Dairy and Swine Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke, QC, J1M 1Z3, Canada Canadian Dairy Network, Guelph, ON, N1K 1E5, Canada
J. Jamrozik
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Poultry Science, Centre for Genetic Improvement of Livestock, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada
B. J. Van Doormaal
Affiliation:
Canadian Dairy Network, Guelph, ON, N1K 1E5, Canada
K. J. Hand
Affiliation:
CanWest DHI, Guelph, ON, N1K 1E5, Canada
D. Lazenby
Affiliation:
CanWest DHI, Guelph, ON, N1K 1E5, Canada
*
†E-mail: jbohmano@uoguelph.ca
Get access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate genetic merit of return over feed (ROF), which is a herd profit index defined by CanWest Dairy Herd Improvement as a difference between milk income and feed cost. A multiple-trait (MT) model and random regression model (RRM) were used. The traits analyzed in MT were rearing cost and ROF of the first three lactations. In RRM, a cumulative ROF was fitted as function of age and rearing cost was treated as a correlated trait. Variance components were estimated within a Bayesian framework by Gibbs sampling using a subsample of data. Breeding values were then estimated for 3 041 078 animals using records of 1 951 893 cows. Estimates of heritability for rearing cost from MT and RRM were 0.23 and 0.22, respectively. ROF per lactation and cumulative ROF were negatively correlated with rearing cost. Estimates of heritability of ROF through the first, second and third lactation from MT were 0.27, 0.10 and 0.08, respectively. Estimates of heritability of ROF from RRM increased with age and ranged from 0.08 through 0.31. Estimated breeding values (EBVs) for ROF from MT and RRM were moderately correlated with official EBV for production traits and the Canadian selection index (Lifetime Profit Index). Herd life EBV had −0.07 and 0.19 correlations with EBVs for ROF from MT and RRM, respectively. From both MT and RRM, small favorable correlations were reported between EBVs for ROF and for bone quality and angularity, whereas low unfavorable correlations were reported with EBV for udder depth, front end and chest width. Majority of correlations between EBVs for ROF and for reproduction traits were near 0, with the exception of EBV for gestation length, calf size and calving ease, where small favorable correlations were reported. The ROF is a good indicator of cow profitability despite the fact that it is a simplified profit index that does not account for animal-specific health and reproductive cost. However, because ROF does not account for differences in heritabilities between components of profit, ROF is not recommended to be used for direct selection for profit.

Keywords

cow profitabilityvariance component estimationbreeding values
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , February 2010 , pp. 173 - 182
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adkinson, RW, Farmer, WS, Jenny, BF 1993. Feeding practices and income over feed cost on pasture-oriented dairy farms in Louisiana. Journal of Dairy Science 76, 3547–3554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allaire, FR, Lin, CY 1980. Heritability of age at first calving. Journal of Dairy Science 63, 171–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canadian Dairy Network (CDN) 2009a. Subject. Articles – Minimum Criteria for an Official Bull Proof. Retrieved May 4, 2009, from http://www.cdn.ca/document.php?id=6Google Scholar
Canadian Dairy Network (CDN) 2009b. Subject. Articles – Health Data Recording in Canada. Retrieved May 4, 2009, from http://www.cdn.ca/document.php?id=160Google Scholar
De Haan, MHA, Cassell, BG, Pearson, RE, Smith, BB 1992. Relationships between net income, days of productive life, production, and linear type traits in grade and registered Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 3553–3561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ettema, JF, Santos, JE 2004. Impact of age at calving on lactation, reproduction, health, and income in first-parity Holsteins on commercial farms. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 2730–2742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goddard, ME 1998. Consensus and debate in the definition of breeding objectives. Journal of Dairy Science 81 (suppl. 2), 6–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hazel, LN 1943. The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics 28, 476–490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jamrozik, J, Fatehi, J, Schaeffer, LR 2005. Estimates of genetic parameters for age at first calving, days open and calving interval for Holsteins, derived from Canadian Female Fertility Model. Retrieved May 4, 2009, from http://cgil.uoguelph.ca/dcbgc/Agenda0509/TC2005Sep-Fert-bis.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kulak, KK 1994. Lifetime profitability measures and their relationships to lifetime and first lactation traits in Holstein cows. MS Thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.Google Scholar
Kulak, KK, Dekkers, JC, McAllister, JCM, Lee, AJ 1997. Lifetime profitability measures for dairy cows and their relationships to lifetime performance traits. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 77, 609–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaren, CJ 2004. The relationship between disease occurrence, feeding management and return over feed in Ontario dairy herds. MS Thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meuwissen, THE, Goddard, ME 1997. Selection of farm animals for non-linear traits and profit. Animal Science 65, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miglior, F, Muir, BL, Van Doormaal, BJ 2005. Selection indices in Holstein cattle of various countries. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 1255–1263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Misztal, I, Tsuruta, S, Strabel, T, Auvray, B, Druet, T, Lee, DH 2002. BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90). Proceedings. 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Montpellier, France. CD-ROM communication 28, 07.Google Scholar
Mulder, H, Jansen, G 2001. Derivation of economic values using lifetime profitability of Canadian Holstein cows. Retreived May 4, 2009, from http://cgil.uoguelph.ca/dcbgc/Agenda0109/MulderJansen.pdfGoogle Scholar
Nilforooshan, MA, Edriss, MA 2004. Effect of age at first calving on some productive and longevity traits in Iranian Holsteins of the Isfahan province. Journal of Dairy Science 87, 2130–2135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norman, HD, Cassell, BG, Pearson, RE, Wiggans, GR 1981. Relation of first lactation production and conformation to lifetime performance and profitability in Jerseys. Journal of Dairy Science 64, 104–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Cabal, MA, Alenda, R 2003. Lifetime profit as an individual trait and prediction of its breeding values in Spanish Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 4115–4122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pérez-Cabal, MA, Garcia, C, Gonzalez-Recio, O, Alenda, R 2006. Genetic and phenotypic relationships among locomotion type traits, profit, production, longevity, and fertility in Spanish dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 1776–1783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
St-Onge, A, Hayes, JF, Cue, RI 2002. Economic values of traits for dairy cattle improvement estimated using field recorded data. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 82, 29–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tigges, RJ, Pearson, RE, Vinson, WE 1984. Use of dairy herd Improvement variables to predict lifetime profitability. Journal of Dairy Science 67, 180–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsuruta, S, Misztal, I, Stranden, I 2001. Use of the preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm as a generic solver for mixed-model equations in animal breeding applications. Journal of Animal Science 79, 1166–1172.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Arendonk, JAM 1991. Use of profit equations to determine relative economic value of dairy cattle herd life and production from field data. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 1101–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Visscher, PM, Goddard, ME 1995. Genetic analyses of profit for Australian dairy cattle. Animal Science 61, 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weigel, DJ, Cassell, BG, Pearson, RE 1997. Prediction of transmitting abilities for productive life and lifetime profitability from production, somatic cell count, and type traits in milk markets for fluid milk and cheese. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 1398–1405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed