Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:51:45.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic characterization and founder effect analysis of recently introduced Salers cattle breed population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2016

D. Gamarra ,
A. Lopez-Oceja  and
M. M. de Pancorbo
D. Gamarra
Affiliation:
BIOMICs Research Group, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Lascaray Research Center, 01006 Vitoria, Spain
A. Lopez-Oceja
Affiliation:
BIOMICs Research Group, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Lascaray Research Center, 01006 Vitoria, Spain
M. M. de Pancorbo*
Affiliation:
BIOMICs Research Group, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Lascaray Research Center, 01006 Vitoria, Spain
*
†E-mail: marian.mdepancorbo@ehu.eus
Get access

Abstract

Salers are a native French breed used for beef and dairy production that has expanded to all the continents. The Salers breed was introduced to the north of Spain in 1985 with only 15 individuals from France and has successfully increased to over 20 000 animals. Although over time new animals have been imported from France for breeding, it is possible that the limiting number of founder animals could have resulted in a reduction of the genetic diversity found in Spanish Salers. Thus, the purpose of the present study has been to characterize the genetic diversity of Salers breed in Spain and evaluate a possible founder effect due to reduced number of the first reproducers. A total of 403 individuals from 12 Salers herds were analyzed using 12 microsatellite markers and compared with phylogenetically and geographically close related Blonde d’Aquitaine, Limousin and Charolais French breeds but also other 16 European breeds. Microsatellites in Salers were polymorphic, with a mean allelic richness of 5.129 and an expected heterozygosity of 0.621 across loci (0.576 to 0.736 among all breeds). Average observed heterozygosity was 0.618. All the loci fit the Hardy–Weinberg (HW) equilibrium except TGLA227 locus due to a significant deficit of heterozygotes in only one of the herds, probably attributable to a sampling effect. When all loci were combined, Salers inbreeding coefficient did not differ statistically from 0 (FIS=0.005), indicating not significant excess or deficit of heterozygotes (P=0.309). Based in allelic distribution, Salers revealed a frequency of 0.488 in BM2113-131 and 0.064 in BM2113-143 diagnostic alleles, which are specific to the African zebu. These zebu alleles are also found in some French breeds, supported by STR data previously postulated hypothesis of a migration route through Mediterranean route by which North African cattle may have left a genetic signature in southern Europe. Phylogenetic tree and population structure analyses could unambiguously differentiate Salers cattle from the other populations and 10% of the total genetic variability could be attributed to differences among breeds (mean RST=0.105; P<0.01). Mutation-drift equilibrium tests (sign test and Wilcoxon’s sign rank test) were in correspondence to the absence of founder effect when Bonferroni was applied. Gene diversity previously reported in French Salers was comparable with the observed in our population. Thus, high genetic diversity in Spanish Salers highlights the resources of this population, which looks toward future breeding and selection programs.

Keywords

admixturefounder effectgenetic structuremicrosatellitesubdivided populations
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 24 - 32
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Achilli, A, Bonfiglio, S, Olivieri, A, Malusa, A, Pala, M, Hooshiar Kashani, B, Perego, UA, Ajmone-Marsan, P, Liotta, L, Semino, O, Bandelt, HJ, Ferretti, L and Torroni, A 2009. The multifaceted origin of taurine cattle reflected by the mitochondrial genome. PLoS One 4, e5753.Google Scholar
Amigues, Y, Boitard, S, Bertrand, C, Sancristobal, M and Rocha, D 2011. Genetic characterization of the Blonde d’Aquitaine cattle breed using microsatellite markers and relationship with three other French cattle populations. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 128, 201–208.Google Scholar
Beja-Pereira, A, Alexandrino, P, Bessa, I, Carretero, Y, Dunner, S, Ferrand, N, Jordana, J, Laloe, D, Moazami-Goudarzi, K, Sanchez, A and Canon, J 2003. Genetic characterization of southwestern European bovine breeds: a historical and biogeographical reassessment with a set of 16 microsatellites. Journal of Heredity 94, 243–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beja-Pereira, A, Caramelli, D, Lalueza-Fox, C, Vernesi, C, Ferrand, N, Casoli, A, Goyache, F, Royo, LJ, Conti, S, Lari, M, Martini, A, Ouragh, L, Magid, A, Atash, A, Zsolnai, A, Boscato, P, Triantaphylidis, C, Ploumi, K, Sineo, L, Mallegni, F, Taberlet, P, Erhardt, G, Sampietro, L, Bertranpetit, J, Barbujani, G, Luikart, G and Bertorelle, G 2006. The origin of European cattle: evidence from modern and ancient DNA. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 8113–8118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belkhir, K, Borsa, P, Chikhi, L, Raufaste, N and Bonhomme, F 2004. GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions, CNRS UMR 5171, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier (France).Google Scholar
Blott, SC, Williams, JL and Haley, CS 1998. Genetic relationships among European cattle breeds. Animal Genetics 29, 273–282.Google Scholar
Böhme, M, Schneeweiss, N, Fritz, U, Schlegel, M and Berendok, T 2007. Small edge populations at risk: genetic diversity of the green lizard (Lacerta viridis viridis) in Germany and implications for conservation management. Conservation Genetics 8, 555–563.Google Scholar
Canon, J, Alexandrino, P, Bessa, I, Carleos, C, Carretero, Y, Dunner, S, Ferran, N, Garcia, D, Jordana, J, Laloe, D, Pereira, A, Sanchez, A and Moazami-Goudarzi, K 2001. Genetic diversity measures of local European beef cattle breeds for conservation purposes. Genetics Selection Evolution 33, 311–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cornuet, JM and Luikart, G 1996. Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144, 2001–2014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cymbron, T, Freeman, AR, Isabel Malheiro, M, Vigne, JD and Bradley, DG 2005. Microsatellite diversity suggests different histories for Mediterranean and Northern European cattle populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 272, 1837–1843.Google Scholar
Cymbron, T, Loftus, RT, Malheiro, MI and Bradley, DG 1999. Mitochondrial sequence variation suggests an African influence in Portuguese cattle. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 266, 597–603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dalvit, C, De Marchi, M, Dal Zotto, R, Zanetti, E, Meuwissen, T and Cassandro, M 2008. Genetic characterization of the Burlina cattle breed using microsatellites markers. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 125, 137–144.Google Scholar
Di Rienzo, A, Peterson, AC, Garza, JC, Valdes, AM, Slatkin, M and Freimer, NB 1994. Mutational processes of simple-sequence repeat loci in human populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 91, 3166–3170.Google Scholar
Earl, D and VonHoldt, B 2012. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetics Resources 4, 359–361.Google Scholar
Evanno, G, Regnaut, S and Goudet, J 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Molecular Ecology 14, 2611–2620.Google Scholar
Excoffier, L and Lischer, HE 2010. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under linux and windows. Molecular Ecology Resources 10, 564–567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gamarra, G, López-Oceja, A, Jiménez-Moreno, S and de Pancorbo, M 2015. Forensic efficacy of twelve STRs in Spanish cattle. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 5, e253–e255.Google Scholar
Gautier, M, Laloe, D and Moazami-Goudarzi, K 2010. Insights into the genetic history of French cattle from dense SNP data on 47 worldwide breeds. PLoS One 5, e13038. Google Scholar
Ginja, C, Telo da Gama, L and Penedo, MC 2009. Y chromosome haplotype analysis in Portuguese cattle breeds using SNPs and STRs. Journal of Heredity 100, 148–157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goudet, J 1995. FSTAT (vers. 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. Journal of Heredity 86, 485–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosclaude, F, Aupetit, R, Lefebvre, J and Meriaux, J 1990. Essai d’analyse des relations génétiques entre les races bovines françaises à l’aide du polymorphisme biochimique. Genetics Selection Evolution 22, 317–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, SW and Thompson, EA 1992. Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometrics 48, 361–372.Google Scholar
Heath Agnew, E 1983. A history of Hereford cattle and their breeders. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
Kalinowski, S, Taper, M and Marshall, T 2007. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology 16, 1099–1106.Google Scholar
Kalinowski, ST 2009. How well do evolutionary trees describe genetic relationships among populations? Heredity 102, 506–513.Google Scholar
Lopez-Oceja, A, Muro-Verde, A, Gamarra, D, Cardoso, S and de Pancorbo, MM 2015. New Q lineage found in bovine (Bos taurus) of Iberian Peninsula. Mitochondrial DNA 11, 1–5.Google Scholar
Luikart, G, Sherwin, WB, Steele, BM and Allendorf, FW 1998. Usefulness of molecular markers for detecting population bottlenecks via monitoring genetic change. Molecular Ecology 7, 963–974.Google Scholar
MacHugh, D 1996. Molecular biogeography and genetic structure of domesticated cattle. PhD thesis, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
MacNeil, MD, Cronin, MA, Blackburn, HD, Richards, CM, Lockwood, DR and Alexander, LJ 2007. Genetic relationships between feral cattle from Chirikof Island, Alaska and other breeds. Animal Genetics 38, 193–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maudet, C, Luikart, G and Taberlet, P 2002. Genetic diversity and assignment tests among seven French cattle breeds based on microsatellite DNA analysis. Journal of Animal Sciences 80, 942–950.Google Scholar
Moazami-Goudarzi, K, Laloe, D, Furet, JP and Grosclaude, F 1997. Analysis of genetic relationships between 10 cattle breeds with 17 microsatellites. Animal Genetics 28, 338–345.Google Scholar
Petit, M and Liénard, G 1988. Performance characteristics and efficiencies of various types of beef cows in French production systems. In 3rd World Congress on Sheep and Beef Cattle Breeding, Paris, pp. 25–51.Google Scholar
Piry, S, Luikart, G and Cornuet, J 1999. BOTTLENECK: a program for detecting recent effective population size reductions from allele frequency data. Journal of Heredity 90, 502–503.Google Scholar
Pritchard, JK, Stephens, M and Donnelly, P 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945–959.Google Scholar
Putnova, L, Vrtkova, I, Srubarova, P and Stehlik, L 2011. Utilization of a 17 microsatellites set for Bovine traceability in Czech cattle populations. Iranian Journal of Applied Animal Science 1, 31–37.Google Scholar
Raymond, M and Rousset, F 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86, 248–249.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, N 2004. Distruct: a program for the graphical display of population structure. Molecular Ecology Notes 4, 137–138.Google Scholar
Rousset, F 1996. Equilibrium values of measures of population subdivision for stepwise mutation processes. Genetics 142, 1357–1362.Google Scholar
Sanz, A, Martin-Burriel, I, Cons, C, Reta, M, Poblador, A, Rodellar, C and Zaragoza, P 2014. Genetic diversity, structure and individual assignment of Casta Navarra cattle: a well-differentiated fighting bull population. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 131, 11–18.Google Scholar
Salers Evolution Group Association 1992. La race salers, historique/origine. Retrieved January 10, 2016, from http://www.salers.org/fr/la-race-salers/historique-origine.Google Scholar
Tsuchihashi, Z and Dracopoli, N 2002. Progress in high-throughput SNP genotyping methods. Journal of Pharmacogenomics 2, 103–110.Google Scholar
Van de Goor, LH, Koskinen, MT and van Haeringen, WA 2011. Population studies of 16 bovine STR loci for forensic purposes. Internacional Journal of Legal Medicine 125, 111–119.Google Scholar
Vigouroux, Y, Glaubitz, JC, Matsuoka, Y, Goodman, MM, Sanchez, GJ and Doebley, J 2008. Population structure and genetic diversity of New World maize races assessed by DNA microsatellites. American Journal of Botany 95, 1240–1253.Google Scholar
Weir, B and Cockerham, C 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38, 1358–1370.Google Scholar
Wiener, P, Burton, D and Williams, JL 2004. Breed relationships and definition in British cattle: a genetic analysis. Heredity (Edinburgh) 93, 597–602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zilhao, J 1993. The spread of agro-pastoral economies across Mediterranean Europe: a view from the far west. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 6, 5–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Gamarra supplementary material

Tables S1-S4 and Figures S1-S2

Download Gamarra supplementary material(File)
File 90.6 KB