Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T12:05:06.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Immunocastration reduces aggressive and sexual behaviour in male pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2010

L. Rydhmer ,
K. Lundström  and
K. Andersson
L. Rydhmer
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7023, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
K. Lundström
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7051, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
K. Andersson*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7024, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden
*
†E-mail: Kristina.Andersson@huv.slu.se
Get access

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) vaccine, Improvac™ (Pfizer Ltd), in suppressing aggressive and sexual behaviour of male pigs. One hundred and thirty-six pigs were assigned to three treatments: entire male pigs (n = 64), immunocastration against GnRH (n = 48) and surgical castration (n = 24). Surgical castration was performed before the age of 1 week. Vaccination comprised two injections: the first injection was given 8 to 11 weeks before slaughter and the second injection 4 weeks before slaughter. After the second injection, immunocastrated pigs showed less non-violent social and aggressive behaviours than entire male pigs of the same age. Mounting was reduced to the same low level as observed in surgically castrated pigs, and more immunocastrated pigs were without skin lesions compared with entire male pigs. Pigs that received the second injection only 1 week before the observation day did not differ significantly in behaviour from those that received the injection 3 weeks before the observation day. Thus, the behaviour seems to change soon after the second injection and these changes remain until slaughter.

Keywords

entire male pigscastrationimmunocastrationbehaviour
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 4 , Issue 6 , June 2010 , pp. 965 - 972
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersson, K, Schaub, A, Andersson, K, Lundström, K, Thomke, S, Hansson, I 1997. The effects of feeding system, lysine level and gilt contact on performance, skatole levels and economy of entire male pigs. Livestock Production Science 51, 131–140.Google Scholar
Andersson, HK, Andersson, K, Zamaratskaia, G, Rydhmer, L, Chen, G, Lundström, K 2005. Effect of single-sex or mixed rearing and live weight on performance, technological meat quality and sexual maturity in entire male and female pigs fed raw potato starch. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science 55, 80–90.Google Scholar
Babol, J, Squires, EJ 1995. Quality of meat from entire male pigs. Food Research International 28, 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonavera, JJ, Dube, MG, Kalra, PS, Kalra, SP 1994. Anorectic effects of oestrogen may be mediated by decreased neuropeptide-Y release in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus. Endocrinology 134, 2367–2370.Google Scholar
Bonneau, M 1998. Use of entire males for pig meat in the European Union. Meat Science 49, 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonneau, M, Dufour, R, Chouvet, C, Roulet, C, Meadus, W, Squires, EJ 1994. The effects of immunization against luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone on performance, sexual development, and levels of boar taint-related compounds in intact male pigs. Journal of Animal Science 72, 14–20.Google Scholar
Cronin, GM, Dunshea, FR, Butler, KL, McCauly, I, Barnett, JL, Hemsworth, PH 2003. The effects of immuno- and surgical castration on the behaviour and consequently growth of group-housed, male finisher pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81, 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunshea, FR, Colantoni, C, Howard, K, McCauley, I, Jackson, P, Long, KA, Lopaticki, S, Nugent, EA, Simons, JA, Walker, J, Hennessy, DP 2001. Vaccination of boars with a GnRH vaccine (Improvac) eliminates boar taint and increases growth performance. Journal of Animal Science 79, 2524–2535.Google Scholar
Einarsson, S, Andersson, HK, Wallgren, M, Lundström, K, Rodriguez-Martinez, H 2009. Short- and long-term effects of immunization against gonadotropin-releasing hormone, using Improvac (TM), on sexual maturity, reproductive organs and sperm morphology in male pigs. Theriogenology 71, 302–310.Google Scholar
Fredriksen, B, Hexeberg, C 2009. The effect of removing animals for slaughter on the behaviour of the remaining male and female pigs in the pen. Research in Veterinary Science 86, 368–370.Google Scholar
Fredriksen, B, Lium, BM, Marka, CH, Mosveen, B, Nafstad, O 2008. Entire male pigs in farrow-to-finish pens – effects on animal welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 110, 258–268.Google Scholar
FVE 2009. Federation of veterinarians of Europe position paper on pig castration. Retrieved 22 December 2009, from www.fve.org.Google Scholar
Godfrey, SI, Walkden-Brown, SW, Martin, GB, Speijers, EJ 1996. Immunization of goat bucks against GnRH to prevent seasonal reproductive and agonistic behaviour. Animal Reproduction Science 44, 41–54.Google Scholar
Hemsworth, PH, Tilbrook, AJ 2007. Sexual behaviour of male pigs. Hormones and Behavior 52, 39–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horn, T, Marx, G, von Borell, E 1999. Behaviour of piglets during castration with and without a local anaesthesia. Deutsche tierärztliche Wochenschrift 106, 271–274.Google Scholar
Huxsoll, CC, Price, EO, Adams, TE 1998. Testis function, carcass traits, and aggressive behaviour of beef bulls actively immunized against gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Journal of Animal Science 76, 1760–1766.Google Scholar
Jago, JG, Cox, NR, Bass, JJ, Matthews, LR 1997. The effect of prepubertal immunization against gonadotropin-releasing hormone on the development of sexual and social behaviour of bulls. Journal of Animal Science 75, 2609–2619.Google Scholar
Janett, F, Stump, R, Burger, D, Thun, R 2009. Suppression of testicular function and sexual behaviour by vaccination against GnRH (Equity™) in the adult stallion. Animal Reproduction Science 115, 88–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jaros, P, Bürgi, E, Stärk, KDC, Claus, R, Hennesey, D, Thun, R 2005. Effect of active immunization against GnRH on androstenone concentration, growth performance and carcass quality in intact male pigs. Livestock Production Science 92, 31–38.Google Scholar
Leidig, MS, Hertrampf, B, Failing, K, Schumann, A, Reiner, G 2009. Pain and discomfort in male piglets during surgical castration with and without local anaesthesia as determined by vocalization and defence behaviour. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 116, 174–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moya, SL, Boyle, LA, Lynch, PB, Arkins, S 2008. Surgical castration of pigs affects the behavioural response to a low-dose lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge after weaning. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 112, 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, RLS 1968. 5α-androst-16-ene-3-one, compound responsible for taint in boar fat. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 19, 31–38.Google Scholar
Price, EO, Adams, TE, Huxsoll, CC, Borgwardt, RE 2003. Aggressive behaviour is reduced in bulls actively immunized against gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Journal of Animal Science 81, 411–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prunier, A, Bonneau, M, von Borell, EH, Cinotti, S, Gunn, M, Fredriksen, B, Giersing, M, Morton, DB, Tuyttens, FAM, Velarde, A 2006. A review of the welfare consequences of surgical castration in piglets and the evaluation of non-surgical methods. Animal Welfare 15, 277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prunier, A, Mounier, AM, Hay, M 2005. Effects of castration, tooth resection, or tail docking on plasma metabolites and stress hormones in young pigs. Journal of Animal Science 83, 216–222.Google Scholar
Rydhmer, L, Zamaratskaia, G, Andersson, HK, Algers, B, Guillemet, R, Lundström, K 2006. Aggressive and sexual behaviour of pigs raised without castration. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science 56, 109–119.Google Scholar
Signoret, JP 1976. Influence of anabolic agents on behaviour. Environmental Quality and Safety 5(Suppl.), 143–150.Google Scholar
Turner, SP, Farnworth, MJ, White, IMS, Brotherstone, S, Mendl, M, Knap, P, Penny, P, Lawrence, AB 2006. The accumulation of skin lesions and their use us a predictor of individual aggressiveness in pigs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 96, 245–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuyttens, FAM 2002. Effects of castration on the welfare and social behaviour of pigs: a review. In Proceedings of the 36th International Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, 6–10 August 2002, p. 41. Egmond-aan-Zee, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Velarde, A, Gispert, M, Oliver, MA, Soler, J, Tibau, J, Fàbrega, E 2007. The effect of immunocastration on the behaviour of pigs. In Proceedings of the 41st International Congres of the the International Society for Applied Ethology, 8–12 August 2007, p. 117. Merida, Mexico.Google Scholar
Vold, E 1970. Fleishproduktionseigenschaften bei Ebern und Kastraten. IV. Organoleptische und gaschromatografische Untersuchungen wasserdampfflüchtiger Stoffe des Rückenspeckes von Ebern. Meldinger fra Norges Landbrukshøgskole 49, 1–25.Google Scholar
Zamaratskaia, G, Andersson, HK, Chen, G, Andersson, K, Madej, A, Lundström, K 2008a. Effect of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone vaccine (Improvac™) on steroid hormones, boar taint compounds and performance in entire male pigs. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 43, 351–359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zamaratskaia, G, Rydhmer, L, Andersson, HK, Chen, G, Lowagie, S, Andersson, K, Lundström, K 2008b. Long-term effect of vaccination against gonadotropin-releasing hormone vaccine, using Improvac™, on hormonal profile and behaviour of male pigs. Animal Reproduction Science 108, 37–48.Google Scholar