Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:27:09.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of source and micronization of soya bean meal on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and ileal mucosal morphology of Iberian piglets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2014

J. D. Berrocoso ,
L. Cámara ,
P. G. Rebollar ,
P. Guzmán  and
G. G. Mateos
J. D. Berrocoso
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain
L. Cámara
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain
P. G. Rebollar
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain
P. Guzmán
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain
G. G. Mateos*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Producción Animal, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040, Madrid, Spain
*
† E-mail: gonzalo.gmateos@upm.es
Get access

Abstract

The effects of inclusion in the diet of different sources of soya bean meal (SBM) on growth performance, total tract apparent digestibility (TTAD) and apparent ileal digestibility (AID) of major dietary components and mucosal ileum morphology were studied in Iberian pigs weaned at 30 days of age. From 30 to 51 days of age (phase I), there was a control diet based on regular soya bean meal (R-SBM; 44% CP) of Argentina (ARG) origin and five extra diets in which a high-protein soya bean meal (HP-SBM; 49% CP) of the USA or ARG origin, either ground (990 μm) or micronized (60 μm), or a soya protein concentrate (SPC; 65% CP) substituted the R-SBM. From 51 to 61 days of age (phase II), all pigs were fed a common commercial diet in mash form. The following pre-planned orthogonal contrasts were conducted: (1) R-SBM v. all the other diets, (2) SPC v. all the HP-SBM diets, (3) micronized HP-SBM v. ground HP-SBM, (4) HP-SBM of ARG origin v. HP-SBM of US origin and (5) interaction between source and the degree of grinding of the HP-SBM. Dietary treatment did not affect growth performance of the pigs at any age but from 30 to 51 days of age, post weaning diarrhoea (PWD) was higher (P<0.001) and the TTAD and AID of all nutrients were lower for pigs fed the R-SBM diet than for pigs fed the HP-SBM or the SPC diets. However, no differences between the HP-SBM and the SPC containing diets were detected for any trait. The TTAD of organic matter (P=0.07) and gross energy (GE) (P=0.05) tended to be higher for the micronized HP-SBM than for the ground HP-SBM and that of GE was higher (P<0.05) for US meal than for the ARG meal. Pigs fed R-SBM had lower villus height (P<0.01) than pigs fed HP-SBM or SPC but no differences in ileal mucosal morphology were detected between SPC and HP-SBM containing diets. It is concluded that feeding the HP-SBM or SPC-reduced PWD and improved nutrient digestibility and ileal morphology as compared with feeding the R-SBM, but had no effect on pig performance. The inclusion in the diet of added value soya products (micronized SBM or SPC) in substitution of the R-SBM increased the TTAD of all nutrients and reduced PWD but had no advantage in terms of growth performance over the use of ground HP-SBM.

Keywords

high-protein soya bean mealpig performanceileal digestibilityparticle sizesoya protein concentrate
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , April 2014 , pp. 555 - 564
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Society of Agricultural Engineers 1995. Method of determining and expressing fineness of feed materials by sieving. In Agricultural Engineers year book of standards. ASAE Standard S319.2, pp. 461–462. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St Joseph, MO, USA.Google Scholar
Baker, KM and Stein, HH 2009. Amino acid digestibility and concentration of digestible and metabolizable energy in soybean meal produced from conventional, high-protein, or low-oligosaccharide varieties of soybeans and fed to growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 87, 2282–2290.Google Scholar
Barea, R, Nieto, R, Vitari, F, Domeneghini, C and Aguilera, JF 2011. Effects of pig genotype (Iberian vs. Landrace×Large White) on nutrient digestibility, relative organ weight and small intestine structure at two stages of growth. Animal 5, 547–557.Google Scholar
Berrocoso, JD, Serrano, MP, Cámara, L, López, A and Mateos, GG 2013a. Influence of source and micronization of soybean meal on nutrient digestibility and growth performance of weanling pigs. Journal of Animal Science 91, 309–317.Google Scholar
Berrocoso, JD, Saldaña, B, Serrano, MP, Cámara, L, Ibáñez, MA and Mateos, GG 2013b. Influence of crude protein content, ingredient complexity, feed form, and duration of feeding of the phase I diets on productive performance and nutrient digestibility of Iberian pigs. Journal of Animal Science 91, 1237–1246.Google Scholar
Bird, AR, Croom, WJ, Fan, YK, Daniel, L, Black, BL, McBride, BW, Eisen, EJ, Bull, LS and Taylor, IL 1994. Jejunal glucose absorption is enhanced by epidermal growth factor in mice. Journal of Nutrition 124, 231–240.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boletín Oficial del Estado 2007. Ley 32/2007 de 7 de Noviembre para el cuidado de los animales, en su explotación, transporte, experimentación y sacrificio. BOE 268, 45914–45920.Google Scholar
Brunsgaard, G 1998. Effects of cereal type and feed particle size on morphological characteristics, epithelial cell proliferation, and lectin binding patterns in the large intestine of pigs. Journal of Animal Science 76, 2787–2798.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Coca-Sinova, A, Valencia, DG, Jiménez-Moreno, E, González-Alvarado, JM, Lázaro, R and Mateos, GG 2008. Apparent ileal digestibility of nitrogen, amino acids, and energy of soybean meals from different origins in broilers. Poultry Science 87, 2613–2623.Google Scholar
De Coca-Sinova, A, Jiménez-Moreno, E, González-Alvarado, JM, Frikha, M, Lázaro, R and Mateos, GG 2010. Influence of source of soybean meal and lysine content of the diet on performance and total tract apparent retention of nutrients in broilers from 1 to 36 days of age. Poultry Science 89, 1440–1450.Google Scholar
Dilger, RN, Sands, JS, Ragland, D and Adeola, O 2004. Digestibility of nitrogen and amino acids in soybean meal with added soyhulls. Journal of Animal Science 82, 715–724.Google Scholar
Dunsford, BR, Knabe, DA and Haensly, WE 1989. Effect of dietary soybean meal on the microscopic anatomy of the small intestine in the early-weaned pig. Journal of Animal Science 67, 1855–1863.Google Scholar
Fastinger, ND and Mahan, DC 2003. Effect of soybean meal particle size on amino acid and energy digestibility in grower-finisher swine. Journal of Animal Science 81, 697–704.Google Scholar
Frikha, M, Serrano, MP, Valencia, DG, Rebollar, PG, Fickler, J and Mateos, GG 2012. Correlation between ileal digestibility of amino acids and chemical composition of soybean meals in broilers at 21 days of age. Animal Feed Science and Technology 178, 103–114.Google Scholar
Fundación Española Desarrollo Nutrición Animal 2006. Necesidades Nutricionales para Ganado Porcino. FEDNA, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Fundación Española Desarrollo Nutrición Animal 2010. Normas FEDNA para la Formulación de Piensos Compuestos. FEDNA, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
Goodband, RD, Tokach, MD and Nelssen, JL 1995. The effects of diet particle size on animal performance. MF-2050. Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA.Google Scholar
Hedemann, MS, Mikkelsen, ML, Naughton, PJ and Jensen, BB 2005. Effect of feed particle size and feed processing on morphological characteristics in the small and large intestine of pigs and on adhesion of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT12 in the ileum in vitro. Journal of Animal Science 83, 1554–1562.Google Scholar
Lallés, JP, Tukur, HM, Toullec, R and Miller, BG 1996. Analytical criteria for predicting apparent digestibility of soybean protein in preruminant calves. Journal of Dairy Science 79, 475–482.Google Scholar
Lawrence, KR, Hastad, CW, Goodband, RD, Tokach, MD, Dritz, SS, Nelssen, JL, DeRouchey, JM and Webster, MJ 2003. Effects of soybean meal particle size on growth performance of nursery pigs. Journal of Animal Science 81, 2118–2122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenehan, NA, De Rouchey, JM, Goodband, RD, Tokach, MD, Dritz, SS, Nelssen, JL, Groesbeck, CN and Lawrence, KR 2007. Evaluation of soy protein concentrate in nursery pig diets. Journal of Animal Science 85, 3013–3021.Google Scholar
Li, DF, Nelssen, JL, Reddy, PG, Blecha, F, Hancock, JD, Allee, GL, Goodband, RD and Klemm, D 1990. Transient hypersensitivity to soybean meal in the early-weaned pig. Journal of Animal Science 68, 1790–1799.Google Scholar
Mateos, GG, Jiménez-Moreno, E, Serrano, MP and Lázaro, RP 2012. Poultry response to high levels of dietary fiber sources varying in physical and chemical characteristics. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 21, 156–174.Google Scholar
Mateos, GG, Martin, F, Latorre, MA, Vicente, B and Lazaro, RP 2006. Inclusion of oat hulls in diets for young pigs based on cooked maize or cooked rice. Animal Science 82, 57–63.Google Scholar
Medel, P, Salado, S, De Blas, JC and Mateos, GG 1999. Processed cereals in diets for early-weaned piglets. Animal Feed Science and Technology 82, 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikkelsen, LL, Naughton, PJ, Hedemann, MS and Jensen, BB 2004. Effects of physical properties of feed on microbial ecology and survival of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium in the pig gastrointestinal tract. Applied Environmental Microbiology 70, 3485–3492.Google Scholar
Miller, BG, Bailey, M, Telemo, E and Stokes, CR 1994. Hypersensitivity to soybean protein in early weaned pigs. In Proceedings toxic factors in crop plants, spring conference (ed. JPF D’Mello and CM Duffus), pp. 86–94. Scottish Agricultural College, Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
Nabuurs, MJ, Hoogendoorn, A, Van der Molen, EJ and Van Osta, AL 1993. Villus height and crypt depth in weaned and unweaned pigs, reared under various circumstances in the Netherlands. Research in Veterinary Science 55, 78–84.Google Scholar
Pluske, JR, Williams, IH and Aherne, FX 1996. Villous height and crypt depth in piglets in response to increases in the intake of cow’s milk after weaning. Animal Science 62, 145–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebollar, PG, De Blas, C, Lázaro, R, Saldaña, B and Mateos, GG 2013. Nutritive value and protein quality of soybean meals according to origin and crop year. Poultry Science 92 (suppl. 1), 58741 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Sohn, KS, Maxwell, CV, Buchanan, DS and Southern, LL 1994. Improved soybean protein sources for weanling pigs: I. Effects on performance and total tract amino acid digestibility. Journal of Animal Science 72, 622–630.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute 1990. SAS User’s Guide. Statistics Version 6, 4th ed. Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Valencia, DG, Serrano, MP, Centeno, C, Lázaro, R and Mateos, GG 2008a. Pea protein as a substitute of soya bean protein in diets for young pigs: effects on productivity and digestive traits. Livestock Science 118, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valencia, DG, Serrano, MP, Lázaro, R, Latorre, MA and Mateos, GG 2008b. Influence of micronization (fine grinding) of soya bean meal and fullfat soya bean on productive performance and digestive traits in young pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 147, 340–356.Google Scholar
Vente-Spreeuwenberg, MAM, Verdonk, JMAJ, Koninkx, JFJG, Beynen, AC and Verstegen, MWA 2004. Dietary protein hydrolysates versus the intact proteins do not enhance mucosal integrity and growth performance in weaned piglets. Livestock Production Science 85, 151–164.Google Scholar
Wondra, KJ, Hancock, JD, Behnke, KC, Hines, RH and Stark, CR 1995. Effects of particle size and pelleting on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, and stomach morphology in finishing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 73, 757–763.Google Scholar
Yang, YX, Kim, YG, Lohakare, JD, Yun, JH, Lee, JK, Kwon, MS, Park, JI, Choi, JY and Chae, BJ 2007. Comparative efficacy of different soy protein sources on growth performance, nutrient digestibility and intestinal morphology in weaned pigs. Asian – Australasian Journal of Animal Science 20, 775–783.Google Scholar
Zarkadas, LN and Wiseman, J 2005. Influence of processing of full fat soya beans included in diets for piglets. 2: Digestibility and intestinal morphology. Animal Feed Science Technology 118, 120–137.Google Scholar