Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T10:39:25.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lameness detection via leg-mounted accelerometers on dairy cows on four commercial farms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 June 2015

V. M. Thorup ,
L. Munksgaard ,
P.-E. Robert ,
H. W. Erhard ,
P. T. Thomsen  and
N. C. Friggens
V. M. Thorup*
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR 791 Systemic Modelling of Ruminant Nutrition, 16 rue Claude Bernard, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France AgroParisTech, UMR 791 Systemic Modelling of Ruminant Nutrition, 16 rue Claude Bernard, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France
L. Munksgaard
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Department of Animal Science, Blichers Allé 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
P.-E. Robert
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR 791 Systemic Modelling of Ruminant Nutrition, 16 rue Claude Bernard, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France AgroParisTech, UMR 791 Systemic Modelling of Ruminant Nutrition, 16 rue Claude Bernard, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France
H. W. Erhard
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR 791 Systemic Modelling of Ruminant Nutrition, 16 rue Claude Bernard, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France AgroParisTech, UMR 791 Systemic Modelling of Ruminant Nutrition, 16 rue Claude Bernard, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France
P. T. Thomsen
Affiliation:
Aarhus University, Department of Animal Science, Blichers Allé 20, 8830 Tjele, Denmark
N. C. Friggens
Affiliation:
INRA, UMR 791 Systemic Modelling of Ruminant Nutrition, 16 rue Claude Bernard, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France AgroParisTech, UMR 791 Systemic Modelling of Ruminant Nutrition, 16 rue Claude Bernard, 75231 Paris cedex 05, France
*
†E-mail: vivi.thorup@agroparistech.fr
Get access

Abstract

Lameness in dairy herds is traditionally detected by visual inspection, which is time-consuming and subjective. Compared with healthy cows, lame cows often spend longer time lying down, walk less and change behaviour around feeding time. Accelerometers measuring cow leg activity may assist farmers in detecting lame cows. On four commercial farms, accelerometer data were derived from hind leg-mounted accelerometers on 348 Holstein cows, 53 of them during two lactations. The cows were milked twice daily and had no access to pasture. During a lactation, locomotion score (LS) was assessed on average 2.4 times (s.d. 1.3). Based on daily lying duration, standing duration, walking duration, total number of steps, step frequency, motion index (MI, i.e. total acceleration) for lying, standing and walking, eight accelerometer means and their corresponding coefficient of variation (CV) were calculated for each week immediately before an LS. A principal component analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between the variables. The effects of LS and farm on the principal components (PC) and on the variables were analysed in a mixed model. The first four PC accounted for 27%, 18%, 12% and 10% of the total variation, respectively. PC1 corresponded to Activity variability due to heavy loading by five CV variables related to standing and walking. PC2 corresponded to Activity level due to heavy loading by MI walking, MI standing and walking duration. PC3 corresponded to Recumbency due to heavy loading by four variables related to lying. PC4 corresponded mainly to Stepping due to heavy loading by step frequency. Activity variability at LS4 was significantly higher than at the lower LS levels. Activity level was significantly higher at LS1 than at LS2, which was significantly higher than at LS4. Recumbency was unaffected by LS. Stepping at LS1 and LS2 was significantly higher than at LS3 and LS4. Activity level was significantly lower on farm 3 compared with farms 1 and 2. Stepping was significantly lower on farms 1 and 3 compared with farms 2 and 4. MI standing indicated increased restlessness while standing when cows increased from LS3 to LS4. Lying duration was only increased in lame cows. In conclusion, Activity level differed already between LS1 and LS2, thus detecting early signs of lameness, particularly through contributions from walking duration and MI walking. Lameness detection models including walking duration, MI walking and MI standing seem worthy of further investigation.

Keywords

accelerometerdairy cowhealth monitoringlameness detectionprincipal component analysis
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 9 , Issue 10 , October 2015 , pp. 1704 - 1712
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almeida, PE, Weber, PSD, Burton, JL and Zanella, AJ 2008. Depressed DHEA and increased sickness response behaviors in lame dairy cows with inflammatory foot lesions. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 34, 89–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alsaaod, M, Römer, C, Kleinmanns, J, Hendriksen, K, Rose-Meierhöfer, S, Plümer, L and Büscher, W 2012. Electronic detection of lameness in dairy cows through measuring pedometric activity and lying behavior. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 142, 134–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, ZE, Leach, KA, Whay, HR, Bell, NJ and Main, DCJ 2010. Assessment of lameness prevalence and associated risk factors in dairy herds in England and Wales. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 932–941.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bicalho, RC, Vokey, F, Erb, HN and Guard, CL 2007. Visual locomotion scoring in the first seventy days in milk: impact on pregnancy and survival. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 4586–4591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackie, N, Bleach, E, Amory, J and Scaife, J 2011. Impact of lameness on gait characteristics and lying behaviour of zero grazed dairy cattle in early lactation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 129, 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruijnis, MRN, Beerda, B, Hogeveen, H and Stassen, EN 2012. Assessing the welfare impact of foot disorders in dairy cattle by a modeling approach. Animal 6, 962–970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brzozowska, A, Lukaszewicz, M, Sender, G, Kolasinska, D and Oprzadek, J 2014. Locomotor activities in dairy cows in relation to season and lactation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 156, 6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burow, E, Thomsen, PT, Rousing, T and Sørensen, JT 2014. Track way distance and cover as risk factors for lameness in Danish dairy cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 113, 625–628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapinal, N, de Passillé, AM, Rushen, J and Wagner, S 2010. Automated methods for detecting lameness and measuring analgesia in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 2007–2013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapinal, N, de Passillé, AM, Pastell, M, Hänninen, L, Munksgaard, L and Rushen, J 2011. Measurement of acceleration while walking as an automated method for gait assessment in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 94, 2895–2901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Mol, RM, André, G, Bleumer, EJB, van der Werf, JTN, de Haas, Y and van Reenen, CG 2013. Applicability of day-to-day variation in behavior for the automated detection of lameness in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 3703–3712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fogsgaard, KK, Bennedsgaard, TW and Herskin, MS 2014. Activity level and lying behavior of dairy cows during a 10 d period after naturally occurring clinical mastitis. In Proceedings of the First DairyCare Conference (ed. C Knight), p. 14. DairyCare COST Action FA1308, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
Gonzàlez, LA, Tolkamp, BJ, Coffey, MP, Ferret, A and Kyriazakis, I 2008. Changes in feeding behavior as possible indicators for the automatic monitoring of health disorders in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 1017–1028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gorzecka, J, Callesen, H, Pedersen, KM and Friggens, NC 2011. The relationship between postpartum vaginal discharge symptoms and progesterone profile characteristics in lactating dairy cows in Denmark. Theriogenology 75, 1016–1028.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyndman, R, Athanasopoulos, G, Razbash, S, Schmidt, D, Zhou, Z, Khan, Y and Bergmeir, C 2013. Forecast: Forecasting functions for time series and linear models. Retrieved March 15, 2014, from http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/forecast/index.html Google Scholar
Ito, K, von Keyserlingk, MAG, LeBlanc, SJ and Weary, DM 2010. Lying behavior as an indicator of lameness in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 93, 3553–3560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamphuis, C, Burke, JK and Jago, JG 2013. Cows becoming clinically lame differ in changes in behaviour and physiology compared to cows that do not become lame. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 73, 5–10.Google Scholar
Leach, KA, Whay, HR, Maggs, CM, Barker, ZE, Paul, ES, Bell, AK and Main, DCJ 2010. Working towards a reduction in cattle lameness: 1. Understanding barriers to lameness control on dairy farms. Research in Veterinary Science 89, 311–317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazrier, H, Tal, S, Aizinbud, E and Bargai, U 2006. A field investigation of the use of the pedometer for the early detection of lameness in cattle. Canadian Veterinary Journal 47, 883–886.Google ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, LR, Pedersen, AR, Herskin, MS and Munksgaard, L 2010. Quantifying walking and standing behaviour of dairy cows using a moving average based on output from an accelerometer. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 127, 12–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastell, M, Hautala, M, Poikalainen, V, Praks, J, Veermae, I, Kujala, M and Ahokas, J 2008. Automatic observation of cow leg health using load sensors. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 62, 48–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telezhenko, E and Bergsten, C 2005. Influence of floor type on the locomotion of dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 93, 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, PT 2009. Rapid screening method for lameness in dairy cows. Veterinary Record 164, 689–690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomsen, PT, Munksgaard, L and Tøgersen, FA 2008. Evaluation of a lameness scoring system for dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 119–126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomsen, PT, Munksgaard, L and Sørensen, JT 2012. Locomotion scores and lying behaviour are indicators of hoof lesions in dairy cows. The Veterinary Journal 193, 644–647.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomsen, PT, Kjeldsen, AM, Sørensen, JT and Houe, H 2004. Mortality (including euthanasia) among Danish dairy cows (1990–2001). Preventive Veterinary Medicine 62, 19–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Nuffel, A, Vangeyte, J, Mertens, KC, Pluym, L, De Campeneere, S, Saeys, W and Van Weyenberg, S 2013. Exploration of measurement variation of gait variables for early lameness detection in cattle using the GAITWISE. Livestock Science 156, 88–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Keyserlingk, MAG, Barrientos, A, Ito, K, Galo, E and Weary, DM 2012. Benchmarking cow comfort on North American freestall dairies: lameness, leg injuries, lying time, facility design, and management for high-producing Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 7399–7408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walker, SL, Smith, RF, Routly, JE, Jones, DN, Morris, MJ and Dobson, H 2008. Lameness, activity time-budgets, and estrus expression in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 4552–4559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yunta, C, Guasch, I and Bach, A 2012. Short communication: lying behaviour of lactating dairy cows is influenced by lameness especially around feeding time. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 6546–6549.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed