Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:10:35.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Management practices as risk factors for the presence of bulk milk antibodies to Salmonella, Neospora caninum and Leptospira interrogans serovar hardjo in Irish dairy herds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2014

E. O’ Doherty ,
D. P. Berry ,
L. O’ Grady  and
R. Sayers
E. O’ Doherty
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Animal & Grassland, Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland School of Veterinary Medicine, UCD Veterinary Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
D. P. Berry
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Animal & Grassland, Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
L. O’ Grady
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Medicine, UCD Veterinary Sciences Centre, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
R. Sayers
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Animal & Grassland, Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
Get access

Abstract

A survey of management practices in 309 Irish dairy herds was used to identify risk factors for the presence of antibodies to Salmonella, Neospora caninum and Leptospira interrogans serovar hardjo in extensively managed unvaccinated dairy herds. A previous study documented a herd-level seroprevalence in bulk milk of 49%, 19% and 86% for Salmonella, Neospora caninum and leptospira interrogans serovar hardjo, respectively in the unvaccinated proportion of these 309 herds in 2009. Association analyses in the present study were carried out using multiple logistic regression models. Herds where cattle were purchased or introduced had a greater likelihood of being positive to leptospira interrogans serovar hardjo (P<0.01) and Salmonella (P<0.01). Larger herds had a greater likelihood of recording a positive bulk milk antibody result to leptospira interrogans serovar hardjo (P<0.05). Herds that practiced year round calving were more likely to be positive to Neospora caninum (P<0.05) compared to herds with a spring-calving season, with no difference in risk between herds that practiced split calving compared to herds that practiced spring calving. No association was found between presence of dogs on farms and prevalence of Neospora caninum possibly due to limited access of dogs to infected materials including afterbirths. The information from this study will assist in the design of suitable control programmes for the diseases under investigation in pasture-based livestock systems.

Keywords

SalmonellaNeospora caninumLeptospira interrogans serovar hardjorisk factorsdairy herds
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 8 , Issue 6 , June 2014 , pp. 1010 - 1019
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartels, CJM, Wouda, W and Schukken, YH 1999. Risk factors for Neospora caninum associated abortion storms in dairy herds in the Netherlands (1995 to 1997). Theriogenology 52, 247–257.Google Scholar
Bennett, RM 1993. Decision support models of leptospirosis in dairy herds. Veterinary Record 132, 59–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Björkman, C, Alenius, S, Emanuelsson, U and Uggla, A 1996. Neospora species infection in a herd of dairy cattle. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 208, 1441–1444.Google Scholar
Carrique-Mas, JJ, Willmington, JA, Papadopoulou, C, Watson, EN and Davies, RH 2010. Salmonella infection in cattle in Great Britain, 2003 to 2008. Veterinary Record 167, 560–565.Google Scholar
Charlier, J, Claerebout, E, De Muelenaere, E and Vercruysse, J 2005. Associations between dairy herd management factors and bulk tank antibody levels against Ostertagia Osteragi . Veterinary Parsitology 133, 91–100.Google Scholar
Chi, J, VanLeeuwen, JA, Weersink, A and Keefe, GP 2002. Direct production losses and treatment costs of bovine viral diarrhoea virus, bovine leukosis virus, Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis and Neospora caninum . Preventive Veterinary Medicine 55, 137–153.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CSO (Central Statistics Office), 2008. Farm structure survey 2007. Retrieved July 10, 2011, from http://www.cso.ie/en/media/csoie/releasespublications/documents/agriculture/2007/farmstructure_2007.pdf Google Scholar
Dillon, P 2011. The Irish dairy industry – planning for 2020. In Proceedings of the Irish National Dairy Conference. The Irish Dairy Industry: To 2015 and Beyond, November 2011, Cork, Ireland, pp. 1–24. Retrieved January 29, 2013, from www.teagasc.ie/publications/viewpublication.apx? Google Scholar
Dillon, P, Crosse, S, Stakelum, G and Flynn, F 1995. The effect of calving date and stocking rate on the performance of spring-calving dairy cows. Grass and Forage Science 50, 286–299.Google Scholar
Drennan, MJ, Carson, AF and Crosse, S 2005. Utilisation of grazed grass in temperate animal systems. Proceedings of a Satellite Workshop of the XXth Internaltional Grassland Congress, July 2005, Cork, Ireland, pp. 19–35.Google Scholar
Dubey, JP, Schares, G and Ortega-More, LM 2007. Epidemiology and control of neosporosis and Neospora caninum . Clinical Microbiology Review 20, 323–367.Google Scholar
Evans, SJ and Davies, RH 1996. Case control study of multiple resistant Salmonella typhimurium DT104 infection of cattle in Great Britain. Veterinary Record 139, 557–558.Google Scholar
Frössling, J, Uggla, A and Björkman, C 2005. Prevalence and transmission of Neospora caninum within infected Swedish dairy herds. Veterinary Parasitology 128, 209–218.Google Scholar
George, D and Mallery, P 2008. SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 15.0 (update. Allyn and Bacon, incorporated).Google Scholar
Hayes, M, Ashe, S, Collins, DM, Power, S, Kenny, K, Sheahan, M, O’Hagan, G and More, SJ 2009. An evaluation of Irish cattle herds with inconclusive serological evidence of bovine brucellosis. Irish Veterinary Journal 62, 182–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Houe, H 1999. Epidemiological features and economic importance of bovine virus diarrhoea virus. Veterinary Microbiology 64, 89–107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leonard, N, Mee, JF, Snijders, S and Mackie, D 2004. Prevalence of antibodies to Leptospira interrogans serovar hardjo in bulk tank milk from unvaccinated Irish dairy herds. Irish Veterinary Journal 57, 226–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lesschen, JP, van der Berg, M, Westhoek, HJ, Witzke, HP and Oenema, O 2011. Greenhouse gas emission profiles of European livestock sectors. Animal Feed Science and Technology 166–167, 16–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levett, PN 2001. Leptospirosis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews 14, 296–326.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maunsell, F and Donovan, GA 2008. Biosecurity and risk management for dairy replacements. Veterinary Clinics of North America; Food Animal Practice 24, 155–190.Google Scholar
McElroy, S 2012. Bulk milk disease screening-A useful tool in assessing infectious status in Irish dairy herds. Veterinary Ireland Journal 2, 308–311.Google Scholar
Mee, JF, Geraghty, T, O’Neill, R and More, SJ 2012. Bioexclusion of diseases from dairy and beef farms: risks of introducing infectious agents and risk reduction. The Veterinary Journal 194, 1p.Google Scholar
Nöremark, M, Håkansson, N, Sternberg-Lewerin, S, Lindberg, A and Jonsson, A 2011. Network analysis of cattle and pig movements in Sweden: measures relevant for disease control and risk based surveillance. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 98, 78–90.Google Scholar
O’Doherty, E, Sayers, R and O’Grady, L 2013. Temporal trends in bulk milk antibodies to Salmonella, Neospora caninum, and Leptospira interrogans serovar hardjo in Irish dairy herds. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 109, 343–348.Google Scholar
Ould-Amrouche, A, Klein, F, Osdoit, C, Mohamed, HO, Touratier, A, Sanaa, M and Mialot, JP 1999. Estimation of Neospora caninum seroprevalence in dairy cattle from Normandy France. Veterinary Research 30, 531–538.Google Scholar
Patton, J 2012. The economics of recycled cows and extended lactations. Paper presented at the Teagasc National Liquid Milk Event 2012, Wexford, Ireland, 17 October 2012. Retrieved January 29, 2013, from http://www.teagasc.ie/publications/2012/1581/index.asp Google Scholar
Ryan, EG, Leonard, N, O’Grady, L, Doherty, ML and More, SJ 2012. Herd level risk factors associated with Leptospira hardjo seroprevalence in beef/suckler herds in the Republic of Ireland. Irish Veterinary Journal 65, 6. http://www.irishvetjournal.org/content/65/1/6 Google Scholar
Sayers, RG, Sayers, GP, Mee, JF, Bermingham, ML and Dillon, P 2013. Implementing biosecurity measures on dairy farms in Ireland. Veterinary Journal 197, 259–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schäres, G, Barwald, A, Staubach, C, Ziller, M, Klos, D, Schroder, R, Labohm, R, Drager, K, Fasen, W, Hess, RG and Conraths, FJ 2004. Potential risk factors for Neospora caninum infection in Germany are not under the control of farmers. Parasitology 129, 301–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaessen, MA, Veling, J, Frankena, K, Graat, EAM and Klunder, T 1998. Risk factors for salmonella dublin infection on dairy farms. Veterinary Quarterly 20, 97–99.Google Scholar
Van Schaik, G, Schukken, YH, Nielen, M, Dijkhuizen, AA, Barkema, HW and Benedictus, G 2002. Probability of and risk factors for introduction of infectious diseases into Dutch SPF dairy farms: a cohort study. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 54, 279–289.Google Scholar
Villarroel, A, Dargatz, DA, Lane, VM, McCluskey, BJ and Salman, BD 2007. Suggested outline of potential critical control points for biosecurity and biocontainment on large dairy farms. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 230, 808–919.Google Scholar
Visser, SC, Veling, J, Dijhuizen, AA and Huirne, RBM 1997. Economic losses due to Salmonella Dublin in dairy cattle. In Proceedings of the Dutch/Danish symposium on animal health and economics (ed. AR Kristensen), pp. 143–151. Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Department of Animal Science and Animal Health, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
Wedderkoop, A, Stroger, U and Lind, P 2001. Salmonella dublin in Danish dairy herds: frequency of change to positive serological status in bulk tank milk ELISA in relation to serostatus of neighbouring farms. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 42, 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, BM 1975. Environmental considerations in Salmonellosis. Veterinary Record 96, 318–321.Google Scholar