Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:49:18.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Milk fat depression and energy balance in stall-fed dairy goats supplemented with increasing doses of conjugated linoleic acid methyl esters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2014

D. Fernandes ,
M. A. S. Gama ,
C. V. D. M. Ribeiro ,
F. C. F. Lopes  and
D. E. De Oliveira
D. Fernandes
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, Santa Catarina State University, 88520-000 Lages, Santa Catarina, Brazil
M. A. S. Gama
Affiliation:
Embrapa Dairy Cattle, 36038-330 Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil
C. V. D. M. Ribeiro
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Sciences, Federal University of Bahia, 40170-110 Salvador, Bahia, Brazil
F. C. F. Lopes
Affiliation:
Embrapa Dairy Cattle, 36038-330 Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil
D. E. De Oliveira*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Production, Santa Catarina State University, 88520-000 Lages, Santa Catarina, Brazil
*
† E-mail: dimas.oliveira@udesc.br
Get access

Abstract

Feeding dietary supplements containing trans-10, cis-12-conjugated linoleic acid (t10,c12-CLA) has been shown to induce milk fat depression in cows, ewes and goats. However, the magnitude of the response is apparently less pronounced in lactating goats. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of increasing doses of CLA methyl esters (CLA-ME) on milk production, composition and fatty-acid profile of dairy goats. Eight Toggenburg goats were separated in two groups (four primiparous and four multiparous) and received the following dietary treatments in a 4×4 Latin Square design: CLA0: 45 g/day of calcium salts of fatty acids (CSFA); CLA15; 30 g/day of CSFA+15 g/day of CLA-ME; CLA30: 15 g/day of CSFA+30 g/day of CLA-ME; and CLA45: 45 g/day of CLA-ME. The CLA-ME supplement (Luta-CLA 60) contained 29.9% of t10,c12-CLA; therefore, the dietary treatments provided 0, 4.48, 8.97 and 13.45 g/day of t10,c12-CLA, respectively. Feed intake, milk production, concentration and secretion of milk protein and lactose, body condition score and body weight were unaffected by the dietary treatments. Milk fat secretion was reduced by 14.9%, 30.8% and 40.5%, whereas milk fat concentration was decreased by 17.2%, 33.1% and 40.7% in response to CLA15, CLA30 and CLA45, respectively. Secretions of both de novo synthesized and preformed fatty acids were progressively reduced as the CLA dose increased, but the magnitude of the inhibition was greater for the former. There was a linear reduction in most milk fat desaturase indexes (14:1/14:0, 16:1/16:0, 17:1/17:0 and 18:1/18:0). Milk fat t10,c12-CLA concentration and secretion increased with the CLA dose, and its apparent transfer efficiency from diet to milk was 1.18%, 1.17% and 1.21% for CLA15, CLA30 and CLA45 treatments, respectively. The estimated energy balance was linearly improved in goats fed CLA.

Keywords

conjugated linoleic acidenergy balancemilk fatty acidsmilk fat depressiongoats
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , April 2014 , pp. 587 - 595
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists 2000. Official methods of analysis, 17th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Bauman, DE, Harvatine, KJ and Lock, AD 2011. Nutrigenomics, rumen-derived bioactive fatty acids, and the regulation of milk fat synthesis. Annual Review of Nutrition 31, 299–319.Google Scholar
Baumgard, LH, Corl, BA, Dwyer, DA and Bauman, DE 2002a. Effects of conjugated linoleic acids (CLA) on tissue response to homeostatic signals and plasma variables associated with lipid metabolism in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science 80, 1285–1293.Google Scholar
Baumgard, LH, Matitashvii, E, Corl, BA, Dwyer, DA and Bauman, DE 2002b. Trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid decreases lipogenic rates and expression of genes involved in milk lipid synthesis in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 2155–2163.Google Scholar
Bernard, L, Leroux, C and Chilliard, Y 2008. Expression and nutritional regulation of lipogenic genes in the ruminant lactating mammary gland. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology 606, 67–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chilliard, Y, Glasser, F, Ferlay, A, Bernard, L, Rouel, J and Doreau, M 2007. Diet, rumen biohydrogenation and nutritional quality of cow and goat milk fat. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology 109, 828–855.Google Scholar
Chouinard, PY, Corneau, L, Saebo, A and Bauman, DE 1999. Milk yield and composition during abomasal infusion of conjugated linoleic acids in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 2737–2745.Google Scholar
Christie, WW 1982. A simple procedure for rapid transmethylation of glycerolipids and cholesterol esters. Journal of Lipid Research 23, 1072–1075.Google Scholar
Cruz-Hernandez, C, Kramer, JKG, Kennelly, JJ, Glimm, DR, Sorensen, BM, Okine, EK, Goonewardene, LA and Weselake, RJ 2007. Evaluating the conjugated linoleic acid and trans 18:1 isomers in milk fat of dairy cows fed increasing amounts of sunflower oil and a constant level of fish oil. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 3786–3801.Google Scholar
de Veth, MJ, Griinari, JM, Pfeiffer, AM and Bauman, DE 2004. Effect of CLA on milk fat synthesis in dairy cows: comparison of inhibition by methyl esters and free fatty acids and relationships among studies. Lipids 39, 365–372.Google Scholar
Hara, A and Radin, NS 1978. Lipid extraction of tissues with low-toxicity solvent. Analytical Biochemistry 90, 420–426.Google Scholar
Harvatine, KJ, Perfield, JW II and Bauman, DE 2009. Expression of enzymes and key regulators of lipid synthesis is upregulated in adipose tissue during CLA-induced milk fat depression in dairy cows. Journal of Nutrition 139, 849–854.Google Scholar
Jenkins, TC, Wallace, RJ, Moate, PJ and Mosley, EE 2008. Recent advances in biohydrogenation of unsaturated fatty acids within the rumen microbial ecosystem. Journal of Animal Science 86, 397–412.Google Scholar
Jensen, RG 2002. The composition of bovine milk lipids: January 1995 to December 2000. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 295–350.Google Scholar
Kay, JK, Mackle, TR, Bauman, DE, Thomson, NA and Baumgard, LH 2007. Effects of a supplement containing trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid on bioenergetic and milk production parameters in grazing dairy cows offered ad libitum or restricted pasture. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 721–730.Google Scholar
Kelsey, JA, Corl, BA, Collier, RJ and Bauman, DE 2003. The effect of breed, parity, and stage of lactation on conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) in milk fat from dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 2588–2597.Google Scholar
Kramer, JKG, Cruz-Hernandez, C and Zhou, J 2001. Conjugated linoleic acids and octadecenoic acids: analysis by GC. European Journal of Lipid Science and Technology 103, 600–609.Google Scholar
Lock, AL, Teles, BM, Perfield, JW II, Bauman, DE and Sinclair, LA 2006. A conjugated linoleic acid supplement containing trans-10, cis-12 reduces milk fat synthesis in lactating sheep. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 1525–1532.Google Scholar
Lock, AL, Rovai, M, Gipson, TA, de Veth, MJ, Bauman, DE 2008. A conjugated linoleic acid supplement containing trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid reduces milk fat synthesis in lactating goats. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 3291–3299.Google Scholar
Maia, MRG, Chaudhary, LC, Bestwick, CS, Richardson, AJ, McKain, N, Larson, TR, Graham, IA and Wallace, RJ 2010. Toxicity of unsaturated fatty acids to the biohydrogenating ruminal bacterium, Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens. BMC Microbiology 50, 52.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC) 1989. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, 6th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC) 2007. Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants: Sheep, Goats, Cervids, and New World Camelids. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Nsahlai, IV, Goetsch, AL, Luo, J, Johnson, ZB, Moore, JE, Sahlu, T, Ferrell, CL, Galyean, ML and Owens, FN 2004. Energy requirements for lactation of goats. Small Ruminant Research 53, 253–273.Google Scholar
Oliveira, DE, Gama, MAS, Fernandes, D, Tedeschi, LO and Bauman, DE 2012. An unprotected conjugated linoleic acid supplement decreases milk production and secretion of milk components in grazing dairy ewes. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 1437–1446.Google Scholar
Palmquist, DL and Jenkins, TC 2003. Challenges with fats and fatty acid methods. Journal of Animal Science 81, 3250–3254.Google Scholar
Perfield, JW II, Delmonte, P, Lock, AL, Yurawecz, MP and Bauman, DE 2006. Trans-10, trans-12 conjugated linoleic acid does not affect milk fat yield but reduces Δ9-desaturase index in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 2259–2566.Google Scholar
Salter, AM and Tarling, EJ 2007. Regulation of gene transcription by fatty acids. Animal 1, 1314–1320.Google Scholar
Shingfield, KJ, Rouel, J and Chilliard, Y 2009. Effect of calcium salts of a mixture of conjugated linoleic acids containing trans-10, cis-12 in the diet on milk fat synthesis in goats. British Journal of Nutrition 101, 1006–1019.Google Scholar
Shingfield, KJ, Bernard, L, Leroux, C and Chilliard, Y 2010. Role of trans fatty acids in the nutritional regulation of mammary lipogenesis in ruminants. Animal 4, 1140–1166.Google Scholar
Statistical Analytical System (SAS) 2002. SAS/STAT user’s guide (Release 9.0). SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Sukhija, OS and Palmquist, DL 1988. Rapid method for determination of total fatty acid content and composition of feedstuffs and feces. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 36, 1202–1206.Google Scholar
Tedeschi, LO, Cannas, A and Fox, DG 2010. A nutrition mathematical model to account for dietary supply and requirements of energy and other nutrients for domesticated small ruminants: the development and evaluation of the Small Ruminant Nutrition System. Small Ruminant Research 89, 174–184.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.Google Scholar
Villaquiran, MT, Gipson, T, Merkel, RC, Goetsch, A and Sahlu, T 2005. Body condition scoring for improved management. Proceedings of 20th Annual Goat Field Day. Langston University, Langston, OK, USA, pp. 111–117.Google Scholar
Weiss, WP, Conrad, HR and St-Pierre, NT 1992. A theoretically-based model for predicting total digestible nutrient values of forages and concentrates. Animal Feed Science and Technology 39, 95–110.Google Scholar