Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T15:18:27.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Narrow-leaved lupine seeds as a dietary protein source for fattening rabbits: a comparison with white lupine seeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2019

Z. Volek Open the ORCID record for Z. Volek [Opens in a new window] ,
L. Uhlířová  and
L. Zita
Z. Volek*
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Physiology and Animal Product Quality, Institute of Animal Science, Přátelství 815, 104 00 Prague, Uhříněves, Czech Republic Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague, Suchdol, Czech Republic
L. Uhlířová
Affiliation:
Department of Nutritional Physiology and Animal Product Quality, Institute of Animal Science, Přátelství 815, 104 00 Prague, Uhříněves, Czech Republic
L. Zita
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague, Suchdol, Czech Republic
*
†E-mail: volek.zdenek@vuzv.cz
Get access

Abstract

Lupine seeds have the potential to be an alternative to imported dietary proteins. In rabbits, it has been indicated that White lupine seed (WLS) is a suitable protein source. Other lupine species, for example, narrow-leaved lupine seed (NLS), have not yet been tested in rabbit diets. Two experiments were carried out to evaluate the effect of the dietary inclusion of NLS on growth performance, sanitary risk index (SRI), coefficients of total tract apparent digestibility (CTTAD) and nitrogen output in fattening rabbits. Narrow-leaved lupine was compared with WLS as a main protein source. For Experiment I, a total of 198 Hyplus rabbits (37 days of age) were allocated into two groups (99 rabbits per group), fed the WLS I diet (120 g/kg of WLS cv. Amiga) or the NLS I diet (150 g/kg of NLS cv. Probor), and used for performance and carcass trait evaluations. In addition, the CTTAD of the diets and the nitrogen output were determined in 10 Hyplus rabbits per treatment (37 days of age). For Experiment II, a total of 180 Hyplus rabbits (32 days of age) were allocated into two groups (90 rabbits per group), fed the WLS II diet (120 g/kg of WLS cv. Amiga) or the NLS II diet (130 g/kg of NLS cv. Primadona), and used for performance and carcass trait evaluations. In addition, the CTTAD of the diets was determined in 10 Hyplus rabbits per treatment (32 days of age). Regardless of the treatment, the dietary inclusion of NLS had a negative effect on growth of the rabbits. The nitrogen excretion and coefficients of nitrogen retention of rabbits were not affected by the treatments. In Experiment I, SRI (37 to 80 days of age) was higher in rabbits fed the NLS I diet than in those fed the WLS I diet (38.4% v. 23.2%, respectively; P = 0.031). Similarly, in Experiment II (32 to 74 days of age), SRI was higher in rabbits fed the NLS II diet than in rabbits fed the WLS II diet (37.8% v. 23.3%, respectively; P = 0.052). In conclusion, regardless of the variety, the dietary inclusion of NLS had no negative effect on the nitrogen output or dressing-out percentage of rabbits when compared to those of rabbits fed the WLS diets. With respect to the SRI and performance, however, NLS did not provide a satisfactory outcome.

Keywords

legumesgrowthhealthnitrogen retentionrabbit
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , April 2020 , pp. 881 - 888
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AOAC International 2005. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 18th edition. AOAC, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.Google Scholar
Blasco, A and Ouhayoun, J 1996. Harmonization of criteria and terminology in rabbit meat research. Revised proposal. World Rabbit Science 4, 93–99.Google Scholar
Calvet, S, Estellés, F, Hermida, B, Blumetto, O and Torres, AG 2008. Experimental balance to estimate efficiency in the use of nitrogen in rabbit breeding. World Rabbit Science 16, 205–211.Google Scholar
Coba de la Pe ña, T and Pueyo, JJ 2012. Legumes in the reclamation of marginal soils, from cultivar and inoculant selection to transgenic approaches. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 32, 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danowska-Oziewicz, M and Kurp, L 2017. Physicochemical properties, lipid oxidation and sensory attributes of pork patties with lupin protein concentrate stored in vacuum, modified atmosphere and frozen state. Meat Science 131, 158–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Blas, C and Mateos, GG 2010. Feed formulation. In Nutrition of the rabbit (ed. Blas, C De and Wiseman, J), 2nd edition, pp. 222–232. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Carmona, J, Blas, E, Pascual, JJ, Maertens, L, Gidenne, T, Xiccato, G and García, J 2005. Recommendations and guidelines for applied nutrition experiments in rabbits. World Rabbit Science 13, 209–228.Google Scholar
Fernández-Pascual, M, Pueyo, JJ, De Felipe, MR, Golvano, MP and Lucas, MM 2007. Singular features of Bradyrhizobium-Lupinus symbiosis. Dynamic Soil, Dynamic Plant 1, 1–16.Google Scholar
Folch, JM, Lees, M and Sloane-Stanley, GH 1957. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. Journal of Biological Chemistry 226, 497–509.Google ScholarPubMed
Gidenne, T, Arveux, P and Madec, O 2001. The effect of the quality of dietary lignocellulose on digestion, zootechnical performance and health of the growing rabbit. Animal Science 73, 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidenne, T, Carabaño, R, García, J and De Blas, C 2010. Fibre digestion. In Nutrition of the rabbit (ed. Blas, C De and Wiseman, J), 2nd edition, pp. 66–82. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidenne, T, Combes, S and Fortun-Lamothe, L 2013. Protein replacement by digestible fibre in the diet of growing rabbits. 1: impact on digestive balance, nitrogen excretion and microbial activity. Animal Feed Science and Technology 183, 132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gresta, F, Wink, M, Prins, U, Abberton, M, Capraro, J, Scafaroni, A and Hill, G 2017. Lupins in European cropping system. In Legumes in cropping systems (ed. Murphy-Brokern, D, Stoddard, FL and Watson, CA), pp. 88–108. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hejdysz, M, Kaczmarek, SA, Kubiś, M, Jamroz, D, Kasprowicz-Potocka, M, Zaworska, A and Rutkowski, A 2018a. Effect of increasing levels of raw and extruded narrow-leafed lupin seeds in broiler diet on performance parameters, nutrient digestibility and AMEN value of diet. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 27, 55–64.Google Scholar
Hejdysz, M, Kaczmarek, SA, Rogiewicz, A and Rutkowski, A 2018b. Influence of graded dietary levels of meals from three lupin species on the excreta dry matter, intestinal viscosity, excretion of total and free sialic acids, and intestinal morphology of broiler chickens. Animal Feed Science and Technology 241, 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heuzé, V, Thiollet, H, Tran, G, Lessire, M and Lebas, F 2019. Blue lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) seeds. Retrieved on 17 July 2019 from https://www.feedipedia.org/node/23099Google Scholar
Hopwood, DE, Pethick, DW and Hampson, DJ 2002. Increasing the viscosity of the intestinal contents stimulates proliferation of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and Brachyspira pilosicoli in weaner pigs. British Journal of Nutrition 88, 523–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Licois, D, Coudert, P and Marlier, D 2006. Epizootic rabbit entheropathy. In Recent advances in rabbit sciences (ed. Maertens, L and Coudert, P), pp. 163–170. ILVO, Melle, Belgium.Google Scholar
Magalhães, SCQ, Fernandes, F, Cabrita, ARJ, Fonseca, AJM, Valentão, P and Andrade, PB 2017. Alkaloids in the valorization of European Lupinus spp. seeds crop. Industrial Crops and Products 95, 286–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertens, DR 2002. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in breakers or crucibles: collaborative study. Journal of AOAC International 85, 1217–1240.Google ScholarPubMed
Musco, N, Cutrignelli, MI, Calabrò, S, Tudisco, R, Infascelli, F, Grazioli, R, Lo Presti, V, Gresta, F and Chiofalo, B 2017. Comparison of nutritional and antinutritional traits among different species (Lupinus albus L., Lupinus luteus L., Lupinus angustifolius L.) and varieties of lupin seeds. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 101, 1227–1241.10.1111/jpn.12643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ouhayoun, J 1998. Influence of the diet on rabbit meat quality. In Nutrition of the rabbit (ed. Blas, C De and Wiseman, J), pp. 177–195. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
Perez, JM, Lebas, F, Gidenne, T, Maertens, L, Xiccato, G, Parigi-Bini, R, Dalle Zotte, A, Cossu, ME, Carazzolo, A, Villamide, MJ, Carabaño, R, Fraga, MJ, Ramos, MA, Cervera, C, Blas, E, Fernández, J, Falcão e Cunha, L and Bengala Freire, J 1995. European reference method for in vivo determination of diet digestibility in rabbits. World Rabbit Science 3, 41–43.Google Scholar
Petterson, DS 2000. The use of lupins in feeding systems – Review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 13, 861–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raes, K, De Smet, S, Balcaen, A, Claeys, E and Demeyer, D 2003. Effect of diets rich in N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on muscle lipids and fatty acids in Belgian Blue double-muscled young bulls. Reproduction Nutrition Development 43, 331–345.10.1051/rnd:2003029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robertson, JB and Van Soest, PJ 1981. The detergent system of analysis. In The analysis of dietary fibre in food (ed. James, WPT and Theander, O), pp. 123–158. Marcel Dekker, New York City, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Sobotka, W, Stanek, M and Bogusz, J 2016. Evaluation of the nutritional value of yellow (Lupinus luteus) and blue lupine (Lupinus angustifolius) cultivars as protein sources in rats. Annals of Animal Science 16, 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Statistical Analysis System 2006. SAS/STAT user’s guide (Release 9.1). SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Steenfeldt, S, González, E and Bach Knudsen, KE 2003. Effects of inclusion with blue lupins (Lupinus angustifolius) in broiler diets and enzyme supplementation on production performance, digestibility and dietary AME content. Animal Feed Science and Technology 110, 185–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlířová, L, Volek, Z, Marounek, M and Tůmová, E 2015. Effect of feed restriction and different crude protein sources on the performance, health status and carcass traits of growing rabbits. World Rabbit Science 23, 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villamide, MJ, Nicodemus, N, Fraga, MJ and Carabaño, R 2010. Protein digestion. In Nutrition of the rabbit (ed. Blas, C De and Wiseman, J), 2nd edition, pp. 39–55. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volek, Z, Bureš, D and Uhlířová, L 2018. Effect of dietary dehulled white lupine seed supplementation on the growth, carcass traits and chemical, physical and sensory meat quality parameters of growing-fattening rabbits. Meat Science 141, 50–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Volek, Z, Marounek, M and Skřivanová, V 2005. Replacing starch by pectin and inulin in diet of early-weaned rabbits: effect on performance, health and nutrient digestibility. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences 14, 327–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volek, Z, Marounek, M, Volková, L and Kudrnová, E 2014. Effect of diets containing whole white lupin seeds on rabbit doe milk yield and milk fatty acid composition as well as the growth and health of their litters. Journal of Animal Science 92, 2041–2049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xiccato, G 1999. Feeding and meat quality in rabbits: a review. World Rabbit Science 7, 75–86.Google Scholar