Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:30:08.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The nutritive value of condensed wheat distillers solubles for cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2016

J. L. De Boever*
Affiliation:
Institute for Agriculture and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Animal Sciences Unit, 9090 Melle, Belgium
M. C. Blok
Affiliation:
Wageningen University & Research Centre, Livestock Research - Animal Nutrition, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
S. Millet
Affiliation:
Institute for Agriculture and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Animal Sciences Unit, 9090 Melle, Belgium
J. Vanacker
Affiliation:
Institute for Agriculture and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Animal Sciences Unit, 9090 Melle, Belgium
S. De Campeneere
Affiliation:
Institute for Agriculture and Fisheries Research (ILVO), Animal Sciences Unit, 9090 Melle, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

The chemical composition and the energy and protein value of five batches of condensed distillers solubles (CDS) originating from wheat were determined. The net energy for lactation (NEL) was derived from digestion coefficients obtained with sheep. The true protein digested in the small intestine (DVE) and the rumen degradable protein balance (OEB) were based on the rumen degradation rate (kdD), the rumen undegradable fraction (U) and intestinal digestibility of undegraded protein (%DVBE) predicted by regression equations derived from a data set of 28 protein feeds with kdD, U and %DVBE determined in situ. The CDS is a by-product with a high, but very variable CP content (238 to 495 g/kg DM). The CP contained on average 81% amino acids, with glutamine as main component (on average 21.8% of CP) and a relatively good lysine proportion (3.0%). Further, CDS contains quite a lot of crude fat (mean±SD: 71±14 g/kg DM), glycerol (95±52 g/kg DM) and sugars (123±24 g/kg DM) resulting in a high organic matter digestibility (88.6±3.0%) and high NEL content (8.3±0.4 MJ/kg DM). The protein value showed a large variation, with DVE ranging from 122 to 244 g/kg DM and OEB from 50 to 204 g/kg DM. Wheat CDS is a rich source of minerals and trace elements with exception of calcium.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous 2012. Antibiotic use in DDGS production. In A Guide to Distillers’ Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS) (Chapter 9, 3rd edition), (ed. the U.S. Grains Council), Washington, USA.Google Scholar
Bharathan, M, Schingoethe, DJ, Hippen, AR, Kalscheur, KF, Gibson, ML and Karges, K 2008. Conjugated linoleic acid increases in milk from cows fed condensed corn distillers solubles and fish oil. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 27962807.Google Scholar
Bitencourt, LL, Silva, JRM, Oliveira, BML, Dias, GS Jr, Lopes, F, Siecola, S Jr, Zacaroni, OF and Pereira, MN 2011. Diet digestibility and performance of dairy cows supplemented with live yeast. Scientia Agricola 68, 301307.Google Scholar
Canale, A, Valente, ME and Ciotti, A 1984. Determination of volatile carboxylic acids (C1-C5i) and lactic acid in aqueous acid extracts of silage by high performance liquid chromatography. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 35, 11781182.Google Scholar
Cone, JW, Van Gelder, AH and Van Vuuren, AM 1995. Further research on in vitro methods to determine the content of rumen bypass protein (in Dutch). The Institute of Animal Science and Health (ID-DLO), Report No. 269. Lelystad, The Netherlands, 49 pp.Google Scholar
Cromwell, GL, Herkelman, KL and Stahly, TS 1993. Physical, chemical, and nutritional characteristics of distillers dried grains with solubles for chicks and pigs. Journal of Animal Science 71, 679686.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CVB 1996. Protocol voor een faecale verteringsproef met hamels. Centraal Veevoederbureau, Product Board Animal Feed, The Netherlands. 8 pp.Google Scholar
CVB 2004. Protocol voor in situ pensincubatie: bepaling van afbraaksnelheid en uitwasbare fracties van eiwit, zetmeel, celwanden en organische restfractie. Centraal Veevoederbureau, Product Board Animal Feed, The Netherlands. 14 pp.Google Scholar
CVB 2011. The CVB feed table. Den Haag, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Da Cruz, CR, Brouk, MJ and Schingoethe, DJ 2005. Lactational response of cows fed condensed corn distillers solubles. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 40004006.Google Scholar
De Boever, JL, Blok, MC, Millet, S, Vanacker, J and De Campeneere, S 2014. The energy and protein value of wheat, maize and blend DDGS for cattle and evaluation of prediction models. Animal 8, 18391850.Google Scholar
De Boever, JL, Cottyn, BG, Vanacker, JM and Boucque, ChV 1997. Potential of solubility, enzymatic methods and NIRS to predict in situ rumen escape protein. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 45, 291306.Google Scholar
De Jonge, LH, van Laar, H, Hendriks, WH and Dijkstra, J 2015. A new approach to estimate the in situ fractional degradation rate of organic matter and nitrogen in wheat yeast concentrates. Animal 9, 437444.Google Scholar
EC 1971a. Determination of sugar. Official Journal of the European Communities L155, 1720.Google Scholar
EC 1971b. Determination of moisture. Official Journal of the European Communities L279, 35.Google Scholar
EC 1992. Determination of crude fibre. Official Journal of the European Communities L344, 3537.Google Scholar
EC 1998. Determination of amino acids. Official Journal of the European Communities L257, 1623.Google Scholar
EC 1999. Determination of crude protein dissolved by pepsin and hydrochloric acid. Official Journal of the European Communities 1972L0199, 89.Google Scholar
EC 2000. Determination of tryptophan. Official Journal of the European Communities L174, 4580.Google Scholar
Gawehn, K 1984. D-(-)-lactate. In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis (vol. VI, 3rd edition), (ed. HU Bergmeyer), pp. 588592. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, Germany.Google Scholar
ISO 1998. Animal feeding stuffs, animal products, and faeces or urine – determination of gross calorific value: bomb calorimeter method, standard 9831. International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. 23 pp.Google Scholar
ISO 1999. Animal feeding stuffs – determination of fat content, standard 6492. International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. 9 pp.Google Scholar
ISO 2002. Animal feeding stuffs – determination of crude ash, standard 5984. International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. 6 pp.Google Scholar
ISO 2005. Animal feeding stuffs – determination of nitrogen content and calculation of crude protein content – part 2: block digestion/steam distillation method, standard 5983-2. International Standards Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. 14 pp.Google Scholar
Iwanchysko, P, McKinnon, JJ, Mustafa, AF, Christensen, DA and McCartney, D 1999. Feeding value of wheat-based thin stillage: in vitro protein degradability and effects on ruminal fermentation. Journal of Animal Science 77, 28172823.Google Scholar
Jouany, JP 1981. Dosage des acides gras volatils et des alcools dans les ensilages par chromatographie en phase gazeuse. Bulletin Technique C.R.Z.V. Theix, INRA 46, 6366.Google Scholar
Larson, EM, Stock, RA, Klopfenstein, TJ, Sindt, MH and Huffman, RP 1993. Feeding value of wet distillers byproducts for finishing ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 71, 22282236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, K and Rosentrater, KA 2012. Distillers grains: production, properties and utilization. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, USA.Google Scholar
Moughan, PJ and Rutherfurd, SM 1996. A new method for determining digestible reactive lysine in foods. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 44, 22022209.Google Scholar
Mustafa, AF, McKinnon, JJ and Christensen, DA 1999. Chemical characterization and in vitro crude protein degradability of thin stillage derived from barley- and wheat-based ethanol production. Animal Feed Science and Technology 80, 247256.Google Scholar
Mustafa, AF, McKinnon, JJ and Christensen, DA 2000. The nutritive value of thin stillage and wet distillers’ grains for ruminants – review. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science 13, 16091618.Google Scholar
Nederlandse Norm 1974. Onderzoekingsmethoden voor veevoeders. Bepaling van het gehalte aan zetmeel m.b.v. enzymatische hydrolyse, standard 3574. Nederlandse Norm, Delft, The Netherlands. 4 pp.Google Scholar
Noll, F 1966. Methode zur quantitative Bestimmung von L(+)-Lactat mittels Lactat-Dehydrogenase und Glutamat-Pyruvat-Transaminase. Biochemischen Zeitschrift 346, 4149.Google Scholar
Ørskov, ER and McDonald, I 1979. The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science 92, 499503.Google Scholar
Sasikala-Appukuttan, AK, Schingoethe, DJ, Hippen, AR, Kalscheur, KF, Karges, K and Gibson, ML 2008. The feeding value of corn distillers solubles for lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 279287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schingoethe, DJ, Kalscheur, KF, Hippen, AR and Garcia, AD 2009. Invited review: the use of distillers products in dairy cattle diets. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 58025813.Google Scholar
Tamminga, S, Van Straalen, WM, Subnel, APJ, Meijer, RGM, Steg, A, Wever, CJG and Blok, MC 1994. The Dutch protein evaluation system: the DVE/OEB-system. Livestock Production Science 40, 139155.Google Scholar
Van Duinkerken, G, Blok, MC, Bannink, A, Cone, JW, Dijkstra, J, Van Vuuren, AM and Tamminga, S 2011. Update of the Dutch protein evaluation system for ruminants: the DVE/OEB2010 system. Journal of Agricultural Science 149, 351367.Google Scholar
Van Es, AJH 1978. Feed evaluation for ruminants. I. The system in use from May 1977 onwards in The Netherlands. Livestock Production Science 5, 331345.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 35833597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar