Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:23:29.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance of dairy cows milked twice daily at contrasting intervals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2009

B. Rémond ,
D. Pomiès ,
C. Julien  and
J. Guinard-Flament
B. Rémond*
Affiliation:
École Nationale d’Ingénieurs des Travaux Agricoles, USC2005 INRA, 63370 Lempdes, France
D. Pomiès*
Affiliation:
INRA, UR1213 Herbivores, Site de Theix, F-63122 Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
C. Julien
Affiliation:
INRA, UE1153 Unité expérimentale des Monts-Dore, Le Roc, F-63210 Orcival, France
J. Guinard-Flament
Affiliation:
Agrocampus Ouest, UMR1080 Production du lait, F-35590 Saint-Gilles, France
*
†E-mail: remond@enitac.fr
pomies@clermont.inra.fr
Get access

Abstract

The time constraints of the classic twice-daily milking routine are less easily endured by individual dairy farmers, because of their impact on quality of life. Our aim was to evaluate milk production responses by dairy cows milked twice daily at contrasting intervals. In experiments 1 (20 cows) and 2 (28 cows), four milking regimes were compared during a 3-week period beginning after the peak of lactation. Three groups of five cows were milked twice daily (TDM) with milking intervals of 11 : 13, 7 : 17 and 3 : 21 h in experiment 1, and three groups of seven cows at 11 : 13, 5 : 19 and 2.5 : 21.5 h in experiment 2. One group (five and seven cows respectively) was milked once daily (ODM) in each experiment. In experiment 3 (three groups, 12 cows per group), one group was milked at 10 : 14 h and one at 5 : 19 h, and the third group once daily. Milking treatments began during the second week of lactation and continued for an average of 23 weeks. In experiments 1 and 2, daily milk yields were reduced by 4.1%, 11.5% and 28%, for the 5 : 19, 3 : 21 and ODM milking treatments compared with the 11 : 13 h interval. In experiment 3, the decrease in daily milk yields for 5 : 19 h and ODM was 10% and 40% compared with the 10 : 14 h time interval. In the average daily milk, fat and protein contents and somatic cell counts were not different between the TDM groups, and the ODM group had (or tended to have) a higher fat and protein content. For a given milking, milk fat content decreased from about 60 to 32 g/kg as the preceding milking interval increased from 2.5 to 3 h up to 12 h. It then levelled out and even increased, mainly after 18 to 20 h. Somatic cell count showed a similar trend, and protein content did not change steadily. Dry matter intake, body weight and body condition score were not affected by contrasting milking intervals. After resumption of TDM with conventional intervals, productions of milk, fat and protein no longer differed between the TDM groups. Milk yield of previously ODM cows remained lower by 2 kg/day (P = 0.15) in experiments 1 and 2, and by 7 kg/day (P < 0.05) in experiment 3. These results suggest that TDM at contrasting intervals up to 5 : 19 h is feasible as it decreases milk yield only moderately, especially if implemented from peak of lactation.

Keywords

dairy cowmilking intervalonce-daily milkingmilk production
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 3 , Issue 10 , October 2009 , pp. 1463 - 1471
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ayadi, M, Caja, G, Such, X, Rovai, M, Albanell, E 2004. Effect of different milking intervals on the composition of cisternal and alveolar milk in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 71, 303–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boutinaud, M, Guinard-Flament, J, Jammes, H 2004. The number and activity of mammary epithelial cells, determining factors for milk production. Reproduction Nutrition Development 44, 499–508.Google Scholar
Cartier, P, Chilliard, Y 1989. Lipase redistribution in cow’s milk during induced lipolysis. I. Activation by agitation, temperature change, blood serum and heparin. Journal of Dairy Research 56, 699–709.Google Scholar
Coulon, JB, Rémond, B 1991. Variations in milk output and milk protein content in response to the level of energy supply in the dairy cow: a review. Livestock Production Science 29, 31–47.Google Scholar
Davis, SR, Farr, VC, Stelwagen, K 1999. Regulation of yield loss and milk composition during once-a-day milking: a review. Livestock Production Science 59, 77–94.Google Scholar
Delamaire, E, Guinard-Flament, J 2006. Longer milking intervals alter mammary epithelial permeability and the udder’s ability to extract nutrients. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 2007–2016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernando, RS, Spahr, SL 1983. Effects of milking interval on selected milk constituents from normal and infected quarters. Journal of Dairy Science 66, 1155–1161.Google Scholar
Hansson, A, Claesson, O, Brannang, E, Gustafsson, N 1958. Studies on monozygous cattle twins. XVI. Milking intervals in relation to yield of milk and milk constituents. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 8, 296–318.Google Scholar
Ichikawa, T, Fujishima, T 1982. Effects of 6.5 and 17.5 h milking intervals on the yield and udder health in dairy cows. Japanese Journal of Zootechnical Science 53, 355–358.Google Scholar
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) 1989. Ruminant nutrition: recommended allowances and feed tables. John Libbey, Eurotext, London, UK.Google Scholar
Jellema, A, Anderson, M, Heeschen, W, Kuzdal-Savoie, S, Needs, EC, Suhren, G, van Reusel, A 1991. Determination of free fatty acids in milk and milk products. Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation no. 265. International Dairy Federation, Brussels, Belgium.Google Scholar
Knight, CH, Dewhurst, RJ 1994. Once daily milking of dairy cows: relationship between yield loss and cisternal milk storage. Journal of Dairy Research 61, 441–449.Google Scholar
Lollivier, V, Guinard-Flament, J, Ollivier-Bousquet, M, Marnet, PG 2002. Oxytocin and milk removal: two important sources of variation in milk production and milk quality during and between milkings. Reproduction Nutrition Development 42, 173–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKusick, BC, Thomas, DL, Berger, YM, Marnet, PG 2002. Effect of milking interval on alveolar versus cisternal milk accumulation and milk production and composition in dairy ewes. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 2197–2206.Google Scholar
O’Brien, B, O’Connell, J, Meaney, WJ 1998. Short-term effect of milking interval on milk production, composition and quality. Milchwissenschaft 53, 123–126.Google Scholar
Rémond, B, Pomiès, D 2005. Once-daily milking of dairy cows: a review of recent French experiments. Animal Research 54, 427–442.Google Scholar
Rowland, SJ 1938. The determination of the nitrogen distribution in milk. Journal of Dairy Research 9, 42–46.Google Scholar
Schmidt, GH 1960. Effect of milking intervals on the rate of milk and fat secretion. Journal of Dairy Science 43, 213–219.Google Scholar
Sjaunja, LO, Baevre, L, Junkkainen, L, Pedersen, J, Setälä, J 1991. A Nordic proposal for an energy corrected milk (ECM) formula. In Performance recording of animals: state of the art (ed. JAM van Arendonk), EAAP publication no. 50, pp. 156–157. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis Systems Institute 1999. Version 8. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Stelwagen, K, Farr, VC, McFadden, HA, Prosser, CG, Davis, SR 1997. Time course of milk accumulation-induced opening of mammary tight junctions, and blood clearance of milk components. American Journal of Physiology 273, 379–386.Google Scholar
Stelwagen, K, Farr, VC, Nicholas, GD, Davis, SR, Prosser, CG 2008. Effect of milking interval on milk yield and quality and rate of recovery during subsequent frequent milking. Livestock Science 114, 176–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suhren, G, Hamann, J, Heeschen, W, Tolle, A 1981. On the influence of animal individual factors, the udder fractions and the milking interval on the content of free fatty acids (FFA) in raw milk. Milchwissenschaft 36, 150–153.Google Scholar
Turner, HG 1955. Sources of variation in residual milk and fat in dairy cows: their relation to secretion rates and persistency of lactation. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 6, 514–529.Google Scholar
Vangroenweghe, F, Dosogne, H, Burvenich, C 2002. Composition and milk cell characteristics in quarter milk fractions of dairy cows with low cell count. Veterinary Journal 164, 254–260.Google Scholar
Villiers de, PA, Smith, A 1976. The influence of the milking interval on milk production. South African Journal of Animal Science 6, 181–185.Google Scholar
Wheelock, JV, Rook, JAF, Dodd, FH, Griffin, TK 1966. The effect of varying the interval between milkings on milk secretion. Journal of Dairy Research 33, 161–176.Google Scholar
Wiking, L, Nielsen, JH, Bavius, AK, Edvardsson, A, Svennersten-Sjaunja, K 2006. Impact of milking frequencies on the level of free fatty acids in milk, fat globule size, and fatty acid composition. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 1004–1009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed