Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:48:26.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Performance of dairy ewes fed diets with a fibrolytic enzyme product included in the concentrate during the suckling period

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2008

C. Flores ,
G. Caja ,
R. Casals ,
E. Albanell  and
X. Such
C. Flores
Affiliation:
Grup de Recerca en Remugants, Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain Departamento Agrobiología, Universidad Autónoma de Tlaxcala, 90120 Ixtacuixtla, Tlaxcala, México
G. Caja*
Affiliation:
Grup de Recerca en Remugants, Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
R. Casals
Affiliation:
Grup de Recerca en Remugants, Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
E. Albanell
Affiliation:
Grup de Recerca en Remugants, Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
X. Such
Affiliation:
Grup de Recerca en Remugants, Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
*
E-mail: gerardo.caja@uab.es
Get access

Abstract

Seventy-two multiparous ewes from two dairy breeds (Manchega, n = 36 and Lacaune, n = 36) were used in a replicated 2 × 2 factorial design to evaluate the effects of diet supplementation with an exogenous fibrolytic enzyme product on lactation performance and feed intake during the suckling period (weeks 1 to 4) according to breed. Ewes were blocked in groups of nine and fed adlibitum after lambing a diet based on 70% forage and 30% concentrate to which the enzyme was added after pelleting. Experimental concentrates were: control (without enzyme) and enzyme (fibrolytic enzyme complex, included at 0.47% volume to weight of concentrate). Twenty-four dry and open ewes (Manchega, n = 12 and Lacaune, n = 12) were also grouped by breed and used to measure the fill value of the ration used. During the suckling period, milk yield, milk composition, dry matter intake, lamb growth, as well as body weight change and body condition score change were not affected by enzyme supplementation. Breed effect was significant for milk yield, the Manchega ewes yielding less milk with a higher content of milk components than the Lacaune ewes. The opposite was observed for dry matter intake. Enzyme supplementation reduced intake by 9% in the dry ewes, resulting in a greater fill value of the diet. In conclusion, no lactational effects were detected when the fibrolytic enzyme product was added to the concentrate fed to dairy ewes.

Keywords

dairy sheepfibrolytic enzymefill valueintakesuckling
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 2 , Issue 6 , June 2008 , pp. 962 - 968
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albanell, E, Cáceres, P, Caja, G, Molina, E, Gargouri, A 1999. Determination of fat, protein, and total solids in ovine milk by near-infrared spectroscopy. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists International 82, 753–758.Google ScholarPubMed
Association of Official Analytical Chemists 2004. Official methods of analysis, vol. 2, 18th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Beauchemin, KA, Rode, LM, Sewalt, VJH 1995. Fibrolytic enzymes increase fiber digestibility and growth rate of steers fed dry forages. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 75, 641–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauchemin, KA, Rode, LM, Maekawa, M, Morgavi, DP, Kampen, R 2000. Evaluation of a nonstarch polysaccharidase feed enzyme in dairy cow diets. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 543–553.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beauchemin, KA, Colombatto, D, Morgavi, DP, Yang, WZ 2003. Use of exogenous fibrolytic enzymes to improve feed utilization by ruminants. Journal of Animal Science 81 (Suppl. 2), E37–E47.Google Scholar
Bocquier, F, Thériez, M, Brelurut, A 1987. Utilisation du foin par la brebis. In Les fourrages secs: récolte, traitement et utilisation (ed. C Demarquilly), pp. 423–455INRA publications, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Bocquier, F, Barillet, F, Guillouet, P, Jacquin, M 1993. Prévision de l’énergie du lait de brebis à partir de différents résultats d`analyses: proposition de lait standard pour les brebis laitières. Annales de Zootechnie 42, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, GR, Beauchemin, KA, Shelford, JA 2002. The proportion of the diet to which fibrolytic enzymes are added affects nutrient digestion by lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 3420–3429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowman, GR, Beauchemin, KA, Shelford, JA 2003. Fibrolytic enzymes and parity affects on feeding behavior, salivation, and ruminal pH of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 565–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caja, G, Bocquier, F, Pérez-Oguez, L, Oregui, L 1997. Mesure de la capacité d’ingestion durant la période de traite des brebis laitières des races méditerranéennes. Rencontres Recherches Ruminants 4, 84.Google Scholar
Caja, G, Marie, C, Bocquier, F, Ferret, A, Gasa, J, Pérez-Oguez, L, Plaixats, J, Oregui, L 2002. Capacité d’ingestion des ovins laitiers: Effets des principaux facteurs de variation. Options Méditerranéennes, Série B, Études et recherches 42, 9–36.Google Scholar
Casals, R, Caja, G, Such, X, Torre, C, Calsamiglia, S 1999. Effects of calcium soaps and rumen degradable protein on the milk production and composition of dairy ewes. Journal of Dairy Research 66, 177–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dhiman, TR, Zaman, MS, Gimenez, RR, Walters, JL, Treacher, R 2002. Performance of dairy cows fed forage treated with fibrolytic enzymes prior to feeding. Animal Feed Science and Technology 101, 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doney, JM, Peart, JN, Smith, WF, Louda, F 1979. A consideration of the techniques for estimation of milk yield by suckled sheep and a comparison of estimates obtained by two methods in relation to the effect of breed, level of production and stage of lactation. Journal of Agricultural Science 92, 123–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González E 2004. Use of fibrolytic enzymes in dairy goats. In vitro evaluation of activity and fermentative characteristics. PhD, Autonoma de Barcelona University.Google Scholar
Jarrige, R 1989. Ruminant nutrition: recommended allowances and feed tables. Libbey Eurotex, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Lee, SS, Hass, JK, Cheng, KJ 2000. Influence of an anaerobic fungal culture administration on in vivo ruminal fermentation and nutrient digestion. Animal Feed Science and Technology 88, 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littell, RC, Henry, PR, Ammerman, CB 1998. Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. Journal of Animal Science 76, 1216–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marie, C, Such, X, Barillet, F, Bocquier, F, Caja, G 2002. Efficacité alimentaire selon le potentiel laitier des brebis. Options Méditerranéennes, Série B, Études et recherches 42, 57–71.Google Scholar
McAllister, TA, Bae, HD, Jones, GA, Cheng, KJ 1994. Microbial attachment and feed digestion in the rumen. Journal of Animal Science 72, 3004–3018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAllister, TA, Stanford, K, Bae, HD, Treacher, RJ, Hristov, AN, Baah, J, Shelford, JA, Cheng, KJ 2000. Effect of a surfactant and exogenous enzymes on digestibility of feed and on growth performance and carcass traits of lambs. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 80, 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller DR, Elliot R and Norton BW 2008. Effects of an exogenous enzyme, Roxazyme G2 Liquid, on digestion and utilization of barley and sorghum grain-based diets by ewe lambs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 140, 90–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minson, DJ 1990. Forage in ruminant nutrition. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.Google Scholar
Molina, E, Ferret, A, Caja, G, Calsamiglia, S, Such, X, Gasa, J 2001. Comparison of voluntary food intake, apparent digestibility, digesta kinetics and digestive tract content in Manchega and Lacaune dairy sheep in late pregnancy and early and mid lactation. Animal Science 72, 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muwalla MM, Haddad SG and Hijazeen MA 2007. Effect of fibrolytic enzyme inclusion in high concentrate fattening diets on nutrient digestibility and growth performance of Awassi lambs. Livestock Science 111, 255–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastor, FIJ, Pujol, X, Blanco, A, Vidal, T, Torres, AL, Díaz, P 2001. Molecular cloning and characterization of a multidomain endoglucanase from Paenibacillus sp BP-23: evaluation of its performance in pulp refining. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 55, 61–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinos-Rodríguez, JM, González, SS, Mendoza, GD, Bárcena, R, Cobos, MA, Hernández, H, Ortega, ME 2002. Effect of exogenous fibrolytic enzyme on ruminal fermentation and digestibility of alfalfa and rye-grass hay fed to lambs. Journal of Animal Science 80, 3016–3020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rode, LM, Yang, WZ, Beauchemin, KA 1999. Fibrolytic enzyme supplements for dairy cows in early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 2121–2126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, AJF, Doney, JM, Gunn, RG 1969. Subjective assessment of body fat in live sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science 72, 451–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somogyi, M 1952. Notes on sugar determination. Journal of Biology Chemistry 195, 19–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Such, X, Caja, G, Fernández, N, Molina, P, Torres, A 1999. The effects of the type of pulsator on the evolution of milk emission kinetics during machine milking in Manchega ewes. In Milking and milk production of dairy sheep and goat (ed. F Barillet and NPO Zervas), pp. 227–232. Wageningen Pers., Wageningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Titi, H, Lubbadeh, WF 2004. Effect of feeding cellulase enzyme on productive responses of pregnant and lactating ewes and goats. Small Ruminant Research 52, 137–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB, Lewis, BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vicini, JL, Bateman, HG, Bhat, MK, Clark, JH, Erdman, RA, Phipps, RH, Van Amburgh, ME, Hartnell, GF, Hintz, RL, Hard, DL 2003. Effect of feeding supplemental fibrolytic enzymes or soluble sugars with malic acid on milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 576–585.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed