Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T12:23:00.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The presence of extreme feather peckers in groups of laying hens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2016

H.-P. Piepho ,
V. Lutz ,
J. B. Kjaer ,
M. Grashorn ,
J. Bennewitz  and
W. Bessei
H.-P. Piepho
Affiliation:
Institute of Crop Science, University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 23, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany
V. Lutz
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstr. 17, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany
J. B. Kjaer
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Welfare and Animal Husbandry, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Doernbergstr. 25–27, 29223 Celle, Germany
M. Grashorn
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstr. 17, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany
J. Bennewitz
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstr. 17, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany
W. Bessei*
Affiliation:
Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstr. 17, 70593 Stuttgart, Germany
*
†E-mail: bessei@uni-hohenheim.de
Get access

Abstract

Feather pecking is a serious economic and welfare problem in laying hens. Feather damage occurs mainly through severe feather pecking (SFP). Selection experiments have proved that this behavior is heritable and lines have been divergently selected for high (HFP) and low feather pecking (LFP). The number of bouts of SFP per hen follows a Poisson distribution with a maximum nearby 0. A few studies indicate that the distribution within flocks is not homogenous but contains sub-groups of birds showing extremely high levels of feather pecking (EFP). It was the aim of the current study to re-analyze data on SFP of lines selected for HFP/LFP and their F2 cross so as to uncover hidden sub-populations of EFP birds. Data of seven selection generations of HFP and LFP selection lines as well as their F2 cross have been used. We fitted a two-component mixture of Poisson distributions in order to separate the sub-group of EFP from the remaining birds. HFP and LFP lines differed mainly in mean bouts per bird. The proportion of EFP was only marginal in the LFP as compared with the HFP and the F2 population. Selection for LFP did not result in total elimination of EFP. The presence of even small proportions of EFP may play an important role in initiating outbreaks of feather pecking in large flocks. Further studies on feather pecking should pay special attention to the occurrence of EFP sub-groups.

Keywords

poultrylaying hensbreedingfeather peckingdistribution
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , March 2017 , pp. 500 - 506
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennewitz, J, Boegelein, S, Stratz, P, Rodehutscord, M, Piepho, HP, Kjaer, JB and Bessei, W 2014. Genetic parameters for feather pecking and aggressive behavior in a large F2-cross of laying hens using generalized linear mixed models. Poultry Science 93, 810–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bessei, W, Bauhaus, H and Boegelein, S 2013. The effect of selection for high and low feather pecking on aggression – related behaviours of laying hens. Archiv fuer Gefluegelkunde 77, 10–14.Google Scholar
Boegelein, S, Hurtado, DM, Kjaer, JB, Grashorn, MA, Bennewitz, J and Bessei, W 2014. The phenotypic interrelationship between feather pecking, being feather pecked and fear criteria in White Leghorn lines selected for high and low severe feather pecking and their F2-crosses. European Poultry Science 78, 1–14.Google Scholar
Brunberg, E, Jensen, P, Isaksson, A and Keeling, L 2011. Feather pecking behavior in laying hens: hypothalamic gene expression in birds performing and receiving pecks. Poultry Science 90, 1145–1152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buitenhuis, AJ and Kjaer, JB 2008. Long term selection for reduced or increased pecking behaviour in laying hens. World’s Poultry Science Journal 64, 477–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, C, Gabrush, T, Schwean-Lardner, K, Knezacek, TD, Classen, HL and Bennett, C 2012. On-farm survey of beak characteristics in White Leghorns as a result of hot blade trimming or infrared beak treatment. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 21, 645–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daigle, CL, Rodenburg, TB, Bolhuis, JE, Swanson, JC and Siegford, JM 2015. Individual consistency of feather pecking behaviour in laying hens: once a feather pecker always a feather pecker? Frontiers in Veterinary Science 2, doi:10.3389/fvets2015.00006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Haas, EN, Nielsen, BL, Buitenhuis, AJ and Rodenburg, TB 2010. Selection on feather pecking affects response to novelty and foraging behaviour in laying hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 124, 90–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GfE 1999. Empfehlungen zur Energie- und Nährstoffversorgung der Legehennen und Masthühner (Broiler). DLG-Verlag, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.Google Scholar
Grams, V, Boegelein, S, Grashorn, MA, Bessei, W and Bennewitz, J 2015b. Quantitative genetic analysis of traits related to fear and feather pecking in laying hens. Behavior Genetics 45, 228–235.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grams, V, Wellmann, R, Preuß, S, Grashorn, MA, Kjaer, JB, Bessei, W and Bennewitz, J 2015a. Genetic parameters and signatures of selection in two divergent laying hen lines selected for feather pecking behavior. Genetics Selection Evolution 47, 77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffmeyer, I 1969. Feather pecking in pheasants – an ethological approach to the problem. Danish Review Game Biology 6, 1–36.Google Scholar
Kjaer, JB 2009. Feather pecking in domestic fowl is genetically related to locomotor activity levels: implications for a hyperactivity disorder model of feather pecking. Behavior Genetics 39, 564–570.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kjaer, JB and Guémené, D 2009. Adrenal reactivity in lines of domestic fowl selected on feather pecking behavior. Physiology & Behavior 96, 370–373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kjaer, JB, Sørensen, P and Su, G 2001. Divergent selection on feather pecking behaviour in laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus). Applied Animal Behaviour Science 71, 229–239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kjaer, JB and Vestergaard, KS 1999. Development of feather pecking in relation to light intensity. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 62, 243–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kops, MS 2014. Feather pecking and monoamines – a behavioural and neurobiological approach. Doctoral Thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Labouriau, R, Kjaer, JB, Abreu, GCG, Hedegaard, J and Buitenhuis, AJ 2009. Analysis of severe feather pecking behavior in a high feather pecking selection line. Poultry Science 88, 2052–2062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liljedahl, LE, Kolstad, N, Sørensen, P and Maijala, K 1979. Scandinavian selection and crossbreeding experiment with laying hens. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 29, 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, V, Kjaer, JB, Iffland, H, Bessei, W and Bennewitz, J 2016. Quantitative genetic analysis of causal relationships between feather pecking, feather eating and general locomotor activity in laying hens using structural equation models. Poultry Science 95, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McAdie, TM and Keeling, LJ 2002. The social transmission of feather pecking in laying hens: effects of environment and age. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 75, 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKeegan, DEF and Philbey, AW 2012. Chronic neurophysiological and anatomical changes associated with infrared beak treatment and their implications for laying hen welfare. Animal Welfare 21, 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muir, WM 1996. Group selection for adaptation to multiple-hen cages: selection program and direct responses. Poultry Science 75, 447–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nicol, CJ, Bestman, M, Gilani, A-M, De Haas, EN, De Jong, IC, Lambton, S, Wagenaar, JP, Weelks, CA and Rodenburg, TB 2013. The prevention and control of feather pecking: application to commercial systems. World’s Poultry Science Journal 69, 775–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodenburg, TB, Buitenhuis, AJ, Ask, B, Uitdehaag, KA, Koene, P, Van Der Poel, JJ and Bovenhuis, H 2003. Heritability of feather pecking and open-field response of laying hens at two different ages. Poultry Science 82, 861–867.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodenburg, TB, de Haas, EN, Nielsen, BL and Buitenhuis, AJ 2010. Fearfulness and feather damage in laying hens divergently selected for high and low feather pecking. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 128, 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodenburg, TB, Van Krimpen, MM, De Jong, IC, De Haas, EN, Kops, MS, Riedstra, BJ, Nordquist, RE, Wagenaar, JP, Bestman, M and Nicol, CJ 2013. The prevention and control of feather pecking in laying hens: identifying the underlying principles. World’s Poultry Science Journal 69, 361–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savory, CJ 1995. Feather pecking and cannibalism. World’s Poultry Science Journal 51, 215–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Hierden, YM, Korte, SM, Ruesink, EW, van Reenen, CG, Engel, B, Korte-Bouws, GAH, Koolhaas, JM and Blokhuis, HJ 2002. Adrenocortical reactivity and central serotonin and dopamine turnover in young chicks from a high and low feather-pecking line of laying hens. Physiology & Behavior 75, 653–659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wechsler, B, Huber-Eicher, B and Nash, DR 1998. Feather pecking in growers. A study with individually marked birds. British Poultry Science 39, 178–185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeltner, E, Klein, T and Huber-Eicher, B 2000. Is there social transmission of feather pecking in groups of laying hens? Animal Behaviour 60, 211–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Piepho supplementary material

Piepho supplementary material

Download Piepho supplementary material(File)
File 14.3 KB