Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:57:03.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pre-weaning management of calves on commercial dairy farms and its influence on calf welfare and mortality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2020

J. Barry Open the ORCID record for J. Barry [Opens in a new window] ,
E. A. M. Bokkers Open the ORCID record for E. A. M. Bokkers [Opens in a new window] ,
I. J. M. de Boer Open the ORCID record for I. J. M. de Boer [Opens in a new window]  and
E. Kennedy Open the ORCID record for E. Kennedy [Opens in a new window]
J. Barry
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, P61 C996Co. Cork, Ireland Animal Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research, P. O. Box 338, 6700 AHWageningen, The Netherlands
E. A. M. Bokkers
Affiliation:
Animal Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research, P. O. Box 338, 6700 AHWageningen, The Netherlands
I. J. M. de Boer
Affiliation:
Animal Production Systems Group, Wageningen University & Research, P. O. Box 338, 6700 AHWageningen, The Netherlands
E. Kennedy*
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, P61 C996Co. Cork, Ireland
*
†E-mail: emer.kennedy@teagasc.ie
Get access

Abstract

Welfare and management of calves is of increasing interest and also influences performance of these animals in later life. The aim of this study was to assess management and environmental conditions under which pre-weaned dairy calves are reared on commercial Irish dairy farms. We included 47 spring-calving, pasture-based herds in this study. Herd and animal-specific data, such as mortality rate, age and breed, were gathered from all participants via the HerdPlus® database. Information pertaining to management practices was collected by conducting an interview with the principal calf rearer, while an assessment of calf housing facilities was conducted to identify conditions calves were reared in. The environmental assessment included measurements of space allowance per calf, as well as feeding equipment hygiene. To assess calf behaviour video observations were used, while accounting for the number of calves present in a group and the space available per calf. Faecal samples were also collected to determine the presence of enteric pathogens among calves. To compare calf space allowance, group size and presence of enteric pathogens early and late in the calving season each farm was visited twice. Calf mortality was not associated with either herd size, space allowance per calf or post-colostrum feeding practices. Higher calf mortality was identified among herds which reported experiencing an on-set of calf pneumonia during weeks 8 to 10 of the calving season. This study demonstrates that factors associated with calf welfare on commercial Irish dairy farms (e.g. space allowance, mortality rate) are independent of herd size. Some management practices however, such as methods used for treating health issues can affect rates of calf mortality experienced. Calf mortality, for example, was lower in herds which treated diarrhoea cases by administering electrolytes, while continuing to offer milk. Behavioural observations indicate that smaller group sizes could promote expression of positive behaviours, potentially resulting from an overall improvement in welfare. Space allowance per calf was not associated with observed behaviour frequencies. We also identified that similar rates of calf mortality are experienced across herds of different sizes.

Keywords

space allowancehealth treatmentshygienepost-colostrum feedingtransition milk
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 14 , Issue 12 , December 2020 , pp. 2580 - 2587
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Animal Consortium

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute (AFBI), Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (DAFM) 2017. All-Island Animal disease surveillance report 2016. Retrieved on 12 September 2018 from https://www.afbini.gov.uk/sites/afbini.gov.uk/files/publications/aiadsr2015_30-11-16%20LR_Designer%204.pdfGoogle Scholar
Aust, V, Knappstein, K, Kunz, HJ, Kaspar, H, Wallmann, J and Kaske, M 2013. Feeding untreated and pasteurized waste milk and bulk milk to calves: effects on calf performance, health status and antibiotic resistance of faecal bacteria. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 97, 1091–1103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barkema, HW, von Keyserlingk, MAG, Kastelic, JP, Lam, TJGM, Luby, C, Roy, JP, LeBlanc, SJ, Keefe, GP and Kelton, DF 2015. Invited review: changes in the dairy industry affecting dairy cattle health and welfare. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 7426–7445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barry, J, Bokkers, EAM, Berry, DP, De Boer, IJM, McClure, J and Kennedy, E 2019a. Associations between colostrum management, calf related hygiene practices and passive immunity and mortality among pre-weaned dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 102, 10266–10276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, J, Kennedy, E, Sayers, R, De Boer, IJM and Bokkers, EAM 2019b. Development of a welfare assessment protocol for dairy calves from birth through to weaning. Animal Welfare 28, 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berge, A, Besser, T, Moore, D and Sischo, W 2009. Evaluation of the effects of oral colostrum supplementation during the first fourteen days on the health and performance of preweaned calves. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 286–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broom, DM and Fraser, AF 2007. Domestic animal behaviour and welfare, 5th revised edition. CABI Publishing, Wallington, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunton, L, Duncan, D, Coldham, N, Snow, L and Jones, J 2012. A survey of antimicrobial usage on dairy farms and waste milk feeding practices in England and Wales. Veterinary Record 171, 296.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Closs, G Jr and Dechow, C 2017. The effect of calf-hood pneumonia on heifer survival and subsequent performance. Livestock Science 205, 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conneely, M, Berry, DP, Murphy, JP, Lorenz, I, Doherty, ML and Kennedy, E 2014. Effect of feeding colostrum at different volumes and subsequent number of transition milk feeds on the serum immunoglobulin G concentration and health status of dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 6991–7000.Google ScholarPubMed
Dannenmann, K, Buchenauer, D and Fliegner, H 1985. The behaviour of calves under four levels of lighting. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 13, 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (DAFM) 2015. Food wise 2025. Retrieved on 12 September 2018, from https://www.agriculture.gov.ie/media/migration/foodindustrydevelopmenttrademarkets/agri-foodandtheeconomy/foodwise2025/report/htmlfiles/5.%20sectoral%20growth.htmGoogle Scholar
Fischer, AJ, Song, Y, He, Z, Haines, DM, Guan, LL and Steele, MA 2018. Effect of delaying colostrum feeding on passive transfer and intestinal bacterial colonization in neonatal male Holstein calves. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 3099–3109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelsinger, S, Heinrichs, A and Jones, C 2016. A meta-analysis of the effects of preweaned calf nutrition and growth on first-lactation performance. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 6206–6214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Godden, S 2008. Colostrum management for dairy calves. Veterinary Clinics: Food Animal Practice 24, 19–39.Google ScholarPubMed
Gulliksen, SM, Lie, KI, Løken, T and Østerås, O 2009. Calf mortality in Norwegian dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 2782–2795.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heikkilä, AM, Liski, E, Pyörälä, S and Taponen, S 2018. Pathogen-specific production losses in bovine mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 9493–9504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heller, MC and Chigerwe, M 2018. Diagnosis and treatment of infectious enteritis in neonatal and juvenile ruminants. veterinary clinics: food animal. Practice 34, 101–117.Google Scholar
Hemsworth, PH 2003. Human–animal interactions in livestock production. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 81, 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jago, J and Berry, DP 2011. Associations between herd size, rate of expansion and production, breeding policy and reproduction in spring-calving dairy herds. Animal 5, 1626–1633.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, MB, Vestergaard, KS and Krohn, CC 1998. Play behaviour in dairy calves kept in pens: the effect of social contact and space allowance. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 56, 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leruste, H, Brscic, M, Cozzi, G, Kemp, B, Wolthuis-Fillerup, M, Lensink, B, Bokkers, E and Van Reenen, C 2014. Prevalence and potential influencing factors of non-nutritive oral behaviors of veal calves on commercial farms. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 7021–7030.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller-Cushon, EK, Bergeron, R, Leslie, KE and DeVries, TJ 2013. Effect of milk feeding level on development of feeding behaviour in dairy calves. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 551–564.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mogensen, L, Nielsen, LH, Hindhede, J, Sørensen, JT and Krohn, CC 1997. Effect of space allowance in deep bedding systems on resting behaviour, production, and health of dairy heifers. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica A-Animal Sciences 47, 178–186.Google Scholar
Rushen, J and de Passillé, AM 2012. Automated measurement of acceleration can detect effects of age, dehorning and weaning on locomotor play of calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 139, 169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayers, RG, Kennedy, A, Krump, L, Sayers, GP and Kennedy, E 2016. An observational study using blood gas analysis to assess neonatal calf diarrhea and subsequent recovery with a European Commission-compliant oral electrolyte solution. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 4647–4655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutherland, MA, Worth, GM, Schütz, KE and Stewart, M 2014. Rearing substrate and space allowance influences locomotor play behaviour of dairy calves in an arena test. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 154, 8–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svensson, C and Liberg, P 2006. The effect of group size on health and growth rate of Swedish dairy calves housed in pens with automatic milk-feeders. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 73, 43–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tapkı, İ, Şahin, A and Önal, AG 2006. Effect of space allowance on behaviour of newborn milk-fed dairy calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 99, 12–20.Google Scholar
Veissier, I, Caré, S and Pomiès, D 2013. Suckling, weaning, and the development of oral behaviours in dairy calves. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 147, 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltner-Toews, D, Martin, S, Meek, A, McMillan, I and Crouch, C 1985. A field trial to evaluate the efficacy of a combined rotavirus-coronavirus/Escherichia coli vaccine in dairy cattle. Canadian Journal of Comparative Medicine 49, 1–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Warnick, L, Janssen, D, Guard, C and Gröhn, Y 2001. The effect of lameness on milk production in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 1988–1997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weaver, DM, Tyler, JW, VanMetre, DC, Hostetler, DE and Barrington, GM 2000. Passive transfer of colostral immunoglobulins in calves. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 14, 569–577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webb, LE, Bokkers, EAM, Heutinck, LFM, Engel, B, Buist, WG, Rodenburg, TB, Stockhofe-Zurwieden, N and Van Reenen, CG 2013. Effects of roughage source, amount, and particle size on behaviour and gastrointestinal health of veal calves. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 7765–7776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Windeyer, M, Leslie, K, Godden, S, Hodgins, D, Lissemore, K and LeBlanc, S 2012. The effects of viral vaccination of dairy heifer calves on the incidence of respiratory disease, mortality, and growth. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 6731–6739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Barry et al. Supplementary Materials

Barry et al. Supplementary Materials

Download Barry et al. Supplementary Materials(File)
File 20.5 KB