Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:37:04.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pudong White pig: a unique genetic resource disclosed by sequencing data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2016

Q. Xiao ,
Z. Zhang ,
H. Sun ,
Q. Wang  and
Y. Pan
Q. Xiao
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, PR China
Z. Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, PR China
H. Sun
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, PR China
Q. Wang*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, PR China Shanghai Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Shanghai 200240, PR China
Y. Pan*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, PR China Shanghai Key Laboratory of Veterinary Biotechnology, Shanghai 200240, PR China
*
†E-mails: wangqishan@sjtu.edu.cn; panyuchun1963@aliyun.com
†E-mails: wangqishan@sjtu.edu.cn; panyuchun1963@aliyun.com
Get access

Abstract

Pudong White (PW) pigs are distributed in the Taihu region of China and are characterized by their completely white coats. A heated debate concerning this genetic resource and its relationship to Taihu and western pig breeds has arisen, due to the white coat of the animals. To determine whether PW is a unique genetic resource, we performed a detailed assessment of the genetic relationships among PW, six breeds from the Taihu population and three western pig breeds, based on whole-genome single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data. A total of 68 102 SNPs were identified in the genomes of the tested populations by next-generation sequencing technology, of which, 64 were determined as the potentially specific to PW breed. The genetic distance between PW pigs and the Taihu population was shorter than that between PW and western breeds. The genetic distance within the PW population was small and neighbour-joining tree analysis revealed that all PW individuals clustered into a separated group, indicating a close genetic relationship among PW individuals which may result from a small effective population size (Ne) and inbreeding. The results of both principal component analysis and evaluation using fastSTRUCTURE demonstrated that PW was clearly differentiated from other breeds. Together, these results indicate that PW is a distinctive genetic resource with a unique genetic structure separate from other Taihu and western pig breeds. Furthermore, this genome-wide comprehensive survey of the relationships among PW, Taihu and western pig breeds, demonstrates the rationality of the current breed classification of PW. The results also provide evidence about the unique genetic resource of PW, based on genome-wide genetic markers. These data will improve our understanding of the genetic structure and current state of PW breed, and facilitate the development of a national project for the conservation and utilization of these pigs.

Keywords

Pudong White pigsingle nucleotide polymorphismsgenetic differentiationgenetic structurenext-generation sequencing
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 11 , Issue 7 , July 2017 , pp. 1117 - 1124
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ai, H, Huang, L and Ren, J 2013. Genetic diversity, linkage disequilibrium and selection signatures in Chinese and Western pigs revealed by genome-wide SNP markers. PLoS One 8, e56001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akey, JM, Zhang, G, Zhang, K, Jin, L and Shriver, MD 2002. Interrogating a high-density SNP map for signatures of natural selection. Genome Research 12, 1805–1814.Google Scholar
Balloux, F and Lugon-Moulin, N 2002. The estimation of population differentiation with microsatellite markers. Molecular Ecology 11, 155–165.Google Scholar
Barbato, M, Orozco-terWengel, P, Tapio, M and Bruford, MW 2015. SNeP: a tool to estimate trends in recent effective population size trajectories using genome-wide SNP data. Frontiers in Genetics 6, 109.Google Scholar
Chen, Q, Ma, Y, Yang, Y, Chen, Z, Liao, R, Xie, X, Wang, Z, He, P, Tu, Y and Zhang, X 2013. Genotyping by genome reducing and sequencing for outbred animals. PLoS One 8, e67500.Google Scholar
China National Commission of Animal Genetic Resources 2011. Animal genetic resources in China PIGS. China Agriculture Press, Beijing, China.Google Scholar
Fan, B, Wang, ZG, Li, YJ, Zhao, XL, Liu, B, Zhao, SH, Yu, M, Li, MH, Chen, SL and Xiong, TA 2002. Genetic variation analysis within and among Chinese indigenous swine populations using microsatellite markers. Animal Genetics 33, 422–427.Google Scholar
Herrero-Medrano, JM, Megens, H-J, Groenen, MA, Ramis, G, Bosse, M, Pérez-Enciso, M and Crooijmans, RP 2013. Conservation genomic analysis of domestic and wild pig populations from the Iberian Peninsula. BMC Genetics 14, 106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howie, BN, Donnelly, P and Marchini, J 2009. A flexible and accurate genotype imputation method for the next generation of genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genetics 5, e1000529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lai, F, Ren, J, Ai, H, Ding, N, Ma, J, Zeng, D, Chen, C, Guo, Y and Huang, L 2007. Chinese white Rongchang pig does not have the dominant white allele of KIT but has the dominant black allele of MC1R. Journal of Heredity 98, 84–87.Google Scholar
Li, H and Durbin, R 2010. Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 26, 589–595.Google Scholar
Li, H, Handsaker, B, Wysoker, A, Fennell, T, Ruan, J, Homer, N, Marth, G, Abecasis, G and Durbin, R 2009. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Megens, H-J, Crooijmans, R, San Cristobal, M, Hui, X, Li, N and Groenen, M 2008. Biodiversity of pig breeds from China and Europe estimated from pooled DNA samples: differences in microsatellite variation between two areas of domestication. Genetics Selection Evolution 40, 103–128.Google Scholar
Patel, RK and Jain, M 2012. NGS QC Toolkit: a toolkit for quality control of next generation sequencing data. PLoS One 7, e30619.Google Scholar
Pham, L, Do, DN, Nam, L, Van Ba, N, Minh, L, Hoan, T, Cuong, V and Kadarmideen, H 2014. Molecular genetic diversity and genetic structure of Vietnamese indigenous pig populations. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 131, 379–386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purcell, S, Neale, B, Todd-Brown, K, Thomas, L, Ferreira, MA, Bender, D, Maller, J, Sklar, P, De Bakker, PI and Daly, MJ 2007. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. American Journal of Human Genetics 81, 559–575.Google Scholar
Raj, A, Stephens, M and Pritchard, JK 2014. fastSTRUCTURE: variational inference of population structure in large SNP data sets. Genetics 197, 573–589.Google Scholar
Ramos, A, Megens, H, Crooijmans, R, Schook, L and Groenen, M 2011. Identification of high utility SNPs for population assignment and traceability purposes in the pig using high-throughput sequencing. Animal Genetics 42, 613–620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sved, JA 1971. Linkage disequilibrium and homozygosity of chromosome segments in finite populations. Theoretical Population Biology 2, 125–141.Google Scholar
Sved, JA, Cameron, EC and Gilchrist, AS 2013. Estimating effective population size from linkage disequilibrium between unlinked loci: theory and application to fruit fly outbreak populations. PLoS One 8, e69078.Google Scholar
Tamura, K, Stecher, G, Peterson, D, Filipski, A and Kumar, S 2013. MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30, 2725–2729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Traspov, A, Deng, W, Kostyunina, O, Ji, J, Shatokhin, K, Lugovoy, S, Zinovieva, N, Yang, B and Huang, L 2016. Population structure and genome characterization of local pig breeds in Russia, Belorussia, Kazakhstan and Ukraine. Genetics Selection Evolution 48, 16–24.Google Scholar
Wang, M, Sheng, Z, Wu, X, Wang, Q and Pan, Y 2010. Mitochondrial DNA-based genetic structure analysis of Pudong White pigs. Biochemical Genetics 48, 924–937.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Z, Chen, Q, Yang, Y, Liao, R, Zhao, J, Zhang, Z, Chen, Z, Zhang, X, Xue, M and Yang, H 2015. Genetic diversity and population structure of six Chinese indigenous pig breeds in the Taihu Lake region revealed by sequencing data. Animal Genetics 46, 697–701.Google Scholar
Waples, RS and Do, C 2008. LDNE: a program for estimating effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Molecular Ecology Resources 8, 753–756.Google Scholar
Weir, BS and Cockerham, CC 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38, 1358–1370.Google Scholar
Wright, S 1949. The genetical structure of populations. Annals of Eugenics 15, 323–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, J, Lee, SH, Goddard, ME and Visscher, PM 2011. GCTA: a tool for genome-wide complex trait analysis. American Journal of Human Genetics 88, 76–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Z 1986. Chinese pig breed records. Shanghai Science and Technology Press, Shanghai, China.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z 1991. Chinese Taihu Pig. Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers, Shanghai, China.Google Scholar
Zhang, Z, Wang, Z, Yang, Y, Zhao, J, Chen, Q, Liao, R, Chen, Z, Zhang, X, Xue, M and Yang, H 2016. Identification of pleiotropic genes and gene sets underlying growth and immunity traits: a case study on Meishan pigs. Animal 10, 550–557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, ZG, Li, B and Chen, X 1986. Pig breeds in China. Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publisher, Shanghai, China.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Xiao supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Xiao supplementary material(Image)
Image 6.3 MB
Supplementary material: Image

Xiao supplementary material

Figure S2

Download Xiao supplementary material(Image)
Image 1.5 MB