Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:08:27.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rearing conditions and life history influence the progress of gametogenesis and reproduction performances in pikeperch males and females

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

A. Khendek ,
A. Chakraborty ,
J. Roche ,
Y. Ledoré ,
A. Personne ,
T. Policar ,
D. Żarski ,
R. Mandiki ,
P. Kestemont  and
S. Milla
...Show all authors
A. Khendek
Affiliation:
University of Lorraine, UR AFPA, USC 340 INRA Vandoeuvre-Lés-Nancy, F-54506France
A. Chakraborty
Affiliation:
University of Lorraine, UR AFPA, USC 340 INRA Vandoeuvre-Lés-Nancy, F-54506France
J. Roche
Affiliation:
University of Lorraine, UR AFPA, USC 340 INRA Vandoeuvre-Lés-Nancy, F-54506France
Y. Ledoré
Affiliation:
University of Lorraine, UR AFPA, USC 340 INRA Vandoeuvre-Lés-Nancy, F-54506France
A. Personne
Affiliation:
University of Lorraine, UR AFPA, USC 340 INRA Vandoeuvre-Lés-Nancy, F-54506France
T. Policar
Affiliation:
Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Zatisi 728/II, 389 25 Vodnany, Czech Republic
D. Żarski
Affiliation:
Department of Ichthyology, Faculty of Environmental Science, University of Warmia and Mazury, 10-719 Olsztyn, Poland
R. Mandiki
Affiliation:
Research Unit in Environmental and Evolutionary Biology (URBE), NARILIS, University of Namur (FUNDP), Rue de Bruxelles 61, B-5000 Namur, Belgium
P. Kestemont
Affiliation:
Research Unit in Environmental and Evolutionary Biology (URBE), NARILIS, University of Namur (FUNDP), Rue de Bruxelles 61, B-5000 Namur, Belgium
S. Milla*
Affiliation:
University of Lorraine, UR AFPA, USC 340 INRA Vandoeuvre-Lés-Nancy, F-54506France
P. Fontaine
Affiliation:
University of Lorraine, UR AFPA, USC 340 INRA Vandoeuvre-Lés-Nancy, F-54506France
*
†E-mail: Sylvain.Milla@univ-lorraine.fr
Get access

Abstract

Pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) is a highly valuable fish in Europe. However, development of aquaculture of pikeperch is highly limited due to seasonality of production. This can be overcome by the controlled reproduction of domesticated fish. The first steps of domestication process may induce changes at anatomical, physiological and molecular levels, thereby affecting a variety of biological functions. While there is abundant literature on their effects on stress and growth for example, these effects on reproduction received limited attention notably in pikeperch, a promising candidate for the development of aquaculture. To answer the question of this life-history effect on pikeperch’s reproduction, we compared two groups (weight: 1 kg) originated from Czech Republic and with the same domestication level (F0). The first group was a recirculating aquatic system cultured one (2 years, previously fed with artificial diet, never exposed to natural changes in temperature/photoperiod conditions) and the second one was a pond cultured group (3 to 4 years, bred under natural feeding and temperature/photoperiod). The wild group successfully spawned, while the farmed one did not spawn at all. During the program, gonadosomatic indexes of both males and females were significantly higher for the wild fish, as well as the sexual steroids. Gene expression analysis revealed significantly lower LH transcript levels at the pituitary level for the farmed females and lower FSH transcript levels at the pituitary level for the males. In conclusion this study showed that the previous rearing conditions (e.g. culture system, age, diet, etc.) alter the further progress of gametogenesis and the reproductive performances in response to controlled photothermal program for both sexes in pikeperch.

Keywords

domesticationreproductionoogenesisSander luciopercagonadotropic axis
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 12 , Issue 11 , November 2018 , pp. 2335 - 2346
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdulfatah, A, Fontaine, P, Kestemont, P, Gardeur, JN and Marie, M 2011. Effects of photothermal kinetics and amplitude of photoperiod decrease on the induction of the reproduction cycle in female Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis). Aquaculture 322, 169–176.Google Scholar
Abdulfatah, A, Fontaine, P, Kestemont, P, Milla, S and Marie, M 2013. Effects of the thermal threshold and the timing of temperature reduction on the initiation and course of oocyte development in cultured female of Eurasian perch Perca fluviatilis . Aquaculture 376, 90–96.Google Scholar
Abi-Ayad, SM 1998. Etude expérimentale de la biologie de la reproduction de la perche fluviatile (Perca fluviatilis). Effet de la composition en acides gras de la série (n-3) de l’alimentation des géniteurs sur la qualité des oeufs et des larves. PhD thesis Liège, Belgium.Google Scholar
Ben Ammar, I, Teletchea, F, Milla, S, Ndiaye, WN, Ledore, Y, Missaoui, H and Fontaine, P 2015. Continuous lighting inhibits the oneset of reproductive cycle in pikeperch. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 41, 344–356.Google Scholar
Brummett, R, Angoni, D and Pouomogne, V 2004. On-farm and on-station comparison of wild and domesticated Cameroonian populations of Oreochromis niloticus . Aquaculture 242, 157–164.Google Scholar
Ciesla, M, Jonczyk, R, Gozdowski, D, Sliwinski, J, Rechulicz, J and Andrzejewski, W 2013. Changes in ide (Leuciscus idus) female’s reproductive parameters after stimulation with carp pituitary homogenate (CPH) and Ovopel: the effect of domestication? Aquaculture International 22, 78–88.Google Scholar
Douxfils, J, Mathieu, C, Mandiki, SNM, Milla, S, Henrotte, E, Wang, N, Vandecan, M, Dieu, M, Dauchot, N, Pigneur, LM, Li, X, Rougeot, C, Melard, C, Silvestre, F, Van Doninck, K, Raes, M and Kestemont, P 2011. Physiological and proteomic evidences that domestication process differentially modulates the immune status of juvenile Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis) under chronic confinement stress. Fish Shellfish Immunology 31, 1113–1121.Google Scholar
Fontaine, P, Pereira, C, Wang, N and Marie, M 2006. Influence of pre-inductive photoperiod variations on Eurasian perch Perca fluviatilis broodstock response to an inductive photothermal program. Acuaculture 255, 410–416.Google Scholar
Fontaine, P, Wang, N and Hermelink, B 2015. Broodstock management and control of the reproductive cycle. In Biology and culture of percid fishes (ed. P Kestemont, K Dąbrowski and RC Summerfelt), pp. 103–122. Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
Fostier, A and Jalabert, B 1986. Stereoidogenesis in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri) at various preovulatory stages: changes in plasma hormone level and in vivo responses of the ovary to salmon gonadotropin. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry 2, 87–99.Google Scholar
Hassin, S, de Monbrison, D, Hanin, Y, Elizur, A, Zohar, Y and Popper, DM 1997. Domestication of the white grouper Epinephlus aeneus. 1. Growth and reproduction. Aquaculture 156, 305–316.Google Scholar
Hermelink, B, Kleiner, W, Schulz, C, Kloas, W and Wuertz, S 2016. Photo-thermal manipulation for the reproductive management of pikeperch Sander lucioperca . Aquaculture International 25, 1–20.Google Scholar
Hermelink, B, Wuertz, S, Rennert, B, Kloas, W and Schulz, C 2013. Temperature control of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) maturation in recirculating aquaculture systems induction of puberty and course of gametogenesis. Aquaculture 400, 36–45.Google Scholar
Hermelink, B, Wuertz, S, Trubiroha, A, Rennert, B, Kloas, W and Schulz, C 2011. Influence of temperature on puberty and maturation of pikeperch, Sander lucioperca . General and Comparative Endocrinology 172, 282–292.Google Scholar
Khendek, A, Alix, M, Viot, S, Ledore, Y, Rousseau, C, Mandiki, R, Kestemont, P, Policar, T, Fontaine, P and Milla, S 2017. How does a domestication process modulate oogenesis and reproduction performances in Eurasian perch?. Acuaculture 473, 206–214.Google Scholar
Krejszeff, S, Targońska, K, Żarski, D and Kucharczyk, D 2009. Domestication affects spawning of the ide (Leuciscus idus) preliminary study. Aquaculture 295, 145–147.Google Scholar
Křisťan, J, Stejskal, V and Policar, T 2012. Comparison of reproduction characteristics and broodstock mortality in farmed and wild Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis L.) females during reproduction under controlled conditions. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 12, 191–197.Google Scholar
Langeron, M 1942. Précis de Microscopie: Technique-Expérimentation-Diagnostic. Masson et Cie, Paris. 1339 pp (in French).Google Scholar
Lubzens, E, Cerda, J, Young, G and Bobe, J 2010. Oogenesis in teleost fish: how fish eggs are formed. General and Comparative Endocrinology 165, 367–389.Google Scholar
Mandiki, SNM, Babiak, I, Bopopi, JM, Leprieur, F and Kestemont, P 2005. Effects of sex steroids and their inhibitors on endocrine parameters and gender growth differences in Eurasian perch (Perca fluviatilis) juveniles. Steroids 70, 85–94.Google Scholar
Nagahama, Y 1987. Gonadotropin action on gametogenesis and steroidogenesis in teleost gonads. Zoology Sciences 4, 209–222.Google Scholar
Policar, T, Blecha, M, Křišťan, J, Mráz, J, Velíšek, J, Stará, A, Stejskal, V, Malinovskyi, O, Svačina, P and Samarin, AM 2016. Comparison of production efficiency and quality of differently cultured pikeperch (Sander lucioperca L.) juveniles as a valuable product for ongrowing culture. Aquaculture International 24, 1607–1626.Google Scholar
Rinchard, J and Kestemont, P 1996. Comparative study of reproductive biology in single and multiple spawner cyprinid fish: I. Morphological and histological features. Journal of Fish Biology 49, 883–894.Google Scholar
Steenfeldt, S, Vestergaard, M, Overton, JL, Paulsen, H, Larsen, VJ and Henriksen, NH 2010. Development of intensive rearing of pikeperch in Denmark. Anonymous , Hirtshals, Denmark.Google Scholar
Tymchuk, WE, Biagi, C, Withler, R and Devlin, RH 2006. Growth and behavioral consequences of introgression of a domesticated aquaculture genotype into a native strain of Coho Salmon. American Fish Society 153, 442–455.Google Scholar
Vandeputte, M and Prunet, P 2002. Génétique et adaptation chez les poissons : domestication, résistance au stress et adaptation aux conditions de milieu. INRA Production Animale 15, 365–371.Google Scholar
Wallace, RA and Selman, K 1981. Cellular dynamic aspects of oocyte growth in teleosts. American Zoology 21, 325–343.Google Scholar
Żarski, D, Krejszeff, S, Palińska, K, Targońska, K, Kupren, K, Fontaine, P, Kestemont, P and Kucharczyk, D 2012. Cortical reaction as an egg quality indicator in artificial reproduction of pikeperch, Sander lucioperca . Reproduction Fertility and Development 24, 843.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Khendek et al. supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Khendek et al. supplementary material(File)
File 46.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Khendek et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Khendek et al. supplementary material(File)
File 14.2 KB