Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T00:36:40.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Resistance to gastrointestinal parasite infection in Djallonké sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2017

A. Traoré ,
D. R. Notter ,
A. Soudre ,
A. Kaboré ,
I. Álvarez ,
I. Fernández ,
M. Sanou ,
M. Shamshuddin ,
K. Periasamy  and
H. H. Tamboura
...Show all authors
A. Traoré*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Biologie et Santé animales, Institut de l’Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles (INERA), 04 BP 8645 Ouagadougou 04, Burkina Faso
D. R. Notter
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA
A. Soudre
Affiliation:
UFR Sciences et Techniques, Université de Koudougou, BP 376 Koudougou, Burkina Faso
A. Kaboré
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Biologie et Santé animales, Institut de l’Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles (INERA), 04 BP 8645 Ouagadougou 04, Burkina Faso
I. Álvarez
Affiliation:
Area de Genetica y Reproduccion Animal, Centro de Biotechnologia Animal, Serida Deva, Camino de Rioseco 1225, E33394 Gijón (Asturias), Spain
I. Fernández
Affiliation:
Area de Genetica y Reproduccion Animal, Centro de Biotechnologia Animal, Serida Deva, Camino de Rioseco 1225, E33394 Gijón (Asturias), Spain
M. Sanou
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Biologie et Santé animales, Institut de l’Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles (INERA), 04 BP 8645 Ouagadougou 04, Burkina Faso
M. Shamshuddin
Affiliation:
International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, PO Box 100, 1400 Vienna, Austria
K. Periasamy
Affiliation:
International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna International Centre, PO Box 100, 1400 Vienna, Austria
H. H. Tamboura
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Biologie et Santé animales, Institut de l’Environnement et de Recherches Agricoles (INERA), 04 BP 8645 Ouagadougou 04, Burkina Faso
F. Goyache
Affiliation:
Area de Genetica y Reproduccion Animal, Centro de Biotechnologia Animal, Serida Deva, Camino de Rioseco 1225, E33394 Gijón (Asturias), Spain
*
†E-mail: traore_pa@yahoo.fr.
Get access

Abstract

Gastrointestinal parasitism places serious constraints on small ruminant production. The situation has been exacerbated by development of drug resistance in many parasite populations, leading to interest in identification of animals with genetically mediated resistance or tolerance to nematode infections. This study assessed the response to natural infection with gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN) in Djallonké sheep during the rainy season in the Sudan-Guinea Savannah region of Burkina Faso. Haemonchus contortus is the most prevalent GIN at this site and time. Djallonké lambs (n=434) were sampled from 40 households and evaluated at a common location in southern Burkina Faso. Lambs were dewormed with levamisole at 2 to 6 months of age and returned to infected pastures. Fecal egg counts (FEC), packed cell volumes (PCV), and FAffa Malan CHArt (FAMACHA©) scores were determined 28 and 35 days after deworming. Lamb mortality was monitored throughout the experiment. Least-squares means for BW increased from 13.8±0.2 kg at 28 days to 14.0±0.2 kg at 35 days (P<0.01). Simple means and medians for FEC were 615 and 100, respectively, at 28 days and 850 and 175, respectively, at 35 days. The FEC exhibited strong right skewness. Following logarithmic transformation and back-transformation of resulting least-squares means to the original scale, FEC were higher (P<0.01) for males (208±27) than females (122±10). Least-squares means for PCV decreased (P<0.001) from 28 (36.3±0.5%) to 35 days (33.7±0.5%), and were higher (P<0.01) for females (36.0±0.4%) than males (33.9±0.7%). Correlations (r) between repeated measurements of BW, FEC, PCV and FAMACHA scores at 28 and 35 days were all positive (P<0.001). The correlation between FAMACHA scores and PCV was negative at 28 (r=−0.14) and 35 days (r=−0.18) (P<0.001). This study revealed that BW was an easily measured predictor of the ability of the lamb to resist infection with GIN and maintain PCV, and confirmed that FAMACHA scores are useful indicators of differences in FEC. Approximately 40% of female and 30% of male lambs did not show detectable levels of infection (i.e. FEC=0) under field conditions. The great variability that was observed in FEC and PCV suggests potential to use Djallonké sheep in breeding programs to enhance resistance to GIN.

Keywords

Burkina FasoDjallonké sheepFAMACHAHaemonchus contortusparasite resistance
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 11 , Issue 8 , August 2017 , pp. 1354 - 1362
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Álvarez, I, Traoré, A, Tamboura, HH, Kaboré, A, Royo, LJ, Fernández, I, Ouédraogo-Sanou, G, Sawadogo, L and Goyache, F 2009. Microsatellite analysis characterizes Burkina Faso as a genetic contact zone between Sahelian and Djallonke sheep. Animal Biotechnology 20, 47–57.Google Scholar
Baker, RL, Nagda, S, Rodriguez-Zas, SL, Southey, BR, Audho, JO, Aduda, EO and Thorpe, W 2003. Resistance and resilience to gastro-intestinal nematode parasites and relationship with productivity of Red Maasai, Dorper and Red Maasai X Dorper crossbred lambs in the subhumid tropics. Animal Science 76, 119–136.Google Scholar
Bambou, JC, Cei, W, Camous, S, Archimède, H, Decherf, A, Philibert, L, Barbier, C, Mandonnet, N and Gonzalez-Garcia, E 2013. Effect of single or trickle Haemonchus contortus experimental infection on digestibility and host responses of naïve Creole kids reared indoor. Veterinary Parasitology 191, 284–292.Google Scholar
Belem, AMG, Kaboré, A and Bessin, R 2005. Gastrointestinal helminthes of sheep in the central, eastern and northern parts of Burkina Faso. Bulletin of Animal Health and Production in Africa 53, 13–23.Google Scholar
Bishop, S, de Jong, M and Gray, D 1999. Opportunities for incorporating genetic elements into the management of farm animal diseases: policy issues. Background Study Paper Number 18. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, FAO, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Box, GEP and Cox, DR 1964. An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistics Society, Series B 26, 211–252.Google Scholar
Burke, JM, Kaplan, RM, Miller, JE, Terrill, TH, Getz, WR, Mobini, S, Valencia, E, Williams, MJ, Williamson, LH and Vatta, AF 2007. Accuracy of the FAMACHA system for on-farm use by sheep and goat producers in the southeastern United States. Veterinary Parasitology 147, 89–95.Google Scholar
Burke, JM and Miller, JE 2002. Relative resistance of Dorper crossbred ewes to gastrointestinal nematode infection compared with St. Croix and Katahdin ewes in the southeastern United States. Veterinary Parasitology 109, 265–275.Google Scholar
Charon, KM 2004. Genes controlling resistance to gastrointestinal nematodes. Animal Science Papers and Reports 22, 135–139 [In Proceedings on the Conference ‘Gene polymorphisms affecting health and production traits in farm animals’, 2–3 October 2003, Jastrzêbiec, Poland].Google Scholar
Craig, TM 1993. Anthelmintic resistance. Veterinary Parasitology 46, 21–131.Google Scholar
Doyle, EK and Eady, SJ 2001. Alternative approaches to presentation of worm resistance breeding values for Australian sheep. Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics 14, 195–198.Google Scholar
D’Agostino, RB and Stephens, M (ed.) 1986. Goodness-of-Fit Techniques. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Draper, NR. and Smith, H 1981. Applied Regression Analysis, 2nd edition. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 1980. Trypanotolerant livestock in West and Central Africa – Vol. 1: General Study. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper 20-1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
Getachew, T, Alemu, B, Solkner, J, Gizaw, S, Hailé, A, Gosheme, S and Notter, DR 2015. Relative resistance of Menz and Washera sheep breeds to artificial infection with Haemonchus contortus in Highlands of Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production 47, 961–968.Google Scholar
Goosens, B, Osaer, S, Kora, S, Jaitner, J, Ndao, M and Geerts, S 1997. The interaction of Trypanosoma congolense and Haemonchus contortus in Djallonké sheep. International Journal for Parasitology 27, 1579–1584.Google Scholar
Houdjik, JGM, Jessop, NS and Kyriazakis, I 2001. Nutrient partitioning between reproductive and immune functions in animals. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 60, 515–525.Google Scholar
Kaboré, A, Tamboura, HH, Belem, AMG and Traoré, A 2007. Traitements ethno-vétérinaires des parasitoses digestives des petits ruminants dans le plateau central du Burkina Faso. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences 1, 297–304.Google Scholar
Kaplan, RM, Burke, JM, Terrill, TH, Miller, JE, Getz, WR, Mobini, S, Valencia, E, Williams, M, Williamson, LH, Larsen, M and Vatta, AF 2004. Validation of the FAMACHA© eye color chart for detecting clinical anemia on sheep and goat farms in the southern United States. Veterinary Parasitology 123, 105–120.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, J, Dwinger, RH, Hallebeek, A, van Dijk, B and Pfister, K 1992. The interaction of Trypanosoma congolense and Haemonchus contortus infections in trypanotolerant N’Dama cattle. Veterinary Parasitology 43, 157–170.Google Scholar
Lompo, D 2014. Evaluation des méthodes de contrôle de la résistance des ovins Djallonkés à l’infestation artificielle par Haemoncus contortus. Mémoire de fin de cycle pour l’obtention du diplôme d’ingénieur d’élevage, l’Institut qPolytechnique Rural/Institut de Formation et de Recherches Appliquées de Katibougou, Koulikoro, Mali.Google Scholar
Malan, FS, Van Wyk, JA and Wessels, C 2001. Clinical evaluation of anaemia in sheep: early trials. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research 68, 165–174.Google Scholar
Murray, M, Trail, JCM, Turner, DA and Wissocq, YJ 1983. Productivité animale et trypanotolérance. Manuel de formation pour les activités du réseau. Centre International pour l'Élevage en Afrique), Addis-Ababa, Ethiopia.Google Scholar
Notter, DR 2011. The NSIP EBVs. NSIP EBV Notebook No. 1. Retrieved on 15 July 2016 from http://nsip.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/NSIP-EBV-Descriptions-FINAL-1.16.15.pdf Google Scholar
Ouédraogo-Koné, S 2008. The Potential of Some Sub-humid Zone Browse Species as Feed for Ruminants. Doctoral thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Overend, DJ, Phillips, ML, Poulton, AL and Foster, CED 1994. Anthelmintic resistance in Australian sheep nematode populations. Australian Veterinary Journal 71, 117–121.Google Scholar
Shalaby, HA 2013. Anthelminthic resistance; how to overcome it. Iran Journal of Parasitology 8, 18–32.Google Scholar
Shapiro, SS and Wilk, MB 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52, 591–611.Google Scholar
Sheferaw, D and Asha, A 2010. Efficacy of selected anthelminthics against gastrointestinal nematodes of sheep owned by smallholder farmers in Wolaita, Southern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Veterinary Journal 14, 31–38.Google Scholar
Signet Breeding Services 2014. Factsheet 7: The Signet guide to breeding for worm resistance. Retrieved on 10 July 2016 from http://www.signetfbc.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/factsheet7_breeding_for_worm_resistance_-_updated_2.pdf Google Scholar
Sotomaior, CS, Rosalinksi-Morais, R, Barbosa da Costa, AR, Maia, D, Monteiro, ALG and Van Wyk, J 2012. Sensitivity and specificity of the FAMACHA system in Suffolk sheep and crossbred Boer goats. Veterinary Parasitology 190, 114–119.Google Scholar
Tamboura, HH, Kaboré, H and Nikiema, L. 2006. Etiology and prophylaxis of henminthiasis in sheep in Burkina Faso. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 849, 474–478.Google Scholar
Tembely, S, Lahlou-Kassi, A, Rege, JEO, Mukasa-Mugerwa, E and Baker, RL 1996. Small ruminant management practices and control of helminthosis under traditional production systems in the cool Ethiopia highlands. In Small Ruminant Research and Development, Proceedings of the 3rd Biennal Conference of the African Small Ruminant Research Network (ed. SHB Lebbie and E Kagwini), pp. 149–157. International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Traoré, A, Tamboura, HH, Kaboré, A, Royo, LJ, Fernández, I, Älvarez, I, Sangaré, M, Bouchel, D, Poivey, JP, Francois, D, Toguyéni, A, Sawadogo, L and Goyache, F 2008. Multivariate characterisation of morphological traits in Burkina Faso sheep. Small Ruminant Research 80, 62–67.Google Scholar
Urquhart, GM, Jarrett, WF, Jennings, FW, McIntyre, WI, Mulligan, W and Sharp, NC 1996. Immunity to Haemonchus contortus infection: Failure of X-irradiated larvae to immunize young lambs. American Journal of Veterinary Research 27, 1641–1643.Google Scholar
Van Wyk, J and Bath, G 2002. The FAMACHA© system for managing haemonchosis in sheep and goats by clinically identifying individual animals for treatment. Veterinary Research 33, 509–529.Google Scholar
Vanimisetti, HB, Andrew, SL, Notter, DR and Zajac, AM 2004a. Inheritance of fecal egg count and packed cell volume and their relationship with production traits in sheep infected with Haemonchus contortus . Journal of Animal Science 82, 1602–1611.Google Scholar
Vanimisetti, HB, Greiner, SP, Zajac, AM and Notter, DR 2004b. Performance of hair sheep composite breeds: resistance of lambs to Haemonchus contortus . Journal of Animal Science 82, 595–604.Google Scholar
Waller, PJ 1994. The development of anthelmintic resistance in ruminant livestock. Acta Tropica 56, 233–243.Google Scholar
Whitlock, HV 1948. Some modifications of the McMaster helminthic egg counting techniques and apparatus. Journal of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research in Australia 21, 177–180.Google Scholar
World Bank 2009. Awakening Africa’s Sleeping Giant: Prospects for Commercial Agriculture in the Guinea Savannah Zone and Beyond. World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Traoré supplementary material

Supplementary Figure

Download Traoré supplementary material(File)
File 215.1 KB