Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:40:58.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Review: The effect of nutrition on timing of pubertal onset and subsequent fertility in the bull

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2018

D. A. Kenny*
Affiliation:
Animal Bioscience Research Department, Teagasc Grange, Dunsany, C15 PW93, Co. Meath, Ireland School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 F6X4, Dublin 4, Ireland
C. J. Byrne
Affiliation:
Animal Bioscience Research Department, Teagasc Grange, Dunsany, C15 PW93, Co. Meath, Ireland School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, D04 F6X4, Dublin 4, Ireland

Abstract

The advent of genomic selection has led to increased interest within the cattle breeding industry to market semen from young bulls as early as possible. However, both the quantity and quality of such semen is dictated by the age at which these animals reach puberty. Enhancing early life plane of nutrition of the bull stimulates a complex biochemical interplay involving metabolic and neuroendocrine signalling and culminating in enhanced testicular growth and development and earlier onset of sexual maturation. Recent evidence suggests that an enhanced plane of nutrition leads to an advancement of testicular development in bulls at 18 weeks of age. However, as of yet, much of the neuronal mechanisms regulating these developmental processes remain to be elucidated in the bull. While early life nutrition clearly affects the sexual maturation process in bulls, there is little evidence for latent effects on semen traits post-puberty. Equally the influence of prevailing nutritional status on the fertility of mature bulls is unclear though management practices that result in clinical or even subclinical metabolic disease can undoubtedly impact upon normal sexual function. Dietary supplements enriched with various polyunsaturated fatty acids or fortified with trace elements do not consistently affect reproductive function in the bull, certainly where animals are already adequately nourished. Further insight on how nutrition mediates the biochemical interaction between neuroendocrine and testicular processes will facilitate optimisation of nutritional regimens to optimise sexual maturation and subsequent semen production in bulls.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2018 

Implications

This review highlights the importance of enhancing early life nutrition of bulls in order to ensure early onset of puberty and sexual maturation. We also highlight the lack of evidence for a substantial effect of dietary augmentation on advancement of sexual maturity, once calves have reached 6 months of age, or indeed an appreciable effect of diet per se on semen quality in well managed post-pubertal bulls. Therefore, cattle producers and breeding companies must ensure that young bulls receive preferential nutritional and health management from birth in order to maximise lifetime fertility and return on their investment.

Introduction

The reproductive performance of the bull contributes to half of overall herd fertility (Perry and Patterson, Reference Perry and Patterson2001). While the incidence of infertility in bulls is generally thought to be low (3% to 5%), sub-fertility has been reported in ~25% of bulls undergoing standard bull breeding soundness evaluations (BBSE) (Kennedy et al., Reference Kennedy, Spitzer, Hopkins, Higdon and Bridges2002). In an era where cattle breeding programmes are dominated by genomically assisted selection approaches, the generation interval becomes an important limiting factor in dictating the rate of genetic gain (Kasinathan et al., Reference Kasinathan, Wei, Xiang, Molina, Metzger, Broek, Kasinathan, Faber and Allan2015). Genomic selection has made it possible to identify potential elite sires within weeks of their birth, long before they are pubertal or even capable of producing spermatozoa. As a result, cattle breeding companies are now focusing on pre-pubertal management regimes that will hasten the onset of puberty and subsequent production of adequate quantities of high quality semen. In the immediate post-pubertal period, ejaculates from young bulls will typically only yield between 50 and 150 saleable doses of frozen semen. Indeed, during their first season at a breeding centre, a young bull may only have 35% to 50% of the semen production capacity of a mature sire (Amann and DeJarnette, Reference Amann and DeJarnette2012). Within the context of a seasonal calving management system, this situation can result in a large imbalance between supply and demand of semen from genetically elite young sires thus accentuating the requirement for appropriate management regimen to consistently advance the availability of adequate supplies.

Endocrine control of sexual maturation

It is now widely accepted that the early rise in LH, typically occurring between 10 and 20 weeks of age, is one of the most important factors in determining the age at onset of puberty in bulls (Rawlings and Evans, Reference Rawlings, Evans, Chandolia and Bagu1995). Hypophyseal portal vein cannulation has shown that GnRH pulsatile secretion occurs as early as 2 weeks of age. However, LH secretion is not evident until 8 weeks of age (Rodriguez and Wise, Reference Rodriguez and Wise1989), indicating the cessation of the infantile period and beginning of the pre-pubertal period. The same study also demonstrated that the frequency of pulsatile release of GnRH, within a 10 h period, increases twofold between 2 and 12 weeks of age. The secretion of FSH is typically high post-natally and remains elevated until ~20 weeks of age, after which it declines, reaching a nadir at ~25 weeks of age (Brito, Reference Brito2014). This raises the question as to why GnRH secretion exclusively promotes the production and secretion of FSH in the immediate post-natal period. One possible reason is due to the role that FSH plays in Sertoli cell differentiation during early life and possibility pre-natally (Brito, Reference Brito2014). For example, a combination of IGF-1 and FSH positively influenced the proliferation of Sertoli cells, cultured in vitro from testicular tissue of 8-week-old calves (Dance et al., Reference Dance, Kastelic and Thundathil2017). These data also demonstrate a lack of effect from FSH alone, suggesting that the metabolic status of the bull calf could impact on the number of Sertoli cells that are available to produce spermatozoa in later life.

Systemic concentrations of testosterone (TT) recorded in bull calves before 24 weeks of age are normally low with a marked rise thereafter coinciding with rapid testicular growth (Rawlings et al., Reference Rawlings and Evans2008; Byrne et al., Reference Byrne, Fair, English, Holden, Dick, Lonergan and Kenny2018a). This initial rise in LH secretion is necessary for differentiation and maturation of testicular Leydig cells, leading to the production and secretion of TT. As Leydig cells begin to increase steroidogenesis, negative feedback to the hypothalamus limits further gonadotropin production and secretion. This androgen negative feedback loop in bulls has been reviewed in detail by Rawlings and Evans (Reference Rawlings, Evans, Chandolia and Bagu1995). The importance of TT for testicular growth has been shown in Angus bull calves where TT concentrations >1 ng/ml, at 20 weeks of age, was subsequently correlated (r=0.67) with larger testes and a greater Sertoli cell number at 54 weeks of age (Moura et al., Reference Moura, Souza and Erickson2011).

Metabolic influence on sexual development

Metabolic hormones play an important role in sexual development of the bull through hypothalamus targeted signalling processes which in turn regulates GnRH pulsatility. The expected systemic profiles of IGF-1, insulin, leptin and growth hormone in beef bulls receiving adequate nutrition from 10 to 70 weeks of age have been reviewed by Brito (Reference Brito2014).

In both beef (Brito et al., Reference Brito, Barth, Rawlings, Wilde, Crews, Mir and Kastelic2007a, Reference Brito, Barth, Rawlings, Wilde, Crews, Mir and Kastelic2007d and Reference Brito, Barth, Rawlings, Wilde, Crews, Boisclair, Ehrhardt and Kastelic2007c) and dairy bulls (Dance et al., Reference Dance, Thundathil, Wilde, Blondin and Kastelic2015; Byrne et al., Reference Byrne, Fair, English, Urh, Sauerwein, Crowe, Lonergan and Kenny2018b), studies have shown that offering pre-pubertal bulls an enhanced plane of nutrition leads to an improved metabolic state which in turn initiates an increase in gonadotropin secretion and advanced onset of puberty and sexual maturation. Temporal secretion patterns of IGF-1 and LH were reported in Holstein-Friesian bulls (Dance et al., Reference Dance, Thundathil, Wilde, Blondin and Kastelic2015), highlighting the role of IGF-1 in the regulation of the early gonadotropin rise and subsequent reproductive development. GnRH neurons express mRNA for IGF-1 and IGF-1R in an age-dependent manner, indicating the existence of an autocrine regulatory mechanism of the IGF-1 system in neuronal GnRH secretion. Moreover, treatment with IGF-1 also increases LH secretion in castrated rams in vivo (Adam et al., Reference Adam, Findlay and Moore1998). In addition, exogenous insulin administration supressed the release of neuro peptide-Y (NPY) in the paraventricular nucleus in the hypothalamus leading to reduced circulating concentrations of LH (60% reduction in males and 90% reduction in females). Reductions in LH secretion have also been reported following disruption of hypothalamus insulin receptors in mice (Bruning et al., Reference Bruning, Gautam, Burks, Gillette, Schubert, Orban, Klein, Krone, Muller-Wieland and Kahn2000). This in turn was associated with impaired spermatogenesis and ovarian follicle maturation. In ruminants, improving the nutrition of mature rams led to an increase in circulating and cerebrospinal fluid insulin concentrations resulting in increased GnRH/LH secretion (Blache et al., Reference Blache, Chagas, Blackberry, Vercoe and Martin2000).

The role of leptin in the regulation of gonadotrophin secretion in livestock has been reviewed (Barb and Kraeling, Reference Barb and Kraeling2004), with the hormone playing an important role in energy intake and satiety. Leptin secretion increases proportionally in line with accumulation of body fat (Landry et al., Reference Landry, Cloutier and Martin2013). The primary location of leptin receptors in the brain is in the hypothalamus, and was thought to be in areas associated with appetite control and reproduction. However, a lack of leptin receptors in GnRH neurons has been confirmed in rodents (Quennell et al., Reference Quennell, Mulligan, Tups, Liu, Phipps, Kemp, Herbison, Grattan and Anderson2009); suggesting that leptin may play an indirect rather than a direct role in reproduction. Indeed, the regulatory role of leptin on GnRH pulsatility is now thought to be mediated via an afferent neuronal network comprising kisspeptin neurons (Pinilla et al., Reference Pinilla, Aguilar, Dieguez, Millar and Tena-Sempere2012); however, this has yet to be substantiated in the bull.

When referring to the role of leptin in reproduction, it is important to consider the metabolic status of the animals, as it has a major influence on the responsiveness to leptin. In ruminants, exogenous leptin will only evoke a significant gonadotropin response if the animal has been fasted or subjected to chronic negative energy balance (Amstalden et al., Reference Amstalden, Harms, Welsh, Randel and Williams2005). Numerous studies examining the effect of plane of nutrition in bulls before 6 months of age report no difference in blood leptin concentration (Brito et al., Reference Brito, Barth, Rawlings, Wilde, Crews, Mir and Kastelic2007a; Dance et al., Reference Dance, Thundathil, Wilde, Blondin and Kastelic2015; Byrne et al., Reference Byrne, Fair, English, Urh, Sauerwein, Crowe, Lonergan and Kenny2018b); with this lack of difference most likely due to the relatively small amounts of adipose tissue present at this age. Despite this, our own recent work shows that that leptin concentrations are greater in bull calves offered a high plane of nutrition post 6 months of age (Byrne et al., Reference Byrne, Fair, English, Urh, Sauerwein, Crowe, Lonergan and Kenny2018b) consistent with increased ultrasonically measured back fat in these animals. Adiponectin, another adipokine, is found at greater systemic concentrations in animals with a higher fat deposition (Comninos et al., 2014). Increased adiponectin concentrations are associated with disturbances in GnRH pulsatility in men apparently mediated via downregulation of the KISS1 gene in the hypothalamus (Wen et al., Reference Wen, Lv, Yang, Nie, Cheng, Yang, Ge, Li and Ning2008), indicating that adiponectin has an opposing effect to that of leptin on reproduction. Adiponectin receptors; AdipoR1 and AdipoR2, are expressed in both the human anterior pituitary and in the hypothalamus (Wen et al., Reference Wen, Lv, Yang, Nie, Cheng, Yang, Ge, Li and Ning2008). We recently reported that serum concentrations are reduced at 12 weeks of age in pre-pubertal bull calves offered a high v. a low plane of nutrition (Byrne et al., Reference Byrne, Fair, English, Urh, Sauerwein, Crowe, Lonergan and Kenny2017b). Adiponectin and its receptors has also been found in spermatozoa of Holstein-Friesian bulls (Kasimanickam et al., Reference Kasimanickam, Kasimanickam, Kastelic and Stevenson2013). Studies by the same group have found that serum concentration of AdipoQ (R 2=0.80) and spermatozoal mRNA abundances for AdipoR1 (R 2=0.80) and AdipoR2 (R 2=0.90) were positively related, to sire conception rate.

Resistin is a secretory protein, produced by both white and brown adipose tissue, but has also been identified in other peripheral tissues. The role of resistin in reproductive function in both male and female humans and rodents has been reviewed (Rak et al., Reference Rak, Mellouk, Froment and Dupont2017); the authors concluded that resistin is present and active in the hypothalamo–pituitary–gonadal axis and many in vitro studies report that adipokines such as resistin can regulate gonadal steroidogenesis and gametogenesis. While there are no data for pre-pubertal bulls, dairy cows offered divergent planes of nutrition displayed no difference in apelin (Weber et al., Reference Weber, Locher, Huber, Kenéz, Rehage, Tienken, Meyer, Dänicke, Sauerwein and Mielenz2016); however, it should be noted that body condition score was also unaffected, indicating that the diets may not have evoked sufficiently different metabolic status in the population of cows under investigation. Apelin is an adipokine, up-regulated by insulin and has been shown to increase glucose uptake by adipose tissue in mice (Dray et al., Reference Dray, Knauf, Daviaud, Waget, Boucher, Buléon, Cani, Attané, Guigné and Carpéné2008). Intra-cerebral infusion of apelin decreases testosterone release by suppressing LH secretion in rats (Sandal et al., Reference Sandal, Tekin, Seker, Beytur, Vardi, Colak, Tapan, Yildiz and Yilmaz2015). As both resistin and apelin are implicated in signalling metabolic status and the hypothalamus has receptors for interpreting nutrient availability; their influence on hypothalamic function warrants further investigation and the role of resistin and apelin in the hypothalamus and pituitary remains to be determined, in cattle.

Neuroendocrine regulation of puberty

While there are many factors which influence the onset of puberty and subsequent reproductive function in bulls all are mediated through the hypothalamic-pituitary-axis. There has been a large volume of research into the role of neuroendocrinology in ovarian function and female fertility and has been reviewed by Duittoz et al. (Reference Duittoz, Tillet, Le Bourhis and Schibler2016) but research on the neuroendocrinological control on testicular function and semen production is limited (Plant, Reference Plant2015). In the case of bulls this lack of knowledge is further accentuated and many of the hypotheses proposed for bulls are based on results that have been extrapolated from data generated by studies in heifers or cows. The arcuate nucleus (ARC) of the hypothalamus is among the most important with regard to reproduction due to its role in interpreting metabolic signals, such as those discussed above, to nuclei that are responsible for GnRH release (Hill et al., Reference Hill, Elmquist and Elias2008). Therefore, the ARC manipulates the timing of sexual development in bulls via regulation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) secretion (Brito et al., Reference Brito, Barth, Rawlings, Wilde, Crews, Boisclair, Ehrhardt and Kastelic2007c). Kisspeptin (KP), pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) and NPY are some of the better known neuropeptides that are involved in the initiation of pulsatile LH release, required for puberty to occur (Amstalden et al., Reference Amstalden, Cardoso, Alves and Williams2014). Neuropeptides known to decrease (i.e. POMC) and increase (i.e. NPY) feed intake have been located in the ARC and pre-optic area (POA) in close proximity to kisspeptin neurons in sheep (Backholer et al. Reference Backholer, Smith, Rao, Pereira, Iqbal, Ogawa, Li and Clarke2010). These latter authors (Backholer et al. (Reference Backholer, Smith, Rao, Pereira, Iqbal, Ogawa, Li and Clarke2010) also reported a possible interaction between these neuronal pathways when they observed that intra-cerebroventricular injection of KP increased NPY gene expression and resulted in a decrease in POMC gene expression in the ARC. They also demonstrated the close contact between POMC fibres and kisspeptin cells which is supported by Cardoso et al. (Reference Cardoso, Alves, Sharpton, Williams and Amstalden2015) who reported an increase in POMC mRNA in the ARC of heifers on an elevated plane of nutrition. While not the only neuropeptide that promotes GnRH secretion, nesfatin, a post-translational processing product derived from nucleobindin2 (NUCB2), has been identified as a potent, anorexigenic agent (García-Galiano et al., Reference García-Galiano, Navarro, Gaytan and Tena-Sempere2010). Moreover, the same authors also report that nesfatin plays an important role in gonadotropin secretion during the peri-pubertal period in female rats; however, nutrient restriction results in a reduction in nesfatin and thus GnRH.

Recently, we offered Holstein-Friesian calves a high or a low plane of nutrition from 2 to 18 weeks of age at the end of which we harvested hypothalamic and anterior pituitary tissue. Following a targeted qPCR approach a down regulation in ghrelin receptor was observed in the ARC of the hypothalamus and the anterior pituitary tissue of bulls offered a high plane of nutrition (English et al., unpublished data), consistent with the inhibitory effect of ghrelin on GnRH pulsatility in heifers (Chouzouris et al., Reference Chouzouris, Dovolou, Dafopoulos, Georgoulias, Vasileiou, Fthenakis, Anifandis and Amiridis2016). Conversely, RNA sequencing data showed no effect of plane of nutrition on gene expression in the ARC nucleus at 18 weeks of age (English et al., unpublished data). In the anterior pituitary, of the same calves genes relating to cell cycle processes such as mitotic roles of polo-like kinase and cell cycle: G2/M DNA damage checkpoint regulation were down regulated in the low relative to the high plane of nutrition groups; however, there was no evidence for differential expression of genes with a known function in reproductive processes in the anterior pituitary. In the testes, genes involved in cholesterol and androgen biosynthesis were downregulated in bull calves on the low compared with the high plane of nutrition. In agreement with this finding, the calves on the high plane of nutrition also displayed characteristics of greater testicular development such as heavier testes, greater Sertoli cell number and volume density, seminiferous tubule diameter and more mature spermatogenic cells; indicating that these calves were at a more advanced physiological stage of sexual maturity. It is clear that these neuronal pathways influence the early onset of puberty; however, clarity is required to determine the exact mechanisms mediating the effect of elevated nutritional regimes on initiation of the pubertal process (Amstalden et al., Reference Amstalden, Cardoso, Alves and Williams2014). In addition, the influence of the more recently discovered adipokines, amongst other signalling proteins, on the hypothalamic–pituitary–testicular axis in bulls remains to be elucidated.

Early life nutrition (birth to 6 months)

On commencing this review, we intended to conduct a meta-analysis of studies which have examined the effect of plane of nutrition on age at onset of puberty in bulls. However, on reviewing the published literature, we were unable to find sufficient studies to provide a meaningful analysis (Table 1). Moreover, commonality in design between these studies was almost non-existent. A summary of Table 1 suggests that offering a high plane of nutrition to bull calves during the putative window of increased gonadotrophin secretion (8 to 20 weeks of age) advances onset of puberty in both beef (Brito et al., Reference Brito, Barth, Rawlings, Wilde, Crews, Mir and Kastelic2007a, Reference Brito, Barth, Rawlings, Wilde, Crews, Mir and Kastelic2007b and Reference Brito, Barth, Rawlings, Wilde, Crews, Boisclair, Ehrhardt and Kastelic2007c) and dairy bulls (Dance et al., Reference Dance, Thundathil, Wilde, Blondin and Kastelic2015; Byrne et al., Reference Byrne, Fair, English, Holden, Dick, Lonergan and Kenny2018a). However, results are not wholly consistent for dairy bulls. For example, Harstine et al. (Reference Harstine, Maquivar, Helser, Utt, Premanandan, DeJarnette and Day2015) offered divergent planes of nutrition from 10 until 31 weeks of age to Holstein-Friesian dairy bulls and reported no difference in age at attainment of puberty. Also, in Holstein-Friesian bulls, divergent planes of nutrition offered during the infantile period (birth to 12 weeks of age) did not result in differences in age at attainment of puberty (Bollwein et al., Reference Bollwein, Janett and Kaske2016 and Reference Bollwein, Janett and Kaske2017). In the latter study, it is possible that the early gonadotropin rise was missed due to premature cessation of the nutritional regimen. From this work it is obvious that there is a necessity for further research in order to identify the specific window of opportunity for nutritional modulation of HPT function and the specific biochemical pathways involved.

Table 1 Effects of plane of nutrition on pubertal and sexual development in bulls

a,b,c,dValues within study with different superscripts differ significantly (P<0.05).

1 Based on ability to produce an ejaculate containing ⩾50 million sperm with ⩾10% progressive linear motility (Wolf et al., 1965).

2 Based on ability to produce a pubertal ejaculate with ⩾70% morphologically normal sperm and ⩾30% progressive linear motility (Brito et al., 2004).

3 Based on attainment of scrotal circumference of 28 cm (Lunstra et al., 1978).

Six months to puberty

Similar to overall body growth, the testes of pre-pubertal bulls follow a sigmoidal growth trajectory (Rawlings et al., Reference Rawlings and Evans2008); with the most rapid period of scrotal occurring from ~25 weeks of age onwards. Despite incremental scrotal growth being greater after 6 months of age, studies in beef bulls (Brito et al., Reference Brito, Barth, Rawlings, Wilde, Crews, Boisclair, Ehrhardt and Kastelic2007c) together with our own work in dairy bulls (Byrne et al., Reference Byrne, Fair, English, Holden, Dick, Lonergan and Kenny2018a) have shown that there is no effect of prevailing plane nutrition during this period on the age at which puberty is reached. For example, Brito et al. (Reference Brito, Barth, Rawlings, Wilde, Crews, Boisclair, Ehrhardt and Kastelic2007c) using Angus and Angus×Charolais bulls, offered either a control or restricted plane of nutrition from 10 until 26 weeks of age. Following this the control bulls were maintained on the same plane of nutrition, whereas their previously restricted contemporaries were offered either the control or an enhanced plane of nutrition. Likewise, using Holstein-Friesian bulls, Byrne et al. (Reference Byrne, Fair, English, Holden, Dick, Lonergan and Kenny2018a) offered a high or a low plane of nutrition from 2 until 24 weeks of age; thereafter, bulls were re-assigned within their original dietary group to either remain on their diet or move to the opposite diet, until puberty. In both studies, bulls offered an improved plane of nutrition after reaching 6 months of age displayed BW and scrotal growth similar to that of bulls that were afforded the consistently unrestricted dietary regimen. However, despite achieving a similar growth rate post 6 months of age, bulls restricted in early life were 25 days older at puberty than their counterparts, unrestricted during this period, thus showing an inability to ‘compensate’ for their earlier dietary restriction/poorer metabolic status. The conclusion of both studies is that the plane of nutrition offered before 6 months of age is the most important determinant of age at puberty in bulls and attempts to mitigate against early life nutritional restriction by offering an enhanced plane of nutrition thereafter, will be in earnest. In addition, at least in the case of Holstein-Friesian bulls, the advantages of an unrestricted plane of nutrition, in terms of influencing age at puberty are not reversed by moderate dietary restriction post 6 months of age (Byrne et al., Reference Byrne, Fair, English, Holden, Dick, Lonergan and Kenny2018a) again highlighting the central importance of early life management.

Effect of nutrition on post-pubertal semen characteristics

Pre-pubertal nutrition

Based on our own findings (Byrne et al., Reference Byrne, Fair, English, Holden, Dick, Lonergan and Kenny2018a) and that of Dance et al. (Reference Dance, Thundathil, Blondin and Kastelic2016) with Holstein-Friesian bulls, sexual maturation occurs, on average, ~35 days after puberty, again highlighting the importance of early life nutrition. Notwithstanding this, while an improved nutritional status during early life advances sexual maturity, latent effects, per se on semen production thereafter, seem limited. Dance et al. (Reference Dance, Thundathil, Blondin and Kastelic2016) reported that enhanced nutrition up to 31 weeks of age increased the number of harvestable spermatozoa by ~30% in bulls, post-puberty. Characteristics affecting fertility, such as post-thawing motility, in vitro fertilisation (IVF) ability, live/dead ratios and spermatozoal proteins were unaffected by early life nutrition. In contrast, both our own findings (Byrne et al. Reference Byrne, Fair, English, Holden, Dick, Lonergan and Kenny2018a) and those of Harstine et al. (Reference Harstine, Maquivar, Helser, Utt, Premanandan, DeJarnette and Day2015) show that pre-pubertal plane of nutrition has no effect on the number of harvestable sperm post-puberty. All three studies are unanimous in finding no evidence for latent effects of pre-pubertal nutrition on the quality of post-pubertal semen production. In addition to the findings of Dance et al. (Reference Dance, Thundathil, Blondin and Kastelic2016), recent data from our group indicate that there is no effect of pre-pubertal plane of nutrition on oocyte fertilisation or subsequent blastocyst rate when post-pubertal frozen-thawed semen was used under IVF conditions (Byrne et al., unpublished). Notwithstanding this, older studies have reported that a high plane of nutrition; in particular, high cereal-based diet can negatively impact progressive motility and sperm morphology in beef bulls (Coulter et al., Reference Coulter, Cook and Kastelic1997). These observations coincided with an associated increase in scrotal temperature in bulls offered an 80% cereal compared with a 100% forage diet from ~6 to 12 months of age. In contrast, data from our research group report that offering a barley-based concentrate on an ad libitum basis during the pre-pubertal period alters scrotal temperature; has no negative effects on semen quality (Byrne et al., Reference Byrne, Fair, English, Holden, Dick, Lonergan and Kenny2018a).

Post-pubertal nutrition and semen production

All over the world potential breeding bulls are commonly offered an excessively high level of energy dense concentrate feed before being offered for sale. While the early sections of this review have highlighted the importance of a high plane of nutrition for hastening the age at puberty; there is evidence that increasing the amount of concentrates in a bull’s diet can have a negative impact on semen quality (Coulter et al., Reference Coulter, Cook and Kastelic1997). It is widely accepted that testicular temperature of the bull must be maintained at 2°C to 6°C lower than body temperature (Kastelic, Reference Kastelic2014) in order for normal spermatogenesis to occur. Infrared thermography has been used to assess scrotal temperature gradient in bulls (Kastelic et al., Reference Kastelic, Cook, Coulter, Wallins and Entz1996); with a smaller gradient (difference in temperature between testicular vascular cone and bottom of scrotum) associated with increased proportions of damaged sperm cells. An increase in dietary energy intake has been associated with a concomitant increase in scrotal fatness and temperature and decreases in the percentage of morphologically normal and progressively linear motile sperm in bulls (Coulter et al., Reference Coulter, Cook and Kastelic1997). In contrast to these findings, we have shown that offering ad libitum access to high energy, grain-based diets for an extended period during pre-pubertal and early post-pubertal stages of development does not negatively impact semen quality of Holstein-Friesian bulls, despite elevating scrotal fatness and surface temperature (Byrne et al., Reference Byrne, Fair, English, Holden, Dick, Lonergan and Kenny2018a). Bulls on a high plane of nutrition in our study, had an ADG of 1.6 kg/day for 3 to 5 months before puberty, which is similar to that of the Angus and Angus×Charolais bulls reported by Brito et al. (Reference Brito, Barth, Wilde and Kastelic2012), where no negative effects on semen production were also reported.

Rapid introduction of concentrate-based diets, rich in readily rumen fermentable carbohydrate to cattle results in a possible reduction in ruminal pH (Owens et al., Reference Owens, Secrist, Hill and Gill1998), leading to sub-acute ruminal (SARA) or even acute acidosis. Animals suffering from SARA may not display overt symptoms and remain untreated. In mature Saint Gertrudis bulls, SARA was induced by oral administration of highly soluble oligo-fructose and compared with non-acidotic control animals which were administered water orally (Callaghan et al., Reference Callaghan, McAuliffe, Rodgers, Hernandez-Medrano and Perry2016). Bulls challenged with oligo-fructose experienced a drop in ruminal pH to 5.7 within 8 h of administration and ruminal pH did not return to levels comparable with the control animal until 24 h after dosing. The transient induction of SARA in that study led to a reduction in the percentage of morphologically normal sperm with large increases in proximal droplets, knobbed acrosome and vacuoles also reported 60 days after oligo-fructose administration. It is also worth noting that these increases in abnormal sperm morphology had not decreased by the end of the trial (90 days post oligo-fructose administration).

Feeding cattle high concentrate-based diets also leads to an increased incidence of laminitis. The role of dietary protein in hoof health is less clear with reports suggesting both putatively positive and negative effects of rumen degradable protein on the incidence of laminitis (Lean et al., Reference Lean, Westwood, Golder and Vermunt2013). Conversely, an inadequate supply of the sulphur-containing amino acids, methionine and cysteine to the corium may increase incidence of lameness as a result of the formation of soft horn. In our studies we failed to observe any negative effect on locomotion score when the aforementioned young Holstein-Friesian bulls were offered ad libitum access to concentrate from ~2 weeks to 18 months of age (Byrne et al., unpublished). Whether such chronic exposure to high grain diets during this key developmental phase could have a latent impact on joint health warrants further investigation. Indeed in a study of bulls culled for infertility in Sweden, Persson et al. (Reference Persson, Söderquist and Ekman2007) reported that despite observing no clinical signs of lameness, 67% of the 34 infertile bulls had moderate or severe lesions associated with osteoarthritis compared with none in a contemporary group of 11 control (normal fertility) bulls. In addition, assessment of caudal sperm from infertile bulls showed that sperm morphology was not sufficiently poor to explain complete infertility, and the author suggested that weakness in the hind limbs as a consequence of the observed joint lesions may have been the primary cause of infertility. The Swedish study highlights another issue around bull fertility, which is libido. Such bulls will very likely pass a BBSE when EE is used to collect semen for evaluation. Despite the importance of normal expression of sexual impetus, there is limited research in the area in recent years. Wierzbowski (Reference Wierzbowski1978) reported that offering bulls a high compared with a low plane of nutrition reduced libido as a consequence of inducing greater BW with knock on negative effects for locomotory ability. Libido appears to be influenced by a range of factors, as reviewed by Petherick (Reference Petherick2005) making treatment low libido bulls particularly challenging.

Dietary restriction and weight loss

In a series of experiments, Angus, Hereford and Angus×Hereford bulls were offered either protein-deficient diets (8, 5 or ~1.35% CP) diets ad libitum or a diet with adequate CP concentration (14%) at a quantity equivalent to 2.25% of BW, adjusted every 14 days between 8 and 12 months of age (Meacham et al., Reference Meacham, Cunha, Warnick, Hentges and Hargrove1963). Testes, epididymis, and seminal gland weights were markedly reduced in bulls fed protein-deficient rations. In addition, seminiferous tubule diameter and seminiferous epithelium thickness were lower in bulls with a restricted protein intake; however, this had no negative effects on semen production. Interestingly, in that study, semen characteristics were not affected until CP was reduced to 1.35%; semen volume and total spermatozoa in the ejaculate were decreased, but sperm morphology and motility remained the same as for the other dietary treatments. Indeed the apparent robustness of the spermatogenic process was evident from the fact that, protein restriction was so severe in these studies that half of the protein restricted (1.35%) bulls died or were slaughtered before imminent death after losing ~40% of their initial BW. In rams, planes of nutrition meeting either 110% of maintenance led to a reduction in testis mass and spermatogenesis associated with impaired basic Sertoli cell function but did not alter the number of Sertoli cells compared with a plane of nutrition meeting 90% of maintenance requirements. This reduction in Sertoli cell function led to DNA damage in sperm cells and reduced sperm velocity in rams also (Guan et al., Reference Guan, Liang, Hawken, Meachem, Malecki, Ham, Stewart, Guan and Martin2014).

Dietary supplements and semen quality/bull fertility

In the preceding sections we examined the impact of quantity of feed offered on aspects of semen quality and bull fertility. There are also a limited number of studies that have examined the potential of certain dietary supplements to augment reproductive potential in ruminants (Gholami et al., Reference Gholami, Chamani, Towhidi and Fazeli2010; Fair et al., Reference Fair, Doyle, Diskin, Hennessy and Kenny2014). Animals cannot synthesise omega-3 or omega-6 poly-unsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) de novo as they lack the appropriate fatty acid de-saturase enzymes and need to obtain these or their precursors from dietary sources. These PUFA are important components of animal cell membranes, and play a crucial role in oocyte fertilisation (Wathes et al., Reference Wathes, Abayasekara and Aitken2007). Indeed omega-3 and omega-6 PUFA cumulatively make up 30% to 40% of the lipid content in bovine spermatozoa cells (Byrne et al., Reference Byrne, Fair, English, Cirot, Staub, Lonergan and Kenny2017a).

Offering Holstein-Friesian bulls a DHA-enriched nutraceutical for 9 weeks resulted in no difference in semen volume, concentration per ml or total spermatozoa number (Gholami et al., Reference Gholami, Chamani, Towhidi and Fazeli2010). A subjective examination of motility in that study found a greater number of motile spermatozoa when bulls were fed the DHA-enriched diet; however, this was not substantiated when the same samples were analysed using computer-assisted semen analysis (CASA). The DHA-enriched diet led to a higher percentage of bulls displaying a positive hypo-osmotic swell test, suggesting an improvement in sperm cell membrane integrity in these animals. Unfortunately, cell FA compositional changes were not analysed in that study so it is impossible to gauge the level of cellular incorporation required to elicit the recorded response. In another study in bulls, employing alpha-linoleic acid (ALA) and palmitic acid (PA) supplements (Gürler et al., Reference Gürler, Calisici, Calisici and Bollwein2015), no difference in preliminary semen characteristics (volume, concentration, motility) was observed which agrees with the findings of Gholami et al. (Reference Gholami, Chamani, Towhidi and Fazeli2010). However, Bulls offered both the ALA and PA supplements had increased levels of plasma membrane and acrosome-intact cells post-thawing. Interestingly, while there was no difference in semen lipid peroxidation (LPO) levels, measured by BODIPY581/591, between treatments post-thawing; LPO was higher after a 3-h post-thaw incubation period in bulls offered the ALA supplement. While the quantity of spermatozoa produced has not been altered in bulls, dietary supplementation of rams with fish oil extract led to a higher semen concentration per ml; however, there was no difference between diets on any of the other semen quality parameters including semen volume, wave motion, progressive linear motility, ability to penetrate artificial mucus, or ability to resist lipid peroxidation in either fresh or liquid stored semen (Fair et al., Reference Fair, Doyle, Diskin, Hennessy and Kenny2014). Recent data from our research group (Byrne et al., Reference Byrne, Fair, English, Cirot, Staub, Lonergan and Kenny2017a) indicate that supplementing young post-pubertal bulls (14 months) for 12 weeks with either an omega-6 (safflower oil) or a an omega-3 (distilled fish oil) enriched diet altered the PUFA composition of spermatozoal cells and seminal plasma but did not lead to any appreciable improvements to the quantity or quality of fresh semen. Many of the reported improvements as a result of dietary PUFA supplementation are linked with post-thaw spermatozoa suggesting that PUFA are important for ensuring spermatozoa survive cryopreservation. Despite this, in our study we failed to observe any improvements in frozen-thawed semen analysed for a range of CASA motility or flow cytometry-based parameters (Byrne et al., Reference Byrne, Fair, English, Cirot, Staub, Lonergan and Kenny2017a).

Mineral supplementation and bull fertility

The dietary mineral requirements of cattle have been reviewed by (Ledoux and Shannon, Reference Ledoux and Shannon2005) and for most processes a relatively large dietary range is evident. Under normal circumstances unrestricted forage availability will meet minimal trace element requirements for bulls. In domestic farm species, zinc has been reported to play an important role in maintenance of testosterone production (Martin et al., Reference Martin, White, Markey and Blackberry1994) and also synthesis of RNA and DNA polymerases, necessary for sperm function (Hidiroglou and Knipfel, Reference Hidiroglou and Knipfel1984). Following copper and zinc supplementation to pre-pubertal beef bulls, Geary et al. (Reference Geary, Kelly, Spickard, Larson, Grings and Ansotegui2016) reported that although a greater percentage of supplemented bulls reached puberty earlier; no effect on semen quality was evident.

The most commonly used supplements are derived from inorganic (rock-based) minerals mainly as a function of cost. However, inorganic sources of minerals are not as easily absorbed as organic mineral compounds (Ledoux and Shannon, Reference Ledoux and Shannon2005). In this regard, when 4 to 9-year-old Angus and Gelbvieh×Angus bulls were supplemented with organic compared with inorganic forms of zinc, copper, cobalt and manganese, in one compound, the organic mineral compound resulted in 9% to 10% higher overall semen motility and progressive linear motility (Rowe et al., Reference Rowe, Powell, Kegley, Lester and Rorie2014). Using a large number (n=167) of yearling Angus bulls, Arthington et al. (Reference Arthington, Corah and Hill2002) found that increasing the inclusion level (60 v. 40 ppm) of a combination of organic and inorganic minerals in a dietary supplement at a high (60 ppm) led to a reduction in the number of bulls failing pre-sale BBSE. Most improvements in semen quality following dietary mineral supplementation are likely observed where the base forage offered is of poor nutritional composition.

Conclusions

Enhancing the plane of nutrition of bull calves during the first 6 months of life will increase gonadotropin secretion and testicular development, resulting in earlier onset of puberty. Recent evidence shows that this is likely mediated through the signalling activity of peripherally derived metabolites and metabolic hormones to neuroendocrine centres within the brain and mediated by the actions of specialised neuropeptides. This leads to enhanced gonadotrophin synthesis and secretion which in turn controls testicular development and function. Improvement of our knowledge on these complex biochemical interactions will be important for designing future nutritional regimes to hasten the onset of puberty, particularly for genetically elite young bulls. Post-pubertal nutrition also plays a role in maintenance of normal semen production; however, most of these improvements are often only observed in situations where animals are already deficient in the nutrient under investigation.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge funding from the Irish Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine under the Research Stimulus Fund (Ref: 11/S/116) and the Irish Research Council (GOIPG/2013/1391).

Declaration of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethics statement

The work described in this manuscript was carried out in accordance with local and national animal ethics recommendations.

Software and data repository resources

The data and models presented in this manuscript are not deposited in an official repository.

References

Adam, CL, Findlay, PA and Moore, AH 1998. Effects of insulin-like growth factor-1 on luteinizing hormone secretion in sheep. Animal Reproduction Science 50, 4556.Google Scholar
Amann, RP and DeJarnette, JM 2012. Impact of genomic selection of AI dairy sires on their likely utilization and methods to estimate fertility: a paradigm shift. Theriogenology 77, 795817.Google Scholar
Amstalden, M, Cardoso, RC, Alves, BRC and Williams, GL 2014. Reproduction symposium: hypothalamic neuropeptides and the nutritional programming of puberty in heifers. Journal of Animal Science 92, 32113222.Google Scholar
Amstalden, M, Harms, PG, Welsh, TH Jr., Randel, RD and Williams, GL 2005. Effects of leptin on gonadotropin-releasing hormone release from hypothalamic-infundibular explants and gonadotropin release from adenohypophyseal primary cell cultures: further evidence that fully nourished cattle are resistant to leptin. Animal Reproduction Science 85, 4152.Google Scholar
Arthington, J, Corah, L and Hill, D 2002. The effects of dietary zinc concentration and source on yearling bull growth and fertility. The Professional Animal Scientist 18, 282285.Google Scholar
Backholer, K, Smith, JT, Rao, A, Pereira, A, Iqbal, J, Ogawa, S, Li, Q and Clarke, IJ 2010. Kisspeptin cells in the ewe brain respond to leptin and communicate with neuropeptide Y and proopiomelanocortin cells. Endocrinology 151, 22332243.Google Scholar
Barb, CR and Kraeling, R 2004. Role of leptin in the regulation of gonadotropin secretion in farm animals. Animal Reproduction Science 82–83, 155167.Google Scholar
Blache, D, Chagas, LM, Blackberry, MA, Vercoe, PE and Martin, GB 2000. Metabolic factors affecting the reproductive axis in male sheep. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 120, 111.Google Scholar
Bollwein, H, Janett, F and Kaske, M 2016. Impact of nutritional programming on the growth, health, and sexual development of bull calves. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 56 (suppl.), S180S190.Google Scholar
Bollwein, H, Janett, F and Kaske, M 2017. Effects of nutrition on sexual development of bulls. Animal Reproduction 14, 607613.Google Scholar
Brito, LF, Barth, AD, Rawlings, NC, Wilde, RE, Crews, DH Jr., Mir, PS and Kastelic, JP 2007a. Effect of nutrition during calfhood and peripubertal period on serum metabolic hormones, gonadotropins and testosterone concentrations, and on sexual development in bulls. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 33, 118.Google Scholar
Brito, LF, Barth, AD, Rawlings, NC, Wilde, RE, Crews, DH Jr., Mir, PS and Kastelic, JP 2007b. Effect of improved nutrition during calfhood on serum metabolic hormones, gonadotropins, and testosterone concentrations, and on testicular development in bulls. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 33, 460469.Google Scholar
Brito, LF, Barth, AD, Rawlings, NC, Wilde, RE, Crews, DH Jr., Boisclair, YR, Ehrhardt, RA and Kastelic, JP 2007c. Effect of feed restriction during calfhood on serum concentrations of metabolic hormones, gonadotropins, testosterone, and on sexual development in bulls. Reproduction 134 (suppl.), 171181.Google Scholar
Brito, LFC 2014. Endocrine control of testicular development and initiation of spermatogenesis in bulls. In Bovine reproduction (ed. R Hopper), pp. 3038. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Brito, LFC, Barth, AD, Rawlings, NC, Wilde, RE, Crews, DJ, Mir, PS and Kastelic, JP 2007d. Circulating metabolic hormones during the peripubertal period and their association with testicular development in bulls. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 42, 502508.Google Scholar
Brito, LFC, Barth, AD, Wilde, RE and Kastelic, JP 2012. Effect of growth rate from 6 to 16 months of age on sexual development and reproductive function in beef bulls. Theriogenology 77, 13981405.Google Scholar
Brito, LF, Silva, AE, Unanian, MM, Dode, MA, Barbosa, RT and Kastelic, JP 2004. Sexual development in early-and late-maturing Bos indicus and Bos indicus× Bos taurus crossbred bulls in Brazil. Theriogenology 62, 11981217.Google Scholar
Bruning, JC, Gautam, D, Burks, DJ, Gillette, J, Schubert, M, Orban, PC, Klein, R, Krone, W, Muller-Wieland, D and Kahn, CR 2000. Role of brain insulin receptor in control of body weight and reproduction. Science 289, 21222125.Google Scholar
Byrne, CJ, Fair, S, English, AM, Cirot, M, Staub, C, Lonergan, P and Kenny, DA 2018a. Plane of nutrition pre and post-six months of age in Holstein-Friesian bulls: I. Effects on performance, body composition, age at puberty and post-pubertal semen production. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 34473459.Google Scholar
Byrne, CJ, Fair, S, English, AM, Holden, SA, Dick, JR, Lonergan, P and Kenny, DA 2017a. Dietary polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation of young post-pubertal dairy bulls alters the fatty acid composition of seminal plasma and spermatozoa but has no effect on semen volume or sperm quality. Theriogenology 90, 289300.Google Scholar
Byrne, CJ, Fair, S, English, AM, Urh, C, Sauerwein, H, Crowe, MA, Lonergan, P and Kenny, DA 2017b. Effect of breed, plane of nutrition and age on growth, scrotal development, metabolite concentrations and on systemic gonadotropin and testosterone concentrations following a GnRH challenge in young dairy bulls. Theriogenology 96, 5868.Google Scholar
Byrne, CJ, Fair, S, English, AM, Urh, C, Sauerwein, H, Crowe, MA, Lonergan, P and Kenny, DA 2018b. Plane of nutrition before and after 6 months of age in Holstein-Friesian bulls: II. Effects on metabolic and reproductive endocrinology and identification of physiological markers of puberty and sexual maturation. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 34603476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Callaghan, MJ, McAuliffe, P, Rodgers, RJ, Hernandez-Medrano, J and Perry, VE 2016. Subacute ruminal acidosis reduces sperm quality in beef bulls. Journal of Animal Science 94, 32153228.Google Scholar
Cardoso, RC, Alves, BR, Sharpton, SM, Williams, GL and Amstalden, M 2015. Nutritional programming of accelerated puberty in heifers: involvement of POMC neurones in the arcuate nucleus. Journal of Neuroendocrinology 8, 647657.Google Scholar
Chouzouris, TM, Dovolou, E, Dafopoulos, K, Georgoulias, P, Vasileiou, NG, Fthenakis, GC, Anifandis, G and Amiridis, GS 2016. Ghrelin suppresses the GnRH-induced preovulatory gonadotropin surge in dairy heifers. Theriogenology 86, 16151621.Google Scholar
Comninos, AN, Jayasena, CN and Dhillo, WS 2014. The relationship between gut and adipose hormones, and reproduction. Human Reproduction Update 20, 153174.Google Scholar
Coulter, GH, Cook, RB and Kastelic, JP 1997. Effects of dietary energy on scrotal surface temperature, seminal quality, and sperm production in young beef bulls. Journal of Animal Science 75, 10481052.Google Scholar
Dance, A, Kastelic, J and Thundathil, J 2017. A combination of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and FSH promotes proliferation of prepubertal bovine Sertoli cells isolated and cultured in vitro. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 29, 16351641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dance, A, Thundathil, J, Blondin, P and Kastelic, J 2016. Enhanced early-life nutrition of Holstein bulls increases sperm production potential without decreasing postpubertal semen quality. Theriogenology 86, 687694.Google Scholar
Dance, A, Thundathil, J, Wilde, R, Blondin, P and Kastelic, J 2015. Enhanced early-life nutrition promotes hormone production and reproductive development in Holstein bulls. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 987998.Google Scholar
Dray, C, Knauf, C, Daviaud, D, Waget, A, Boucher, J, Buléon, M, Cani, PD, Attané, C, Guigné, C and Carpéné, C 2008. Apelin stimulates glucose utilization in normal and obese insulin-resistant mice. Cell Metabolism 8, 437445.Google Scholar
Duittoz, AH, Tillet, Y, Le Bourhis, D and Schibler, L 2016. The timing of puberty (oocyte quality and management). In 32nd Meeting of the European Embryo Transfer Association, pp. 313–333 (AETE), Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
Fair, S, Doyle, DN, Diskin, MG, Hennessy, AA and Kenny, DA 2014. The effect of dietary n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids supplementation of rams on semen quality and subsequent quality of liquid stored semen. Theriogenology 81, 210219.Google Scholar
García-Galiano, D, Navarro, VM, Gaytan, F and Tena-Sempere, M 2010. Expanding roles of NUCB2/nesfatin-1 in neuroendocrine regulation. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology 45, 281290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geary, TW, Kelly, WL, Spickard, DS, Larson, CK, Grings, EE and Ansotegui, RP 2016. Effect of supplemental trace mineral level and form on peripubertal bulls. Animal Reproduction Science 168, 19.Google Scholar
Gholami, H, Chamani, M, Towhidi, A and Fazeli, MH 2010. Effect of feeding a docosahexaenoic acid-enriched nutriceutical on the quality of fresh and frozen-thawed semen in Holstein bulls. Theriogenology 74, 15481558.Google Scholar
Guan, Y, Liang, G, Hawken, PA, Meachem, SJ, Malecki, IA, Ham, S, Stewart, T, Guan, LL and Martin, GB 2014. Nutrition affects Sertoli cell function but not Sertoli cell numbers in sexually mature male sheep. Reproduction, Fertility and Development 28, 11521163.Google Scholar
Gürler, H, Calisici, O, Calisici, D and Bollwein, H 2015. Effects of feeding omega-3-fatty acids on fatty acid composition and quality of bovine sperm and on antioxidative capacity of bovine seminal plasma. Animal Reproduction Science 160, 97104.Google Scholar
Harstine, BR, Maquivar, M, Helser, LA, Utt, MD, Premanandan, C, DeJarnette, JM and Day, ML 2015. Effects of dietary energy on sexual maturation and sperm production in Holstein bulls. Journal of Animal Science 93, 27592766.Google Scholar
Hidiroglou, M and Knipfel, J 1984. Zinc in mammalian sperm: a review. Journal of Dairy Science 67, 11471156.Google Scholar
Hill, JW, Elmquist, JK and Elias, CF 2008. Hypothalamic pathways linking energy balance and reproduction. Endocrinology and Metabolism 294, E827E832.Google Scholar
Kasimanickam, VR, Kasimanickam, RK, Kastelic, JP and Stevenson, JS 2013. Associations of adiponectin and fertility estimates in Holstein bulls. Theriogenology 79, 766777.Google Scholar
Kasinathan, P, Wei, H, Xiang, T, Molina, JA, Metzger, J, Broek, D, Kasinathan, S, Faber, DC and Allan, MF 2015. Acceleration of genetic gain in cattle by reduction of generation interval. Scientific Reports 5, 8674.Google Scholar
Kastelic, JP 2014. Thermoregulation of the testes. In Bovine reproduction (ed. H Richard), pp. 2629. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Oxford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastelic, JP, Cook, RB, Coulter, GH, Wallins, GL and Entz, T 1996. Environmental factors affecting measurement of bovine scrotal surface temperature with infrared thermography. Animal Reproduction Science 41, 153159.Google Scholar
Kennedy, SP, Spitzer, JC, Hopkins, FM, Higdon, HL and Bridges, WC Jr. 2002. Breeding soundness evaluations of 3,648 yearling beef bulls using the 1993 Society for Theriogenology guidelines. Theriogenology 58, 947961.Google Scholar
Landry, D, Cloutier, F and Martin, LJ 2013. Implications of leptin in neuroendocrine regulation of male reproduction. Reproductive Biology 13, 114.Google Scholar
Lean, IJ, Westwood, CT, Golder, HM and Vermunt, JJ 2013. Impact of nutrition on lameness and claw health in cattle. Livestock Science 156, 7187.Google Scholar
Ledoux, DR and Shannon, MC 2005. Bioavailability and antagonists of trace minerals in ruminant metabolism. In Proceeding of 16th Annual Meeting, pp. 23–37, Florida Ruminant Nutrition Symposium, Gainesville, Florida.Google Scholar
Lunstra, DD, Ford, JJ and Echternkamp, SE 1978. Puberty in beef bulls: hormone concentrations, growth, testicular development, sperm production and sexual aggressiveness in bulls of different breeds. Journal of Animal Science 46, 10541062.Google Scholar
Martin, G, White, C, Markey, C and Blackberry, M 1994. Effects of dietary zinc deficiency on the reproductive system of young male sheep: testicular growth and the secretion of inhibin and testosterone. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 101, 8796.Google Scholar
Meacham, TN, Cunha, TJ, Warnick, AC, Hentges, JF and Hargrove, DD 1963. Influence of low protein rations on growth and semen characteristics of young beef bulls. Journal of Animal Science 22, 115120.Google Scholar
Moura, AA, Souza, CEA and Erickson, BH 2011. Early prepubertal testis criteria, seminiferous epithelium and hormone concentrations as related to testicular development in beef bulls. Animal Reproduction Science 124, 3947.Google Scholar
Owens, FN, Secrist, DS, Hill, WJ and Gill, DR 1998. Acidosis in cattle: a review. Journal of Animal Science 76, 275286.Google Scholar
Perry, GA and Patterson, DJ 2001. Determining reproductive fertility in herd bulls. Extension Publications MU, University of Missouri, MO, USA.Google Scholar
Persson, Y, Söderquist, L and Ekman, S 2007. Joint disorder; a contributory cause to reproductive failure in beef bulls? Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 49, 3137.Google Scholar
Petherick, JC 2005. A review of some factors affecting the expression of libido in beef cattle, and individual bull and herd fertility. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 90, 185205.Google Scholar
Pinilla, L, Aguilar, E, Dieguez, C, Millar, RP and Tena-Sempere, M 2012. Kisspeptins and reproduction: physiological roles and regulatory mechanisms. Physiological Reviews 92, 12351316.Google Scholar
Plant, TM 2015. The hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis. The Journal of Endocrinology 226, T41T54.Google Scholar
Quennell, JH, Mulligan, AC, Tups, A, Liu, X, Phipps, SJ, Kemp, CJ, Herbison, AE, Grattan, DR and Anderson, GM 2009. Leptin indirectly regulates gonadotropin-releasing hormone neuronal function. Endocrinology 150, 28052812.Google Scholar
Rak, A, Mellouk, N, Froment, P and Dupont, J 2017. Adiponectin and resistin: potential metabolic signals affecting hypothalamo-pituitary gonadal axis in females and males of different species. Reproduction 153, R215R226.Google Scholar
Rawlings, NC and Evans, ACO 1995. Androgen negative feedback during the early rise in LH-secretion in bull calves. Journal of Endocrinology 145, 243249.Google Scholar
Rawlings, N, Evans, ACO, Chandolia, RK and Bagu, ET 2008. Sexual maturation in the bull. Reproduction in Domestic Animals 43 (suppl. 2), 295301.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, RE and Wise, ME 1989. Ontogeny of pulsatile secretion of gonadotropin-releasing hormone in the bull calf during infantile and pubertal development. Endocrinology 124, 248256.Google Scholar
Rowe, MP, Powell, JG, Kegley, EB, Lester, TD and Rorie, RW 2014. Effect of supplemental tracemineral source on bull semen quality. The Professional Animal Scientist 30, 6873.Google Scholar
Sandal, S, Tekin, S, Seker, FB, Beytur, A, Vardi, N, Colak, C, Tapan, T, Yildiz, S and Yilmaz, B 2015. The effects of intracerebroventricular infusion of apelin-13 on reproductive function in male rats. Neuroscience Letters 602, 133138.Google Scholar
Wathes, DC, Abayasekara, DR and Aitken, RJ 2007. Polyunsaturated fatty acids in male and female reproduction. Biology of Reproduction 77, 190201.Google Scholar
Weber, M, Locher, L, Huber, K, Kenéz, Á, Rehage, J, Tienken, R, Meyer, U, Dänicke, S, Sauerwein, H and Mielenz, M 2016. Longitudinal changes in adipose tissue of dairy cows from late pregnancy to lactation. Part 1: The adipokines apelin and resistin and their relationship to receptors linked with lipolysis. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 15491559.Google Scholar
Wen, JP, Lv, WS, Yang, J, Nie, AF, Cheng, XB, Yang, Y, Ge, Y, Li, XY and Ning, G 2008. Globular adiponectin inhibits GnRH secretion from GT1-7 hypothalamic GnRH neurons by induction of hyperpolarization of membrane potential. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 371, 756761.Google Scholar
Wierzbowski, S 1978. The sexual behaviour of experimentally underfed bulls. Applied Animal Ethology 4, 5560.Google Scholar
Wolf, FR, Almquist, J and Hale, E 1965. Prepuberal behavior and puberal characteristics of beef bulls on high nutrient allowance. Journal of Animal Science 24, 761765.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Effects of plane of nutrition on pubertal and sexual development in bulls