Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T21:02:07.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Selenium supplementation of lactating dairy cows: effects on milk production and total selenium content and speciation in blood, milk and cheese

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2008

R. H. Phipps ,
A. S. Grandison ,
A. K. Jones ,
D. T. Juniper ,
E. Ramos-Morales  and
G. Bertin
R. H. Phipps*
Affiliation:
Centre for Dairy Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, RG6 6AR, UK
A. S. Grandison
Affiliation:
Department of Food Biosciences, University of Reading, RG6 6AP, UK
A. K. Jones
Affiliation:
Centre for Dairy Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, RG6 6AR, UK
D. T. Juniper
Affiliation:
Centre for Dairy Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, RG6 6AR, UK
E. Ramos-Morales
Affiliation:
Centre for Dairy Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, University of Reading, RG6 6AR, UK
G. Bertin
Affiliation:
Alltech France, EU Regulatory Affairs Dept, 14 Place Marie-Jeanne Bassot 92300 Levallois-Perret, France
*
E-mail: r.h.phipps@reading.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

Forty multiparous Holstein cows were used in a 16-week continuous design study to determine the effects of either selenium (Se) source, selenised yeast (SY) (derived from a specific strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-3060) or sodium selenite (SS), or Se inclusion rate in the form of SY in the diets of lactating dairy cows on the Se concentration and speciation in blood, milk and cheese. Cows received ad libitum a total mixed ration (TMR) with a 1 : 1 forage : concentrate ratio on a dry matter (DM) basis. There were four diets (T1 to T4), which differed only in either source or dose of Se additive. Estimated total dietary Se for T1 (no supplement), T2 (SS), T3 (SY) and T4 (SY) was 0.16, 0.30, 0.30 and 0.45 mg/kg DM, respectively. Blood and milk samples were taken at 28-day intervals and at each time point there were positive linear effects of Se in the form of SY on the Se concentration in blood and milk. At day 112, blood and milk Se values for T1 to T4 were 177, 208, 248 and 279 ± 6.6 and 24, 38, 57 and 72 ± 3.7 ng/g fresh material, respectively, and indicate improved uptake and incorporation of Se from SY. In whole blood, selenocysteine (SeCys) was the main selenised amino acid and the concentration of selenomethionine (SeMet) increased with the increasing inclusion rate of SY. In milk, there were no marked treatment effects on the SeCys content, but Se source had a marked effect on the concentration of SeMet. At day 112, replacing SS (T2) with SY (T3) increased the SeMet concentration of milk from 36 to 111 ng Se/g and its concentration increased further to 157 ng Se/g dried sample as the inclusion rate of SY increased further (T4) to provide 0.45 mg Se/kg TMR. Neither Se source nor inclusion rate affected the keeping quality of milk. At day 112, milk from T1, T2 and T3 was made into a hard cheese and Se source had a marked effect on total Se and the concentration of total Se comprised as either SeMet or SeCys. Replacing SS (T2) with SY (T3) increased total Se, SeMet and SeCys content in cheese from 180 to 340 ng Se/g, 57 to 153 ng Se/g and 52 to 92 ng Se/g dried sample, respectively. The use of SY to produce food products with enhanced Se content as a means of meeting the Se requirements is discussed.

Keywords

milkcheeseseleniumselenocysteineselenomethionine
Type
Full Paper
Information
animal , Volume 2 , Issue 11 , November 2008 , pp. 1610 - 1618
Copyright
Copyright © The Animal Consortium 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bierla, K, Vacchina, V, Szpunar, J, Bertían, G, Lobinski, R 2008a. Simultaneous derivatization of selenocysteine and selenomethionine in animal blood prior to their specific determination by 2D size-exclusion ion-pairing reversed-phase HPLC-ICP MS. Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry 23, 508–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bierla, K, Dernovics, M, Vacchina, V, Szpunar, J, Bertían, G, Lobinski, R 2008b. Determination of selenocysteine and selenomethionine in edible tissues by 2D size-exclusion ion-pairing reversed-phase HPLC-ICP MS following carbamidomethylation and protein extraction. Annals of Bioanalytical Chemistry 390, 1789–1793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, JW 1984. The interpretation of serum biochemistry test results in domestic animals. Veterinary Clinical Pathology 13, 7–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caja, G, Flores, AA, Salama, K, Salado, J, Bertin, G 2007. Organic selenium (Sel-Plex®) improves selenium content in milk and cheese in dairy goats. Journal of Dairy Science 90 (suppl. 1), 356.Google Scholar
Combs, GF 2001a. Impact of selenium and cancer prevention findings on the nutrition health paradigm. Nutrition and Cancer 40, 6–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Combs, GF 2001b. Selenium in global food systems. British Journal of Nutrition 85, 517–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fweja, LWT, Lewis, MJ, Grandison, AS 2007. Alternative strategies for activation of the natural lactoperoxidase system in cows’ milk: trials in Tanzania. Journal of Dairy Research 74, 382–387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Givens, DI, Cottyn, B, Dewey, PJS, Steg, A 1995. A comparison of the neutral detergent-cellulase method with other laboratory methods for predicting the digestibility in-vivo of maize silage from three European countries. Animal Feed Science and Technology 54, 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givens, DI, Allison, R, Cottrill, B, Blake, JS 2004. Enhancing the selenium content of bovine milk through alteration of the form and concentration of selenium in the diet of the dairy cow. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 84, 811–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grace, ND, Lee, J, Mills, RA, Death, AF 1997. Influence of Se status on milk Se concentrations in dairy cows. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 40, 75–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heard, JW, Stockdale, CR, Walker, GP, Leddin, CM, Dunshea, FR, McIntosh, GH, Shields, PM, McKenna, A, Young, GP, Doyle, PT 2007. Increasing selenium concentration in milk: effects of amount of selenium from yeast and cereal grain supplements. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 4117–4127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henderson, L, Gregory, J, Swan, G 2002. The National Diet and Nutrition Survey: adults aged 19–64 years. Volume 1: types and quantities of foods consumed. The Stationery Office, London.Google Scholar
Home Office 1986. Animal Scientific Procedures Act 1986. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London.Google Scholar
Jones, EL, Shingfield, KJ, Kohen, C, Jones, AK, Lupoli, B, Grandison, AS, Beever, DE, Williams, CM, Calder, PC, Yaqoob, P 2005. Chemical, physical and sensory properties of dairy products enriched with conjugated linoleic acid. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 2923–2937.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juniper, DT, Phipps, RH, Jones, AK, Bertin, G 2006. Selenium supplementation of lactating dairy cows: effect on selenium concentration in blood, milk, urine and feces. Journal of Dairy Science 89, 3544–3551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Juniper, DT, Phipps, RH, Ramos-Morales, E, Bertin, G 2008. Selenium persistency and speciation in the tissues of lambs following the withdrawal of dietary high-dose selenium-enriched yeast. Animal 2, 375–380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knowles, SO, Grace, ND, Wurms, K, Lee, J 1999. Significance of amount and form of dietary selenium on blood, milk, and casein selenium concentrations in grazing cows. Journal Dairy Science 82, 429–437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korhola, MA, Vainio, A, Edelmann, K 1986. Selenium yeast. Annals of Clinical Research 18, 65–68.Google ScholarPubMed
Marks, NE, Grandison, AS, Lewis, MJ 2001. Challenge testing the lactoperoxidase system in pasteurised milk. Journal of Applied Microbiology 91, 735–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food 1993. Prediction of energy values of compound feedstuffs for farm animals. Booklet 1285. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, London.Google Scholar
National Research Council 2001. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle, Seventh Revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Offer NW, Cotterill BR and Thomas C 1996. Relationship between silage evaluation and animal response. In Proceedings 11th International Silage Conference, Institute of Grassland and Environmental Research, pp. 26–38. Aberystwyth, UK.Google Scholar
Official Journal of the European Union 2004. List of the authorized additives in feedingstuffs published in application of Article 9t (b) of Council Directive 70/524/EEC concerning additives in feedingstuffs. C 50/1-143.Google Scholar
Official Journal of the European Union. 2006. Commission regulation (EC) No. 1750/2006 concerning the authorization of selenomethionine as a feed additive. 28 November 2006. L 330/9-11.Google Scholar
Ortman, K, Pehrson, B 1999. Effect of selenate as a feed supplement to dairy cows in comparison to selenite and selenium yeast. Journal Animal Science 77, 3365–3370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pehrson, B 1993. Selenium in nutrition with special reference to biopotency of organic and inorganic selenium compounds. In Proceedings the 9th Alltech Symposium, Biotechnology in the Feed Industry (ed. PT Lyons), pp. 71–89. Nottingham University Press, Nothingham, UK.Google Scholar
Rayman, MP 2000. The importance of selenium to human health. Lancet 356, 233–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rayman, MP 2004. The use of high-selenium yeast to raise selenium status: how does it measure up? British Journal of Nutrition 92, 557–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, K, Foltz, CM 1957. Selenium as an integral part of factor 3 against dietary necrotic liver degeneration. Journal of the American Chemical Society 79, 3292–3293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spears, JW, Hansen, SL 2008. Bioavailability criteria for trace minerals in monogastrics and ruminants. In Trace elements in animal production systems (ed. P Schlegel, S Duroysoy and AW Jongbloed). Wageningen Academic Publishers, Netherlands.Google Scholar
Storry, JE, Grandison, AS, Millard, D, Owen, AJ, Ford, GD 1983. Chemical composition and coagulating properties of renneted milks from different breeds and species of ruminant. Journal of Dairy Research 50, 215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, KT, Ogra, Y 2002. Metabolic pathway for selenium in the body: speciation by HPLC-ICP MS with enriched Se. Food Additives and Contaminants 19, 974–983.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, WP 2003. Selenium nutrition of dairy cows: comparing responses to organic and inorganic selenium forms. In Proceeding 19th Alltech Annual Symposium. Nutritional Biotechnology in the Feed and Food Industries (ed. PT Lyons and KA Jaques), pp. 333–343. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Weiss WP 2005. Selenium sources for dairy cattle. In Proceedings of the Tri-State Dairy Nutrition Conference, pp. 61–72. Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA.Google Scholar
Weiss, WP, Todhunter, DA, Hagan, JS, Smith, KL 1990. Effect of duration of supplementation of selenium and vitamin E on periparturient dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 73, 3187–3194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yasumoto, K, Iwami, K, Yoshida, M 1979. Vitamin B6 dependence of selenomethionine and selenite utilization for glutathione peroxidase in the rat. Journal of Nutrition 109, 760–766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed