Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:11:19.199Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Timed artificial insemination plus heat II: gonadorelin injection in cows with low estrus expression scores increased pregnancy in progesterone/estradiol-based protocol

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2019

W. B. Rodrigues ,
A. S. Silva ,
J. C. B. Silva ,
N. A. Anache ,
K. C. Silva ,
C. J. T. Cardoso ,
W. R. Garcia ,
P. Sutovsky  and
E. Nogueira Open the ORCID record for E. Nogueira [Opens in a new window]
W. B. Rodrigues
Affiliation:
Embrapa Pantanal, Rua 21 de Setembro, 1880, Corumbá, MS 79320-900, Brasil
A. S. Silva
Affiliation:
Genesis Tecnologia e Reprodução Animal, Rua Goncalves Dias, 390, Campo Grande, MS, 79004-210, Brasil
J. C. B. Silva
Affiliation:
Embrapa Pantanal, Rua 21 de Setembro, 1880, Corumbá, MS 79320-900, Brasil
N. A. Anache
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Veterinárias, UFMS – Av. Senador Filinto Muller, 2443,Campo Grande -MS, 79074-460, Brasil
K. C. Silva
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Veterinárias, UFMS – Av. Senador Filinto Muller, 2443,Campo Grande -MS, 79074-460, Brasil
C. J. T. Cardoso
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Veterinárias, UFMS – Av. Senador Filinto Muller, 2443,Campo Grande -MS, 79074-460, Brasil
W. R. Garcia
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Veterinárias, UFMS – Av. Senador Filinto Muller, 2443,Campo Grande -MS, 79074-460, Brasil
P. Sutovsky
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Women’s Health, Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
E. Nogueira*
Affiliation:
Embrapa Pantanal, Rua 21 de Setembro, 1880, Corumbá, MS 79320-900, Brasil Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Veterinárias, UFMS – Av. Senador Filinto Muller, 2443,Campo Grande -MS, 79074-460, Brasil
*
†E-mail: eriklis.nogueira@embrapa.br
Get access

Abstract

The use of tail chalk and estrus/heat expression scores (HEATSC) evaluation is instrumental in identifying cows with greater estrus expression and greater artificial insemination pregnancy rates (P/AI) in cows submitted to timed artificial insemination (TAI), and cows with low or no estrus expression present lower P/AI. It was intended in this study to improve the pregnancy rates in TAI for Bos indicus beef cows, and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) injection was hypothesized to increase pregnancy rates in a TAI program for cows submitted to progesterone–estradiol-based protocols with low or no estrus expression, evaluated by HEATSC. Cows (n= 2284) received a progesterone device and 2 mg estradiol benzoate, after 8 days the device was removed and 1 mg estradiol cypionate, 150 μg of d-cloprostenol and 300 IU equine chorionic gonadotropin was administered. All cows were marked with chalk and HEATSC evaluated (scales 1 to 3) at TAI performed on day 10. Animals with HEATSC1 and HEATSC2 (n= 937) received 100 μg de gonadorelin (GNRH group; n= 470), or 1 ml saline (Control group; n= 467), and cows with HEATSC3 (named HEAT group; n= 1347) received no additional treatment. The larger dominant follicle, evaluated on day 8and at TAI (day 10), was greater in HEAT group (P= 0.0145 and P <0.001, respectively). Corpus luteum (CL) area and progesterone concentration was evaluated on day 17, and CL area was larger in HEAT group, intermediary in Control and lower in GnRH group (Control= 2.68 cm2, GnRH= 2.37 cm2, HEAT group= 3.07 cm2, P <0.001). Greater progesterone concentrations were found in HEAT group than in Control and GnRH groups (Control= 4.74 ng/ml, GnRH= 4.29 ng/ml, HEAT group= 6.08 ng/ml, P<0.001). There was a difference in ovulation rate, greater in HEAT group than GnRH and Control groups (Control= 72.5%; GnRH= 81.25%; HEAT group= 90.71%; P= 0.0024). Artificial insemination pregnancy rates was greater in HEAT group (57.09% (769/1347) than in Control and GNRH groups, with positive effect of GnRH injection at the time of TAI in P/AI (Control= 36.18% (169/467), GnRH= 45.95% (216/470); P<0.0001). In conclusion, GnRH application in cows with low HEATSC (1 and 2) is a simple strategy, requiring no changes in TAI management to increase pregnancy rates in postpartum beef cows submitted to progesterone–estradiol-based TAI protocols, without reaching, however, the pregnancy rates of cows that demonstrate high estrus expression at the TAI.

Keywords

artificial inseminationfertilityfolliclereproductionmanagement
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 13 , Issue 10 , October 2019 , pp. 2313 - 2318
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barros, CM, Moreira, MB, Figueiredo, RA, Teixeira, AB and Trinca, LA 2000. Synchronization of ovulation in beef cows (Bos indicus) using GnRH, PGF2alpha and estradiol benzoate. Theriogenology 53, 1121–1134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batista, EOS, Del Valle, TA, Ortolan, M, Renno, FP, Nogueira, GP, Souza, AH and Baruselli, PS 2017. The effect of circulating progesterone on magnitude of the GnRH-induced LH surge: Are there any differences between Bos indicus and Bos taurus heifers? Theriogenology 104, 43–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, BE, Thomas, JM, Abel, JM, Poock, SE, Ellersieck, MR, Smith, MF and Patterson, DJ 2017a. Split-time artificial insemination in beef cattle: II. Comparing pregnancy rates among nonestrous heifers based on administration of GnRH at AI. Theriogenology 87, 229–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bishop, BE, Thomas, JM, Abel, JM, Poock, SE, Ellersieck, MR, Smith, MF and Patterson, DJ 2017b. Split-time artificial insemination in beef cattle: III. Comparing fixed-time artificial insemination to split-time artificial insemination with delayed administration of GnRH in postpartum cows. Theriogenology 99, 48–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bo, GA, Adams, GP, Pierson, RA and Mapletoft, RJ 1996. Effect of progestogen plus estradiol-17beta treatment on superovulatory response in beef cattle. Theriogenology 45, 897–910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Busch, DC, Atkins, JA, Bader, JF, Schafer, DJ, Patterson, DJ, Geary, TW and Smith, MF 2008. Effect of ovulatory follicle size and expression of estrus on progesterone secretion in beef cows. Journal Animal Science 86, 553–563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buttrey, BS, Burns, MG and Stevenson, JS 2010. Ovulation and pregnancy outcomes in response to human chorionic gonadotropin before resynchronized ovulation in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 73, 449–459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campos, CC, Oliveira, M, de Freitas Ferreira Mohallem, R and dos Santos, RM 2016. Gonadorelin at the outset and/or end of an ovulation synchronization progesterone estradiol benzoate-based protocol in Nellore females. Semina: Ciências Agrárias 37, 173–182.Google Scholar
Colazo, MG, Kastelic, JP, Davis, H, Rutledge, MD, Martinez, MF, Small, JA and Mapletoft, RJ 2008. Effects of plasma progesterone concentrations on LH release and ovulation in beef cattle given GnRH. Domestic Animal Endocrinology 34, 109–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dadarwal, D, Mapletoft, RJ, Adams, GP, Pfeifer, LFM, Creelman, C and Singh, J 2013. Effect of progesterone concentration and duration of proestrus on fertility in beef cattle after fixed-time artificial insemination. Theriogenology 79, 859–866.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, SL, Grieger, DM, Olson, KC, Jaeger, JR, Dahlen, CR, Crosswhite, MR, Pereira, NN, Underdahl, SR, Neville, BW, Ahola, J, Fischer, MC, Seidel, GE and Stevenson, JS 2016. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone increased pregnancy risk in suckled beef cows not detected in estrus and subjected to a split-time artificial insemination program. Journal Animal Science 94, 3722–3728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jinks, EM, Smith, MF, Atkins, JA, Pohler, KG, Perry, GA, Macneil, MD, Roberts, AJ, Waterman, RC, Alexander, LJ and Geary, TW 2013. Preovulatory estradiol and the establishment and maintenance of pregnancy in suckled beef cows. Journal Animal Science 91, 1176–1185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaim, M, Bloch, A, Wolfenson, D, Braw-Tal, R, Rosenberg, M, Voet, H and Folman, Y 2003. Effects of GnRH administered to cows at the onset of estrus on timing of ovulation, endocrine responses, and conception. Journal Dairy Science 86, 2012–2021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kastelic, JP, Pierson, RA and Ginther, OJ 1990. Ultrasonic morphology of corpora lutea and central luteal cavities during the estrous cycle and early pregnancy in heifers. Theriogenology 34, 487–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meneghetti, M, Sa Filho, OG, Peres, RF, Lamb, GC and Vasconcelos, JL 2009. Fixed-time artificial insemination with estradiol and progesterone for Bos indicus cows I: basis for development of protocols. Theriogenology 72, 179–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nogueira E, Silva MR, Silva JCB, Abreu UPG, Anache NA, Silva KC, Cardoso CJT, Sutovsky P and Rodrigues WB 2019. Timed artificial insemination plus heat I: effect of estrus expression scores on pregnancy of cows subjected to progesterone–estradiol-based protocols. Animal. doi:10.1017/S1751731119000442 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, MHC, Wiltbank, MC and JLM, Vasconcelos 2016. Expression of estrus improves fertility and decreases pregnancy losses in lactating dairy cows that receive artificial insemination or embryo transfer. Journal Dairy Science 99, 2237–2247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perry, GA and Perry, BL 2009. GnRH treatment at artificial insemination in beef cattle fails to increase plasma progesterone concentrations or pregnancy rates. Theriogenology 71, 775–779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfeifer, LFM, Castro, NA, Melo, VTO, Neves, PMA, Cestaro, JP and Schneider, A 2015. Timed artificial insemination in blocks: a new alternative to improve fertility in lactating beef cows. Animal Reproduction Science 163, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfeifer, LFM, Mapletoft, R, Kastelic, JP, Small, JA, Adams, GP, Dionello, NJ and Singh, J 2009. Effects of low versus physiologic plasma progesterone concentrations on ovarian follicular development and fertility in beef cattle. Theriogenology 72, 1237–1250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ray, DE 1965. Oestrous response of ovariectomized beef heifers to oestradiol benzoate and human chorionic gonadotrophin. Journal Reproduction and Fertility 10, 329–335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ree, TO, Colazo, MG, Lamont, AG, Kastelic, JP, Dyck, MK, Mapletoft, RJ, Ametaj, BN and Ambrose, DJ 2009. The effect of porcine luteinizing hormone in the synchronization of ovulation and corpus luteum development in nonlactating cows. Theriogenology 72, 120–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, BN, Hill, SL, Stevenson, JS, Djira, GD and Perry, GA 2016. Expression of estrus before fixed-time AI affects conception rates and factors that impact expression of estrus and the repeatability of expression of estrus in sequential breeding seasons. Animal Reproduction Science 166, 133–140.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sa Filho, MF, Ayres, H, Ferreira, RM, Marques, MO, Reis, EL, Silva, RC, Rodrigues, CA, Madureira, EH, Bo, GA and Baruselli, PS 2010. Equine chorionic gonadotropin and gonadotropin-releasing hormone enhance fertility in a norgestomet-based, timed artificial insemination protocol in suckled Nelore (Bos indicus) cows. Theriogenology 73, 651–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sa Filho, MF, Santos, JE, Ferreira, RM, Sales, JN and Baruselli, PS 2011. Importance of estrus on pregnancy per insemination in suckled Bos indicus cows submitted to estradiol/progesterone-based timed insemination protocols. Theriogenology 76, 455–463.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitt, EJ, Drost, M, Diaz, T, Roomes, C and Thatcher, WW 1996. Effect of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist on follicle recruitment and pregnancy rate in cattle. Journal Animal Science 74, 154–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shephard, RW, Morton, JM and Norman, ST 2014. Effects of administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone at artificial insemination on conception rates in dairy cows. Animal Reproduction Science 144, 14–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva AS, Borges Silva JC, Abreu UGP, Batista DSN, Anache NA, Bezerra AO, Jara JP, Nogueira E 2016. Heat score accessed with aid of tail-chalk influences pregnancy rate of suckled Bos indicus beef cows subjected to P4/estradiol TAI-based protocols. Animal Reproduction 13, 451.Google Scholar
Thomas, JM, Lock, SL, Poock, SE, Ellersieck, MR, Smith, MF and Patterson, DJ 2014. Delayed insemination of nonestrous cows improves pregnancy rates when using sex-sorted semen in timed artificial insemination of suckled beef cows. Journal Animal Science 92, 1747–1752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Twagiramungu, H, Guilbault, LA, Proulx, J and Dufour, JJ 1992. Synchronization of estrus and fertility in beef cattle with two injections of buserelin and prostaglandin. Theriogenology 38, 1131–1144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Twagiramungu, H, Guilbault, LA, Proulx, JG and Dufour, JJ 1995. Buserelin alters the development of the corpora lutea in cyclic and early postpartum cows. Journal Animal Science 73, 805–811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vasconcelos, JL, Sartori, R, Oliveira, HN, Guenther, JG and Wiltbank, MC 2001. Reduction in size of the ovulatory follicle reduces subsequent luteal size and pregnancy rate. Theriogenology 56, 307–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voss, AK and Fortune, JE 1992. Oxytocin/neurophysin-I messenger ribonucleic acid in bovine granulosa cells increases after the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge and is stimulated by LH in vitro. Endocrinology 131, 2755–2762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed