Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:49:50.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of banquettes of Posidonia oceanica as a source of fiber and minerals in ruminant nutrition. An observational study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2014

C. Castillo ,
A. R. Mantecón ,
J. Sotillo ,
J. L. Benedito ,
A. Abuelo ,
C. Gutiérrez  and
J. Hernández
C. Castillo*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Patología Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain
A. R. Mantecón
Affiliation:
Instituto de Ganadería de Montaña, CSIC-ULE, Finca Marzanas, 24346 Grulleros-León, Spain
J. Sotillo
Affiliation:
Departamento de Medicina y Cirugía Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Campus de Espinardo, 30100 Murcia, Spain
J. L. Benedito
Affiliation:
Departamento de Patología Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain
A. Abuelo
Affiliation:
Departamento de Patología Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain
C. Gutiérrez
Affiliation:
Departamento de Medicina y Cirugía Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Campus de Espinardo, 30100 Murcia, Spain
J. Hernández
Affiliation:
Departamento de Patología Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, 27002 Lugo, Spain
*
†E-mail: cristina.castillo@usc.es
Get access

Abstract

In the search for new food sources that contribute to the optimization of livestock production this paper discusses the possibility of using waste (called banquettes) of a marine plant commonly found on the Mediterranean coasts: Posidonia oceanica. The idea stems from the use of a waste that in summertime generates large costs because it is considered bothersome on the beaches. Thus, tons and tons of residues are collected each year from the beach, being destined for incineration. However, alternative uses for these residues are suggested, such as forage that is particularly relevant for the Mediterranean coast, where the weather does not support abundant grass growth. With this purpose, samples of banquettes of P. oceanica from six different points of a touristic place located in the Murcia Region (S.E. of Spain) were collected in April 2012 on the same day directly from the beach above the water line, washed with distilled water and sun-dried for 48 h. Approximately 500 g of each sample of plant material was chopped and two subsamples of 200 g each were placed in airtight plastic containers and sent to the laboratory for mineral and chemical analysis. This report provides data on the nutritional composition of P. oceanica such as mineral contents (As, Cd, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb and Zn) and chemical composition (ash, CP, ether extract (EE), NDF and ADF, respectively) and ADL. Finally, the in sacco rumen disappearance of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), CP and NDF were studied. Our results showed that minerals, except for Fe, where within the range of values reported for P. oceanica in other parts of the Mediterranean region. Given the high Fe content further studies assessing the antagonic Fe–Cu interaction and its effect on animal health should be addressed. In relation to chemical composition, it is clear that this seagrass is a poor protein source and has levels of DM degradability at 24 h, similar to those obtained for cereal straw. The information summarized here shows some potential for the use of banquettes of P. oceanica as forage source in ruminant nutrition.

Keywords

P. oceanicaruminantsnutritionforagemineral
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 8 , Issue 10 , October 2014 , pp. 1663 - 1666
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ancora, S, Bianchi, N, Butini, A, Buia, MC, Gambi, MC and Leonzio, C 2004. Posidonia oceanica as a biomonitor of trace elements in the gulf of Naples: temporal trends by lepidochronology. Environmental Toxicology Chemistry 23, 1093–1099.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Association of Official Analytical Chemists 1999. Official methods of analysis, 16th edition. AOAC, Arlington, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Association of Official Analytical Chemists 2003. Official methods of analysis, 17th edition. AOAC, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.Google Scholar
Calsamiglia, S, Ferret, A and Bach, A 2004. Tablas FEDNA de valor nutritivo de Forrajes y Subproductos fibrosos húmedos. Fundación para el Desarrollo de la Nutrición Animal, Madrid, Spain. Retrieved November 11, 2012, from http://www.fundacionfedna.org/forrajes/introduccion-forrajes Google Scholar
Cocozza, C, Parente, A, Zaccone, C, Mininni, C, Santamaria, P and Miano, T 2011. Comparative management of offshore posidonia residues: composting vs. energy recovery. Waste Management 31, 78–84.Google Scholar
de Ambrosio, L and Segovia, E 2000. Las praderas de Posidonia: importancia y conservación. Retrieved September 9, 2012, from http://www.revistaentrelineas.es/26/sites/default/files/pdfs/reportajes/informe_posidonia_1.pdf Google Scholar
de Falco, G, Simeone, S and Baroli, M 2008. Management of Beach-Cast Posidonia oceanica Seagrass on the Island of Sardinia (Italy, Western Mediterranean). Journal of Coastal Research 4 (suppl.), 69–75.Google Scholar
Duarte, CM 1990. Seagrass nutrient content. Marine Ecology Progress Series 67, 201–207.Google Scholar
Malea, P, Boubonari, T and Kevrekidis, T 2008. Iron, zinc, copper, lead and cadmium contents in Ruppia maritima from a Mediterranean coastal lagoon: monthly variation and distribution in different plant fractions. Botanica Marina 51, 320–330.Google Scholar
Sanz-Lazaro, C, Malea, P, Apostolaki, ET, Kalantzi, I, Marin, A and Karakassis, I 2012. The role of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica in the cycling of trace elements. Biogeosciences 9, 2623–2653.Google Scholar
Simeone, S and de Falco, G 2012. Morphology and composition of beach-cast Posidonia oceanica litter on beaches with different exposures. Geomorphology 151–152, 224–233.Google Scholar
Suttle, NF 2010. Mineral Nutrition of Livestock, 4th edition. CAB International, Oxfordshire, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torbatinejad, N and Sabine, JR 2001. Laboratory evaluation of some marine plants on South Australian beaches. Journal of Agriculture Science and Technology 3, 91–100.Google Scholar
Torbatinejad, N, Annison, G, Rutherfurd-Makwick, K and Sabine, JR 2007. Structural constituents of the Seagrass Posidonia australis . Journal of Agriculture and Food Chemistry 55, 4021–4026.Google Scholar
Tovar-Sanchez, A, Seron, J, Marba, N, Arrieta, JM and Duarte, CM 2010. Long-term records of trace metal content of Western Mediterranean seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) meadows: natural and anthropogenic contributions. Journal Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 115, G02006.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Supplementary material

To view supplementary material for this article, please visit

Download Supplementary material(File)
File 1.3 MB