Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:49:58.944Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does different versus equal daytime and night-time respiration matter for quantification of lake metabolism using diel dissolved oxygen cycles?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 August 2011

Nusret Karakaya
Nusret Karakaya*
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Abant Izzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkey
*
*Corresponding author: karakaya_n@ibu.edu.tr
Get access

Abstract

Diel dissolved oxygen (DO) measurements can be used to estimate water metabolism of aquatic systems, in particular, lakes, lagoons and streams in terms of gross primary production (GPP), ecosystem respiration (Reco) and net ecosystem production (NEP). One of the main assumptions in the calculation of lake metabolism is that Reco is the same for daytime (Rdaytime) and nighttime (Rdarkhr). This study aimed at testing the equal Rdaytime and Rdarkhr assumption to estimate GPP, Reco and NEP in a littoral zone of a temperate shallow lake (Lake Yeniçağa) in northwestern Turkey with and without the assumption. Based on the equal Rdarkhr and Rdaytime assumption, values calculated for GPP and Rdaytime were different than those based on the different Rdarkhr and Rdaytime assumption (P<0.001). GPP was lower by 7.5% in July, 49.6% in September and 14.9% in October, while Reco was lower by 5.9% in July and 55.8% in September. GPP was higher by 8.9% in August and 55% in November, while Reco was higher by 7.8% in August and 23.9% in November.

Keywords

Aquatic ecosystemsdiel dissolved oxygenecosystem respirationlake metabolismshallow lake
Type
Research Article
Information
Annales de Limnologie - International Journal of Limnology , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , 2011 , pp. 251 - 257
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ciavatta, S., Pastres, R., Badetti, C., Ferrari, G. and Beck, M.B., 2008. Estimation of phytoplanktonic production and system respiration from data collected by a real-time monitoring network in the Lagoon of Venice. Ecol. Model., 212, 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, J.J. and Caraco, N.F., 1998. Atmospheric exchange of carbon dioxide in a low-wind oligotrophic lake measured by the addition of SF6. Limnol. Oceanogr., 43, 647–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dengiz, O., Ozaytekin, H., Cayci, G. and Baran, A., 2009. Characteristics, genesis and classification of a basin peat soil under negative human impact in Turkey. Environ. Geol., 56, 1057–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, P.C., Bade, D.L. and Carpenter, S.R., 2003. Lake metabolism: relationships with dissolved organic carbon and phosphorus. Limnol. Oceanogr., 48, 1112–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, P.C., Carpenter, S.R., Kimura, N., Wu, C., Cornelius, S.P. and Kratz, T.K., 2008. Evaluation of metabolism models for free-water dissolved oxygen methods in lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods, 6, 454–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtgrieve, G.W., Schindler, D.E., Branch, T.A. and A'Mar, Z.T., 2010. Simultaneous quantification of aquatic ecosystem metabolism and reaeration using a Bayesian statistical model of oxygen dynamics. Limnol. Oceanogr., 55, 1047–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauster, G.H., Hanson, P.C. and Kratz, T.K., 2006. Gross primary production and respiration differences among littoral and pelagic habitats in northern Wisconsin lakes. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci., 63, 1130–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markager, S. and Sand-Jensen, K., 1989. Patterns of night-time respiration in dense phytoplankton community under a natural light regime. J. Ecol., 77, 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odum, H.T., 1956. Primary production in flowing waters. Limnol. Oceanogr., 1, 102–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saygı (Başbuğ), Y., 2005. Seasonal succession and distribution of zooplankton in Yeniçağa Lake in northwestern Turkey. Zool. Middle East, 34, 93–100.Google Scholar
Seeley, M.C., 1969. The diurnal curve in estimates of primary production. Chesapeake Sci., 10, 322–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S.V., 1985. Physical, chemical and biological characteristics of CO2 gas flux across the air–water interface. Plant Cell Environ., 8, 387–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staehr, P.A. and Sand-Jensen, K., 2007. Temporal dynamics and regulation of lake metabolism. Limnol. Oceanogr., 52, 108–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staehr, P.A., Bade, D., Van de Bogert, M.C., Koch, G.R., Williamson, C., Hanson, P., Cole, J.J. and Kratz, T., 2010. Lake metabolism and the diel oxygen technique: state of the science. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods, 8, 628–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomann, R.V. and Mueller, J.A., 1987. Principles of Surface Water Quality Modeling and Control, Harper & Row Pub., Inc., New York, 644 p.Google Scholar
USGS (United States Geological Survey), 1981. Water quality: new tables of dissolved oxygen saturation values, Amendment of Quality of Water Technical Memorandum No. 81.11-81.15.
Vallino, J.J., Hopkinson, C.S. and Garritt, R.H., 2005. Estimating estuarine gross production, community respiration and net ecosystem production: a nonlinear inverse technique. Ecol. Model., 187, 281–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Bogert, M.C., Carpenter, S.R., Cole, J.J. and Pace, M.L., 2007. Assessing pelagic and benthic metabolism using free water measurements. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods, 5, 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H., Hondzo, M., Xu, C., Poole, V. and Spacie, A., 2003. Dissolved oxygen dynamics of streams draining an urbanized and an agricultural catchment. Ecol. Model., 160, 145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wanninkhof, R., 1992. Relationship between wind speed and gas exchange over the ocean. J. Geophys. Res., 97, 7373–7382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar