Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:47:00.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Habitat selection by breeding Common Kingfishers (Alcedo atthis L.) in rivers from Northern Iberia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2012

Get access

Abstract

The relative importance of biotic and abiotic variables on the Common Kingfisher Alcedo atthis breeding distribution in northern Iberian rivers was quantified through surveys completed in 2007. Eight rivers were surveyed for “positive” and “negative” (control) breeding territories (PBT and NBT, respectively). PBT (N=9) were 3-km river sections with breeding pairs; NBT (N=8) were 3-km river sections close to PBT, where no pairs were found, with apparently similar features to the PBT and one or more cut banks suitable for nesting. Stepwise discriminant analysis (SDA) correctly classified 94.1% of territories and revealed PBT was associated with higher oxygen concentrations, a lower maximum depth and lower proportion of rockfills. Causes and consequences of these findings are discussed.

Keywords

Habitat mappingreproductionriparianfreshwater fishwater quality
Type
Short Note
Information
Annales de Limnologie - International Journal of Limnology , Volume 48 , Issue 3 , 2012 , pp. 289 - 294
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bain, M.B. and Stevenson, N.J., 1999. Aquatic Habitat Assessment: Common Methods, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.Google Scholar
Bonnington, C., Weaver, D. and Fanning, E., 2008. The habitat preference of four kingfisher species along a branch of the Kilombero River, southern Tanzania. Afr. J. Ecol., 46, 424–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burfield, I. and van Bommell, F., 2004. Birds in Europe: Population Estimates, Trends, and Conservation Status. BirdLife Conservation Series No. 12, BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Campos, F., Fernández, A., Gutiérrez-Corchero, F., Martín-Santos, F. and Santos, P., 2000. Diet of the Eurasian kingfisher (Alcedo atthis) in northern Spain. Folia Zool., 49, 115–121.Google Scholar
Cramp, S., 1985. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa, Vol. 4, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Grossman, G.D., Nickerson, D.M. and Freeman, M.C., 1991. Principal component analyses of assemblage structure data: utility of tests based on eigenvalues. Ecology, 72, 341–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasahara, S. and Katoh, K., 2008. Food-niche differentiation in sympatric species of kingfishers, the Common Kingfisher Alcedo atthis and the Greater Pied Kingfisher Ceryle lugubris. Ornithol. Sci., 7, 123–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J.R. and Jackson, D.A., 1999. Variable selection in large environmental data sets using principal components analysis. Environmetrics, 10, 67–77.3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leunda, P.M., Oscoz, J. and Miranda, R., 2006. Length–weight relationships of fishes from tributaries of the Ebro River, Spain. J. Appl. Ichthyol., 22, 299–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leunda, P.M., Sistiaga, M., Oscoz, J. and Miranda, R., in press. Ichthyofauna of a near-natural Pyrenean river: spatio-temporal variability and reach-scale habitat. Environ. Eng. Manage. J.Google Scholar
Meadows, B.S., 1972. Kingfisher numbers and stream pollution. Ibis, 114, 443.Google Scholar
Moreno-Opo, R., 2003. Martín Pescador Común, Alcedo atthis. In: Martí, R. and Del Moral, J.C. (eds.), Atlas de las aves reproductoras de España, Dirección General de la Conservación de la Naturaleza – Sociedad Española de Ornitología, Madrid, pp. 342–343.Google Scholar
Munne, A., Prat, N., Sola, C., Bonada, N. and Rieradevall, N., 2003. A simple field method for assessing the ecological quality of riparian habitat in rivers and streams: QBR index. Aquat. Conserv., 13, 147–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peris, S.J. and Rodríguez, R., 1996. Some factors related to distribution by breeding Kingfisher (Alcedo atthis L.). Ekol. Polska, 44, 31–38.Google Scholar
Reid, S.M., Yunker, G. and Jones, N.E., 2009. Evaluation of single-pass backpack electric fishing for stream fish community monitoring. Fish. Manage. Ecol., 16, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, S., 2007. Nutzung künstlicher Brutwände durch den Eisvogel Alcedo atthis: Welche Konsequenzen ergeben sich für deren Konstruktion? Ornithol. Beob., 104, 225–223.Google Scholar
Whitfield, A.K. and Blaber, S.J.M., 1978. Feeding ecology of piscivorous birds at Lake St Lucia, part 1: diving birds. Ostrich, 49, 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodwall, P.F., 1991. Morphometry, diet and habitat in the kingfishers (Aves: Alcedinidae). J. Zool., 223, 9–90.Google Scholar