Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T05:53:47.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Zooplankton of the Paraguay River : a comparison between sectionsand hydrological phases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2009

S. M. Frutos
Affiliation:
Centro de Ecología Aplicada del Litoral (CONICET). C.C. 291, 3400 Corrientes, Argentina. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales. Universidad Nacional del Nordeste. Av. Libertad 5500, 3400 Corrientes, Argentina.
A. S.G. Poi de Neiff
Affiliation:
Centro de Ecología Aplicada del Litoral (CONICET). C.C. 291, 3400 Corrientes, Argentina. Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales. Universidad Nacional del Nordeste. Av. Libertad 5500, 3400 Corrientes, Argentina.
J. J. Neiff
Affiliation:
Centro de Ecología Aplicada del Litoral (CONICET). C.C. 291, 3400 Corrientes, Argentina.
Get access

Abstract

Changes in the abundance, species richness and species diversity of zooplankton were studied in the Paraguay River. Fifty-ninesites were studied at two hydrological phases between Porto Cáceres (16º03’S-26º23’W) and the confluence with the Paraná(Argentine, 26º53’S-58º23’W), representing a distance of 2270 km. Zooplankton densities varied between 1 and 60 ind.l-1 athigh water and between 11 and 100 ind.l-1 at low water. Multiple regression analysis revealed that the hydrological phaseexplained 64% of the variability in zooplankton density. Surveys found 196 taxa in the Paraguay River (including both the maincourse and its floodplain). The greater species richness was registered in the upper section. There were significant differences inthe species richness and species diversity of Rotifera (Monogononta) between hydrological phases. In the main channel, thehydrological phase explained 54% of variability in species richness, whereas water temperature and electric conductivityexplained less than 22% of the variability in species diversity. Rotifera was the most abundant group in both study periods.Despite the total number of species registered in the main channel, only six planktonic genera dominated the zooplanktonassemblage (Polyarthra, Synchaeta, Filinia, Keratella and Lecane). The most abundant cladocerans belonged to Bosminidae(Bosminopsis sp.) and the dominant copepods were in the nauplii and juveniles stages. A longitudinal pattern in dominant taxawas not defined at high water. At low water, three species-site groups were separated in relation to environmental variables. Thepulsing of the river determines the degree of connectivity with the floodplain and local features had a greater effect onzooplankton assemblages than large-scale landscape patterns.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Université Paul Sabatier, 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)