Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:22:32.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use of Dynamic Financial Analysis and Financial Condition Reporting by United Kingdom General Insurers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2011

Y. Shiu  and
P. Moles
Y. Shiu
Affiliation:
Department of Business Administration, National Cheng King University, 1 Ta-Hsueh Road, Tainan, Taiwan., ext. 53300;, Tel: +886(0)6-275-7575, Fax: +886(0)6-208-0179
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents the findings of a survey of the current Dynamic Financial Analysis (DFA)/Financial Condition Report (FCR) practices in the United Kingdom general insurance industry. An independent samples t test for non-respondent bias was conducted, and the results suggest that the respondent sample is representative of the survey population. The survey results revealed: (1) that the use of DFA techniques in the industry was limited; (2) that scenario testing was the most frequently used technique; (3) that the most common DFA application was the evaluation of reinsurance programmes; (4) that less than ten scenarios were run regularly; (5) that inflation was the most frequently modelled economic variable; (6) that the capability of asset modelling of general insurers was restricted; (7) that the most common method of liability modelling was to use all in force policies in aggregate; (8) that the most common projection periods in DFA and business planning were three years; (9) that the main reason for not using DFA techniques and producing FCR was lack of need; and (10) that views on whether a Guidance Note on FCR specifically for general insurers should be introduced differed.

Keywords

Dynamic Financial AnalysisFinancial Condition ReportGeneral InsurersPostal Survey
Type
Papers
Information
Annals of Actuarial Science , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 79 - 101
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Canadian Institute of Actuaries (1991). Standard of practice on dynamic solvency testing for life insurance companies (in effect January 1, 1992). This document is available at http://www.actuaries.ca/publications/sop_e.htmlGoogle Scholar
Canadian Institute of Actuaries (1993). Standard of practice on dynamic solvency testing for fraternal benefits society (in effect January 1, 1994). This document is available at http://www.actuaries.ca/publications/sop_e.htmlGoogle Scholar
Canadian Institute of Actuaries (1998). Standard of practice on dynamic capital adequacy testing (in effect January 1, 1999). This document is available at http://www.actuaries.ca/publications/sop_e.htmlGoogle Scholar
Casualty Actuarial Society Working Party on Executive-Level Decision-Making using DRM (2004). Presenting DRM results to decision makers: a summary report, Fall 2004 CAS Forum, Casualty Actuarial Society U.S.A.Google Scholar
Dynamic Solvency Testing Working Party (1994). Dynamic solvency testing. Proceedings of Current Issues in Life Assurance Seminar, 2 November 1994, Faculty and Institute of Actuaries.Google Scholar
Fender, I. & Gibson, M. (2001). Stress testing in practice: a survey of 43 major financial institutions, BIS (Bank for International Settlements) Quarterly Review, June, 58–61.Google Scholar
Oakden, D.J., Friedman, E. & Perigny, I. (2001). Dynamic capital adequacy survey, Tillinghast-Towers Perrin. This document is available at http://www.actuaries.ca/meetings/aa/2001/I_Perigny.pdfGoogle Scholar
Szkoda, S., Cripe, F., Hayne, R., Holler, K., Kadison, J., Ludwig, S., McFarlan, L., Morgan, S. & Nichols, R. (1995). CAS dynamic financial analysis handbook, release 1.0 (final), Casualty Actuarial Society, U.S.A.Google Scholar