Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 October 2013
The principal results of the work of the first two seasons on the Acropolis were described in the Annual two years ago (xxvi. pp. 240–76), and it remains to complete the account for the two following years (1926–27). The task is fairly simple, since the main features of the stratification of the area which yielded finds of predominantly Hellenic date have been already described, and the results obtained from the other parts of the Acropolis which we explored are of much less interest and importance, and can be dismissed briefly. The Byzantine church on the eastern spur of the main summit must be reserved for a separate report.
page 38 note 1 B.S.A. xxvi. p. 251Google Scholar f.
page 39 note 1 My account of the results obtained in 1926 owes a great deal to the careful records kept by Mr. G. A. D. Tait, who supervised the work on the Acropolis throughout that campaign.
page 40 note 1 B.S.A. xxvi. pp. 297Google Scholar ff.
page 41 note 1 Cf. Douglas Van Buren, E., Greek Fictile Revetments, p. 181Google Scholar.
page 42 note 1 Olympia, ii. p. 190Google Scholar f., and Tafelband, ii. Pl. CXV.
page 42 note 2 E. Douglas Van Buren, op. cit., pp. 18 and 60 f.; cf. B.S.A. xxvii. p. 201Google Scholar.
page 44 note 1 B.S.A. xiii. p. 144Google Scholar f.
page 46 note 1 These fragments require still further study, but will not, I fear, yield enough results to permit of a full restoration of their contents.
page 47 note 1 Cf. B.S.A. xxvi. p. 236Google Scholar.
page 47 note 2 B.S.A. xxvii. p. 198Google Scholar.