Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 September 2013
Current technical interest in the nature of the black inlaid decoration on ancient metalware has stimulated an examination of some of the well-known bronze daggers, silver vessels, and other fragments, all with inlaid decoration and dating to the 16–14th centuries BC, from Mycenae, Prosymna, Dendra, Routsi, and Pylos. Results of non-destructive X-ray fluorescence analysis point to great versatility in working with copper (or bronze)–gold–silver alloys. The black inlaid decoration is usually copper/bronze–gold alloy with small quantities of silver. Four of the objects were also examined by X-ray radiography.
1 See e.g. Laffineur, R., ‘L'incrustation à l'époque mycénienne’, Ant. Cl. 43 (1974), 5–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Xenaki-Sakellariou, A. and Hatziliou, Ch., Peinture en métal à l'époque mycénienne (Athens, 1989).Google Scholar
2 See Hood, S., The Arts in Prehistoric Greece (London, 1978), 178–81Google Scholar, and more recently Dickinson, O. T. P. K., The Aegean Bronze Age (Cambridge, 1994), 99–100.Google Scholar See also Laffineur (n. 12 below), 269–76, for a thorough discussion of the origin of inlaid Mycenaean objects.
3 Marinatos, S., Hirmer, S. and Hirmer, M., Crete and Mycenae (London, 1960)Google Scholar; Xenaki-Sakellariou and Hatziliou (n. 1). Niello is produced by heating copper, silver, and/or lead with sulphur in a crucible, resulting in the formation of the black sulphides of these metals. After cooling, it is crushed to a fine powder, reheated, and then poured as a liquid, or spread, in a semi-paste-like state, onto the metal to be decorated, be it silver, gold, brass, or bronze. This technique was used extensively from the Roman period to the 19th cent. in many parts of the world. For a detailed account of niello, see La Niece, S., ‘Niello: an historical and technical survey’, Ant. J. 63.2 (1983), 279–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 There are two exceptions: objects 7842 and 2489, both discussed in detail here. Xenaki-Sakellariou and Hatziliou (n. 1), 34 n. 6. The reported presence of sulphur is now thought to have arisen from atmospheric weathering.
5 Photos, E., Jones, R. E., and Papadopoulos, Th., ‘The black inlay decoration on a Mycenaean bronze dagger’, Archaeometry, 36.2 (1994), 267—75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Dietz, S., pers. comm. Illustrated in Vermeule, E., Greece in the Bronze Age (Chicago, 1972), pl. 13Google Scholarc, and in Xenaki-Sakellariou and Hatziliou (n. 1), pl. 9. 1.
7 Ogden, J., ‘Aesthetic and technical considerations regarding the colour and texture of ancient goldwork’, in La Niece, S. and Craddock, P. T. (eds), Metal Plating and Patination: Cultural, Technical and Historical Development (Oxford, 1994), 39–49Google Scholar, in particular 41—2.
8 Fischman, B. and Fleming, S. J., ‘A bronze figure of Tutankhamun: technical studies’, Archaeometry, 22.1 (1980), 81–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Schaeffer, C. F. A., Enkomi Alasia: nouvelles missions en Chypre 1946–50 (Paris, 1952), 379–80.Google Scholar See also Xenaki-Sakellariou and Hatziliou (n. 1), 30, pl. 10. 3.
10 Schaeffer, C. F. A., Enkomi-Alasia, i (Paris, 1952), pl. 9.Google Scholar
11 Lucas, A. (revised by Harris, J. R.), Ancient Egyptian Materials and Industries (London, 1962), 250–1Google Scholar; Xenaki-Sakellariou and Hatziliou (n. 1), pl. 9. 3.
12 Xenaki-Sakellariou and Hatziliou (n. 1), 20–1, pl. 15; Laffineur, R., ‘Material and craftsmanship in the Mycenae shaft graves’, Minos, n.s. 25–26 (1990–1991), 245–95Google Scholar, in particular 269.
13 Shaeffer, C. F. A., Syria, 19 (1938), pl. 34Google Scholar and Syria, 10 (1929), pl. 52 respectively.
14 We are indebted to Dr Annie Caubet, Département des Antiquités Orientales, Musée du Louvre, for bringing to our attention the two objects in the Louvre's collections and for suggesting the possibility of analyses being carried out on these objects. For the Byblos harp see Montet, P., Byblos et Égypte (Paris, 1929), pl. 98. 648Google Scholar; 99. 653; 100. 653, and Xenaki-Sakellariou and Hatziliou (n. 1), pl. 15. 1–2.
15 Laffineur (n. 12), 270, ‘on which (blades) both metal inlays and niello are used’.
16 We thank Ms Lorraine McEwan for the drawings in Figs. 1–4.
17 We wish to thank the British School at Athens for permission to use the Fitch Laboratory's XRF in 1992, and Dr V. Perdikatsis, of the Institute for Geology and Mineral Exploration in Athens, for the XRD. EM was responsible for the radiography and AAS, REJ for the XRF, and EPJ for examination with optical microscope and compilation of the data.
18 Hall, E. T., Schweizer, F., and Toller, P. A., ‘X-ray analysis of museum objects: a new instrument’, Archaeometry, 15 (1973), 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19 Due to the proximity of the Pb, As and Au, K, and L peaks lying in the 10–12 KeV region of the XRF spectrum.
20 The X-ray instrument in the Chemistry Laboratory of the National Archaeological Museum is an Andrex, model 3001. Operating conditions for NM 390 were 130 kV, 4 mA, 4 min. exposure with Kodak film (X-omat MA, ready backed without lead); for NM 2489: 130 kV, 2 min., 5 mA, D7Pb structurix Vacupac (SV); NM 7736: 140 kV, 2 min., 5.5 mA, D7Pb (SV); and NM 7842: 120 kV, 2 min., 2 mA, D4Pb(SV).
21 On the basis of XRF analyses of LBA bronzes from the Menelaion, Mycenae, Ayios Stephanos, Kalithea in Achaia (to be published by REJ), and Nichoria, (Rapp, G., Jones, R. E., Cooke, S. R. B., and Henrickson, E. L., ‘Analyses of metal artefacts’, in Rapp, G. and Aschenbrenner, S. E. (eds), Excavations at Nichoria, i (Minnesota, 1978), 166–81.Google Scholar See now Mangou, E., Μελέτη αϱχαίων χαλϰινών αντιϰείμενων από τον Ελλαδιϰό χώρο, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Patras (1994).Google Scholar
22 see n. 5.
23 Born, H., ‘Multi-coloured antique bronze statues’, in La Niece, S. and Graddock, P. T. (eds), Metal Plating and Patination: Cultural, Technical and Historical Development (Oxford, 1994), 19–29.Google Scholar
24 Craddock, P. T. and Giumlia-Mair, A. R., ‘Hsmn km, Corinthian bronze, shakudo: black-patinated bronze in the ancient world’, in La Niece, S. and Craddock, P. T. (eds), Metal Plating and Patination: Cultural, Technical and Historical Development (Oxford, 1994), 103–4Google Scholar, Fig. 9.1, Tables 9.1 and 9. 2. Two objects in the British Museum dating to 600–100 BC have similar compositions: (1) a figurine of Ptah (EA 27363), a black patinated and gold foil inlaid figure with Cu 90.5%, Sn 2.15%, Au 2.71%, Ag 0.45%, As 0.57%, Pb 0.12% (determined by AAS); (2) Osiris (EA 64477) with composite necklace of electrum and black bronze inlaid into the body (Cu 68.1%, Sn 10.6%, Au 3.8%, Ag 2%, Pb 3.5%, and possible presence of arsenic (XRF surface analysis)).
25 Copper–gold alloys with fine inlaid decoration in gold silver and copper were first extensively studied in medieval Japanese sword guards made of that alloy and called shakudo. Intricate recipes for the preparation of organic reagents consisting of plant juices are employed even today, into which decorative objects made of the alloy are dipped and boiled in order to acquire the rich blue-black patina. For shakudo see S. La Niece, ‘Japanese polychrome metalwork’, in Pernicka, E. and Wagner, G. (eds), Archaeometry 90 (Basel, 1990), 87–94Google Scholar; Notis, N. R., ‘The Japanese alloy shakudo: its history and patination’, in Maddin, R. (ed.), The Beginning of the Use of Metals and Alloys (London, 1988), 315–27.Google Scholar
26 See n. 5.
27 Xenaki-Sakellariou and Chatziliou (n. 1), pl. 8. 1–2 (1874) and 3 (1816).
28 See n. 24.
29 Vermeule, E., Greece in the, Bronze Age (Chicago, 1972), 100.Google Scholar
30 Laffineur (n. 12), 275.