Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 September 2013
The absolute chronology for the Early Bronze Age of Central and Northern Europe, including that for the Wessex culture of southern Britain, is not yet reliably established. This point was emphasized by V. Gordon Childe in his Retrospect, and the following words were indeed the very last which he wrote. Speaking of ‘the urgency of establishing a reliable chronology’, he stated: ‘a great deal of the argument depends on a precise date for the beginning of Unétice, that is at best very slightly the most probable out of perfectly possible guesses ranging over five centuries’.
At that time the basis for the absolute chronology of the Early Bronze Age was, as it largely remains today, a framework of synchronous links built up across Europe to the Mycenaean world of the Aegean Late Bronze Age. The assumption was made—and Childe stressed that it was an assumption—that European development and chronology were to be viewed in terms of ‘the irradation of European barbarism by Oriental civilisation’. Possible links for the European Early Bronze Age with Mycenae and indeed the Near East were eagerly sought in an attempt to build up a coherent chronology founded on this assumption.
1 Childe, V. G., ‘Retrospect’, Antiquity xxiii (1958) 74.Google Scholar
2 Childe, V. G., Prehistoric Migrations in Europe (1950) 6 Google Scholar; id., ‘The Orient and Europe’, American Journal of Archaeology xliii (1939) 10.
3 Piggott, Stuart, ‘The Early Bronze Age in Wessex’, PPS iv (1938) 52 Google Scholar; and a detailed and more recent account of Mycenaean, contact in ‘Mycenae and barbarian Europe’, Sbornik Narodniho Muzea v Praza xx (1966) 117.Google Scholar A more precise definition of the ‘Wessex Culture’ is now needed, with more clearly defined chronological subdivisions. The forthcoming study by Miss Sabine Gerloff will be very welcome.
4 ApSimon, A. M., ‘Dagger Graves in the Wessex Bronze Age’, Institute of Archaeology, Annual Riport x (1954) 37.Google Scholar
5 Childe, V. G., The Dawn of European Civilization (1957) 339.Google Scholar
6 Kohl, G. and Quitta, H., ‘Berlin radiocarbon measurements II’, Radiocarbon 8 (1966) 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 von Brünn, W. A., Die Hortfunde der früheren Bronzezeit aus Sachsen-Anhalt, Sachsen und Thüringen (1959) 25.Google Scholar
8 Butler, J. J. and van der Waals, J. D., ‘Bell Beakers and early metal working’, Palaeohistoria xii (1966) 54.Google Scholar
9 Clarke, D. L., ‘Reclassification of British Beaker pottery’, Palaeohistoria xii (1966) 196.Google Scholar
10 Piggott, S., ‘Abercromby and after: the Beaker cultures of Britain re-examined’, in Foster, I. L. and Alcock, L. (eds.), Culture and Environment (1963) 90.Google Scholar
11 Lewis, G. D., ‘Some radiocarbon dates from the Peak District’, Derbyshire Archaeological Journal lxxxvi (1966) 115.Google Scholar
12 Damon, P. E., Long, A., and Grey, D. C., ‘Fluctuations of atmospheric C-14 during the last six millennia’, Journal of Geophysical Research 71 (1966) 1055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; cf. also Stuiver, M. and Suess, H. E., ‘On the relationship between Radiocarbon dates and true sample age’, Radiocarbon 8 (1966) 534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Kigoshi, K. and Kobayashi, H., ‘Gakushin radiocarbon measurements’, Radiocarbon 8 (1966) 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Suess, H. E., ‘Bristlecone pine calibration of the radiocarbon time scale from 4100 B.C. to 1500 B.C.’, in Radioactive Dating and Methods of Low Level Counting (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1967) 143.Google Scholar See also Ralph, E. K. and Michael, H. N., ‘Problems of the radiocarbon calendar’, Archaeometry 10 (1967) 3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Bucher, V. and Neustupny, E., ‘Changes in the Earth's magnetic field and radiocarbon dating’, Pamatky archeologicke (1967), 599.Google Scholar
15 Ochre Grave, Baia-Hamangia: Bln-29, GrN-1995; Cernavoda-Ezero culture: Bln-61a, 61, 62. See also Neustupny, E. ‘Absolute chronology of the Neolithic and Aeneolithic periods in central and south-eastern Europe’, Slovenska Archeologia xvi (1968) 19.Google Scholar
16 Butler and van der Waals, op. cit. (supra, p. 278 n. 8) 47.
17 Atkinson, R. J. C., ‘Further radiocarbon dates for Stonehenge’, Antiquity xli (1967) 63.Google Scholar
18 Childe, op. cit. (supra, p. 278 n. 5) 135.
19 Hayes, W. C., Rowton, M. B., and Stubbings, F. H., ‘Chronology: Egypt, Western Asia, Aegean Bronze Age’, Cambridge Ancient History 1, ch. vi (1962).Google Scholar
20 Ferrara, G., Reinharz, M., and Tongiorgi, E., ‘C-14 dating in Pisa’, Radiocarbon 1 (1959), 107.Google Scholar
21 Childe, V. G., The Danube in Prehistory (1929) 239 Google Scholar; id., The Dawn of European Civilization (1957) 134; Gimbutas, M., Bronze Age Cultures in Central and Eastern Europe (1965) 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22 Childe, V. G., Prehistoric Communities of the British Isles (1956) 145.Google Scholar
23 Stone, I. F. S. and Thomas, L. C., ‘The use and distribution of faience beads in the Near East and prehistoric Europe’, PPS xxii (1956) 37 Google Scholar; Newton, R. G. and Renfrew, C., ‘The Origin of the British Faience Beads reconsidered’, PPS xxxv.Google Scholar
24 Beck, C. W., Wilbur, E., Meret, S., Kossove, M., and Kermani, K., ‘The infra-red spectra of amber and the identification of Baltic amber’, Archaeometry 8 (1965) 96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25 Sandars, N. K., ‘Amber spacer-beads again’, Antiquity xxxiii (1959) 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26 Renfrew, C., ‘Cycladic metallurgy and the Aegean Early Bronze Age’ American Journal of Archaeology 71 (1967) pl. 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27 Athens National Museum 8623, exhibited in April 1968 with material from Grave Χ.
28 Mr. Grinsell points out that the Badbury carvings do, on the other hand, have some stratigraphic context.
29 Renfrew, C., ‘Trade and culture process in European Prehistory’, Current Anthropology 10, April 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30 For example the valuable paper by Britton, D., ‘Traditions of metal-working in the Later Neolithic and Early Bronze Age of Britain’, PPS xxix (1963) 258.Google Scholar
31 For helpful and constructive criticism I am very grate ful to Mr. Andrew Fleming, Mr. L. V. Grinsell, Mr, Geoffrey Lewis, and Professor Stuart Piggott. The diagram. Fig. 1, was very kindly drawn by Mr. H. A. Shelley.