Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T04:58:20.858Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Media and Second Dialect Acquisition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2019

Jennifer Nycz Open the ORCID record for Jennifer Nycz [Opens in a new window]
Jennifer Nycz*
Affiliation:
Georgetown University
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: jennifer.nycz@georgetown.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article addresses the role that different types of media might play in second dialect acquisition. While many scholars agree that broadcast media such as television have little effect on individual speakers’ language use, research across fields (sociolinguistics, second language learning, laboratory phonology, and phonetics) suggests that high levels of engagement could facilitate dialect learning via mediated speech. I will briefly describe the mechanisms underlying acquisition of new dialect features, discuss how these mechanisms might operate when speakers are exposed to speech via specific types of media, and sketch some avenues for future research.

Type
Short Report
Information
Annual Review of Applied Linguistics , Volume 39 , March 2019 , pp. 152 - 160
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ames, M. G., Go, J., Kaye, J., & Spasojevic, M. (2010). Making love in the network closet: The benefits and work of family videochat. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW ’10 (pp. 145–154). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
Androutsopolous, J. (2013). Participatory culture and metalinguistic discourse: Performing and negotiating German dialects on YouTube. In Tannen, D. & Trester, A. M. (Eds.), Discourse 2.0: Language and new media (pp. 47–71). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Babel, M. (2010). Dialect divergence and convergence in New Zealand English. Language in Society, 39, 437–456.Google Scholar
Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13, 145–204.Google Scholar
Bell, A., & Johnson, G. (1997). Towards a sociolinguistics of style. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 4(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York, NY: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Bourhis, R. Y., & Giles, H. (1977). The language of intergroup distinctiveness. In Giles, H. (Ed.), Language, ethnicity, and intergroup relations (pp. 119–135). London, UK: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Buhler, T., Neustaedter, C., & Hillman, S. (2013). How and why teenagers use video chat. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work SE - CSCW ’13 (pp. 759–768). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. (1992). Dialect acquisition. Language, 68, 673–705.Google Scholar
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910.Google Scholar
Chau, C. (2010). YouTube as a participatory culture. New Directions for Youth Development, 128, 65–74.Google Scholar
Coupland, N. (1984). Accommodation at work. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 4–6, 49–70.Google Scholar
De Decker, P., & Nycz, J. (2011). For the record: Which digital media can be used for sociophonetic analysis? University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 17(2), 51–59.Google Scholar
de Vasconcelos Filho, J. E., Inkpen, K. M., & Czerwinski, M. (2009). Image, appearance and vanity in the use of media spaces and video conference systems. In Proceedings of the ACM 2009 International Conference on Supporting Group Work - GROUP ’09 (pp. 253–262). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
Delvaux, V., & Soquet, A. (2007). The influence of ambient speech on adult speech productions through unintentional imitation. Phonetica, 64, 145–173.Google Scholar
Dias, J. W., & Rosenblum, L. D. (2011). Visual influences on interactive speech alignment. Perception, 40, 1457–1466.Google Scholar
DiDomenico, S., & Boase, J. (2013). Bringing mobiles into the conversation: Applying a conversation analytic approach to the study of mobiles in co-present interaction. In Tannen, D. & Trester, A. M. (Eds.), Discourse 2.0: Language and new media (pp. 119–132). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Drummond, R. (2013). The Manchester Polish STRUT: Dialect acquisition in a second language. Journal of English Linguistics, 41(1), 65–93.Google Scholar
Edison Research. (2016). The podcast consumer. Retrieved from https://app.customshow.com/viewer?s=gk4o0d&popupdetectorOn=trueGoogle Scholar
Eckert, P. (2003). Sociolinguistics and authenticity: The elephant in the room. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7, 392–431.Google Scholar
Fasold, R. W. (1972). Tense marking in Black English: A linguistic and social analysis. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Fix, S. (2014). AAE as a bounded ethnolinguistic resource for white women with African American ties. Language and Communication, 35, 55–74.Google Scholar
Gass, S. M., Mackey, A., & Pica, T. (1998). The role of input and interaction in second language acquisition: Introduction to the special issue. Modern Language Journal, 82, 299–305.Google Scholar
German, J. S, Carlson, K., & Pierrehumbert, J.B. (2013). Reassignment of consonant allophones in rapid dialect acquisition. Journal of Phonetics, 41(3), 228–248.Google Scholar
Giles, H., Coupland, J., & Coupland, N. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In Giles, H., Coupland, J., & Coupland, N. (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics (pp. 1–68). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251–279.Google Scholar
Goldinger, S. D. (2000). The role of perceptual episodes in lexical processing. In Cutler, A., McQueen, J. M., & Zondervan, R. (Eds.), Proceedings of SWAP (Spoken Word Access Processes) (pp. 155–159). Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Havenhill, J. (2018). Constraints on articulatory variability: Audiovisual perception of lip rounding (Doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Hazen, K. (2001). An introductory investigation into bidialectalism. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 7(3), 85–100.Google Scholar
Honorof, D. N., Weihing, J., & Fowler, C. A. (2011). Articulatory events are imitated under rapid shadowing. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 18–38.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society, 1, 97–120.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (2001). Principles of linguistic change, vol. 2: Social factors. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (2007). Transmission and diffusion. Language, 83, 344–387.Google Scholar
Labov, W., Ash, S., & Boberg, C. (2006). The atlas of North American English. New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Licoppe, C., & Morel, J. (2012). Video-in-interaction: “Talking heads” and the multimodal organization of mobile and Skype video calls. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 45(4): 399–429.Google Scholar
Kim, M., Horton, W. S., & Bradlow, A. R. (2011). Phonetic convergence in spontaneous conversations as a function of interlocutor language distance. Journal of Laboratory Phonology, 2, 125–156.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, T. (2014). Knowing the driving force in language change: Density or subjectivity? Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18(2), 233–241.Google Scholar
Milroy, L. (2007). Off the shelf or under the counter? On the social dynamics of sound changes. In Cain, C. M. & Russom, G. (Eds.), Managing chaos: Strategies for identifying change in English (pp. 149–172). New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Molyneaux, H., O'Donnell, S., & Milliken, M. (2012). Staying socially connected with online communications: A case study. Canadian Journal of Communications, 37(3), 421–440.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J., Derwing, T. M., & Flege, J. E. (1999). Canadians in Alabama: A perceptual study of dialect acquisition in adults. Journal of Phonetics, 27, 385–403.Google Scholar
Namy, L. L., Nygaard, L. C., & Sauerteig, D. (2002). Gender differences in vocal accommodation: The role of perception. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 21, 422–432.Google Scholar
Nielsen, K. (2011). Specificity and abstraction of VOT imitation. Journal of Phonetics, 39, 132–142.Google Scholar
Nycz, J. (2013). Changing words or changing rules? Second dialect acquisition and phonological representation. Journal of Pragmatics, 52, 49–62.Google Scholar
Nycz, J. (2015). Second dialect acquisition: A sociophonetic perspective. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9, 469–482.Google Scholar
Nycz, J. (2016). Awareness and acquisition of new dialect features. In Babel, A. (Ed.), Awareness and control in sociolinguistic research (pp. 62–79). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nycz, J., & Mooney, S. (2017). Variable vowel convergence in a novel cooperative task. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 142, 2583.Google Scholar
O'Hara, K., Black, A., & Lipson, M. (2006). Everyday practices with mobile video telephony. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 871–880). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
Pardo, J. (2006). On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 2382–2393.Google Scholar
Pardo, J., Gibbons, R., Suppes, A., & Krauss, R. (2012). Phonetic convergence in college roommates. Journal of Phonetics, 40, 190–197.Google Scholar
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2004). Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 169–226.Google Scholar
Sayers, D. (2014). The mediated innovation model: A framework for researching media influence in language change. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18(2), 185–212.Google Scholar
Shepard, C. A., Giles, H., & Le Poire, B. A. (2001). Communication accommodation theory. In Robinson, W. P. & Giles, H. (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 33–56). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Shockley, K., Sabadini, L., & Fowler, C. 2004. Imitation in shadowing words. Perception and Psychophysics, 66, 422–429.Google Scholar
Shockley, K., Santana, M., & Fowler, C. (2003). Mutual interpersonal postural constraints are involved in cooperative conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 326–332.Google Scholar
Siegel, J. (2010). Second dialect acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stuart-Smith, J., Pryce, G., Timmins, C., & Gunter, B. (2013). Television can also be a factor in language change: Evidence from an urban dialect. Language, 89, 501–536.Google Scholar
Sumby, W. H., & Pollack, I. (1954). Visual contribution to speech intelligibility in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 212.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S. (2014). Situating media influence in sociolinguistic context. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18(2), 223–232.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1986). Dialects in contact. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (2014). Diffusion, drift, and the irrelevance of media influence. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18(2), 214–222.Google Scholar
Varonis, E. M., & Gass, S. (1985). Non-native/non-native conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6, 71–90.Google Scholar
Walker, A. (2014). Crossing oceans with voices and ears: Second dialect acquisition and topic-based shifting in production and perception (PhD thesis). The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Walker, A. (2018). The effect of long-term second dialect exposure on sentence transcription in noise. Journal of Phonetics, 71, 162–176.Google Scholar