Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T00:56:09.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bacterial communities in Antarctic lichens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2016

Chae Haeng Park ,
Kyung Mo Kim ,
Ok-Sun Kim ,
Gajin Jeong  and
Soon Gyu Hong
Chae Haeng Park
Affiliation:
Divison of Polar Life Sciences, Korea Polar Research Institute, 26 Songdomirae-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, Korea School of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Science, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Seoul, Korea
Kyung Mo Kim
Affiliation:
Korean Bioinformation Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, 111 Gwahangno, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Korea
Ok-Sun Kim
Affiliation:
Divison of Polar Life Sciences, Korea Polar Research Institute, 26 Songdomirae-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, Korea
Gajin Jeong
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, College of Natural Science, Seoul National University, 1 Gwanak-ro, Seoul, Korea
Soon Gyu Hong*
Affiliation:
Divison of Polar Life Sciences, Korea Polar Research Institute, 26 Songdomirae-ro, Yeonsu-gu, Incheon, Korea
*
polypore@kopri.re.kr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To date, many studies surveying the bacterial communities in lichen thalli from diverse geographical areas have shown that Alphaproteobacteria is the predominant bacterial class in most lichens. In this study, bacterial communities in several Antarctic lichens with different growth form and substrates were analysed. The bacterial community composition in fruticose and foliose lichens, Cladonia, Umbilicaria and Usnea, and crustose lichens, Buelia granulosa, Amandinea coniops and Ochrolechia parella, from King George Island was analysed by pyrosequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA genes. Results showed that Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes were predominant phyla. The predominant bacterial class in most of the samples was Alphaproteobacteria. Acetobacteriaceae of the order Rhodospiralles in Alphaproteobacteria was the most abundant bacterial family in Antarctic lichens. The LAR1 lineage of the order Rhizobiales, a putative N-fixer which has been frequently observed in lichens from temperate areas, was detected only from a few samples at low frequency. It is expected that other bacterial taxa are working as N-fixers in Antarctic lichens. From the PCoA analysis of the Fast UniFrac distance matrix, it was proposed that the microbial community structures in Antarctic lichens were affected by host species, growth form and substrates.

Keywords

Cladonialichen-associated bacteriaUmbilicariaUsnea
Type
Biological Sciences
Information
Antarctic Science , Volume 28 , Issue 6 , December 2016 , pp. 455 - 461
Check for updates
Copyright
© Antarctic Science Ltd 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bates, S.T., Cropsey, G.W.G., Caporaso, J.G., Knight, R. & Fierer, N. 2011. Bacterial communities associated with the lichen symbiosis. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 77, 1309–1314.Google Scholar
Cardinale, M., Puglia, A.M. & Grube, M. 2006. Molecular analysis of lichen-associated bacterial communities. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 57, 484–495.Google Scholar
Cardinale, M., de Castro, J.V., Müller, H., Berg, G. & Grube, M. 2008. In situ analysis of the bacterial community associated with the reindeer lichen Cladonia arbuscula reveals predominance of Alphaproteobacteria. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 66, 63–71.Google Scholar
Cardinale, M., Grube, M., Castro, J.V., Müller, H. & Berg, G. 2012a. Bacterial taxa associated with the lung lichen Lobaria pulmonaria are differentially shaped by geography and habitat. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 329, 111–115.Google Scholar
Cardinale, M., Steinová, J., Rabensteiner, J., Berg, G. & Grube, M. 2012b. Age, sun and substrate: triggers of bacterial communities in lichens. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 4, 23–28.Google Scholar
Casano, L.M., del Campo, E.M., García-Breijo, F.J., Reig-Armiñana, J., Gasulla, F., del Hoyo, A., Guéra, A. & Barreno, E. 2011. Two Trebouxia algae with different physiological performances are ever-present in lichen thalli of Ramalina farinacea. Coexistence versus competition? Environmental Microbiology, 13, 806–818.Google Scholar
Edgar, R.C. 2010. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics, 26, 2460–2461.Google Scholar
Edgar, R.C., Haas, B.J., Clemente, J.C., Quince, C. & Knight, R. 2011. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics, 27, 2194–2200.Google Scholar
González, I., Ayuso-Sacido, A., Anderson, A. & Genilloud, O. 2005. Actinomycetes isolated from lichens: evaluation of their diversity and detection of biosynthetic gene sequences. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 54, 401–415.Google Scholar
Grube, M. & Muggia, L. 2010. Identifying algal symbionts in lichen symbioses. In Nimis, P.L. & Lebbe, R.V., eds. Tools for identifying biodiversity: progress and problems. Proceedings of the International Congress, Paris, 20–22 September 2010. Trieste: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste, 295–299.Google Scholar
Grube, M., Cardinale, M., de Castro, J.V., Muller, H. & Berg, G. 2009. Species-specific structural and functional diversity of bacterial communities in lichen symbioses. ISME Journal, 3, 1105–1115.Google Scholar
Guzow-Krzeminska, B. 2006. Photobiont flexibility in the lichen Protoparmeliopsis muralis as revealed by ITS rDNA analyses. Lichenologist, 38, 469–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamady, M., Lozupone, C. & Knight, R. 2009. Fast UniFrac: facilitating high-throughput phylogenetic analyses of microbial communities including analysis of pyrosequencing and PhyloChip data. ISME Journal, 4, 17–27.Google Scholar
Hodkinson, B.P. & Lutzoni, F. 2009. A microbiotic survey of lichen-associated bacteria reveals a new lineage from the Rhizobiales. Symbiosis, 49, 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodkinson, B.P., Gottel, N.R., Schadt, C.W. & Lutzoni, F. 2012. Photoautotrophic symbiont and geography are major factors affecting highly structured and diverse bacterial communities in the lichen microbiome. Environmental Microbiology, 14, 147–161.Google Scholar
Hwang, K., Oh, J., Kim, T.K., Kim, B.K., Yu, D.S., Hou, B.K., Caetano-Anollés, G., Hong, S.G. & Kim, K.M. 2013. CLUSTOM: a novel method for clustering 16S rRNA next generation sequences by overlap minimization. PLoS ONE, 8, 10.1371/journal.pone.0062623.Google Scholar
Kim, O.-S., Cho, Y.-J., Lee, K., Yoon, S.-H., Kim, M., Na, H., Park, S.-C., Jeon, Y.S., Lee, J.-H., Yi, H., Won, S. & Chun, J. 2012. Introducing EzTaxon-e: a prokaryotic 16S rRNA gene sequence database with phylotypes that represent uncultured species. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 62, 716–721.Google Scholar
Lee, Y.M., Kim, E.H., Lee, H.K. & Hong, S.G. 2014. Biodiversity and physiological characteristics of Antarctic and Arctic lichens-associated bacteria. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 30, 2711–2721.Google Scholar
Liba, C.M., Ferrara, F.I.S., Manfio, G.P., Fantinatti-Garboggini, F., Albuquerque, R.C., Pavan, C., Ramos, P.L., Moreira-Filho, C.A. & Barbosa, H.R. 2006. Nitrogen-fixing chemo-organotrophic bacteria isolated from cyanobacteria-deprived lichens and their ability to solubilize phosphate and to release amino acids and phytohormones. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 101, 1076–1086.Google Scholar
Mushegian, A.A., Peterson, C.N., Baker, C.C.M. & Pringle, A. 2011. Bacterial diversity across individual lichens. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 77, 4249–4252.Google Scholar
Oh, J., Kim, B.K., Cho, W.-S., Hong, S.G. & Kim, K.M. 2012. PyroTrimmer: a software with GUI for pre-processing 454 amplicon sequences. Journal of Microbiology, 50, 766–769.Google Scholar
Ohmura, Y., Kawachi, M., Kasai, F., Watanabe, M.M. & Takeshita, S. 2006. Genetic combinations of symbionts in a vegetatively reproducing lichen, Parmotrema tinctorum, based on ITS rDNA sequences. Bryologist, 109, 43–59.Google Scholar
Øvstedal, D.O. & Lewis Smith, R.I. 2001. Lichens of Antarctica and South Georgia: a guide to their identification and ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 424 pp.Google Scholar
Park, C.H., Kim, K.M., Elvebakk, A., Kim, O.-S., Jeong, G. & Hong, S.G. 2015. Algal and fungal diversity in Antarctic lichens. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 62, 196–205.Google Scholar
Pedraza, R.O. 2008. Recent advances in nitrogen-fixing acetic acid bacteria. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 125, 25–35.Google Scholar
Piercey-Normore, M.D. 2006. The lichen-forming ascomycete Evernia mesomorpha associates with multiple genotypes of Trebouxia jamesii . New Phytologist, 169, 331–344.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Printzen, C., Fernández-Mendoza, F., Muggia, L., Berg, G. & Grube, M. 2012. Alphaproteobacterial communities in geographically distant populations of the lichen Cetraria aculeata . FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 82, 316–325.Google Scholar
Rösch, C., Mergel, A. & Bothe, H. 2002. Biodiversity of denitrifying and dinitrogen-fixing bacteria in an acid forest soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 68, 3818–3829.Google Scholar
Saravanan, V.S., Madhaiyan, M., Osborne, J., Thangaraju, M. & Sa, T.M. 2008. Ecological occurrence of Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and nitrogen-fixing Acetobacteraceae members: their possible role in plant growth promotion. Microbial Ecology, 55, 130–140.Google Scholar
Scott, G.D. 1956. Further investigation of some lichens for fixation of nitrogen. New Phytologist, 55, 111–116.Google Scholar
Selbmann, L., Zucconi, L., Ruisi, S., Grube, M., Cardinale, M. & Onofri, S. 2010. Culturable bacteria associated with Antarctic lichens: affiliation and psychrotolerance. Polar Biology, 33, 71–83.Google Scholar
Sigurbjörnsdóttir, M.A., Andrésson, Ó.S. & Vilhelmsson, O. 2015. Analysis of the Peltigera membranacea metagenome indicates that lichen-associated bacteria are involved in phosphate solubilization. Microbiology - SGM, 161, 989–996.Google Scholar
Sigurbjörnsdóttir, M.A., Heiðmarsson, S., Jónsdóttir, A.R. & Vilhelmsson, O. 2014. Novel bacteria associated with Arctic seashore lichens have potential roles in nutrient scavenging. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 60, 307–317.Google Scholar
Thompson, J.D., Gibson, T.J. & Higgins, D.G. 2002. Multiple sequence alignment using ClustalW and ClustalX. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, 2, 10.1002/0471250953.bi0203s00.Google Scholar
Turnbaugh, P.J., Ley, R.E., Mahowald, M.A., Magrini, V., Mardis, E.R. & Gordon, J.I. 2006. An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest. Nature, 444, 1027–1031.Google Scholar
Warnecke, F., Luginbuhl, P., Ivanova, N. et al. 2007. Metagenomic and functional analysis of hindgut microbiota of a wood-feeding higher termite. Nature, 450, 560–565.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Park supplementary material

Table S1

Download Park supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 24.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Park supplementary material

Table S2

Download Park supplementary material(File)
File 81.3 KB