Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:13:27.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determination of an experimental geoid at Deception Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2016

Bismarck Jigena Open the ORCID record for Bismarck Jigena [Opens in a new window] ,
Manuel Berrocoso ,
Cristina Torrecillas ,
Juan Vidal ,
Ignacio Barbero  and
Alberto Fernandez-Ros
Bismarck Jigena*
Affiliation:
Department of Nautical Sciences and Maritime Studies, University of Cádiz, CP 11510, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain Astronomy, Geodesy and Cartography Laboratory (LAGC-UCA), University of Cádiz, Faculty of Science, CP 11510, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain
Manuel Berrocoso
Affiliation:
Astronomy, Geodesy and Cartography Laboratory (LAGC-UCA), University of Cádiz, Faculty of Science, CP 11510, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain Department of Mathematics, University of Cádiz, CP 11510, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain
Cristina Torrecillas
Affiliation:
Astronomy, Geodesy and Cartography Laboratory (LAGC-UCA), University of Cádiz, Faculty of Science, CP 11510, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain Department of Graphic Engineering, University of Seville, CP 41092, Seville, Spain
Juan Vidal
Affiliation:
Astronomy, Geodesy and Cartography Laboratory (LAGC-UCA), University of Cádiz, Faculty of Science, CP 11510, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain Department of Naval Construction, University of Cádiz, CP 11510, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain
Ignacio Barbero
Affiliation:
Department of Naval Construction, University of Cádiz, CP 11510, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain
Alberto Fernandez-Ros
Affiliation:
Astronomy, Geodesy and Cartography Laboratory (LAGC-UCA), University of Cádiz, Faculty of Science, CP 11510, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain Department of Mathematics, University of Cádiz, CP 11510, Puerto Real, Cádiz, Spain
*
bismarck.jigena@gm.uca.es
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Deception Island is an active volcano located in Bransfield Strait. Its volcanic activity is linked to the presence of gravity anomalies that influence the definition of the geoid. In this paper, a precise undulation geoid model (GeoiDEC14) has been computed from GPS, gravimetric and levelling measurements. GeoiDEC14 highlights local anomalies of the island that match with hot spots, such as the minimum values shown in Fumarole Bay and Whalers Bay (fumarole areas), or the maximum values found in the remains of lava at Colatinas, Black Glacier and Murature Point. Comparison of GeoiDEC14 with global models always shows negative values due to an average of 18.80 m for our model compared to 19.80–20.60 m for models such as ITSG-Grace2014s, EGM08, AIUG-Grace03s or EGM96. This difference is due to the lack of resolution of global models and to the volcanic activity on the island. To confirm the results, the same measurements were taken on nearby Livingston Island. The values of geoid undulation on this island reaffirm the lack of detail in the global geoid in the area, presenting an average of 18.90 m, similar to the average value of GeoiDEC14.

Keywords

geoid undulationgravimetriclevellingLivingston Islandmean sea levelorthometric height
Type
Earth Sciences
Information
Antarctic Science , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , August 2016 , pp. 277 - 292
Check for updates
Copyright
© Antarctic Science Ltd 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altamimi, Z., Sillard, P. & Boucher, C. 2002. ITRF2000: a new release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame for earth science applications. Journal of Geophysical Research - Solid Earth, 107, 10.1029/2001JB000561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrocoso, M., Torrecillas, C., Jigena, B. & Fernández-Ros, A. 2012. Determination of geomorphological and volumetric variations in the 1970 land volcanic craters area (Deception Island, Antarctica) from 1968 using historical and current maps, remote sensing and GNSS. Antarctic Science, 24, 367–376.Google Scholar
Berrocoso, M., Gárate, J., Martín-Dávila, J., Fernández-Ros, A., Moreu, G. & Jigena, B. 1996. Improving the local geoid with GPS. Reports of the Finnish Geodetic Institute, 96, 91–96.Google Scholar
Berrocoso, M., Fernández-Ros, A., Torrecillas, C., Enríquez De Salamanca, J.M., Ramírez, M.E., Pérez-Peña, A., González, M.J., Páez, R., Jiménez-Teja, Y., García-García, A., Tárraga, M. & García-García, F. 2006. Geodetic research on Deception Island, Antarctica. In Fütterer, D.K., Damaske, D., Kleinschmidt, G., Miller, H. & Tessensohn, F., eds. Antarctica: contributions to global earth sciences. Berlin: Springer, 391–396.Google Scholar
Berrocoso, M., Fernández-Ros, A., Ramírez, M.E., Enríquez De Salamanca, J.M., Torrecillas, C., Pérez-Peña, A., Páez, R., García-García, A., Jiménez-Teja, Y., García-García, F., Soto, R., Gárate, J., Martín-Dávila, J., Sanchez-Alzola, A., De Gil, A., Fernández-Prada, J.A. & Jigena, B. 2008. Geodetic research on Deception Island and its environment (South Shetland Islands, Bransfield Sea and Antarctic Peninsula) during Spanish Antarctic campaigns (1987–2007). In Capra, A. & Dietrich, R., eds. Geodetic and geophysical observations in Antarctica. Berlin: Springer, 97–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouin, M.N. & Vigny, C. 2000. New constrains on Antarctic plate motion and deformation from GPS data. Journal Geophysical Research - Solid Earth, 105, 28 279–28 293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbó, A., Muñoz-Martín, A., Dávila, J., Catalán, M. & García, A. 2001. Análisis de nuevos datos gravimétricos marinos en el entorno de la Isla Decepción (Islas Shetland del Sur, Antártida). Revista de la Sociedad Geológica de España, 14, 189–197.Google Scholar
CGE (Centro Geográfico Ejército Español) 1992. Topographic map of Deception Island. 1:25 000. Madrid: Centro Geográfico Ejército Español.Google Scholar
Crescentini, L. & Amoruso, A. 2007. Effects of crustal layering on the inversion of deformation and gravity data in volcanic areas: an application to the Campi Flegrei caldera, Italy. Geophysical Research Letters, 34, 10.1029/2007GL029919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esri 2008. ArcGIS desktop 9.3 help. Redlands, CA: Esri.Google Scholar
Fecher, T., Pail, R. & Gruber, T. 2015. Global gravity field modeling based on GOCE and complementary gravity data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 35, 120–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gracia, E., Canals, M., Farranz, M.L., Sorribas, J. & Pallas, R. 1997. Central and eastern Bransfield basins (Antarctica) from high-resolution swath-bathymetry data. Antarctic Science, 9, 168–180.Google Scholar
Heiskanen, W.A. & Moritz, H. 1967. Physical geodesy. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman, 364 pp.Google Scholar
Hungentobler, U., Schaer, S. & Fridez, P., eds. 2001. Bernese GPS Software Version 4.2. Berne: Astronomical Institute, University of Berne, 32 pp.Google Scholar
Jigena, B., Vidal, J. & Berrocoso, M. 2014. Determination of the mean sea level at Deception and Livingston islands, Antarctica. Antarctic Science, 27, 101–102.Google Scholar
Ledesma, R., Macbeth, G. & Cortada, N. 2008. Tamaño del efecto: revisión teórica y aplicaciones con el sistema estadístico ViSta. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 40, 425–439.Google Scholar
Leick, A. 2004. GPS satellite surveying, 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, 464 pp.Google Scholar
Lemoine, F.G., Kenyon, S.C., Factor, J.K., Trimmer, R.G., Pavlis, N.K., Chinn, D.S., Cox, C.M., Klosko, S.M., Luthcke, S.B., Torrence, M.H., Wang, Y.M., Williamson, R.G., Pavlis, E.C., Rapp, R.H. & Olson, T.R. 1998. The development of the joint NASA GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) geopotential model EGM96. NASA technical report NASA/TP-1998-206861. Available at: http://cddis.nasa.gov/926/egm96/egm96.html.Google Scholar
Maestro, A., Somoza, L., Rey, J., Martínez-Frías, J. & López-Martínez, J. 2007. Active tectonics, fault patterns, and stress field of Deception Island: a response to oblique convergence between the Pacific and Antarctic plates. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 23, 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martín-Furones, A. 2000. Análisis y ajuste de modelos de geoide. Observación y cálculo de la red gravimétrica de tercer orden en la Provincia de Valencia. PhD thesis, Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, 163 pp..Google Scholar
Martí, J., Vila, J. & Rey, J. 1996. Deception Island (Bransfield Strait, Antarctica); an example of a volcanic caldera developed by extensional tectonics. Geological Society Special Publication, No. 110, 253–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer-Guerr, T., Zehentner, N., Klinger, B. & Kvas, A. 2014. The satellite-only gravity field model ITSG-GRACE2014s. Graz: Institute of Theoretical Geodesy and Satellite Geodesy, Graz University of Technology, Available at: http://itsg.tugraz.at/research/ITSG-Grace2014.Google Scholar
Pail, R., Goiginger, H., Schuh, W.-D., Höck, E., Brockmann, J.M., Fecher, T., Gruber, T., Mayer-Gürr, T., Kusche, J., Jäggi, A. & Rieser, D. 2010. Combined satellite gravity field model GOCO01S derived from GOCE and GRACE. Geophysical Research Letters, 37, 10.1029/2010GL044906.Google Scholar
Pavlis, N.K., Holmes, S.A., Kenyon, S.C. & Factor, J.K. 2012. The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008). Journal of Geophysical Research - Solid Earth, 117, 10.1029/2011JB008916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prates, G., Berrocoso, M., Fernández-Ros, A. & García, A. 2013. Enhancement of sub-daily positioning solutions for surface deformation monitoring at Deception volcano (South Shetland Islands, Antarctica). Bulletin of Volcanology, 75, 10.1007/s00445-013-0688-3.Google Scholar
Reyes, R.B., Nagai, M., Kamiya, Y., Tipdecho, T. & Ninsawat, S. 2015. Effect of sea level rise in the validation of geopotential/geoid models in Metro Manila, Philippines. Survey Review, 47, 211–219.Google Scholar
Seeber, G. 2003. Satellite geodesy, 2nd ed. Berlin: Gruyter, 589 pp.Google Scholar
Smellie, J.L. 2001. Lithostratigraphy and volcanic evolution of Deception Island, South Shetland Islands. Antarctic Science, 13, 188–209.Google Scholar
Smellie, J.L. 2002. The 1969 subglacial eruption on Deception Island (Antarctica): events and processes during an eruption beneath a thin glacier and implications for volcanic hazards. Special Publication of the Geological Society of London, No. 202, 59–79.Google Scholar
Smellie, J.L., López-Martínez, J., Thomson, J.W. & Thomson, M.R.A. 2002. Geology and geomorphology of Deception Island. BAS GEOMAP Series, Sheets 6-A and 6-B, 1:25 000, supplementary text. Cambridge: British Antarctic Survey, 77 pp.Google Scholar
Torrecillas, C., Berrocoso, M. & Garcia, A. 2006. The Multidisciplinary Scientific Information Support System (SIMAC) for Deception Island, Antarctica. In Fütterer, D.K., Damaske, D., Kleinschmidt, G., Miller, H. & Tessensohn, F., eds. Antarctica: contributions to global earth sciences. Berlin: Springer, 397–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrecillas, C., Berrocoso, M., Perez-Lopez, R. & Torrecillas, M.D. 2011. Determination of volumetric variations and coastal changes due to historical volcanic eruptions using historical maps and remote-sensing at Deception Island (West Antarctica). Geomorphology, 136, 6–14.Google Scholar
Valencio, D.A., Mendía, J.E., Vilas, J.F. 1979. Paleomagnetism and K-Ar age of Mesozoic and Cenozoic igneous rocks from Antarctica. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 45, 61–68.Google Scholar
Vidal, J., Berrocoso, M. & Fernández-Ros, A. 2012. Study of tides and sea levels at Deception and Livingston islands, Antarctica. Antarctic Science, 24, 193–201.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Jigena supplementary material

Figure S1 and Tables S1-S4

Download Jigena supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 886.8 KB