Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:24:11.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Give a dog a bad name

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2004

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Does Antarctic research have a bad name? The short answer in some quarters is, ‘Yes’. But why should this be so? Antarctica is an exciting and stimulating place to work and, whatever one's field of science, because of the continent's present-day isolated position, its massive ice cover and its previous key location within the ancient Gondwana supercontinent, it holds many important clues and answers to questions about our planet and its environment. Yet, those of us who are required to submit our science to peer review are sometimes perplexed by incomprehensible and unreasonably negative comments that come from outside. Are these non-Antarctic scientists just jealous, or do they have a point?

Type
Editorial
Copyright
© Antarctic Science Ltd 1997