Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:41:49.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘Hitchhiker’ polynoid polychaetes in cold deep waters and their potential influence on benthic soft bottom food webs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 May 2010

Stefano Schiaparelli ,
Maria Chiara Alvaro ,
Jehns Bohn  and
Giancarlo Albertelli
Stefano Schiaparelli*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento per lo Studio del Territorio e delle sue Risorse (Dip.Te.Ris.), Università di Genova, C.so Europa 26, Genova I-16132, Italy
Maria Chiara Alvaro
Affiliation:
Museo Nazionale dell’Antartide (MNA), Università di Genova, Viale Benedetto XV n°5, Genova I-16132, Italy
Jehns Bohn
Affiliation:
Zoologische Staatssammlung München, Münchhausenstrasse 21, München D-81247, Germany
Giancarlo Albertelli
Affiliation:
Dipartimento per lo Studio del Territorio e delle sue Risorse (Dip.Te.Ris.), Università di Genova, C.so Europa 26, Genova I-16132, Italy
*
stefano.schiaparelli@unige.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We describe a new association for Antarctica, involving an holothuroid host, Bathyplotes bongraini Vaney, 1914, and a parasitic polynoid polychaete, Eunoe opalina McIntosh, 1885, which lives on the host body. Both species have never been recorded in the study area, the Ross Sea. The ecological definition of this partnership is difficult to assess, being a mix of phoresis, protective association, parasitism and, possibly, kleptocommensalism. Eunoe opalina emerges also as a true predator, ingesting several food items that do not belong to the diet of Bathyplotes. We compare this association with analogous examples known from shallow tropical environments as well as bathyal and abyssal depths. Given the conspicuous similarities between the deep water and high latitude examples of this kind of association, a possible common origin is hypothesized. Although the role of such a kind of parasitic relationships in Antarctic communities remains to be fully evaluated, it seems evident that, at high latitudes, where trophic levels are simplified and food webs do not have much redundancy, the impact of such a ‘multitasking’ predator-parasite as E. opalina might be of a greater magnitude than its shallow water tropical counterpart.

Keywords

AntarcticaHolothuroideaparasitismPolychaetaRoss Sea‘symbiotic’ association
Type
Biological Sciences
Information
Antarctic Science , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , August 2010 , pp. 399 - 407
Copyright
Copyright © Antarctic Science Ltd 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J.B. 1999. Antarctic marine geology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 289 pp.Google Scholar
Aronson, R.B.Blake, D.B. 2001. Global climate change and the origin of modern benthic communities in antarctica. American Zoologist, 41, 27–39.Google Scholar
Barel, C.D.Kramers, P.G. 1977. A survey of the echinoderm associates of the north-east Atlantic area. Zoologische Verhandelingen, 156, 1–159.Google Scholar
Brey, T., Dahm, C., Gorny, M., Kalges, M., Stiller, M.Arntz, W.E. 1996. Do Antarctic benthic invertebrates show an extended level of eurybathy? Antarctic Science, 8, 3–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britayev, T.A.Zamishlyak, E.A. 1994. The biology of a commensal polychaete Gastrolepidia clavigera (Polychaeta, Polynoidae) with remarks on the biology of host holothurians (Holothuriidae, Stichopodidae). Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 73, 39–53.Google Scholar
Britayev, T.A.Zamyshlyak, E.A. 1996. Association of the commensal scaleworm Gastrolepidia clavigera (Polychaeta: Polynoidae) with holothurians near the coast of South Vietnam. Ophelia, 45, 175–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britayev, T.A., Doignon, G.Eeckhaut, I. 1999. Symbiotic polychaetes from Papua New Guinea associated with echinoderms, with descriptions of three new species. Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 40, 359–374.Google Scholar
Britayev, T.A.Lyskin, S.A. 2002. Feeding of the symbiotic polychaete Gastrolepidia clavigera (Polynoidae) and its interactions with its hosts. Doklady Biological Sciences, 385, 352–356.Google Scholar
Britayev, T.A., Krylova, E.M., Aksyuk, T.S.Cosel, R. 2003. Association of Atlantic hydrothermal mytilids of the genus Bathymodiolus spp. (Mollusca: Mytilidae) with the polychaeta Branchipolynoe aff. seepensis (Polychaeta: Polynoidae): commensalism or parasitism? Doklady Biological Sciences, 391, 371–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bary, A.H. 1878. Über Symbiose. Tagblatt der 51. Versammlung Deutscher Naturforscher und Aerzte in Cassel. Kassel: Baier & Lewalter, 121–126.Google Scholar
Dimock, R.V.Davenport, D. 1971. Behavioural specificity and the induction of host recognition in a symbiotic polychate. Biological Bulletin, 141, 472–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ditlevsen, H. 1917. Annelids. I. The Danish Ingolf Expedition, 4 (4), 1–71.Google Scholar
Dunne, J.A., Williams, R.J.Martinez, N.D. 2002. Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: robustness increases with connectance. Ecology Letters, 5, 558–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fauchald, K. 2009. Eunoe opalina McIntosh, 1885. In Fauchald, K., ed. World Polychaeta database. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=327847 on 22 September 2009.Google Scholar
Fauchald, K.Jumars, P. 1979. The diet of worms: a study of polychaete feeding ecology. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review, 17, 193–284.Google Scholar
Fauchald, K.Barnich, R. 2009a. Polynoidae. In Fauchald, K.,ed. World Polychaeta database. Accessed through: World Register of Marine Species at http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=939 on 24 September 2009.Google Scholar
Fauchald, K.Barnich, R. 2009b. Polynoidae. In Fauchald, K.,ed. World Polychaeta database. Accessed through: De Broyer, C., Clarke, A., Koubbi, P., Pakhomov, E., Scott, F., Vanden Berghe, E. & Danis, B., eds. The SCAR-MarBIN Register of Antarctic Marine Species (RAMS) at http://www.scarmarbin.be/rams.php?p=taxdetails&id=939 on 24 September 2009.Google Scholar
Hartmann-Schröder, G. 1989. Polynoe thouarellicola n. sp. aus der Antarktis, assoziiert mit Hornkorallen, und Wiederbeschreibung von Polynoe antarctica Kinberg, 1858 (Polychaeta, Polynoidae). Zoologische Anzaiger, 3/4, 205–221.Google Scholar
Hay, M.K., Parker, J.D., Burkepile, D.E., Caudill, C.C., Wilson, A.E., Hallinan, Z.P.Chequer, A.D. 2004. Mutualism and aquatic community structure: the enemy of my enemy is my friend. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 35, 175–197.Google Scholar
Holden, M.J.Raitt, D.F.S. 1974. Manual of fisheries science. 2. Methods of resource investigation and their application. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, No. 115, 1–211.Google Scholar
Jangoux, M. 1987a. Diseases of Echinodermata. III. Agents metazoans (Annelida to Pisces). Disease of Aquatic Organisms, 3, 59–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jangoux, M. 1987b. Diseases of Echinodermata. IV. Structural abnormalities and general considerations on biotic diseases. Disease of Aquatic Organisms, 3, 221–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirkegaard, J.B.Billet, D. 1980. Eunoe laetmogonensis, a new species of polynoid worm, commensal with the bathyal holothurian Laetmogone violacea, in the north-east Atlantic. Steenstrupia, 6, 101–109.Google Scholar
Lafferty, K.D., Dobson, A.P.Kuris, A.M. 2006. Parasites dominate food web links. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 11211–11216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lyskin, S.A.Britayev, T.A. 2005. Symbionts of holothurians from South Vietnam: intra- and interspecific interactions. Doklady Biological Sciences, 401, 116–119.Google Scholar
Martin, D.Britayev, T.A. 1998. Symbiotic Polychaetes: review of known species. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review, 36, 217–340.Google Scholar
Middelfart, P.Craig, M. 2004. Description of Austrodevonia sharnae n. gen. n. sp. (Galeommatidae: Bivalvia), en ectocommensal of Taeniogyrus australianus (Stimpson, 1855) (Synaptidae: Holothuroidea). Molluscan Research, 24, 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, J.L. 1983. A new method using hexamethildisilazane for preparation of soft insect tissues for scanning electron microscopy. Stain Technology, 58, 347–351.Google Scholar
Ng, P.K.L.Manning, R.B. 2003. On two new genera of pea crabs parasitic in holothurians (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Pinnotheridae) from the Indo-West Pacific, with notes on allied genera. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 116, 901–919.Google Scholar
O’Loughlin, P.M. 2002. Report on selected species of BANZARE and ANARE Holothuroidea, with reviews of Meseres Ludwig and Heterocucumis Panning (Echinodermata). Memoirs of Museum Victoria, 59, 297–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Loughlin, P.M., Manjón-Cabeza, M.E.Ruiz, F.M. 2009. Antarctic holothuroids from the Bellingshausen Sea, with descriptions of new species (Echinodermata: Holothuroidea). Zootaxa, 2016, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parmentier, E.Vandewalle, P. 2005. Further insight on carapid-holothuroid relationships. Marine Biology, 146, 455–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettibone, M.H. 1982. Annelida. In Parker, S.B., ed. Synopsis and classification of living organisms. New York: McGraw Hill, 1–43.Google Scholar
Pettibone, M.H. 1993. Scaled Polychaetes (Polynoidae) associated with ophiuroids and other invertebrates and review of species referred to Malmgrenia Mclntosh and replaced by Malmgreniella Hartman, with descriptions of new taxa. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 538, 1–92.Google Scholar
Register of Antarctic Marine Species (RAMS). 2009. Polychaeta. Accessed through: De Broyer, C., Clarke, A., Koubbi, P., Pakhomov, E., Scott, F., vanden Berghe, E. & Danis, B.,eds. The SCAR-MarBIN Register of Antarctic Marine Species (RAMS) at http://www.scarmarbin.be/rams.php?p=taxdetails&id=883 on 23 October 2009.Google Scholar
Schiaparelli, S., Ghirardo, C., Bohn, J., Chiantore, M., Albertelli, G.Cattaneo-Vietti, R. 2007. Antarctic associations: the parasitic relationship between the gastropod Bathycrinicola tumidula (Thiele, 1912) (Ptenoglossa: Eulimidae) and the comatulid Notocrinus virilis Mortensen, 1917 (Crinoidea: Notocrinidae) in the Ross Sea. Polar Biology, 30, 1545–1555.Google Scholar
Strugnell, J.M., Rogers, A.D., Prodohl, P.A., Collins, M.A.Allcock, A.L. 2008. The thermohaline expressway: the Southern Ocean as a centre of origin for deep-sea octopuses. Cladistics, 24, 853–860.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tiago, C.G., Brites, A.D.Kawauchi, G.Y. 2005. A simple enzymatic method for examining calcite ossicles of Echinodermata. Journal of Microscopy, 218, 240–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warén, A. 1983. A generic revision of the family Eulimidae (Gastropoda, Prosobranchia). The Journal of the Molluscan Studies, S13, 1–96.Google Scholar
Wesenberg-Lund, E. 1941. Notes on Polychaeta I. 1. Harmothoe bathydomus H. Ditlevsen refound. Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk naturhistorisk Forening i Köbenhaven, 105, 31–32.Google Scholar