Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:47:41.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Population status of the Antarctic shag Phalacrocorax (atriceps) bransfieldensis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2018

Michael Schrimpf*
Affiliation:
106 Life Sciences Building, Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA
Ron Naveen
Affiliation:
PO Box 15259, Chevy Chase, MD 20825, USA
Heather J. Lynch
Affiliation:
106 Life Sciences Building, Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA Institute for Advanced Computational Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA

Abstract

Antarctic shags Phalacrocorax (atriceps) bransfieldensis are the southernmost cormorants in the world and assessment of their conservation status has been complicated by the logistical challenges of obtaining regular estimates of population size, as well as by taxonomic ambiguity of the blue-eyed shag complex. The available information on the taxonomy, distribution and population size of Antarctic shags are reviewed and a refined estimate of the global population is presented: 11 366 breeding pairs, plus an additional 1984 pairs of uncertain taxonomic status in the South Orkney Islands. This analysis suggests a possible spatial shift in the distribution of Antarctic shags similar to that reported for other Antarctic seabirds, which probably reflects a gradient in environmental changes along the western Antarctic Peninsula. This review should aid future conservation and management assessments.

Type
Biological Sciences
Copyright
© Antarctic Science Ltd 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barlow, E.J., Daunt, F., Wanless, S. & Reid, J.M. 2013. Estimating dispersal distributions at multiple scales: within-colony and among-colony dispersal rates, distances and directions in European shags Phalacrocorax aristotelis. Ibis, 10.1111/ibi.12060.Google Scholar
Bustnes, J.O., Anker-Nilssen, T., Erikstad, K.E., Lorentsen, S.H. & Systad, G.H. 2013. Changes in the Norwegian breeding population of European shag correlate with forage fish and climate. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 10.3354/meps10440.Google Scholar
Casanovas, P., Naveen, R., Forrest, S., Poncet, J. & Lynch, H.J. 2015. A comprehensive coastal seabird survey maps out the front lines of ecological change on the western Antarctic Peninsula. Polar Biology, 10.1007/s00300-015-1651-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casaux, R. & Barrera-Oro, E. 2006. Shags in Antarctica: their feeding behaviour and ecological role in the marine food web. Antarctic Science, 10.1017/s0954102006000010.Google Scholar
Casaux, R. & Barrera-Oro, E. 2016. Linking population trends of Antarctic shag (Phalacrocorax bransfieldensis) and fish at Nelson Island, South Shetland Islands (Antarctica). Polar Biology, 10.1007/s00300-015-1850-5.Google Scholar
Che-Castaldo, C., Jenouvrier, S., Youngflesh, C., Shoemaker, K.T., Humphries, G., McDowall, P., Landrum, L., Holland, M.M., Li, Y., Ji, R. & Lynch, H.J. 2017. Pan-Antarctic analysis aggregating spatial estimates of Adélie penguin abundance reveals robust dynamics despite stochastic noise. Nature Communications, 10.1038/s41467-017-00890-0.Google Scholar
Cimino, M.A., Lynch, H.J., Saba, V.S. & Oliver, M.J. 2016. Projected asymmetric response of Adélie penguins to Antarctic climate change. Scientific Reports, 10.1038/srep28785.Google Scholar
Clements, J.F., Schulenberg, T.S., Iliff, M., Roberson, D., Fredericks, T.A., Sullivan, B.L. & Wood, C.L. 2016. The eBird/Clements checklist of birds of the world: v2016. Available at http://www.birds.cornell.edu/clementschecklist/download/.Google Scholar
Coria, N.R., Montalti, D., Rombola, E., Santos, M.M., Garcia Betoño, M.I. & Juares, M.A. 2011. Birds at Laurie Island, South Orkney Islands, Antarctica: breeding species and their distribution. Marine Ornithology, 39, 207213.Google Scholar
Gill, F. & Donsker, D. 2017. IOC world bird list (v 7.1). 10.14344/IOC.ML.7.1. Available at www.worldbirdnames.org/ioc-lists/crossref/.Google Scholar
Harris, C., Carr, R., Lorenz, K. & Jones, S. 2011. Important Bird Areas in Antarctica: Antarctic Peninsula, South Shetland Islands, South Orkney Islands – final report. Prepared for BirdLife International and the Polar Regions Unit of the UK Foreign & Commonwealth Office. Cambridge: Environmental Research & Assessment, 225 pp. Available at http://datazone.birdlife.org/userfiles/file/IBAs/AntPDFs/IBA_Antarctic_Peninsula_Rev1-20110826.pdf.Google Scholar
Harris, C.M. 2006. Wildlife awareness manual: Antarctic Peninsula, South Shetland Islands, South Orkney Islands. Cambridge: Environmental Research & Assessment, 136 pp.Google Scholar
Harrison, P. 1985. Seabirds: an identification guide. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company, 448 pp.Google Scholar
Humphries, G.R.W., Naveen, R., Schwaller, M., Che-Castaldo, C., McDowall, P., Schrimpf, M. & Lynch, H.J. 2017. Mapping Application for Penguin Populations and Projected Dynamics (MAPPPD): data and tools for dynamic management and decision support. Polar Record, 10.1017/s0032247417000055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnsgard, P.A. 1993. Cormorants, darters, and pelicans of the world. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 445 pp.Google Scholar
Lynch, H.J., Naveen, R. & Fagan, W.F. 2008. Censuses of penguin, blue-eyed shag Phalacrocorax atriceps and southern giant petrel Macronectes giganteus populations on the Antarctic Peninsula, 2001–2007. Marine Ornithology, 36, 8397.Google Scholar
Lynch, H.J., Naveen, R. & Casanovas, P. 2013. Antarctic Site Inventory breeding bird survey data, 1994–2013. Ecology, 10.1890/13-1108.1.Google Scholar
Naveen, R., Forrest, S.C., Dagit, R.G., Blight, L.K., Trivelpiece, W.Z. & Trivelpiece, S.G. 2000. Censuses of penguin, blue-eyed shag, and southern giant petrel populations in the Antarctic Peninsula region, 1994–2000. Polar Record, 36, 323334.Google Scholar
Nur, N. & Sydeman, W.J. 1999. Survival, breeding probability and reproductive success in relation to population dynamics of Brandt’s cormorants Phalacrocorax penicillatus . Bird Study, 46, 92103.Google Scholar
Orta, J., Garcia, E.F.J., Christie, D.A., Jutglar, F. & Kirwan, G.M. 2017. Imperial shag (Phalacrocorax atriceps). In Del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., Sargatal, J., Christie, D.A. & de Juana, E., eds. Handbook of the birds of the world alive. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions. Available at http://www.hbw.com/node/52649.Google Scholar
Potts, G.R., Coulson, J.C. & Deans, I.R. 1980. Population-dynamics and breeding success of the shag, Phalacrocorax aristotelis, on the Farne Islands, Northumberland. Journal of Animal Ecology, 10.2307/4258.Google Scholar
Shirihai, H., Jarrett, B. & Cox, J. 2007. Complete guide to Antarctic wildlife, 2nd ed. London: A&C Black Publishers, 544 pp.Google Scholar
Shuford, W.D. & Spear, L.B. 1988. Surveys of breeding penguins and other seabirds in the South Shetland Islands, Antarctica, January–February 1987. Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/NEC-59. Woods Hole, MA: US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Northeast Fisheries Center, 27 pp.Google Scholar
Sibley, C.G. & Monroe, B.L. 1990. Distribution and taxonomy of birds of the world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1111 pp.Google Scholar
Siegel-Causey, D. 1988. Phylogeny of the Phalacrocoracidae. Condor, 90, 885905.Google Scholar
Watson, E. 1975. Birds of the Antarctic and sub-Antarctic. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union, 350 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woehler, E.J., Blight, L. & Bullock, I. 2010. Ornithological observations at Eckener Point, Antarctic Peninsula. Polar Record, 46, 279281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Schrimpf et al. supplementary material

Schrimpf et al. supplementary material 1

Download Schrimpf et al. supplementary material(File)
File 111.6 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Schrimpf et al. supplementary material

Schrimpf et al. supplementary material 2

Download Schrimpf et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 158.9 KB