Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:07:38.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Upper crustal structure of Deception Island area (Bransfield Strait, Antarctica) from gravity and magnetic modelling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2005

A. MUÑOZ-MARTÍN
Affiliation:
Departamento de Geodinámica, Facultad de Geología, Universidad Complutense, Madrid 28040, Spain
M. CATALÁN
Affiliation:
Real Instituto y Observatorio de la Armada, San Fernando 11100 (Cádiz), Spain
J. MARTÍN-DÁVILA
Affiliation:
Real Instituto y Observatorio de la Armada, San Fernando 11100 (Cádiz), Spain
A. CARBÓ
Affiliation:
Departamento de Geodinámica, Facultad de Geología, Universidad Complutense, Madrid 28040, Spain

Abstract

Deception Island is a young, active volcano located in the south-western part of Bransfield Strait, between the Antarctic Peninsula and the South Shetland archipelago. New gravity and magnetic data, from a marine geophysical cruise (DECVOL-99), were analysed. Forty-eight survey lines were processed and mapped around Deception Island to obtain Bouguer and magnetic anomaly maps. These maps show well- defined groups of gravity and magnetic anomalies, as well as their gradients. To constrain the upper crustal structure, we have performed 2+1/2D forward modelling on three profiles perpendicular to the main anomalies of the area, and taking into account previously published seismic information. From the gravity and magnetic models, two types of crust were identified. These were interpreted as continental crust (located north of Deception Island) and more basic crust (south of Deception Island). The transition between these crustal types is evident in the Bouguer anomaly map as a high gradient area trending NE–SW. Both magnetic and gravity data show a wide minimum at the eastern part of Deception Island, which suggests a very low bulk susceptibility and low density intrusive body. With historical recorded eruptions and thermal and fumarolic fields, we interpret this anomaly as a partially melted intrusive body. Its top has been estimated to be at 1.7 km depth using Euler deconvolution techniques.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Antarctic Science Ltd 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)