Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:45:38.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The importance of pharmacist engagement in diagnostic stewardship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2024

Kimberly C. Claeys Open the ORCID record for Kimberly C. Claeys [Opens in a new window] ,
Daniel J. Morgan  and
Melissa D. Johnson
Kimberly C. Claeys*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor Infectious Diseases, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA
Daniel J. Morgan
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA Veterans’ Affairs Maryland Healthcare System, Baltimore, MD, USA
Melissa D. Johnson
Affiliation:
Professor in Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases & International Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA Liaison Clinical Pharmacist, Duke Antimicrobial Stewardship Outreach Network (DASON), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
*
Corresponding author: Kimberly C. Claeys; Email: kclaeys@rx.umaryland.edu

Abstract

Diagnostic stewardship is increasingly recognized as a powerful tool to improve patient safety. Given the close relationship between diagnostic testing and antimicrobial misuse, antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) pharmacists should be key members of the diagnostic team. Pharmacists practicing in AMS already frequently engage with clinicians to improve the diagnostic process and have many skills needed for the implementation of diagnostic stewardship initiatives. As diagnostic stewardship becomes more broadly used, all infectious disease clinicians, including pharmacists, must collaborate to optimize patient care.

Type
Commentary
Information
Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , 2024 , e43
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Diagnostic stewardship, diagnostic error, and infectious diseases

Diagnostic stewardship involves modifying the ordering, processing, and/or reporting of diagnostic tests to decrease diagnostic error and improve patient quality of care. Reference Fabre, Davis and Diekema1,Reference Morgan, Malani and Diekema2 Diagnostic stewardship implements system-based interventions across the diagnostic process to reduce errors that occur through misdiagnosis or missed diagnosis. The modern concept of diagnostic stewardship builds off existing principles of laboratory stewardship and the National Academy of Medicine’s (NAM) focus on decreasing diagnostic error. Reference Morgan, Malani and Diekema2,Reference Balogh, Miller and Ball3 Diagnostic stewardship extends beyond the diagnosis of the individual and aims to change both diagnostic and treatment paradigms to improve patient outcomes. As such, optimal diagnostic stewardship involves multiple healthcare providers along the continuum of the diagnostic process, all with unique knowledge bases and skillsets that complement the diagnostic process. Reference Hueth, Prinzi and Timbrook4

Diagnostic errors are common; upwards of 1 in 20 patients in acute or ambulatory care will experience a diagnostic error, and an estimated 800,000 Americans will die or become permanently disabled annually. Reference Balogh, Miller and Ball3,Reference Newman-Toker, Nassery and Schaffer5 More so, infections are among the “big three” causes of diagnostic error leading to medical malpractice claims in the United States. Reference Newman-Toker, Nassery and Schaffer5 In fact, a recent study estimated that there are more than 600,000 infection-related diagnostic errors in the United States annually from missed or delayed diagnosis alone, not considering overdiagnosis secondary to inappropriate/excessive diagnostic tests. Reference Newman-Toker, Wang and Zhu6 Improving infectious disease diagnosis often focuses on advanced diagnostic testing strategies, without consideration for the need to steward these resources and prevent overdiagnosis. Reference Morgan, Malani and Diekema2 The growing complexity of healthcare administration, combined with the ever-increasing options for advanced diagnostic testing options, highlights the emergent need for new innovative collaborations to improve the diagnosis of infectious diseases. Pharmacists with infectious diseases/antimicrobial stewardship expertise can be leaders and key collaborators in diagnostic stewardship efforts.

Diagnostic error in infectious diseases leads to antimicrobial misuse

Inappropriate diagnostic testing and test interpretation lead to inappropriate antimicrobial use. Half of inpatient antimicrobial use is considered inappropriate or unnecessary, often driven by diagnostic testing. Reference Spivak, Cosgrove and Srinivasan7–Reference Shapiro, King, Fleming-Dutra, Hicks and Hersh9 Antimicrobial overuse leads to serious threats to both individual patients and population health. Upwards of 20% of patients on antimicrobials experience adverse drug events, and many occur in patients without clinical indications for antimicrobials. Reference Tamma, Avdic, Li, Dzintars and Cosgrove10 Excessive unnecessary antimicrobial exposure also leads to increased antimicrobial resistance; each additional day of broad-spectrum therapy increases the risk of infection with a multidrug-resistant organism. Reference Teshome, Vouri, Hampton, Kollef and Micek11 With rates of unnecessary antimicrobial treatment exceeding 70% in conditions such as asymptomatic bacteriuria, the need for improving diagnosis and tempering inappropriate antibiotic use through diagnostic stewardship is imperative. Reference Claeys and Johnson12

Antimicrobial stewardship pharmacists and diagnostic stewardship

The NAM report on “Improving Diagnosis in Healthcare” stresses the importance of interdisciplinary teams to decrease diagnostic errors; this includes pharmacists. Reference Balogh, Miller and Ball3 The Leapfrog Group also recommends the formation of multidisciplinary teams, which include pharmacists. 13 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Core Elements of Hospital Antibiotic Stewardship Programs highlight the need to incorporate diagnostic stewardship into AMS programs. 14 With diagnostic stewardship becoming more broadly adopted, now is the time to be mindful of how we can best position these programs to have the necessary resources to improve patient care. An essential part of this discussion is determining key members of the diagnostic stewardship team and what roles these members fulfill. Antimicrobial stewardship pharmacists have established clinical relationships, skillsets suited to support diagnostic stewardship, and accessibility across healthcare systems. As dedicated diagnostic stewardship teams are formed, AMS pharmacists should not be overlooked as key members of these teams.

Antimicrobial stewardship programs implement initiatives to improve patient safety through optimizing antimicrobial use. As such, AMS pharmacists are equipped with a broad range of skills that are built on clinician engagement, behavioral economics, and implementation science. The proficiencies of AMS programs and their pharmacists can easily be leveraged to implement diagnostic stewardship initiatives. For example, pharmacists are proactive users of the electronic medical record (EMR). Reference Nelson, Poikonen, Reese, El Halta and Weir15 Pharmacists detect diagnostic errors through close review of patient records, including routine interpretation of laboratory results such as antimicrobial susceptibilities, white blood cell count, and serum creatinine. Through EMR review, a pharmacist was able to clarify the correct diagnosis and eliminate overtreatment of latent syphilis in a patient with penicillin allergy, thus preventing unnecessary hospital admission. Reference Nelson16 In certain settings, pharmacists routinely order diagnostic tests as part of protocols or collaborative practice agreements. In a cross-sectional survey of pharmacists from 44 states, 71% of hospital pharmacists report they recommend cultures or laboratory tests. Reference Dionne, Wagner, Chastain, Rosenthal, Mahoney and Bland17 Additionally, AMS pharmacists can audit the use of diagnostic tests, removing duplicative unnecessary testing from order sets or assisting in targeting clinical services for education and clinical detailing. Reference Hueth, Prinzi and Timbrook4,Reference Hueth, Jackson and Schmidt18 The skillsets needed to ensure the success of diagnostic stewardship programs are more relevant than the individual’s professional background. So, although pharmacists are not responsible for routine diagnoses, they are well equipped to influence provider behavior and implement system-wide initiatives for most common diagnoses that drive unnecessary antimicrobial use.

Strong relations with infection prevention, health information technology, and a wide array of frontline clinicians are all necessary for the implementation of effective diagnostic stewardship strategies. Within AMS program, key relationships are already in place, from the Clinical Microbiology to Chief Patient Quality and Safety Officers. Additionally, AMS pharmacists already frequently work with other healthcare providers to improve ordering and reporting of diagnostic tests for infectious diseases. For example, AMS pharmacists advocate against obtaining urine cultures in asymptomatic patients or recommend cessation of therapy in patients colonized with Clostridioides difficile. Given strong relationships with clinical microbiology, AMS pharmacists often serve as liaisons between the laboratory and frontline clinicians. This includes contributing to microbiology plate rounds by providing patient-specific insights. Reference MacVane, Hurst and Steed19 When a hospital is considering changing its antimicrobial susceptibility testing panels or adding a new molecular rapid diagnostic test (mRDT), AMS pharmacists work with health IT and clinical microbiology to optimize the impact of these tests on downstream antimicrobial use. Reference Langford, Leung and Haj20

There are several examples of successful diagnostic stewardship interventions led by pharmacists in the literature (Figure 1). These often occur at large academic medical centers through quality improvement initiatives. A commonly cited example of pharmacists’ involvement in diagnostic stewardship is the implementation of prospective review and feedback of culture or mRDT results in patients with bloodstream infections (BSI). Reference Timbrook, Morton, McConeghy, Caffrey, Mylonakis and LaPlante21,Reference Lapin, Smith, Hornback, Johnson and Claeys22 A recently published AMS intervention leveraged AMS pharmacists to reduce inappropriate ordering of C. difficile testing, decreasing National Healthcare Safety Network Standardized Infection Ratio (SIR) and oral vancomycin days of therapy. Reference Christensen, Barr and Martin23 AMS pharmacists have also decreased inappropriate antimicrobial use by improving the diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections. For example, a pharmacist-led initiative that combined report nudging and clinical detailing significantly decreased unnecessary broad-spectrum anti-Methicillin-resistant S. aureus and anti-pseudomonal therapy in patients with respiratory cultures growing only normal flora. Reference Musgrove, Kenney and Kendall24 Pharmacists also routinely spearhead programs aimed at diagnostic safety through penicillin allergy assessment and de-labeling. De-labeling of penicillin allergies has become a focus of healthcare providers, as misdiagnosis of these allergies often leads to suboptimal care and worse clinical outcomes. Reference Staicu, Vyles and Shenoy25 Pharmacists have been leveraged to implement multidisciplinary de-labeling initiatives, with pharmacist-driven programs in place for nearly 20 years. Although many view prospective review and feedback on mRDT results for BSI as the crux of pharmacist involvement in infectious disease diagnostic stewardship, pharmacists play a pivotal role in improving diagnosis in myriad ways for numerous types of infections and patient populations. Not including pharmacists as essential members of dedicated diagnostic stewardship teams would hinder future innovative practices such as those described above.

Figure 1. Examples of pharmacist-led diagnostic stewardship activities. Note: ASB, asymptomatic bacteriuria; BPA, best practice alert; BSI, bloodstream infection; CDI, Clostridioides difficile infection; LTRI, lower respiratory tract infection; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; PCT, procalcitonin; PSA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa; RDT, rapid diagnostic test. *Examples included in cited references.

Conclusion

Diagnostic stewardship is growing beyond academic infection prevention and AMS programs. To effectively expand beyond these confines and continue advancing its core principles, diagnostic stewardship programs need dedicated leadership, personnel (including pharmacists), and resources. Moving forward, these programs must pay close attention to clinicians with the necessary skills to optimize outcomes and gain organizational support to improve diagnosis and patient outcomes. Antimicrobial stewardship pharmacists are a potentially untapped resource in many hospitals. The tools used in AMS programs, including behavioral and implementation sciences, patient safety, and information technology, are the same needed for diagnostic stewardship. Given the close relationship between diagnostic testing and antimicrobial use, AMS pharmacists are well suited to this work.

Acknowledgment

KCC, DJM, and MDJ all contributed to the writing and editing of this commentary.

Financial support

This manuscript was not supported by external funding.

Competing interests

KCC reports speaking and service for bioMérieux and research funding from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Merck & Co. KCC has served on advisory boards for Melinta Therapeutics, La Jolla Pharmaceuticals, and AbbVie.

MDJ has received consulting fees from Astellas, Cidara, Merck, Entasis, Paratek, Pfizer, and Theratechnologies, author royalties from UpToDate, and research grants to her institution from Astellas, Scynexis, Charles River Laboratories, and Merck & Co and has served on the Board of the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. She also has a patent pending for gene expression-based classifiers of fungal infection.

References

Fabre, V, Davis, A, Diekema, DJ, et al. Principles of diagnostic stewardship: a practical guide from the society for healthcare epidemiology of America diagnostic stewardship task force. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2023;44:178–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, DJ, Malani, PN, Diekema, DJ. Diagnostic stewardship to prevent diagnostic error. JAMA 2023;329:1255–1256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balogh, E, Miller, BT, Ball, JR, The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care. Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hueth, KD, Prinzi, AM, Timbrook, TT. Diagnostic stewardship as a team sport: interdisciplinary perspectives on improved implementation of interventions and effect measurement. Antibiot (Basel) 2022;11:250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman-Toker, DE, Nassery, N, Schaffer, AC, et al. Burden of serious harms from diagnostic error in the USA. BMJ Qual Saf 2023;33:109–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman-Toker, DE, Wang, Z, Zhu, Y, et al. Rate of diagnostic errors and serious misdiagnosis-related harms for major vascular events, infections, and cancers: toward a national incidence estimate using the “big three.” Diagnosis (Berl) 2021;8:67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spivak, ES, Cosgrove, SE, Srinivasan, A. Measuring appropriate antimicrobial use: attempts at opening the black box. Clin Infect Dis 2016;63:1639–1644.Google ScholarPubMed
Childers, R, Liotta, B, Brennan, J, et al. Urine testing is associated with inappropriate antibiotic use and increased length of stay in emergency department patients. Heliyon 2022;8:e11049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shapiro, DJ, King, LM, Fleming-Dutra, KE, Hicks, LA, Hersh, AL. Association between use of diagnostic tests and antibiotic prescribing for pharyngitis in the United States. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2020;41:479–481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamma, PD, Avdic, E, Li, DX, Dzintars, K, Cosgrove, SE. Association of adverse events with antibiotic use in hospitalized patients. JAMA Internal Med 2017;177:1308–1315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Teshome, BF, Vouri, SM, Hampton, N, Kollef, MH, Micek, ST. Duration of exposure to antipseudomonal β-Lactam antibiotics in the critically ill and development of new resistance. Pharmacother 2018;39:261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claeys, KC, Johnson, MD. Leveraging diagnostic stewardship within antimicrobial stewardship programmes. Drugs Context 2023;12:2022-9–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The Leapfrog Group. Recognizing Excellence in Diagnosis: Recommended Practices for Hospitals. Leapfrog. https://www.leapfroggroup.org/recognizing-excellence-diagnosis-recommended-practices-hospitals. Published 2022. Accessed November 7, 2023.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Core Elements of Hospital Antibiotic Stewardship Programs | Antibiotic Use | CDC. https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/core-elements/hospital.html. Published 2021. Accessed February 21, 2022.Google Scholar
Nelson, SD, Poikonen, J, Reese, T, El Halta, D, Weir, C. The pharmacist and the EHR. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017;24:193–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, SD. Correct Treatment Plan for Incorrect Diagnosis: A Pharmacist Intervention. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/web-mm/correct-treatment-plan-incorrect-diagnosis-pharmacist-intervention. Published 2011. Accessed October 10, 2023.Google Scholar
Dionne, B, Wagner, JL, Chastain, DB, Rosenthal, M, Mahoney, MV, Bland, CM. Which pharmacists are performing antimicrobial stewardship: a national survey and a call for collaborative efforts. Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol 2022;2:e24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hueth, KD, Jackson, BR, Schmidt, RL. An audit of repeat testing at an academic medical center: consistency of order patterns with recommendations and potential cost savings. Am J Clin Pathol 2018;150:27–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacVane, SH, Hurst, JM, Steed, LL. The role of antimicrobial stewardship in the clinical microbiology laboratory: stepping up to the plate. Open Forum Infect Dis 2016;3:ofw201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langford, BJ, Leung, E, Haj, R, et al. Nudging in microbiology laboratory evaluation (NIMBLE): a scoping review. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2019;40:1400–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timbrook, TT, Morton, JB, McConeghy, KW, Caffrey, AR, Mylonakis, E, LaPlante, KL. The effect of molecular rapid diagnostic testing on clinical outcomes in bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2017;64:15–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lapin, JS, Smith, RD, Hornback, KM, Johnson, JK, Claeys, KC. From bottle to bedside: Implementation considerations and antimicrobial stewardship considerations for bloodstream infection rapid diagnostic testing. Pharmacother 2023;43:847–863.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, AB, Barr, VO, Martin, DW, et al. Diagnostic stewardship of C. difficile testing: a quasi-experimental antimicrobial stewardship study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2019;40:269–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Musgrove, MA, Kenney, RM, Kendall, RE, et al. Microbiology comment nudge improves pneumonia prescribing. Open Forum Infect Dis 2018;5:ofy162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Staicu, ML, Vyles, D, Shenoy, ES, et al. Penicillin allergy delabeling: a multidisciplinary opportunity. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2020;8:2858–2868.e16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kufel, WD, Mastro, KA, Steele, JM, et al. Impact of a pharmacist-facilitated, evidence-based bundle initiative on staphylococcus aureus bacteremia management. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2021;101:115535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wenzler, E, Wang, F, Goff, DA, et al. An automated, pharmacist-driven initiative improves quality of care for staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 2017;65:194–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, JR, Frens, JJ, Snider, CB, Claeys, KC. Impact of a pharmacist-driven care package on staphylococcus aureus bacteremia management in a large community healthcare network: a propensity score-matched, quasi-experimental study. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2018;90:50–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liao, S, Rhodes, J, Jandarov, R, DeVore, Z, Sopirala, MM. Out of sight-out of mind: impact of cascade reporting on antimicrobial usage. Open Forum Infect Dis 2020;7:ofaa002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vissichelli, NC, Orndahl, CM, Cecil, JA, et al. Impact of cascade reporting of antimicrobial susceptibility on fluoroquinolone and meropenem consumption at a Veterans’ Affairs medical center. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2022;43:199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tran, NN, Mills, JP, Zimmerman, C, et al. Incorporating preauthorization into antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist workflow reduces Clostridioides difficile and gastrointestinal panel testing. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2020;41:1136–1141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carr, AL, Daley, MJ, Givens Merkel, K, Rose, DT. Clinical utility of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus nasal screening for antimicrobial stewardship: a review of current literature. Pharmacother 2018;38:1216–1228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moradi, T, Bennett, N, Shemanski, S, Kennedy, K, Schlachter, A, Boyd, S. Use of procalcitonin and a respiratory polymerase chain reaction panel to reduce antibiotic use via an EMR alert. Clin Infect Dis 2019;71:1684–1689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLaggan, TD, Le, CP, Iverson, KA, et al. The clinical impact of a urinary tract infection management bundle in a tertiary-care teaching hospital. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2019;40:72–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, K, Zahlanie, Y, Ortwine, JK, et al. Decreased outpatient fluoroquinolone prescribing using a multimodal antimicrobial stewardship initiative. Open Forum Infect Dis 2020;7:ofaa182.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrade, A, Bang, H, Reddick, K, Villaseñor, B, Tran, NK, May, L. Evaluation of pharmacist guided intervention using procalcitonin and respiratory virus testing. Am J Emerg Med 2023;66:146–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Figure 1. Examples of pharmacist-led diagnostic stewardship activities. Note: ASB, asymptomatic bacteriuria; BPA, best practice alert; BSI, bloodstream infection; CDI, Clostridioides difficile infection; LTRI, lower respiratory tract infection; MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; PCT, procalcitonin; PSA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa; RDT, rapid diagnostic test. *Examples included in cited references.