Article contents
The Iron Age and Anglo-Saxon Site at Upton, Northants
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 November 2011
Summary
The Iron Age and Anglo-Saxon site at Upton near Northampton was excavated by Mr. Jackson on behalf of the Ministry of Public Building and Works, July—December 1965. In addition to Iron Age pits and ditches the principal discovery was that of a timber Saxon building which is remarkable for its combination of the structural features of a Grubenhaus with the dimensions and plan of a small timber hall. The building contained more than sixty loom-weights, and is interpreted as a weaving shed rather than a domestic occupation site. It was destroyed by fire, and charred timbers have revealed the position of internal fixed wooden furniture. From pottery and small finds it is suggested that the site was occupied in the late sixth to early seventh centuries A.D.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1969
References
page 202 note 1 Proc. Soc. Ant. Lond. 2nd ser., xix, 310–12.
page 210 note 1 We are obliged to Mr. P. D. C. Brown for his comments on the loom-weights, which have been incorporated in this section.
page 211 note 1 Bradford, and Goodchild, , ‘Excavations at Frilford, Berks., 1937–8’, Oxoniensia, iv (1939), 13 and pl. vcGoogle Scholar.
page 211 note 2 Fell, , ‘The Hunsbury Hill-fort, Northants.…’, Arch. Journ. xciii (1936), 66Google Scholar.
page 211 note 3 Jessup, , ‘Bigberry Camp, Harbledown, Kent’, ibid. lxxxix (1933), pl. 1aGoogle Scholar. Dawkins, Boyd, ‘On Bigbury Camp…’, ibid. lix (1902), fig. 4b.Google Scholar
page 211 note 4 Fox, Lane, ‘Excavations at Mount Caburn Camp …’, Archaeologia, xlvi (1881), pl. xxiv, 4Google Scholar.
page 211 note 5 Knight, , ‘A Romano-British Site at Bloxham, Oxon.’, Oxoniensia, iii. (1939), 54 and pl. VIIIbGoogle Scholar.
page 212 note 1 Bulleid, and Gray, , The Meare Lake Village, ii (1953), pl. XLVIII, E. 147Google Scholar.
page 212 note 2 Fell, , op. cit., 62Google Scholar.
page 213 note 1 Germania, xxv (1957), 275–317Google Scholar; xxxix (1961), 42–69; xli (1963), 280–317
page 215 note 1 It is, for example, common on pots of the proto-Saxon cultures of Oberjersdal and Fuhlsbüttel; Tischler, F., Das Gräberfeld Oberjersdal (1955)Google Scholar, Tafel, A; Fuhlsbüttel, ein Beitrag zur Sachsenfrage (1937), Abb. 3, 7, 15, 22–5, 27Google Scholar.
page 215 note 2 e.g. on the early biconical examples from Brundall and North Elmham, Norfolk; Norfolk Archaeology, xxvii, pl. I. 2; Coll. Ant. v, 115 and pl. x.
page 215 note 3 e.g. Loveden Hill 59/164a; Caistor-by-Norwich M 49 (a). Myres, J. N. L., Anglo-Saxon Pottery and the Settlement of England (1969), p. 178, fig. 16Google Scholar.
page 215 note 4 e.g. the bowl from the late sixth-century Gr. xxvi at Petersfinger, or that from Sutton Hoo (Mound 3), which may well be later still; Leeds, E. T. and Shortt, H. de S., An Anglo-Saxon Cemetery at Petersfinger, Wilts (1953), fig. 11 and pl. xiGoogle Scholar; Bruce-Mitford, R. L. S. in Proc. Suff. Inst. of Arch, xxx (1964), 18 and fig. 3Google Scholar.
page 216 note 1 In the Prittlewell Museum at Southend. Close parallels to the decoration of the Upton pot can also be found among the seventh-century pottery of central Germany, e.g. the piece from Grave 7 at Thalmässing (Dannheimer, H., Die germanischen Funde in Mittelfranken (1962), pp. 109, 112 and Tafel 57 B)Google Scholar.
- 7
- Cited by