Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:35:42.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Small Bronzes from Northern Asia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2012

Extract

Early in 1929 the British Museum acquired a lot of two dozen small bronzes. Mr. Reginald Smith gave a preliminary account of them and illustrated eighteen in the British Museum Quarterly. The Society is indebted to the Trustees of the British Museum for the loan of these plates (our 1 and 11). Mr. Smith was good enough to suggest that I should treat them in greater detail in the Antiquaries Journal.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Antiquaries of London 1930

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 1 note 1 B.M.Q. iii (1929), 4, pp. 97–9Google Scholar , pl. l, li.

page 2 note 1 Pârvan, V., Getica, Bucarest, 1926, pp. 140Google Scholar , and Dacia, Cambridge, 1928, 3473.Google ScholarFettich, N., ‘La Trouvaille Scythe de Zöldhalompuszta près de Miskolc, Hongrie’, in Arckaeologia Hungarica, III, Budapest (1928), pp. 3742Google Scholar ; Childe, V. G., The Danube in Prehistory, Oxford (1929), pp. 394–7Google Scholar.

page 2 note 2 Filov, B., Bulletin (Izvestiya) de l'institut Arch. Bulgare, IV (1927), pp. 2760.Google Scholar

page 3 note 1 Altai-Iran, p. 122.

page 4 note 1 M.A.R. 34 (1914)Google Scholar , ‘The Archaic Period in South Russia’.

page 4 note 2 First in Turán, 05 1918, p. 273.Google Scholar

page 6 note 1 Materialy po Etnografii, IV, 2 (1929), pp. 4160.Google Scholar

page 7 note 1 Antiquities of Katanda, Altai’, J. R.A.I. lv (1926), pp. 3757Google Scholar ; ci. his Ancient Wood and Bone Work from the Altai’, Ant. Jour. vi (1926), p. 410Google Scholar.

page 8 note 1 Besides the Russian report see Yetts, , Burlington Magazine, 04 1926Google Scholar ; J. R. A. S. 1929, p. 229Google Scholar ; new pieces in Ausstellung Chinesischer Kunst, Berlin, 1929Google Scholar.

page 8 note 2 For Tangut see Devéria, , L'Écriture du Royaume de Si-hia ou Tangout, Paris, 1898Google Scholar ; the writings of A. I. Ivanov, the chief authority, are inaccessible to me, but see Journal Asiatique, 1920, p. 107Google Scholar ; there is a new bilingual, Stein, , Innermost Asia, pl. cxxxiv.Google ScholarOm mani padmi hum, see Bushell, , Chinese Art, i, p. 36 and fig. 25Google Scholar.

page 12 note 1 Cf. Report of Japanese Investigations in South Corea, vol. ii (Daisho II = 1923), Pl. 9, 10, 12.Google Scholar

page 12 note 2 Documents, i, p. 19.

page 12 note 3 Professor Pelliot, , Documents, i, p. 11Google Scholar , is a little hard on me for rash remarks on mirrors made fifteen years ago: I long ago had observed that I had misunderstood what Professor Giles told me orally about the writing of the Chinese words.

page 13 note 1 Pelliot, P., Jades Archaïques de la Chine, Paris, 1925, pl. xxx.Google Scholar

page 16 note 1 Minns, p. 178, f. 73 = Smêla, III. x. 2.

page 17 note 1 Borovka, 8 A, C, cf. B: Minns, p. 209, fig. 109, and Rostovtsev, passim.

page 17 note 2 Borovka, 11 G; Minns, p. 267, fig. 184.

page 17 note 3 Smêla, III, xviii, II.

page 17 note 4 Revue des Arts Asiatiques, 1924, 3, p. 14Google Scholar , fig. 2; Documents, i, p. 21.

page 18 note 1 Animal Style, pp. 42 and 58, pl. xii, 1, 2; Σκυθικά. Α', p. 16, and pls. v, vi, 22-30.

page 18 note 2 Animal Style, pl. xxviii, 6.

page 20 note 1 Mater, for Arch. Cauc. (M.A.K.) viii, xcii, 13.

page 20 note 2 e. g. K. T. R., fig. 472, fig. 425 = Chantre, III, vi, 7 ; C.R. Arch. Com. 1904, p. 132Google Scholar , fig. 244, from Audi, Echedit, Daghestan.

page 20 note 3 e. g. Aspelin, one-headed, 700, 982, two-headed, 677, 701, 984, etc., see Tallgren, , E. S. A., iii, p. 86Google Scholar.

page 20 note 4 Such as Chantre, 11, xxvi, 2, lvii, 1, 2, 3.

page 21 note 1 M. A. K., viii, lxix, 1, 2, Stepan Tsminda; lxxxix, 4, Kumbulta; cxviii, 26, Komunta; p. 353, fig. 278, Racha; cf. Chantre, 11, lviii, 1-5; III, iii, 7, v, 1. A new example particularly like pl. iv, 4, is a deer of cast bronze about 9 cm. long with a loop below, from Dzherakh in Daghestan, , Bulletin (Izvestiya) of the Ingush Scientific Institute for Local Lore, I, Vladikavkaz, 1928, pp. 194, 195Google Scholar , Semënov, L. P., ‘Arch, and Ethn. Researches in Ingushia’, 1925–7.Google Scholar The development of these Institutes of Local Lore (Kraevedenie) in modern Russia is remarkable.

page 21 note 2 Our knowledge of Chinese mirrors confirms A. D. dates, see Jolly, , Praeh. Zeitschrift, xix (1928), 3, 4Google Scholar.