We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
CUTFORTH, R.1970. Stonehenge at midsummer, Antiquity,XLIV, 305—7.Google Scholar
DYER, J.1978. Letter, quoted in Antiquity,LII, 178.Google Scholar
FOLKERZHEIMER, H.1562. Letter to Josiah Simler, in (ed.) ROBINSON, H.. The Zurich letters (second series) . . . (London, 1845), letter 39.Google Scholar
FOWLES, J. & BRUKOFF, B.1980. The enigma of Stonehenge (London).Google Scholar
GOWLAND, W.1902. Recent excavations at Stonehenge, Archaeologia,LXVIII, 38—119.Google Scholar
HAMILTON, M.1978. Letter, The Times, 21 June.Google Scholar
HARPER, G.C.1899. The Exeter road (London).Google Scholar
HUTCHINSON, H.G.1914. The life of Sir John Lubbock,II (London).Google Scholar
JONES, I. & WEBB, J.1655. The most notable antiquity of Great Britain, vulgarly called Stone-heng . . . (London).Google Scholar
KEILLER, A.1927—9. Letters in PRO WORK/14489.Google Scholar
LE GALLIENNE, R.1900. Travels in England (London).Google Scholar
MANASSEH, L. & PARTNERS, 1978. Snowdon summit (Cheltenham).Google Scholar
OFFICE OF WORKS, 1919—20. Correspondence in PRO work/ 14488.Google Scholar
OFFICE OF WORKS, 1929. Memorandum from Chief Architect in PRO work/14489.Google Scholar
OFFICE OF WORKS, 1933a, Memorandum in PRO WORK/14838.Google Scholar
OFFICE OF WORKS, 1933b. Minutes after visit to Stonehenge in PRO WORK/14837.Google Scholar
OFFICE OF WORKS, 1980. Memorandum in PRO WORK/14840.Google Scholar
OFFICE OF WORKS, 1981. Memoranda in PRO work/14840.Google Scholar
PEERS, C.R.1919. Memorandum in PRO WORK/14485.Google Scholar
PEPYS, S.1668. Diary, 11 June, in (ed.) LATHAM, R. and MATTHEWS, W.The diary of Samuel Pepys,IX (London, 1976), 229.Google Scholar
PITT-RIVERS, A.1893. Report on Stonehenge in PRO WORK/14213.Google Scholar
‘VACATION RAMBLER’, 1871. Stonehenge, The Times, 14 September.Google Scholar
WILTSHIRE ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1886. Report of deputation to examine into the present state of the stones at Stonehenge, Wilts. Arch. Nat. Hist. Mag., XXIII, 102—7.Google Scholar
SNODGRASS, A.M.1964. Early Greek armour and weapons, (Edinburgh). 1967. Arms and armour of the Greeks, (Cornell).Google Scholar
VERDELIS, N.M.1977. The metal finds, in ÅSTRóM, P.et al., The Cuirass Tomb and other finds at Dendra I, SIMA,IV, 28—65.Google Scholar
YADIN, Y.1963. The art of warfare in Biblical lands (New York).Google Scholar
HAWKES, C.F.C.1947. Britons, Romans and Saxons round Salisbury and in Cranborne Chase, Arch. J., CIV, 27—81.Google Scholar
HEDGES, J.1975. Excavation of two Orcadian burnt mounds at Liddle and Beaquoy, PSAS,CVI, 39—98.Google Scholar
PITT RIVERS, A.1888. Excavations in Cranborne Chase II, (London, privately printed).Google Scholar
HEDGES, J.1898. Excavations in Cranborne Chase,IV (London, privately printed).Google Scholar
THOMPSON, M.W.1977General Pitt Rivers: evolution and archaeology in the nine'eenth century (Bradfordon-Avon).Google Scholar
TOMS, H.1925. Bronze Age, or earlier, lynchets, Proc. Dorset Nat. Hist&Antiq. Field ClubXLVI, 89—100.Google Scholar
A.R., IVJ.A.S., 1866. Abstract and discussion of Westropp’s analogous forms of implements among early and primitive races, Anthropological Review iv, in Journal of the Anthropological Society,CLXXXIII-CLXXXVI.Google Scholar
BROMEHEAD, C.N.1952. What was Murrhine óAntiquity,XXVI, 65—70.10.1017/S0003598X00023590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BROWN, J.A.1893. On the continuity of the Palaeolithic and Neolithic periods, JAI,XX, 66—98.Google Scholar
CLARK, J.G.D.1932. The mesolithic age in Britain (Cambridge).Google Scholar
CLARK, J.G.D.1978. Neothermal orientations, in ed., MELLARS, P.A.. The early post-glacial settlement of Northern Europe (London), 1—10.Google Scholar
CZARNIK, S.A.1976. The theory of the Mesolithic in European archaeology, Proc. Am. Philosoph. Soc.,120, 59—66.Google Scholar
DANIEL, G.1967. The Origins and growth of archaeology (Harmondsworth).Google Scholar
WESTROPP, H.M.1865b. On the Fanaux de Cimetiere in France and the Round Towers in Ireland (Dublin).Google Scholar
WESTROPP, H.M.1866. Analogous forms of implements among early and primitive races, Memoirs of the Anthropological SocietyII, 288—93.Google Scholar
WESTROPP, H.M.1867a.Handbook of archaeology. Egyptian—Greek— Etruscan—Roman (London).Google Scholar
WESTROPP, H.M.1867b. The Round Towers, Athenaeum (1), 590.Google Scholar
WESTROPP, H.M.1867c. On the sequence of the phases of civilisation and contemporaneous implements, Anthropological Review v, in Journal of the Anthropological Society,cxcii-cc.Google Scholar
1869a. A few words on the origin and development of language, Anthropological Review vii, in Journal of the Anthropological Society,xxxix-xlvi.Google Scholar
WESTROPP, H.M.1869b. On the mythic age, Anthropological Review vii, in Journal of the Anthropological Society,clxxv-clxxxvi.Google Scholar
WESTROPP, H.M.1870. On phallic worship, Journal of the Anthropological Society in Journal of Anthropology,cxxxvi-cxlii.Google Scholar